Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

August, 2015:

Tobacco key facts and figures

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/tobacco-kff

Key facts and figures on tobacco sales, consumption and prevalence

Each year, smoking kills an estimated 15,000 Australians1 and costs Australia $31.5 billion2 in social (including health) and economic costs.

Tobacco sales

Recent figures released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) show that total consumption of tobacco and cigarettes in the March quarter 2014 is the lowest ever recorded, as measured by estimated expenditure on tobacco products:

$5.135 billion in September 1959;
$3.508 billion in December 2012; and
$3.405 billion in March 2014.3

Tobacco consumption

Treasury has advised that tobacco clearances (including excise and customs duty) fell by 3.4% in 2013 relative to 2012 and fell a further 7.9% in 2014. Tobacco clearances have fallen a total of 11.0% since 2012 when tobacco plain packaging was introduced.

These growth rates do not take into account refunds of excise equivalent customs duty made under Customs’ plain packaging related Tobacco Refund Scheme between December 2012 and May 2013. These refunds cannot be related to annual net clearances on a comparable basis to other data used to derive these growth rates.

The tobacco excise rate was indexed to average weekly ordinary time earnings (AWOTE) from 1 March 2014 and there were two separate 12.5% increases in the tobacco excise rate (1 December 2013 and 1 September 2014).

Clearances are an indicator of tobacco volumes in the Australian market.

Smoking prevalence rates

In relation to smoking rates, the Australian Government relies on data from national surveys conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW).

National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report 2013

On 17 July 2014, the AIHW released the 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: key findings, which outlines the topline data for tobacco, alcohol and licit and illicit drugs.

On 25 November 2014, AIHW’s National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report 20134 was released showing that there has been a significant decrease in daily smokers aged 14 years or older in Australia, falling from 16.6% in 2007, 15.1% in 2010 to 12.8% in 2013.

shjfhfhf

Other tobacco related findings from the NDSHS detailed report 2013 are:

Young people are delaying commencing smoking – the age at which 14 to 24 year olds smoked their first full cigarette increased from 15.4 years of age in 2010 to 15.9 years of age in 2013.

The proportion of 12-17 years olds who had never smoked in 2013 remained high at 95%.

The proportion of 18 to 24 year olds who have never smoked increased significantly between 2010 and 2013, from 72% to 77% respectively.

People aged 18 to 49 years of age were far less likely to smoke daily than they were 12 years ago.

The average number of cigarettes smoked per week has decreased from 111 cigarettes in 2010 to 96 cigarettes in 2013.

16.5% of smokers (14 years or older) reported using unbranded tobacco in their lifetime with 3.6% using unbranded tobacco (half the time or more) in 2013, declining from 4.9% in 2010.

Dependent children are far less likely to be exposed to tobacco smoke inside the home, (2013, 3.7% compared to 1995 at 31%).

These results do not reflect any impact from the Australian Government’s change to bi-annual indexation of tobacco excise or the first of four 12.5% excise increases on tobacco products which took effect on 1 December 2013.

Specific population groups

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians aged 14 years or older were two and a half times as likely as non-Indigenous Australians to smoke daily in 2013: 32% (Indigenous compared to 12.4% (non-Indigenous).

The proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians aged 14 years or older smoking daily declined from 35% in 2010 to 32% in 2013, and the number of cigarettes smoked per week declined significantly, from 154 in 2010 to 115 in 2013.

Remoteness

People aged 14 years or older, living in remote and very remote areas, were twice as likely to have smoked daily in the previous 12 months as those in major cities: 22% compared with 11.0%.

The proportion of people aged 14 years or older smoking daily rose with increasing remoteness: 11.0% in major cities; 15.4% in inner regional; 19.4% in outer regional; and 22% in remote and very remote areas.

Socioeconomic and employment status

People (14 years or older) living in areas with the lowest socioeconomic status (SES) were 3 times more likely to smoke daily than people with the highest SES, 19.9% compared with 6.7%, but there were significant declines in daily smoking in both these groups between 2010 and 2013.

The declines in daily smoking seen nationally were also seen among employed people but there were no significant changes in the smoking behaviour of unemployed people who were unable to work between 2010 and 2013.

People aged 14 years or older, who were unemployed were 1.7 times more likely to smoke daily and those who were unable to work were 2.4 times more likely to smoke daily.

Compared to 2010, employed people aged 14 years or older were less likely to smoke daily in 2013, down from 16.1% to 13.5% respectively.

Table 3: Comparison of 2010 and 2013 State and Territory tobacco smoking status, people aged 14 years or older, by sex and jurisdiction (age-standardised)7

ffff

Figure 1: Smoking prevalence rates for 14 years or older and key tobacco control measures implemented in Australia since 19905

0

Australian Health Survey: Updated Results, 2011-12

The ABS Australian Health Survey: Updated Results, 2011-12 were released on 30 July 2013 and reported that in 2011-12, 16.3% of Australians aged 18 years and older smoked daily (age standardised).

ddd

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations9

The ABS Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey: Updated Results, 2012-13 (AATSIHS) were released in June 2014. The final results of the survey were based on the full Indigenous sample of around 12,900.

The Report shows that 42% of Indigenous Australians aged 15 years and over smoked daily.

Between 2002 and 2012-13, current daily smoking rates for Indigenous Australians aged 15 years and over declined significantly by 7 percentage points.

Males had higher daily smoking rates than females:

15 years and over, the rates were 42.9% and 38.7%, and
18 years and over, the rates were 44.2% and 40.2%, respectively 10

The combined middle age group, 25 to 34 year olds, had the highest daily smoking rate, 51.5%.

In 2012-13, the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 15 years and over who were daily smokers was higher in remote areas than in non-remote areas, 50% compared with 39%. This pattern is evident for all age groups.

There have been significant decreases in the daily smoking rates for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 15 years and over, in non-remote areas, between 2002 and
2012-13, 48% to 39% respectively.

This has not been mirrored in remote areas. The daily smoking rate of Indigenous Australians aged 15 years and over remained stagnant at 50% between 2002 and 2011-13.

Consistent with the decreases in current daily smoking rates between 2002 and 2012-13, the proportion of ex-smokers, aged 15 years and over, increased from 15% to 20%.

The proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, aged 15 years and over, who said they had never smoked increased from 33% to 36%.

For young people aged 15-17 years, the proportion who had never smoked increased from 61% in 2002 to 77% in 2012-13.

For those aged 18-24 years, the proportion who had never smoked increased from 34% to 42% over the same period.

Tobacco control in Australia

Australia’s low smoking rate is the result of sustained, concerted and comprehensive public policy efforts from all levels of government and action from public health organisations.

1973 – health warnings first mandated on all cigarette packs in Australia;
1976 – bans on all cigarette advertising on radio and television in Australia;
1986 to 2006 – phased in bans on smoking in workplaces and public places;
1990 – bans on advertising of tobacco products in newspapers and magazines published in Australia;
1992 – increase in the tobacco excise;
1993 – Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Act 1992 prohibited broadcasting and publication of tobacco advertisements;
from 1994 to 2003 – bans on smoking in restaurants;
1995 – nationally consistent text-only health warnings required;
1998 to 2006 – bans on point-of-sale tobacco advertising across Australia;
2006 – graphic health warnings required on packaging of most tobacco products;
2010 – 25% increase in the tobacco excise;
2011 – first complete State or Territory ban on point-of-sale tobacco product displays
2012 – introduction of tobacco plain packaging, and updated and expanded graphic health warnings;
2013 – changes to the bi-annual indexation of tobacco excise and a further 12.5% excise increase on 1 December;
2014 – second of four 12.5% excise increases on 1 September 2013; and
2015 and 2016 – remaining 12.5% excise increases on 1 September each year.

Tobacco plain packaging

The objectives of the tobacco plain packaging measure, as summarised in the Explanatory Memorandum for the legislation, are to:

reduce the attractiveness and appeal of tobacco products to consumers, particularly young people;
increase the noticeability and effectiveness of mandated health warnings;
reduce the ability of the retail packaging of tobacco products to mislead consumers about the harms of smoking; and
through the achievement of these aims in the long term, as part of a comprehensive range of tobacco control measures, contribute to efforts to reduce smoking rates.

Tobacco plain packaging operates as part of a comprehensive set of tobacco control measures. It is an investment in the long term health of Australians and its full effects will be seen over the long term.

Questions and Answers

Question: Have tobacco sales increased since the introduction of tobacco plain packaging on 1 December 2012?

Answer:
Tobacco sales data are not publicly available.

Recent figures released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics show that total consumption of tobacco and cigarettes in the March quarter 2014 is the lowest ever recorded, as measured by estimated expenditure on tobacco products i.e. $5.135 billion in September 1959, $3.508 billion in December 2012 and $3.405 billion in March 2014. See Table 8 at 5206.0 – Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product, Mar 2014

Treasury has advised that tobacco clearances (including excise and customs duty) fell by 3.4% in 2013 relative to 2012 and fell a further 7.9% in 2014. Tobacco clearances have fallen a total of 11.0% since 2012 when tobacco plain packaging was introduced.

These growth rates do not take into account refunds of excise equivalent customs duty made under Customs’ plain packaging related Tobacco Refund Scheme between December 2012 and May 2013. These refunds cannot be related to annual net clearances on a comparable basis to other data used to derive these growth rates.

The tobacco excise rate was indexed to average weekly ordinary time earnings (AWOTE) from 1 March 2014 and there were two separate 12.5% increases in the tobacco excise rate (1 December 2013 and 1 September 2014).

Clearances are an indicator of tobacco volumes in the Australian market.

In April 2013, the CEO of a major tobacco company noted a decline in tobacco product sales:

“As I’m looking at Asia Pacific, I should also mention Australia, we’ve had the first six months of the plain pack environment in Australia. We’ve seen the market decline roughly 2% to 3%, so maybe not as bad as we might have anticipated.” Transcript of Imperial Tobacco half-year 2013 results – Interview with Alison Cooper, CEO, and Bob Dyrbus, FD

Question: Are Australia’s tobacco plain packaging laws having an impact on smoking rates in Australia?

Answer:

Over the past 40 years, Australian Governments have implemented an increasingly progressive range of tobacco control measures including advertising and promotion restrictions, education campaigns, bans on smoking in enclosed and public spaces, excise increases, quitlines, graphic health warnings and tobacco plain packaging, which together have worked to cut smoking rates in half.

In relation to smoking rates, the Australian Government relies on data from national surveys conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

The results of the Australian Health Survey conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, show that the national adult (18 years and over) daily smoking rate has continued to fall, from 22.3% in 2001 to 16.3% in 2011-12. This is the most recent national data available on smoking prevalence. 4364.0.55.001 – Australian Health Survey: First Results, 2011-12 – Tobacco smoking

The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare’s, National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report 2013 released on 25 November 2014, shows smoking rates have significantly fallen for people aged 14 years or older from 15.1% in 2010 to 12.8% in 2013 and for people aged 18 years or older from 15.9% in 2010 to 13.3% in 2013. The report and online tables are available from the AIHW website.

Question: What is the evidence for the introduction of tobacco plain packaging?

Answer:
Tobacco plain packaging is based on a broad range of studies and reports, and supported by leading Australian and international public health experts.

Extensive research evidence to June 2009 in support of tobacco plain packaging is set out in the reports of the National Preventative Health Taskforce, a group of Australia’s leading public health experts. The report of the Taskforce is available on the Preventative Health Taskforce website.

The research shows that industry branding and packaging design can mislead about the harmful effects of the product, reduce the effectiveness of graphic health warnings on tobacco products, and increase the appeal of tobacco to young people.

Since 2009 the evidence base has continued to grow. Some additional studies were referenced in the government’s consultation paper on the plain packaging legislation released in April 2011. A review of the evidence prepared by the Cancer Council Victoria – which cited 24 studies in the peer-reviewed literature – was tabled in the House of Representatives on 25 May 2011. The Cancer Council Victoria evidence review was updated in August 2011. Evidence – Plain packaging of cigarettes: a review of the evidence

Question: Have any early impacts of tobacco plain packaging been identified?

Answer:
Research undertaken during the roll-out phase of the tobacco plain packaging legislation, when both plain and branded packs were available found that plain packaged cigarettes with larger health warnings increased smokers’ urgency to quit and lowered the appeal of smoking. Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study

A recent observational study of the prevalence of cigarette pack display and smoking in outdoor venues before and after the introduction of tobacco plain packaging and larger graphic health warnings, indicate a decline in apparent active smoking rates and personal pack display (packs clearly visible on tables) among patrons.
Personal tobacco pack display before and after the introduction of plain packaging with larger pictorial health warnings in Australia: an observational study of outdoor café strips

Research has also found a significant increase in the number of calls to the smoking cessation helpline, Quitline, in NSW and the ACT. The research showed a 78% increase in the number of calls to the Quitline associated with the introduction of plain packaging. This peak occurred four weeks after the initial appearance of plain packaging. This research also found the increase in calls was sustained and was not attributable to anti-tobacco advertising activity, cigarette price increases, nor other identifiable causes.
Association between tobacco plain packaging and Quitline calls: a population-based, interrupted time-series analysis

The effect of tobacco plain packaging, as part of Australia’s comprehensive package of tobacco control measures, will be seen over the longer term.

In particular, by reducing the appeal of tobacco products and preventing consumers being misled about the harms of tobacco products, it is anticipated that tobacco plain packaging will have an impact on uptake of smoking by youth, and will encourage existing smokers to quit and stay quit.

Question: Figures quoted in the press suggest that smoking rates have increased in New South Wales and South Australia.

Answer:
New South Wales

A major Australian daily newspaper reported that ‘Last year’s NSW population health survey, released last month, showed 16.4 per cent of all adults in the state smoke, up from 14.7 per cent in 2011′.

While these figures are accurate, they are incomplete in that they do not report the 2012 smoking rate of 17.1% i.e. the 2013 smoking rate of 16.4% was less than the 2012 smoking rate of 17.1%.

The increase in smoking rates between 2011 (14.7%) and 2012 (17.1%) is likely to have been due to a change in the methodology of the survey, in which mobile phones were included in the survey methods for the first time. This would have captured more young people, especially young men, who typically have higher current smoking rates.

Current smoking in adults by sex, NSW 2002 to 2013
Snapshot May 2014 – Tobacco Strategy 2012-2017

From 2002 to 2011, when the methodology changed, the long-term trend in smoking in NSW had been downwards.

As outlined in Table 3, smoking rates in NSW have fallen from 14.2% in 2007 to 11.8% in 2013.

South Australia

A major Australian daily newspaper reported that ‘ in South Australia (smoking) rates were up from 16.7 per cent to 19.4 per cent over the past year’.

These statistics, which were released by the South Australian Minister for Health, are to be understood in the context that the state government ceased all expenditure on social marketing in June 2013 after a period of strong investment.

Media release – Alfresco dining areas out of puff

There is a solid research evidence base about quality social marketing as part of a comprehensive approach to tobacco control. In recognition of this fact, and following the release of the latest smoking data, the South Australian Health Minister, Jack Snelling MP, stated in May 2014 that the State Government will re-instate $1.1 million a year in anti-tobacco mass media campaigns.

Question: Will funding continue for anti-smoking social marketing activity in 2013-14?

Answer:
The Department of Health is well placed to undertake social marketing activities and is responsible for delivering the National Tobacco Campaign – More Targeted Approach, which targets hard to reach audiences and high prevalence smoking groups, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

On 31 May 2014, World No Tobacco Day, the Government announced an injection of $4.6 million to the More Targeted Approach Campaign in 2013-14.

As outlines in Table 3, smoking rates in South Australia have fallen 15.0% in 2007 to 13.0% in 2013.

Question: Will funding for Quitline services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples continue?

Answer:
All Quitline services targeting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples continue – there have been no cuts.

1. Begg S., Vos T., Barker B., Stevenson C., Stanley L., and Lopez AD., (2007) The Burden of Disease and Injury in Australia 2003, PHE 82 Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, p76.
2. Collins D., and Lapsley H., (2008) The Cost of Tobacco, Alcohol and Illicit Drug Abuse to Australian Society in 2004/05, Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Health and Ageing, Monograph Series No.64, p65.
3. ABS website – 5206.0 – Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product, Mar 2014
4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2014. National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report 2013. Drug statistics series no. 28. Cat. No. PHE 183. Canberra: AIHW. Available from the AIHW website
5. National Drug Strategy Household Survey 1991, 1993, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2013.
6. Figures for 1991, 1993, and 1995 are from AIHW unpublished data. 1998 to 2010 data is from the 2010 NDSHS report, Supplementary table, released on the AIHW website, 5 November 2010. 2013 data available at the AIHW website
7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2014). 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report. Online Table A7.1, Tobacco smoking status, people aged 14 years or older, by sex and state/territory, 2013 (age-standardised per cent)
8. For 2001, 2004-05 and 2007-08 – ABS, 4125.0 – Gender Indicators, Australia, July 2012.
8. ABS Australian Health Survey: Updated Results, 2011-12 (AHS), released 30 July 2013, Table 13.3, Selected health characteristics with age standardised proportions – 2001 to 2011-12.
9. ABS, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey: Updated Results, 2012-13 – Australia, released 6 June 2014. Table 10.3 Smoker status by age.
10. Data age standardised to the 2001 Australian Estimated Resident Population.

 

TTIP controversy: The European Commission and Big Tobacco accused of cover-up after heavily redacted documents released

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/ttip-controversy-the-european-commission-and-big-tobacco-accused-of-coverup-after-heavily-redacted-documents-released-10473601.html

image001 (3)

Paul Gallagher

Wednesday 26 August 2015

The European Commission has been accused of a cover-up after refusing to release details of talks between its officials and the tobacco industry during negotiations over the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) treaty.

Corporate lobbying campaigners published documents that revealed the EU’s executive body had met and corresponded with lobbyists from British American Tobacco and Philip Morris.

But the documents, as released, revealed little else.

Almost all the content, including the names of officials and tobacco lobbyists involved, the issues discussed and even the dates some meetings took place, had been redacted.

The documents relate to ongoing talks between the EU and the United States over the proposed TTIP free trade deal, as well as separate talks between the EU and Japan.

Critics of the trade talks, which centre on reducing the regulatory barriers to international trade for big business, said the documents back up fears that TTIP will allow tobacco giants to take legal action against the UK and other European governments who attempt to tighten smoking legislation.

Responding to a Freedom of Information request from an EU watchdog regarding contacts between officials and the tobacco industry, the European Commission released a set of documents that had been so heavily redacted as to be meaningless. In this 14-page letter from British American Tobacco from its London HQ, outlining its “serious concerns with the consistency of [redacted]”, only five per cent of the text was visible.

So-called “Big Tobacco” firms have already used similar legislation to sue countries around the world: Philip Morris used a comparable trade treaty to take legal action against Australia over mandatory plain cigarette packaging and is also suing Uruguay in a $25m lawsuit over its attempts to enlarge health warnings on cigarette packets.

The heavily redacted documents were released by Catherine Day, Secretary-General of the European Commission, in reply to a freedom of information transparency request by the research and campaign group Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO).

They include a 14-page letter from British American Tobacco, written on 15 May last year from the company’s London office, which sets out its “serious concerns with the consistency of [redacted]”.

The remaining 13 pages are blacked-out entirely with the exception of some perfunctory closing remarks. A previous letter from Commission officials to the tobacco company is also almost entirely redacted with the exception of a reference to “allegations” made by BAT, presumably over the trade talks.

In another document – a one-page summary of a meeting between Commission officials and the US cigarette firm Philip Morris – even the date of the meeting is removed.

CEO had argued for full disclosure of the documents citing the EU’s freedom of information law and the World Health Organisation’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The latter’s guidelines oblige governments to limit interactions with the tobacco industry to a minimum and to ensure full transparency of those interactions that occur.

Ms Day refused the request allowing only “partial access” stating that the documents “contain elements that relate to the Commission’s negotiating position with regards to tobacco in the ongoing bilateral negotiations for a free trade agreement with the USA and Japan.”

She said: “Whilst I fully recognise the importance of transparency in enabling citizens to follow trade negotiations, I take the view that this public interest does neither outweigh the public interest in protecting the Commission’s international relations and decision-making process, nor the commercial interests of the companies in question in this case.”

The Secretary General said disclosure of the discussions with BAT would reveal the Commission’s negotiating positions and tactical considerations which, in turn, would weaken the EU’s position in the ongoing trade talks.

The CEO campaign group has said it was “deeply concerned about the Commission’s secrecy around its relations with tobacco industry lobbyists” and is preparing a complaint to the European Ombudsman.

Campaigners fear that a system of international-state dispute settlements (ISDS) created by TTIP will allow multinational firms including tobacco companies to sue European governments in tribunals ruled upon by lawyers.

Reacting to the publication of the redacted documents, TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady said: “Trade agreements must be negotiated in the public interest not for private profit. The agreements currently being negotiated allow foreign investors, such as tobacco companies, privileged access to huge compensation payments for democratically-made decisions that might threaten their future profits.

“The TUC believes there is no place for such ISDS provisions in any trade agreement. A level playing field means the same arrangements for foreign investors as for workers, consumers and other stakeholders. EU trade negotiators must operate on the principle that their negotiations should be public unless there is a good reason for confidentiality. Sadly, they seem more wedded to keeping this secret unless they are forced into the open.”

Labour leadership hopeful Andy Burnham described the lack of transparency as ‘alarming’ and ‘damaging’ (Reuters)

Labour leadership candidate Andy Burnham told The Independent he would give “no guarantee of support” for the TTIP deal if he was elected.

He said: “The alarming lack of transparency in the TTIP negotiations has damaged public confidence in the entire process. In particular, the involvement of big tobacco in those discussions raises serious concerns and appears to go against commitments under the World Health Organisation’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control not to include tobacco companies in policy discussions. There must be a full and open public debate about its merits and challenges before any decision is made.”

The European Union claims a number of “myths and false claims” have been made about TTIP including one that “big business is calling the shots on TTIP”.

In a briefing document on “the top 10 myths of TTIP: separating fact from fiction” the European Commission says: “The TTIP talks are the most open ever for a trade deal and our negotiators are consulting widely.”

That claim was dismissed as “laughable” by campaigners last night. Blanche Jones, Campaigns Director at political activist group 38 Degrees, said: “These redacted documents prove that the officials behind TTIP, a deal that will affect millions of people, are laughing in the face of democracy. What use is a document with almost all of the words blacked out? It must be suspicious to keep it so secret.

“Leaks to the TTIP text so far have revealed huge dangers for our rights, our public services and our environmental protections. 38 Degrees members are calling on the European Commission to end this nonsense now – the public has a right to know what powers big businesses are lined up to get.”

Labour MEP and European health spokesperson Glenis Willmott said: “I’m deeply concerned that the Commission is not prepared to give further details on its dealings with the tobacco industry.

The Commission’s reply states that the public interest in transparency does not outweigh the commercial interests of the companies in question. Yet there is a fundamental conflict between the public interest and commercial interests of the tobacco industry, which rely on the promotion of a product that is the leading cause of preventable death and disease in Europe.

“Given the importance of strong tobacco control policies in protecting public health, I think it’s entirely reasonable for the public to have an interest in tobacco industry lobbying on TTIP.”

Although MEPs cannot start or stop trade talks the European Parliament can approve or reject TTIP once negotiations, set to continue beyond 2016, are concluded.

A spokesperson for British American Tobacco said: “The letters that were shared do not relate to any tobacco control measures nor do they attempt to influence tobacco control regulations; but rather contain commercially-sensitive information relevant to the Commission’s various negotiations regarding free trade agreements.

“Commission officials have the right to hear all views that impact the whole of the EU business community when formulating new trade agreements. We advocate transparency in all of our communications where it does not conflict with commercial confidentiality and sensitivities, and believe that all sides should adopt this approach

British American Tobacco’s new nicotine-inhalation product Voke hits shelves this year

http://www.cityam.com/222888/tobacco-firm-put-quitting-aid-market

by Aaron Payne

British American Tobacco’s (BAT) first anti-smoking product, Voke, will arrive in shops at the end of the year, marking a victory for BAT over its rivals such as Imperial Tobacco who have similar products in development.

BAT was granted regulatory approval in 2014 by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHPRA).

The product will be the first approved quitting aid made by a tobacco company.

An MHPRA spokesperson said: “The MHPRA continues to encourage and actively support companies to submit medicines licence applications for electronic cigarettes and other nicotine containing products, which can be used in stop smoking services.”

http://www.nicoventures.co.uk/announcing-voke-safer-alternative-smoking-licensed-medicines-and-healthcare-products-regulatory

Big tobacco should be excluded from the TPPA

http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/comment/71394377/big-tobacco-should-be-excluded–from-the-tppa

PHILIP PATTEMORE

The TPPA may stop New Zealand become smokefree on schedule.

OPINION: Most of us are familiar with the cost to personal health from smoking tobacco, and from passive exposure of children and others who have no choice to tobacco smoke. Tobacco is the largest preventable cause of mortality worldwide – every year 6 million people (more than the population of New Zealand) die from smoking, and another 600,000 die from passive exposure to tobacco smoke. Globally, 50 per cent of children are exposed (UN estimates).

That’s why the majority of people, including smokers in this country, want stronger regulation and more taxes. New Zealand doctors and nurses are therefore deeply concerned about the protections and rights given to tobacco corporations by the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) .

But its not just smokers and their families that are adversely affected by tobacco. Few people are aware of the environmental and human costs of farming and processing tobacco particularly in developing countries. Tobacco plants displace food crops, and cause serious nicotine poisoning in farmers and tobacco workers (often children). Curing the green Virginia tobacco leaf requires huge amounts of firewood, mostly obtained in these countries by cutting down forests, and consequently contributing to landslides, water catchment disruption, flooding and loss of biodiversity.

Two tobacco leaf merchants and four multinational cigarette companies control the international tobacco market, and reap massive profits. The corporations are currently using their financial and legal muscle to challenge tobacco control public health legislation in Uruguay, Australia and other countries. Defending this challenge in Uruguay was so expensive that the government was about to repeal the law before being rescued by the Bloomberg Philanthropic Trust and the Gates Foundation.

Australia believes that they were fully entitled to make tobacco plain packaging laws. However it has already cost the Australian government an estimated 50 million dollars contesting first part of the tobacco company challenge – simply establishing that there is no basis for that challenge.

Given these facts it is greatly concerning but perhaps not surprising that these tobacco corporations, along with other corporations, have had access to the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement texts that have been denied to New Zealand citizens and health analysts.

Within the United States there have been strong calls from many to “carve” tobacco out of trade agreements. This has been opposed by other politicians protecting the financial interests of their tobacco growing states and the heavyweight US Chamber of Commerce. This lobbying group for large businesses, with its worldwide affiliates, use their influence to challenge tobacco control measures, such as warning labels on cigarette packs. In Ukraine their influence was used to bring a World Trade Organisation dispute against Australia for their plain packaging legislation, even though Ukraine does not export tobacco to Australia. In Nepal the Chamber affiliates have challenged and delayed the implementation of graphic labels for cigarette packages. It is an organisation that seems willing, even determined to make things difficult for health in poor countries.

The TPPA gives giant tobacco corporations and their ethically-challenged supporting offices unprecedented entry into our country’s public health policies.

New Zealand has dragged its feet implementing plain packaging laws for tobacco. Australia took 19 months, Ireland 22 months and the UK 35 months; we’re 38 months and still awaiting a second reading of the bill. The most likely reason is the one given by John Key in 2013 – we need to wait and see what happens to the challenge in Australia. In other words we have suffered a “chill” based on our existing agreements, and Australia’s case, and here we are about to hand over yet more power to the tobacco corporations. How will TPPA nations like Vietnam have the resources to tackle this issue if we don’t?

Globally, there are even bigger risks to health: other investment agreements that will likely cross fertilise with the TPPA. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and PACER Plus negotiations include some of the poorest nations on the planet. If we let the TPPA lock in the ability of big tobacco companies to sue New Zealand we will risk making our Asian and Pacific neighbors (such as Kiribati, Vanuatu, Myanmar and Cambodia) susceptible to that same toxic and unethical power.

k
New Zealand is the first nation to set a date to be smokefree. However, we are not shaping up well to achieve the Government’s own target of a Smokefree Aotearoa by 2025.. Our Government needs to be consistent in its commitment to this goal..

We should have nothing to do with an industry that has such a chilling reputation for making its billions from death, disease and environmental degradation. We need to tell them and their American and Japanese representatives that, just as New Zealand rejoices in being nuclear-free, we are determined to become the world’s first smokefree nation.

Philip Pattemore is an associate professor of paediatrics at Otago University, and wrote this on behalf of Doctors for Healthy Trade.

– The Dominion Post

Customs seize 920,000 illegal cigarettes in Tin Shui Wai sting

http://hongkong.coconuts.co/2015/08/24/customs-seize-920000-illegal-cigarettes-sting-tin-shui-wai

By Coconuts Hong Kong August 24, 2015

image001 (2)

Customs officers broke up a suspected illegal cigarette distribution ring in Tin Shui Wai on Saturday, arresting a 33-year-old man and seizing 920,000 cigarettes.

The goods are worth about HKD2.48 million, and would have given the government HKD1.75 million in tax revenue had they been sold legally.

image002 (3)

Customs suspected that a syndicate was using lorries to distribute illegal cigarettes to peddlers in Tin Shui Wai and Yuen Long.

The authorities believe that this particular syndicate has now been “neutralised”.

Anyone caught dealing with, selling, or buying illicit cigarettes are liable to a fine of HKD1 million and two years in prison.

Tobacco bills fast-tracked to Senate floor

http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-tobacco-bills-fast-tracked-to-senate-floor-20150824-story.html

A package of anti-tobacco bills, including one raising the smoking age to 21, was fast-tracked to the Senate floor by the chamber’s Appropriations Committee on Monday.

Some of the bills have costs to the state that normally would have required them to be placed in the suspense file, where they would receive more detailed analysis of the financial implications.

However, Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens), the committee’s chairman, persuaded the panel to send them all on to the full Senate because they are part of a special session called by the governor on health issues and some had been approved by the Senate during the regular session.

“We want to move all of these bills to the floor as a package to continue the deliberation during the special-session discussion,” Lara said.

Sen. Pat Bates (R-Laguna Niguel) objected to giving the bills special treatment. “We believe that the public has a right to have some time to deliberate rather than going directly to the floor,” said Bates, the committee’s vice chairwoman.

The bills would

-regulate electronic cigarettes the same way regular smoking is restricted in public places,
-bar smoking on all school campuses,
-allow counties to seek voter approval of local tobacco taxes, and
-raise the smoking age from 18 to 21.

Sen. Ed Hernandez (D-West Covina) said he drew up the latter bill because most smokers start before they are 21. “By targeting this population, this bill seeks to stop our youth from experimenting with this addictive and deadly drug,” Hernandez told the panel.

Clashing Views on E-Cigarettes

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/24/opinion/clashing-views-on-e-cigarettes.html?_r=2

A British government agency has issued a bullish assessment of the value of electronic cigarettes in helping people to quit smoking. It found that e-cigarettes can reduce the health risks of smoking by 95 percent because they deliver nicotine to satisfy an addiction, but far fewer harmful chemicals than regular cigarettes. It also found little evidence that large numbers of consumers who had never smoked were taking up e-cigarettes. That seemed to challenge the notion that e-cigarettes would be a gateway to more dangerous products.

But the study is hardly definitive; experts in America have drawn different conclusions on usage and on the gateway issue.

The British assessment, commissioned by Public Health England and conducted by academic experts, was cautious in its claims. It noted that the best results are obtained when e-cigarettes are used in combination with professional counseling and smoking-cessation medication.

In the United States, according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, e-cigarette use by young people has grown more rapidly than in Britain. The user population includes many children who have never smoked and thus may be vulnerable to being hooked by nicotine and later moving to traditional cigarettes.

By coincidence, a day before the British study was issued, a study tracking more than 2,500 students at 10 Los Angeles schools who had never smoked tobacco, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, came to the opposite conclusion. It said ninth graders who had tried e-cigarettes were far more likely than other students to start smoking “combustible tobacco” (cigarettes, cigars, hookahs) within a year.

Strong regulation is needed in Europe and the United States to protect young people from advertising and promotions designed to lure them into trying e-cigarettes and perhaps getting hooked on them. America’s Food and Drug Administration needs to issue rules it proposed last year and make them even stronger by banning flavors that appeal to youngsters.

Warrington pub boss fined over smoking ban

http://www.cheshire-today.co.uk/35591/warrington-pub-boss-fined-over-smoking-ban/

A Warrington pub boss has been fined £400 and ordered to pay costs of £725 after admitting failing to stop people smoking in the Cheshire Cheese pub in Latchford.

Denise Cooke was found guilty by Warrington Magistrates Court on Wednesday 19 August for breaching the smoke free rules under the Health Act 2006.

The prosecution was brought by Warrington Borough Council’s regulatory services following the recovery of CCTV evidence from the pub by Cheshire Constabulary.

The CCTV footage from 16 March 2015 revealed Cooke smoking behind the bar while serving customers who were sat at the bar and were also smoking.

Peter Astley MBE, assistant director for regulation and public protection, said: “The smoke free legislation under the Health Act 2007 has been in force since 1 July 2007. Ms Cooke had received previous advisory visits from officers to ensure she fully understood the smoke free rules.

“The legislation was designed to improve the health of those previously at risk from second hand smoke particularly those working in premises like pubs. If you breathe in second hand smoke you are exposed to over 4000 chemical gases and particles, some of which are proven harmful and dangerous poisons.

“This legislation is very popular with those who work in and frequent, pubs and other public spaces due to the health and other benefits and it is inevitable that we will find out very quickly when these laws are being flaunted.”

E-cigarettes just as dangerous

http://www.nst.com.my/node/97492

KUALA LUMPUR: Anti-tobacco advocates have called on the Health Ministry to ban e-cigarettes (e-cig) and e-liquids to prevent nicotine addiction among the younger generation.

Universiti Putra Malaysia’s senior consultant of public health medicine Professor Dr Lekhraj Rampal said the increase in e-cig users among adolescents and youth in Malaysia was a critical issue.

“A study overseas revealed that among adolescents, non-smokers who used e-cig showed more willingness to smoke cigarettes compared with those who had never used any tobacco product,” he told the New Straits Times.

He said a Dutch research showed that as well as nicotine, the potentially harmful substances in e-cigs included propylene glycol, glycerol, aldehydes, nitrosamines and metals, which when inhaled, could lead to irritation and damage to the respiratory tract, heart palpitations and increased risk of cancer.

He said propylene glycol was used to produce smoke, or vape, and the process of heating the substance at a voltage of more than five volts would produce formaldehyde, which was carcinogenic or cancer causing.

“Most vaporisers will use 10 to 12 volts to get more vape or smoke. The Dutch study showed that in some cases, the quantity of nicotine in the vapour was not in line with the breakdown on the packaging. In others, the concentrations of some substances were higher in the vapour than in the fluid.

“This substance will give the same or worse effect to people surrounding them. In addition, there are not many studies to prove that other volatile substances are not produced during vaping.”

Dr Lekhraj urged Malaysians not to jump to the conclusion that vaping was safer than smoking cigarettes, and wait for a directive from the World Health Organisation (WHO).

University Malaya Centre of Addiction Sciences addiction medicine specialist Associate Professor Dr Amer Siddiq Amer Nordin said e-cigs were not approved as quit-smoking aids in most countries.

“Without regulation at present, users are using these devices at their own risk. There is no control on quality of devices or more importantly the e-liquid used. Also, nicotine is a Group C Poison under the Poison Act 1952,” he said.

Malaysian Green Lung Association co-founder and president Ho Rhu Yann said if nicotine patches or gum were listed as Group C Poison, e-cigs should also be the same.

A Bernama report said a study on e-cigarette addiction conducted by the Institute of Respiratory Medicine (IPR) since 2013 was expected to be completed next year.

According to IPR’s senior medical consultant Professor Datuk Dr Abdul Razak Abdul Muttalif, the research, currently in the preliminary epidemiology stage, required more time to study.

“The e-cig issue is controversial, and there are pros and cons. We have to wait for the outcome and will also obtain information from WHO, which may take a long time, the latest by next year.”

Razak said e-cig smokers might experience acute effects, such as coughing and tiredness.

Bill to raise minimum tobacco purchase age to 21

http://www.tobaccojournal.com/Bill_to_raise_minimum_tobacco_purchase_age_to_21.53139.0.html

The Health Ministry plans to raise the minimum age for purchasing tobacco from 18 to 21 and ban displays of the products in shops, the New Straits Times said.

Smoking in vehicles with children as passengers also would be part of the legislation, the newspaper said on its website. A ministry spokesperson was quoted as saying the ministry has had a tobacco act ready for submission to Parliament since 2009, but unnamed factors prevented submission until this year.