Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

December, 2011:

Second-hand smoke ‘drifts’ indoors

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/6160066/Second-hand-smoke-drifts-indoors

Kim

CRAIG SIMCOX/Fairfax NZ

FRESH AIR?: Matterhorn duty manager Kim O’Leary in the outdoor smoking area.

Health

Even sitting indoors in a smokefree pub may not protect you from second-hand smoke.

Seven years after laws came into force banning smoking inside bars, Wellington researchers have found that the air quality inside pubs is being affected by “drift” from legal semi-enclosed outdoor smoking areas.

Further regulations may be needed to protect people indoors, they say.

The team of researchers from Otago University, Wellington, visited seven city bars on three separate occasions and measured particulate levels – one way to detect second-hand smoke – in outdoor areas, inside the bar close to the outdoor area, and further inside.

All outdoor measurements, and nearly all indoor measurements, were greater than World Health Organisation guidelines for air quality. Even deep inside the pub, average particulate readings were twice the maximum level.

When there was constant access between the indoor and outdoor areas – for example, a door left open – inside levels were much higher.

The group defined semi-enclosed outdoor areas as those with three walls, or four walls but no roof.

Lead author Professor Richard Edwards said it was worrying that even outdoor areas that met legal requirements were contaminating indoor areas.

“The most important finding is that you can get drift from those semi-enclosed outdoor areas to areas much further inside the pub.”

Bar staff were most likely to suffer from the exposure, especially at pubs that had bars in their outdoor areas, Dr Edwards said. He urged policymakers to consider tightening the regulations for outdoor areas. That could include ensuring that connecting doors and windows be kept shut as much as possible. “You might also change the criteria for the degree of enclosure that’s allowed.”

Places such as Queensland had laws requiring at least 50 per cent of outdoor seating in pubs to be smoke-free, he said.

“Lots of non-smokers do like to go outside on a nice day, so it becomes a question of whether part of that area should be smoke-free.”

Although the researchers would not identify which bars they tested, they confirmed that courtyards like those at Wellington bar Matterhorn, met the testing criteria.

Matterhorn general manager Zach Twentyman said the doors to the courtyard were opened during gigs but were otherwise kept closed.

None of his staff had complained about drifting smoke or asked not to work in the outdoor bar. “To be honest, most of them smoke.”

Ad Feedback

– © Fairfax NZ News

‘Cigarette smoke should be treated like asbestos’

http://www.news.com.au/national/cigarette-smoke-should-be-treated-like-asbestos/story-e6frfkvr-1226225271744

Smoker

Gamze Dastan, 20, has lunch and a cigarette at a cafe on Phillip St, Parramatta. Picture: Adam Ward Source: The Daily Telegraph

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.

Related Coverage

End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

ATTENTION smokers: your days of puffing away in NSW restaurants are numbered – if the state’s councils have their way.

NSW cabinet is considering a proposal to stub out alfresco smoking across the state.

Local governments in the city and the bush have put forward the proposal to make a uniform law out of what they say is a patchwork of conflicting rules across jurisdictions.

Should smokers be banned in public? Tell us below.

Sydney City and Parramatta, the two councils with the most cafes and bars, are leading the push for NSW Health Minister Jillian Skinner to bring in the blanket ban. Last week Parramatta launched an assault on cafe smokers, against the wishes of two-thirds of its business community.

Just 33 of 152 councils in NSW have outlawed smoking in outdoor dining areas – but they claim it’s a job for the state.

Councils have labelled current bans as sporadic, and say the “inconsistency is a catalyst for confusion and angst: among both the smoking and not smoking population”.

However, the state government risks breaking a memorandum of understanding signed during the election campaign, which promises to keep smoking as the status quo.

The Daily Telegraph understands a new smoking policy is before the cabinet.

Parramatta Lord Mayor Lorraine Wearne said a state ban would eliminate confusion from Sydney’s 44 councils that have different smoking policies.

“The state government needs to come on board and make it clear what is permitted and in what areas, instead of leaving it to councils to implement their own smoke-free policies,” she said.

Parramatta will ban smokers from lighting up in alfresco dining areas including its premier Eat Street from May 1, next year – despite studies finding up to 70 per cent of business owners thought the ban would have a major impact on their takings.

Sydney City Lord Mayor Clover Moore will also write to the state government “to lobby for introduction of legislation that uniformly prohibits smoking in outdoor dining areas on public land”.

A spokeswoman for Health Minister Jillian Skinner said the government could not comment until the issue had been through cabinet.

Action on Smoking and Health Australia spokesman Stafford Sanders said a state-wide ban was long overduefor NSW.

“Tobacco is a highly toxic, carcinogenic contaminant, “he said.

“There is no good reason why it should be treated differently to asbestos.”

A spokesman for Clubs NSW said clubs and hotels spent more than $1 billion building outdoor smoking areas to comply with smoking laws established by the previous state government.

The proposed ban is being driven by The Local Government and Shires Associations of NSW (LGSA).

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/national/cigarette-smoke-should-be-treated-like-asbestos/story-e6frfkvr-1226225271744#ixzz1gu1ZPVPw

New Year to see 14.6% hike in cigarette price in New Zealand

Submitted by Nimisha Sachdev on Sun, 12/18/2011 – 03:42

In what clearly is a massive push in the direction of getting smokers in New Zealand to quit smoking, the cost of cigarettes will be increased from the New Year’s Day.

As a result of the increase to take effect from January 1, 2012, the cost of a standard pack of 20 cigarettes will witness a 14.6 percent rise; thus breaking through the NZ$15 price tag.

The tobacco-hike move in New Zealand comes in the wake of the observations by Dr Jeffrey Wigand – a scientist and tobacco industry whistleblower – who is of the opinion that even though the country has progressed in terms of fighting tobacco addiction, there was still a lot of more work required.

The forthcoming hike in the cost of the standard 20-pack of cigarettes will be third one since June 2010, and is largely an upshot of the yearly adjustments which are made to excise duty. It was last year that the government brought legislation to Parliament for increasing the excise duty on tobacco.

Noting that the last two tax increase witnessed an approximate 93 percent increase in the demand for Quitline services, Bruce Bassett –Quitline’s spokesman – told the NZ Herald that with household price thresholds apparently determining spending, price increases to a certain point “shocks people into realising how much of their discretionary income is being put into feeding their addiction.”

http://www.frenchtribune.com/teneur/118597-new-year-see-146-hike-cigarette-price-new-zealand

New Zealand year on year tobacco excise increase Standard packet of cigarettes will cost HKD 90.4 from January 1st 2012

http://www.frenchtribune.com/teneur/118597-new-year-see-146-hike-cigarette-price-new-zealand

New Year to see 14.6% hike in cigarette price in New Zealand

Submitted by Nimisha Sachdev on Sun, Dec 18/2011 – 03:42

In what clearly is a massive push in the direction of getting smokers in New Zealand to quit smoking, the cost of cigarettes will be increased from the New Year’s Day.

As a result of the increase to take effect from January 1, 2012, the cost of a standard pack of 20 cigarettes will witness a 14.6 percent rise; thus

breaking through the NZ$15 price tag (HKD 90.4).

The tobacco-hike move in New Zealand comes in the wake of the observations by Dr Jeffrey Wigand – a scientist and tobacco industry whistleblower – who is of the opinion that even though the country has progressed in terms of fighting tobacco addiction, there was still a lot of more work required.

The forthcoming hike in the cost of the standard 20-pack of cigarettes will be third one since June 2010, and is largely an upshot of the yearly adjustments which are made to excise duty. It was last year that the government brought legislation to Parliament for increasing the excise duty on tobacco.

Noting that the last two tax increase witnessed an approximate 93 percent increase in the demand for Quitline services, Bruce Bassett – Quitline’s spokesman – told the NZ Herald that with household price thresholds apparently determining spending, price increases to a certain point “shocks people into realising how much of their discretionary income is being put into feeding their addiction.”

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10723986

Tobacco sales drop 10pc after tax rise By Martin Johnston

5:30 AM Saturday May 7, 2011

Tobacco sales have slumped by 10 per cent following a tax increase that led many smokers either to quit or cut down.

“The number of cigarettes released for sale per adult is now at its lowest in 90 years,” said the chairman of the End Smoking Trust, Dr Murray Laugesen, a public health specialist.

“This result is in line with the 15 per cent decrease in supermarket sales we reported after the 12 per cent May increase in tobacco excise 12 months ago,” he said.

A spokeswoman for Associate Health Minister Tariana Turia said yesterday that the minister, who was to return from overseas last night, would be delighted by the decrease, although she had not yet seen the figures.

Around 20 per cent of adults smoke. Based on Government tobacco tax data, Dr Laugesen calculated that the equivalent of 969 cigarettes per adult were sold in 2010, down from 1080 the previous year.

The figures include all adults, not just smokers, and loose tobacco as well as factory-made cigarettes.

He said it was impossible to know from the data what the contributions of quitting and cutting down were to the overall sales reduction.

However, figures released earlier by the government’s Quit Group suggest the number of smokers giving up the habit has increased as a result of last May’s tax hike – which was followed by another in January, ahead of the third and last of the trio of tax rises next January.

The number of people who called the Quitline last May was nearly double the number recorded in May 2009. A check later last year found that after six months, 17.2 per cent of smokers who had called the Quitline in May were still not smoking. The organisation said this was “comparable to Quitline’s standard quit success measure of 20.9 per cent”.

“The key outcome is that there were 59 per cent more people successfully quit at six months than there would have been without the tax increase …”

By Martin Johnston | Email Martin

China: Coming slowly to 300 million Chinese puffers: smoke-free zones

Peter Ford

Despite a new smoke-free zone at Peking University, China is making only half-hearted efforts to dissuade people from smoking.

In the mad urban grind of Beijing, the green lawns and spreading trees of Peking University’s bucolic campus offer a rare respite.

They will soon offer something even rarer in China, if the university authorities get their way: a smoke-free zone.

The university this week banned smoking anywhere on campus – even outdoors – and outlawed the sale of tobacco in any of its shops. Students and teachers caught smoking three times will be ineligible for any prizes, and faculty members still on probation will not be hired, according to the new rules. This is the latest in a string of generally half-hearted official efforts to dissuade people from smoking in China, the biggest consumer and producer of tobacco in the world, where more than 300 million adults smoke daily. Several million children under 15 have not been counted.

That figure has remained unchanged for nearly a decade, and government critics say the authorities are not doing enough to persuade smokers to give up. “The tobacco forces remain all-powerful,” Yang Gonghuan, deputy head of the Chinese Center for Disease Control told the UN World Health Organization bulletin last year.

That is partly because tobacco is a state monopoly in China, bringing in $93 billion in direct revenues and an additional $77 billion in tax – 7 percent of total taxes – in 2009, according to official figures.

It does not help that the agency responsible for warning citizens of the dangers of smoking, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, works hand in glove with the state owned China National Tobacco Company, which produces and sells cigarettes. The two organizations share a website and a board of directors.

“They share the same staff who have conflicts of interest,” points out Wang Ke-an, founder of the Think Tank Research Center for Health Development. “It would be very helpful if the company was separated from the government.”

That so many people smoke in China – 57 percent of men smoking makes the habit normal here – is hardly surprising when you consider that fewer than 25 percent of Chinese know that smoking is harmful to their health, according to the WHO.

“Ordinary people are not aware of the risks they run by smoking, and not enough is being done to warn them,” says Sarah England, a tobacco expert with the WHO in Beijing.

That is clear from cigarette packs, whose simple warnings in tiny print that “smoking is harmful to your health, quitting smoking early is good for your health” fall well short of the standards that China adopted as legally binding when it signed on to the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in 2005.

Not only do tobacco companies shy away from of alerting consumers to the dangers of their product, they go out of their way to encourage youngsters to smoke, often with official sanction. Tobacco companies are allowed to sponsor schools, plastering their walls with slogans such as “tobacco helps you grow up and become accomplished,” and paying for school uniforms emblazoned with their logos.

The government has not been wholly inactive in the face of the tobacco lobby’s fierce tactics, however. It has banned tobacco advertising in newspapers and magazines and on TV and billboards, it made big international events such as the 2008 Beijing Olympics and the 2010 Shanghai World Expo smoke-free, and the 12th Five Year Plan, unveiled earlier this year, pledges to ban smoking in all public places “in a comprehensive manner.”

Last May Beijing issued regulations banning smoking in restaurants, hotels and public transport, but they are only spottily applied. “The biggest challenge is to enforce the rules,” says Dr. Wang. “The main problem is that the regulations do not specify who is to enforce them, nor how violators should be punished.”

The results of such vagueness are clear in hospitals. More than three years after the Ministry of Health banned smoking in China’s 20,000 hospitals, only half of them have started to do anything about it, according to Dr. England.

The same is true in schools and universities. The rules that Peking University introduced this week are designed to comply with guidelines issued by the Ministry of Education 18 months ago. An undercover investigation of 800 schools and colleges earlier this year by the independent Chinese Association for Tobacco Control, however, found only 16 institutions making any real effort to enforce the ministerial diktat.

The authorities’ ambivalence towards tobacco was graphically illustrated this week when a row broke out in the august ranks of the Chinese Academy of Engineering. A number of prestigious academicians publicly protested the elevation to their ranks of Xie Jianping, a scientist working for a research institute belonging to the China National Tobacco Company.

Dr. Xie’s contribution to science has been to claim that the addition of Chinese herbs to cigarettes makes them less harmful. “How can a researcher working on a fake subject, a technician who helps to sell death, become an academician?” wondered Chen Junshi, a member of the Academy of Engineering, in the China Youth Daily newspaper.

This official ambivalence towards tobacco means that reducing its use in China “will be a long term job,” says Wang.

But the government’s total control over the tobacco industry has a potential upside, suggests Dr. England, even if the authorities still appear to be afraid that cutting the number of Chinese smokers could undermine an important industry at a time of economic uncertainty.

A 2008 study by Chinese and Swedish scientists found that the direct medical costs and indirect economic costs linked to smoking in China outweighed the tobacco industry’s profits and tax revenues. “Once China’s leaders are convinced that it is not in the country’s best interests, they have the power to sunset this industry,” says England. “The challenge we have now is to persuade them that this is not good for the economy.”

Link: Christian Science Monitor

Rules on duty-free tobacco needed

16/12/2011 10:42:00

The Legislative Assembly (AL) unanimously passed the new tobacco tax yesterday but several lawmakers urged the government to introduce stricter rules for duty-free cigarettes, similar to those enforced in Hong Kong.

Others said the MOP 6 tax increase is not enough and that Macau still lags behind other regions, while some lawmakers expressed concerns about the risk of tobacco smuggling.
The tobacco tax will increase by MOP 0.5 for each cigarette, in order to be in line with the ban on smoking in public places that comes into effect from January 1. Tobacco packs will increase by at least MOP 6.
In Macau the tobacco tax was last updated in 2009 and is currently at MOP 0.2 per cigarette or MOP 4 per 20-cigarette pack. As soon as the revision comes into effect, the tax will be MOP 10 per pack.
Currently, the average price of a cigarette pack is MOP 20 while in Hong Kong the price is MOP 50 after a 41.6 tax increase enforced in June this year.
The new tax was submitted to the AL in an urgent procedure and all lawmakers expressed their support of the government’s proposal. However they want more to be done in order to control smoking in Macau.

Smuggling fears

Directly-elected lawmaker Ng Kuok Cheong warned the government that the “tobacco smuggling market doesn’t seem to be under control” and sellers are worried that it will affect their business. “Does the government have the capacity to fight smuggling?” the pan-democrat questioned.
He also stressed that not only are tobacco prices higher in Hong Kong but that it’s also forbidden to enter the neighbouring SAR with more than 19 cigarettes. In Macau people can enter with as many as 10 packs.
The goal set out by the World Health Organisation is that tobacco tax should be 70 percent or more of the retail cost of a packet of cigarettes. According to the bill approved yesterday, the local tobacco tax duty will only be 38 percent of the retail cost while in Hong Kong it is close to 70 percent.
Ho Ion Sang said that Macau is still far away from that goal. “The government needs to consult the governments of neighbouring regions because there is a large discrepancy in this area. What will the government do to control smuggling? Will the government limit the number of duty-free tobacco?” he asked.
Pan-democrat Paul Chan Wai Chi also warned that “smuggled or counterfeit tobacco affects residents”. He urged more work be undertaken by the Customs Service (SA).

Rule revision

Other AL members questioned whether the SA has the necessary human resources to increase control and inspections.
Most lawmakers urged the government to continue to raise the tax in order to reduce the number of smokers, mainly among the youth.
Chui Sai Cheong added that the anti-smoking act, to be enacted next month, should be revised after the three-year grace period for casinos and bars.
Ho Sio Kam, from the education sector, said that the tax is “not the only way” to prevent smoking. “Awareness and education are also important. Each person can carry 10 packs of duty-free tobacco to Macau. Can you limit that? Otherwise the tax cannot produce the desired effects,” she added.
Secretary for Economy and Finance Francis Tam Pak Yuen pledged to strengthen the awareness and punishment of smuggling, as well as to enhance the action of the SA.
“We will promote close contact and communication with mainland China and tackle the smuggling routes,” he pledged.
As for the change of duty-free rules, Tam agreed with lawmakers’ opinions but explained that it requires the revision of the law on foreign trade. He also promised to review the tax-duty in the future.
Yesterday lawmakers also passed the 2012 Government Budget.

http://www.macaudailytimes.com.mo/macau/32405-Rules-duty-free-tobacco-needed.html

Golden Holocaust now published

Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition byRobert N. Proctor (Author)

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2011/december/tobacco-industry-proctor-121211.html

Robert N. Proctor

Professor of the History of Science

History Dept., Bldg 200

Stanford University

Stanford CA  94305

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2011/december/tobacco-industry-proctor-121211.html

Stanford Report, December 12, 2011

Tobacco industry dying? Not so fast, says Stanford expert

Smoking is not going away. Worldwide, says Stanford historian Robert Proctor, the tobacco industry continues to create toxic products that cause not just lung cancer but also cataracts, ankle fractures, early onset menopause, spontaneous abortion and erectile dysfunction, among other maladies.

Steve Fyffe and L.A. Cicero

‘The industry has spent tens of billions designing cigarettes since the 1940s – that’s from the industry’s own documents,’ Robert Proctor said.

BY CYNTHIA HAVEN

The cigarette industry is not dying. It continues to reap unimaginable profits. It’s still winning lawsuits. And cigarettes still kill millions every year.

So says Stanford’s Robert Proctor, author of the new bombshell study, Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition, a book the tobacco industry tried to stop with subpoenas and hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

Proctor, the first historian to testify in court against the tobacco industry (in 1998), warns that the worst of the health catastrophe is still ahead of us: Thanks to the long-term effects of cigarettes, “If everyone stopped smoking today, there would still be millions of deaths a year for decades to come.”

“Low-tar” cigarettes? “Light” cigarettes? Better filters? Forget it, he said. They don’t work. Today’s cigarettes are deadlier even than those made 60 years ago, gram for gram.

Half the people who smoke will die from their habit. A surprising number will die from stroke and heart attacks, not cancer.

Moreover, he asks, “How many people know that tobacco is a major cause of blindness, baldness and bladder cancer, not to mention cataracts, ankle fractures, early onset menopause, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and erectile dysfunction?”

Six trillion cigarettes are smoked every year – that’s 6,000,000,000,000. Proctor said that’s “enough to make a continuous chain from Earth to the sun and back, with enough left over for a couple of round trips to Mars.”

Robert Proctor with collection of cigarette ads and packages

L.A. Cicero 

‘There’s hundreds of things people don’t know about smoking,’ Robert Proctor said.

His 750-page book, a decade in the making, has already earned high praise, with terms like “a real page-turner,” “a must-read,” “the most important book on smoking in 50 years.”

“This book is a remarkable compendium of evil,” wrote Columbia’s David Rosner, an author of Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution. “It will keep you spinning from page one through the last. … It is the type of book that makes you wonder how, in God’s name, this could have happened.”

According to Donald Kennedy, Stanford president emeritus and former editor of the journal Science, the book “unpacks the sad history of an industrial fraud. [Proctor’s] tightly reasoned exploration touches on all topics on which the tobacco makers lied repeatedly to Congress and the public.”

The hefty book has not only won him accolades, but it’s personally cost Proctor $50,000 in legal fees to defend himself against the industry, which subpoenaed his email and unpublished manuscript.

According to an article in The Nation last year, Proctor is one of only two historians who currently testify on behalf of smokers injured by tobacco products; 50 have testified on behalf of the industry. Academics from virtually every discipline have been collaborating with the Marlboro Men – and made big money doing so.

“This is the biggest breach of academic integrity since the Nazis,” he said, and “certainly the most deadly.”

Such language is typical for Proctor. When it comes to cigarettes, he speaks in provocative superlatives, pulling no punches.

Cigarettes are “the deadliest artifact in the history of civilization” – more than bullets, more than atom bombs, more than traffic accidents or wars or heroin addiction combined. They are also among “the most carefully and most craftily devised small objects on the planet.”

“The industry has spent tens of billions designing cigarettes since the 1940s – that’s from the industry’s own documents,” he said.

Old ad of two famous women promoting a brand of cigarette

He also marshals evidence to show that smoking contributes substantially to environmental damage, even global warming: “When we finally decide to take seriously the problem of global climate change, cigarettes will come under increasing scrutiny. Tobacco agriculture and cigarette manufacturing have heavy carbon footprints – think deforestation and petrochemical pesticides – and cigarettes are leading causes of fires and industrial accidents. There’s not much room for cigarettes in an environmentally conscious world.”

For the industry, though, the cigarette represents the perfect business model. “It costs a penny to make. Sell it for a dollar. It’s addictive,” says investment guru Warren Buffett. Proctor notes that “by artfully crafting its physical character and chemistry, industry scientists have managed to create an optimally addictive drug delivery device, one that virtually sells itself.”

“There’s hundreds of things people don’t know about smoking,” said Proctor. Myths have instead lulled the public into complacency. He listed a few of the most common:

Myth #1. Nobody smokes anymore. If you read the media, smoking sounds like a dying habit in California. That’s far from true, said Proctor. Californians still smoke about 28 billion cigarettes per year, a per capita rate only slightly below the global average.

So why do we have this illusion? “We don’t count the people who don’t count. It’s not the educated or the rich who smoke anymore, it’s the poor,” said Proctor.

Also, look at popular social trends – the recent trendiness of cigars, for example. Or the current fad for hookah parties. He recalled one such event at Stanford: “They would never have a Marlboro party. But hookah is just as addictive, and just as deadly.”

Myth #2The tobacco industry has turned over a new leaf. “The fact is that the industry has never admitted they’ve lied to the public or marketed to children or manipulated the potency of their project to create and sustain addiction,” Proctor said. “A U.S. Federal Court in 2006 found the American companies in violation of RICO racketeering laws, and nothing has changed since then. And the same techniques used in the past in the U.S. are now being pushed onto vulnerable populations abroad.”

Myth #3. Everyone knows that smoking is bad for you. Proctor pointed out that most people begin smoking at the age of 12 or 13, or even younger in some parts of the world. “Do they know everything?” Proctor asked rhetorically. “And how many people know that cigarettes contain radioactive isotopes, or cyanide, or free-basing agents like ammonia, added to juice up the potency of nicotine?”

Old cigarette ad with a dentist promoting a brand of cigarette

Myth #4. Smokers like smoking, and so should be free to do itAnd the industry has a right to manufacture cigarettes, even if defective. Proctor called this “the libertarian argument.”

“It is wrong to think about tobacco as a struggle between liberty and longevity; that tips the scales in favor of the industry. People will always choose liberty, as in ‘Give me liberty or give me death.’ What people don’t realize is that most smokers dislike the fact they smoke, and wish they could quit. Cigarettes are actually destroyers of freedom.”

There are tobacco industry documents, he noted, in which smoking is compared not to drinking but rather to being an alcoholic. Proctor also points to how we handle other forms of toxic pollution: “We don’t allow kids to play with toys coated with lead paint. We don’t drive cars that don’t meet safety standards.”

The upshot: “People should be free to smoke wherever it harms no one else, but cigarettes as now designed are too dangerous to be produced or sold.”

Myth #5. The tobacco industry is here to stay. Global tobacco use would be declining were it not for China, where 40 percent of the world’s cigarettes are made and smoked. Proctor has a bet with a colleague, though, that China will be among the first to bar the sale of cigarettes, once their financial costs are recognized. Governments throughout the world have benefited from tobacco taxes, which he calls “the second addiction.” The costs of paying for diseases caused by smoking are high, however – especially when you count lost productivity – and governments will start winding down on tobacco, he says, once this is taken seriously.

Proctor also said that in the United States, a “Kafkaesque world” divides smokers and non-smokers. The industry has computerized databases of virtually all smokers and spends over $400 per smoker per year on special offers, coupons, sign-ups and other direct mail approaches – an unseen world to non-smokers. “This is precisely how the industry wants it; a fungus always grows best in the dark,” he writes.

Proctor admits to a personal motivation for his research. Three of his grandparents died from smoking – one from emphysema, another from lung cancer and a third from a heart attack in his mid-50s. The family blamed the last death on eating too many eggs. “That’s the story,” said Proctor, “but he smoked nonstop.”

For Proctor, then, his engagement with Big Tobacco is more than just research: “It’s part of my sense of what it means to be an ethical human being, using my expertise to do what’s right for humanity on the planet.”

Media Contact

Robert Proctor, History: (650) 269-4495(650) 323-6346rproctor@stanford.edu

Dan Stober, Stanford News Service: (650) 721-6965dstober@stanford.edu

and the book via Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Golden-Holocaust-Cigarette-Catastrophe-Abolition/dp/0520270169

Prof .   J u d i t h   L o n g s t a f f   M a c k a y , O B E , S B S , J P

MBChB, FRCP (Edin), FRCP (Lon)

Senior Advisor

t:  +852.2719.1995 f:  +852.2719.5741

Riftswood, 9th Milestone

DD 229, Lot 147, Clearwater Bay Road

Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR

worldlungfoundation.org

The Associated Press: Dutch government backtracks on anti-smoking

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2eAbxTCrUFD51AdAxKt8YFXZnbg?docId=865380acadc34593aac68cdd2de37222

Dutch government backtracks on anti-smoking

By MARIA CHENG, Associated Press–17 minutes ago

AMSTERDAM (AP) — It’s getting surprisingly easy to light up in the Netherlands these days — cigarettes, that is.

Even as the Dutch government hardens its famous tolerance policy on marijuana, it is taking an increasingly relaxed stance toward tobacco, bucking the trend in nearly every other developed country.

Last year it exempted some bars from a smoking ban and now it has unveiled plans to reduce spending on anti-smoking advertising campaigns and end funding for health care programs to help people kick the habit. The Netherlands is also planning to cease funding its national center on tobacco control.

Nearly half of the nation’s bars and nightclubs flout the 2008 smoking ban but they’re rarely punished.

“There’s no other country that’s taking these backward steps,” said Lies Van Gennip, director of the national tobacco control center, slated to be closed in 2013. “I’m ashamed of what’s happening here.”

At a press briefing on Wednesday, several Dutch politicians and experts blasted the government for backtracking on tobacco control policies. Opposition lawmaker Renske Leijten of the Socialist Party said Health Minister EdithSchippers was making the wrong decision to cut back on quit smoking policies.

“You can even wonder if she is minister of health or minister for the tobacco industry,” she said.

Schippers said she believes in freedom of choice for smokers and that the government has “gone too far in making rules about it.”

Inge Freriksen, a health ministry spokeswoman, told the Associated Press the Netherlands had chosen “a different manner of prevention” — one that focuses on educating children on the dangers of smoking.

The Netherlands is home to Europe’s biggest tobacco industry and also has Philip Morris’ largest factory worldwide. Some experts have suggested possible improper links between the Dutch government and Dutch tobacco that account for the changes.

In a recent documentary on Dutch television, tobacco lobbyist Alexander van Voorst Vader said he knew Schipperswhen she served in Dutch Parliament and held numerous discussions with her. “She was very open (to) sensible points of view of the industry,” he said.

Any communication where the tobacco industry might influence government policies is strictly forbidden by the World Health Organization’s international tobacco control treaty, which the Netherlands signed in 2005.

Health ministry spokeswoman Freriksen said any communication government officials had with the tobacco industry was legitimate. “It’s not forbidden to have communication with tobacco companies in a normal manner about enforcement,” she said. “You do talk with them.”

The WHO tobacco control treaty obliges signatory nations to introduce strong tobacco control measures including increased legislation, taxation and education. But like most global treaties, there are no real measures to punish countries that don’t comply.

According to the Netherlands’ National Organization for Tobacco Trade, Dutch consumers bought more than 4 billioneuros ($5 billion) worth of tobacco products last year. About 27 percent of people in the Netherlands smoke, slightly higher than other rich countries including Britain and the U.S.

According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the Netherlands has a lung cancer rate of about 93 people per 100,000, higher than the average in Western Europe, including Austria, France and Germany.

Earlier this year, Dutch researchers predicted that without stronger anti-smoking policies, almost a million people in the Netherlands would die prematurely due to tobacco-related diseases between now and 2040.

By 2020, they estimated smoking-related diseases would kill 600 additional people as a result of the government’s decision to stop paying for quit smoking programs and ending mass education campaigns.

Schippers argued in a letter to Parliament that the projection was “partially dependent on assumptions.”

The government’s liberal stance toward tobacco contrasts strongly with its moves to curtail the country’s famous tolerance policy toward marijuana: the government is reducing the number of cafes licensed to sell the drug and plans to introduce a pass system next year that would bar tourists from buying it at all.

Critics argue the Dutch population is woefully ignorant of the dangers of tobacco. In a global survey on smokers’ awareness, only 61 percent of Dutch smokers agreed second-hand smoke was dangerous to non-smokers — much lower than smokers elsewhere, including Mauritius, China, Brazil and Mexico.

“Dutch smokers are among the least informed about the harms of smoking and second-hand smoke,” said Geoff Fong, at the University of Waterloo in Canada, who heads a program that monitors smoking policies worldwide.

“The Dutch are heading into a situation where their tobacco control could be worse than many developing countries,” he said.

Last year, the government declared that small, owner-operated bars without employees would be exempt from the smoking ban.

Ex-smoker Eddie Moojen quit smoking four months ago on his own and says he isn’t worried about second-hand smoke.

“We had dinner the other night at a cafe where they smoke, it doesn’t make that much difference,” said Moojen, 39, founder of Opentracker, a software company in the southern city of Eindhoven. “I’m not uptight about smokers bothering non-smokers.”

Cheng reported from London. Associated Press Writer Mike Corder in The Hague contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

State to back fight with Big Tobacco on health costs

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/state-to-back-fight-with-big-tobacco-on-health-costs/story-e6frgczx-1226222317940

Matthew Myers, anti-smoking lobbyist

Matthew Myers, anti-smoking lobbyist. Picture: James Croucher Source: The Australian

Nicola Roxon cigarette packets

Nicola Roxon with the proposed plain cigarette pack. Picture: Alan Pryke Source: The Australian

MOMENTUM is building among the states for legal action against Big Tobacco to recover costs imposed on health budgets by smoking-related diseases.

South Australia yesterday called on new Attorney-General Nicola Roxon to lead the charge.

But British American Tobacco accused the former health minister of a stunt in bringing to Australia anti-smoking lobbyist Matthew Myers to stir up the states and distract attention from a High Court battle over plain packaging laws.

South Australian Health Minister John Hill yesterday met with Mr Myers, a lawyer who advised 50 US state attorneys-general in lawsuits against Big Tobacco for smoking-related healthcare costs in the late 1990s.

Mr Myers, who this week also met the NSW and Victorian governments, impressed Mr Hill, who said South Australia would back the real possibility of individual suits or a class action by states against tobacco companies.

Mr Hill said Ms Roxon, as the new attorney-general, would be expected to take a leadership role in bringing other states on board for any legal action.

“I think legal action is worth exploring,” he told The Australian yesterday.

“The reality for us is we know that one in two people who are long-term smokers are going to die from smoking, and lung cancers for example cost the health system buckets of money, so why shouldn’t those who cause this be responsible for paying for it?

“Australia is not that different from America in common law.

“If you can make the connection between smoking and related diseases, and if tobacco companies are prepared to compensate in another jurisdiction,” legal action should be considered.

South Australia would be prepared to offer resources in any legal fight, he said.

Ms Roxon yesterday refused to answer questions about the cost to taxpayers of bringing Mr Myers to Australia, referring The Australian to the Health Department.

A department spokeswoman said: “Minister Roxon invited Mr Myers to Australia at a time when tobacco companies are bringing litigation against the Australian government, to share his extensive experience in tobacco-related litigation with the Australian government and with interested state and territory governments.”

It is understood that it is too early to know the full costs of Mr Myers’ taxpayer funded trip.

A spokeswoman for Ms Roxon said the minister was “heartened by the support of such an esteemed anti-tobacco expert”.

Customs seizes 1,400 kilogrammes of illicit tobacco (with photos)

http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201112/14/P201112140383.htm

Hong Kong Customs last week seized 72 parcels containing around 900 kilogrammesof illicit tobacco at the Airmail Centre, which was waiting to be airmailed to the United Kingdom.

This morning (December 14), after in-depth investigations, Customs officers cracked down on an illicit tobacco storage centre inside an industrial building in Kwai Chung and arrested three men. During the operation, a total of 1,400kilogrammes of illicit tobacco valued at about $3.9 million with a duty potential of $2.4 million was seized.

Customs officers first seized some 900 kilogrammes of illicit tobacco from the 72 parcels destined for the United Kingdom. The seizures were worth about $2.5 million, with a duty potential of about $1.4 million.

After investigation, it was found that the smugglers had attempted to send the illicit tobacco by airmail, and tried to avoid the Customs investigation by posting the parcels at different post offices.

Following further investigation, Customs officers today cracked down on an illicit tobacco storage centre inside an industrial building in Kwai Chung with the arrest of three men, aged between 33 and 49. Two of them were preparing to send parcels containing tobacco by airmail.

Some 500 kilogrammes of illicit tobacco valued at $1.4 million with a duty potential of $1 million were seized at the storage centre. The three men were detained for further investigation.

To deter smuggling activities by airmail, officers of the Customs Airport Command inspect inbound and outbound airmail using advanced equipment such as X-ray machines and ion scanners. The Customs also maintain intelligence exchange with overseas counterparts to fight against smuggling activities.

The department reminded members of the public that using airmail for illicit purposes is an offence and will be prosecuted.

Under the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance, anyone involved in dealing with, possession, selling and buying of illicit cigarettes or tobacco commits an offence. The maximum penalty on conviction is imprisonment for two years and a fine of $1 million.

Hong Kong Customs will spare no effort in combating illicit cigarette or tobacco activities. Members of the public are urged to report any such activities to the Customs’ 24-hour hotline 2545 6182 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 2545 6182end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

Ends/Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Issued at HKT 21:21
PhotoPhoto
NNNN