Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

Investments

Japan’s JT Buys 40% Stake In Ethiopian Tobacco Monopoly For A Record $510M

http://afkinsider.com/129796/129796/

Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT), the seller of Camel and Winston cigarettes outside the U.S., announced on Sunday it had won a bid to buy 40 percent of the National Tobacco Enterprise S.C. from the Ethiopian government for a record $510 million.

JT said in a press release (in Japanese) that it has signed a share purchase agreement of $510 million with the Ethiopian Government for 40% of the total shares in the country’s tobacco monopoly after submitting a successful bid last May.

“The JT Group is delighted to be entering the Ethiopian market where we currently have no presence,” said Mutsuo Iwai, executive vice president and president of the tobacco business.

“Ethiopia will be an important expansion of our geographic footprint in emerging markets. As the largest shareholder, we expect to be able to exert significant influence over the direction of the company. The country is currently experiencing double-digit economic growth, with industry volume also expected to continue to increase.” Iwai added.

The more than half a billion dollar bid by the publicly listed Japanese company was the highest offer ever made for any Ethiopian state-owned enterprise, Addis Fortune reported.

It was more than double its closest rival British American Tobacco – maker of brands such as Rothmans and Dunhill, which offered $230 million for the same stake, Bloomberg reported in May.

Other companies that were involved in the bid included Phillip Morris International, known for Marlboro and a Chinese company—China Logistics Company Ltd. They were among the five bidders, including an unnamed individual from Niger.

The National Tobacco Enterprise S.C., a company established in 1942 as the Imperial Ethiopian Tobacco Monopoly, is one of the four public companies the Ethiopian government said it will privatize in 2016.

The country’s Ministry of Enterprises said in March it plans to sell some of governments shareholding in Bahir Dar Textile S.C., Kombolcha Textile S.C., National Tobacco Enterprise S.C. and Ethiopian Crown Cork and Can Manufacturing Industry S.C.

National Tobacco Enterprise S.C. was first privatized in 2008 when 22 percent of its shares were sold to a Yemeni company, Sheba Ethiopia Investment Plc, for $35 million.

Sheba’s bid to beef up its share by 20 percent was however disqualified after its representatives arrived late for the bid opening meeting in May, Addis Fortune reported.

With JT’s purchase Sheba’s stake in the Ethiopian company is now valued at $255 million, seven times the amount they paid in 2008.

In 2012, Ethiopia offered to sell over 40 public enterprises, including several large farms, a winery and a big hotel, over the next three years, Reuters reported.

While it managed to sell some firms, several other still remain unsold due to lack of interest from foreign investors.

Up in Smoke: Why China has Banned Foreign Investment in Tobacco

China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) recently announced regulations barring foreign investment in the country’s enormous tobacco industry, blocking foreign-invested enterprises and individual businesses from participating in tobacco wholesale, retail, and alternative forms of trading. These new restrictions come on the heels of various government efforts to reduce China’s rampant tobacco use, with middling results to date.

http://www.chinabusinessreview.com/up-in-smoke-why-china-has-banned-foreign-investment-in-tobacco/

By Alexander Chipman Koty

China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) recently announced regulations barring foreign investment in the country’s enormous tobacco industry, blocking foreign-invested enterprises and individual businesses from participating in tobacco wholesale, retail, and alternative forms of trading. These new restrictions come on the heels of various government efforts to reduce China’s rampant tobacco use, with middling results to date.

There are more than 320 million smokers in China, making it the world’s largest producer and consumer of tobacco products. While comprising about 20 percent of the world’s population, China is responsible for 45 percent of all cigarettes consumed globally. With an ageing population, a shrinking workforce, and an increasingly prosperous society, China faces mounting pressure to look after the wellbeing of its constituents, but that comes at a significant price.

Tobacco cessation products and healthcare services stand to benefit from increased supervision of the tobacco industry. Although China is moving toward regulation, wavering government commitment because of the industry’s huge profitability and deep-seated use within society stand in the way of stamping out tobacco’s pervasive presence. The country remains a challenging market for tobacco cessation products and services.

Tobacco use in China

Tobacco use is firmly entrenched in Chinese society, with applications ranging from day-to-day use to deeper cultural practices. Usage is starkly divided between the sexes — 68 percent of Chinese men smoke, compared to only 3.2 percent of women. However, all are exposed to the negative health effects of smoking. Ineffective smoking restrictions in indoor and public places such as restaurants and offices means about 740 million Chinese are exposed to secondhand smoke. As a result of widespread tobacco use and the country’s issues with pollution, China has the most lung cancer diagnoses and fatalities in the world.

Social pressure for men to smoke is significant; those who refuse cigarettes are often met with curious looks and the offerer loses face. In China, offering cigarettes is a symbolic way of establishing trust and forming relationships, particularly among strangers. Similarly to the deep-rooted drinking culture among business people, expensive cigarettes and tobacco products are commonly presented as gifts, and there is often pressure to smoke with coworkers and business partners. Compounded with these practices are ill-informed myths and misconceptions about tobacco, including beliefs that Asians are less susceptible to tobacco’s negative health effects, that it is easy to quit, and that smoking is an ancient part of Chinese culture, according to the Lancet medical journal.

Government involvement in the tobacco industry

The Chinese tobacco market is dominated by the China National Tobacco Corporation (CNTC), a state-owned enterprise (SOE) that is responsible for 98 percent of all cigarettes sold in China. The CNTC owns more than 900 brands, from large ones such as Hong Shuangxi, Yun Yan, and Zhongnanhai, to smaller regional brands and derivatives. The CNTC’s state monopoly has made the penetration of foreign brands largely unsuccessful, and only a small number of them have been manufactured in China. Foreign companies are only able to manufacture and sell their tobacco products through a joint venture with the CTNC. For example, Marlboro, one of the world’s largest tobacco brands, only started manufacturing in China in 2008 after coming to an agreement with the CNTC to promote Chinese brands overseas.

Government restriction of foreign competition is largely explained by tobacco’s extraordinary profitability. Further, restricting foreign companies’ access to China increases the CNTC’s leverage to access international markets and compete with established brands. An incredible 7-10 percent of all government revenue is through tobacco sales, giving the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA) vast power. Chinese Premier Li Keqiang’s younger brother headed the STMA until February 2015, demonstrating its stature. While the long-term costs of medical services and premature losses of workers is higher than immediate profits, it is difficult for the government to jettison a steady source of revenue by committing to tobacco dissuasion at a time when other streams are slowing.

The uneven implementation of recent reforms points to this reluctance. The government issued a draft law for public consultation in late 2014 banning smoking in all indoor places and some outdoor ones, as well as restricting advertising, and in 2015 raised taxes on wholesale cigarettes from 5 to 11 percent. However, the government ultimately backtracked on many of its initial proposals, allowing restaurants, bars, hotels, and airports to have smoking sections and allowing smoking in individual offices. Combined with infrequent enforcement of existing restrictions, the laws do little to dissuade smoking.

The tobacco cessation market

Government efforts to discourage smoking, however halfhearted, combined with China’s massive smoking population offer immense but difficult-to-grasp potential for tobacco cessation products.

Tobacco cessation products encounter a variety of challenges when attempting to penetrate the Chinese market. Nicotine patches are the most popular cessation product in China; other products with varying degrees of scientific credibility that are also used include e-cigarettes, toothpaste, cigarette holders, and Chinese medicines. Product use is low. In 2014, Johnson & Johnson stopped selling its leading Nicorette product there due to poor sales. Other companies like Pfizer and Novartis have entered the Chinese market calculating a long timeframe before costs can be recovered. Despite the lack of profits, foreign pharmaceutical companies face relatively little competition, as Venturepharm is the only Chinese company producing tobacco cessation medication.

Although e-cigarettes are often marketed as an anti-smoking product, many dispute this, arguing that they are just as bad, or even worse than regular cigarettes. Regardless, there is little awareness of e-cigarettes in China, and those who use them generally do so as a fashion statement. While about 90 percent of the world’s e-cigarettes are made in the southern city of Shenzhen, almost all are exported to foreign markets. The e-cigarette industry is currently unregulated, but the National Health and Family Planning Commission has stated its intent to regulate production, sale, and use of e-cigarettes.

The disappointing performance of tobacco cessation products is in part explained by high costs. E-cigarettes in China are decidedly more expensive than regular cigarettes, and a full round of medication costs upward of RMB 2,000. The deeper cause of the tobacco cessation industry’s poor performance is the lack of awareness and desire for smokers to quit. Fewer than 25 percent of Chinese adults understand the specific health hazards of tobacco use. Additionally, fewer than 10 percent of Chinese smokers quit by choice, in comparison to more than 50 percent in many high-income countries where there are more former smokers than smokers.

Observations

China is slowly addressing its tobacco problem. In 2015, cigarette sales in China declined for the first time in two decades, demonstrating some success in smoking dissuasion. However, this is mostly due to higher taxes curtailing frequent use, rather than reducing the number of individual smokers.

As is commonplace for foreign investors doing business in emerging economies, the specter of SOEs such as the CNTC often complicates business. Vested interests ranging from pure profits to sprawling bureaucracies and payrolls to corruption in the form of kickbacks make it difficult for foreign companies to compete with SOEs who benefit from preferential treatment. This phenomenon has tragic consequences in China’s tobacco industry, where the state’s lucrative monopoly hinders efforts to curb tobacco use, resulting in exploding cancer rates and premature deaths.

While China presents an enormous opportunity for tobacco cessation products, success will be difficult to achieve without genuine government efforts to spread awareness of tobacco’s adverse health effects. With growing healthcare costs and productivity losses, however, China is gradually moving toward tighter control of tobacco use. Although China is not yet primed for tobacco cessation products, it is a question of time before the public comes to grips with the ramifications of its smoking habit, making it essential for producers to create an entry strategy.

About the author: This article originally appeared in China Briefing, a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN. For further information, please emailchina@dezshira.com or visit www.dezshira.com.

Letter on $110 million funding cut for CDC and OSH

Download (PDF, 942KB)

Pharmalutions Pte Ltd – German-owned, Singapore-based

Download (PDF, 7.24MB)

Cancer Research UK widely criticised over scientist pensions invested in tobacco

http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/finance/news/content/21870/pensions_of_cruk_scientists_invested_in_tobacco_industry

Cancer Research UK has been the subject of critical articles in a number of newspapers after the pension schemes of scientists they fund were found to be heavily invested in the tobacco industry.

The latest accounts of the UK’s leading provider of academic pensions, the Universities Superannuation Scheme, show that more than £200m was invested by USS in British American Tobacco (BAT) in the year to March 2015.

However while CRUK provides money to fund scientists’ salaries, including pensions, it cannot control where universities invest those pensions.

One anonymous scientist working for CRUK said she was “horrified” to learn that her money was invested in an industry that was causing the disease she was trying to cure.

“This means that, even if only indirectly through our time and labour, Cancer Research UK money is being invested in growing and supporting the tobacco industry,” she told the Guardian.

“The idea that we all have our pension invested in British American Tobacco is outrageous.

“All the work of this institute is done under the guidance of Cancer Research UK, and we are, quite rightly, regularly reviewed to ensure that [charity] money is being spent effectively and efficiently in the global fight against cancer.

“How can this possibly be in line with the fact that most of us will retire comfortably on money earned from tobacco investments?”

Yesterday, Alison Cox, director of cancer prevention for CRUK, told Civil Society News the charity was making efforts to encourage pension schemes to end investment in tobacco.

“Tobacco is responsible for one in four cancer deaths. To help make it easier for organisations’ pension schemes to opt out of tobacco shares, we’re now funding the UK arm of Tobacco Free Portfolios to encourage investment funds to end investment in tobacco. AXA’s move earlier this week to withdraw billions in investment from the tobacco industry shows what can be done,” she said.

“Pensions are complex and what we want to see is a clearer choice for people, no matter where they are employed, to have easy options of not investing in tobacco.”

This morning, USS told Civil Society News it was an “active and responsible shareowner” – an approach its “trustees believe will protect and enhance the long-tern value of the fund”.

“In order to ensure appropriate diversification we invest in a wide range of companies and assets,” a spokeswoman for the organisation said.

“We have a significant in-house Responsible Investment team and work with the companies in which we invest to improve ethical, environmental and governance standards, in the best financial interest of our members and beneficiaries.

“In recent times, this has included engaging with tobacco companies on marketing approaches and regulations around e-cigarettes. The trustees keep the approach under review,” she said.

Cigarette brands owned by British American Tobacco include Lucky Strike, Pall Mall and Benson & Hedges.

Revealed: UK cancer research pensions investing millions in British American Tobacco

Pension plans for scientists working at Cancer Research UK are among those to have invested in British American Tobacco to the tune of £211 million (US$308 million).
The fund, which caters for university lecturers and staff, is worth just shy of £50 billion. Its biggest investment is in the equally-controversial Royal Dutch Shell company, with £344 million going to the latter, reported The Guardian.

News that Cancer Research UK money has essentially been used to both fight the effects of smoking and fund the tobacco industry comes as a shock to many.

A Universities UK spokesperson defended the choice of investments of the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), insisting financial return takes precedence over the moral dilemmas raised.

“The USS, as part of its investment duties, takes into account wider social, ethical, and environmental and governance issues, so long as that ensures that the assets of the scheme are invested in the best financial interests of members and their beneficiaries,” they said.

Earlier this year the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) called on people and companies to stop investing in tobacco.

“For decades, it has actively sought to mislead the world about the harms caused by its products. It has corrupted public officials, been complicit in illicit activities such as smuggling, and has undermined legislation to protect the health of the public,” read the statement.

EUPHA President Professor Martin McKee added that “it is simply unacceptable that USS should continue to invest in this discredited industry.”

Cancer Research UK Tobacco Policy Manager George Butterworth admitted he was unhappy with the investment situation but insisted the Tobacco Free Portfolios movement shows that things can change.

“The tobacco industry’s deadly products are responsible for one in four cancer deaths. Many people would be shocked to learn that their pensions are invested in tobacco company shares – especially those striving to develop cures for diseases caused by this lethal industry,” Butterworth said.

“Cancer Research UK’s own pension funds are tobacco-free, but many of our researchers are based at institutions where that is not the case,” he added.

“To help make it easier for organisations’ pension schemes to opt out of tobacco shares, we’re now funding the UK arm of Tobacco Free Portfolios to encourage investment funds to divest from tobacco stocks. AXA’s move earlier this week to withdraw billions in investment from the tobacco industry shows what can be done.”

Scientists trying to cure cancer have pensions invested in tobacco industry

CLEAR THE AIR SAYS:

HOW MUCH MONEY HAS HK GOVERNMENT IN TOBACCO RELATED INVESTMENTS?
HOW MUCH MONEY HAVE MPF TRUSTEES’ DO-AS-YOU-WISH GOVT UNREGULATED UNETHICAL FUNDS IN TOBACCO RELATED INVESTMENTS?
HOW MUCH MONEY HAVE HK UNIVERSITIES IN TOBACCO RELATED INVESTMENTS?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/29/scientists-trying-to-cure-cancer-have-pensions-invested-in-tobac/

Scientists funded by are among thousands of academics with pensions invested in the tobacco industry, it has emerged.

The pension fund for university staff owned £211 million in British American Tobacco as of March 2015, its fifth biggest equity holding.

Cancer Research UK ensures that its employees’ pension funds free of tobacco industry investments.

Many people would be shocked to learn that their pensions are invested in tobacco company sharesGeorge Butterworth, Cancer Research UK

However, the charity funds many full-time academic posts at British universities whose pensions are invested through the Universities Superannuation scheme (USS), worth £49 billion in 2015.

Universities UK, which represents vice-chancellors and principals, said the USS was a responsible investor, but public health campaigners argue it is not possible to reform the tobacco industry and have called on investors to dump their holdings.

The tobacco investment has come as a shock to many researchers, academics and staff, many of whom have spent their working lives searching for cancer cures.

George Butterworth, Cancer Research UK’s tobacco policy manager, said: “The tobacco industry’s deadly products are responsible for one in four cancer deaths.

“Many people would be shocked to learn that their pensions are invested in tobacco company shares – especially those striving to develop cures for diseases caused by this lethal industry.

“To help make it easier for organizations’ pension schemes to opt out of tobacco shares, we’re now funding the UK arm of Tobacco Free Portfolios to encourage investment funds to divest form tobacco stocks.”

However, Universities UK defended its pension strategy.

“USS, as part of its investment duties, takes into account wider social, ethical, and environmental and governance issues, so long as that ensures that the assets of the scheme are invested in the best financial interest of members and their beneficiaries,” said a spokesman.

“USS is also a responsible and engaged investor.

“They have for example, undertaken engagement with tobacco companies on marketing approaches and regulations around e-cigarettes.”

Imperial has £2.3 million invested in tobacco firms via endowment

Investments are indirect but clash with college’s cancer research efforts

http://felixonline.co.uk/news/6194/-imperial-has-23-million-invested-in-tobacco-firms-via-endowment/

This week FELIX revealed that the college has significant investments in several tobacco firms, as part of its endowment portfolio.

Overall, Imperial has invested just under £2.4 million across several tobacco firms, via several equity and hedge funds.

Our findings, made via a Freedom of Information request, show that although Imperial was not investing directly in any tobacco firms, three funds it was paying significant amounts of money into did have tobacco firms in their top ten holdings.

This is somewhat surprising considering Imperial’s long term partnership with Cancer Research UK, the college’s substantial research department dedicated to lung cancer and the fact that eighteen different Imperial departments form part of Imperial’s cancer network, aiming to research and cure the disease.

The firms we’re indirectly investing in include Imperial Brands, who make Camel cigarettes, British American, who produce Lucky Strikes, and Philip Morris, who manufacture the world’s most smoked cigarette – Malboros.

Imperial is investing just over £18 million across three investment funds that have holdings in the tobacco industry, and those are just the ones who were open with where their money goes. FELIX looked at the percentage these funds were investing in tobacco to work out how much of our cash has gone to the controversial corporations.

The £2,384,327.09 that FELIX calculated Imperial is investing in these firms is just a fraction of the £201 million or so the college has invested as part of its total endowment.

Other universities, such as Edinburgh, have divested from tobacco firms, after it was pointed out that the university’s research efforts clashed with such investments.

A college spokesperson told FELIX: “It is College policy to neither undertake research to develop or promote tobacco products, nor to directly invest in tobacco companies.”

“Where the College delegates investment decisions to its external fund managers, they are instructed not to directly invest in tobacco companies.”

“Some of their investments are, however, in managed funds. The College and its external fund managers have no control over the composition of those funds, which change on a continual basis. The College Endowment Board has a responsibility to optimise investment return to support Imperial’s academic mission but continues to keep its policies under review, which includes looking at ways to avoid even indirect investment in tobacco.”

Investor mixes tobacco with lung clinics

http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/conflict-of-interest-_investor-mixes-tobacco-with-lung-clinics/42179148

A South African investment group has been strongly criticised for maintaining a controlling stake in a Swiss private hospital group, which treats patients for lung diseases, whilst at the same time investing funds in a tobacco firm.

The Swiss Lungenliga, an association that campaigns against the tobacco industry, has questioned whether the Hirslanden Group of private clinics is free to take an active stand against smoking while it is under the control of the investment vehicle Remgro.

Remgro is controlled by the South African Rupert family which initially made its money from tobacco and currently holds a stake in British American Tobacco, makers of the Lucky Strike and Parisienne cigarette brands. Since 2007, Remgro has owned Hirslanden’s parent company Mediclinic International.

“I find it extremely disturbing when such opposing interests are housed under the same roof,” Swiss Lungenliga director Sonja Bietenhard told the Nordwestschweiz newspaper. “I find it cynical and an ethical contradiction of the highest level.”

“Can [Hirslanden] fully engage in [helping people] stop smoking? Can it continue to criticise tobacco manufacturers? These are the questions I would like answered.”

Both Hirslanden and Remgro have declined to comment to the media. In 2007, shortly after taking over Mediclinic, the Mediclinic Chairman Edwin Hertzog told the Neue Zürcher Zeitung newspaper: “Smoking is a matter of personal choice.”

Smoking-related deaths

There is evidence that Hirslanden has continued to speak out against smoking since Remgro took over in 2007. For example, Karl Klingler, a specialist at Hirslanden’s lung clinic in Zurich penned a media article in 2012 with the headline “Stopping Smoking is the Best Medicine”. The article spelled out the health risks of smoking.

Since 1998, Hirslanden has run a clinic in Zurich with the express aim of helping people to quit smoking. That clinic is still operational.

But this has not assuaged the concerns of Lungenliga’s Bietenhard, who believes commercial interests have overridden health and ethical considerations. “From an economic perspective, I have some understanding for the investor who is only interested in making money,” she said ironically.

Last November, the Swiss health ministry produced a study on cancer that revealed that 9,500 people died of smoking-related illnesses in 2012, a figure that made up 15% of all recorded deaths in the country in that year.

While the number of deaths linked to tobacco products declined 13% in men between 1995 and 2012, the corresponding mortality rate of women rose 58%, the study revealed.

At the same time as the report’s publication, Health Minister Alain Berset put forward proposals to ban tobacco sales to under-18s and place restrictions of tobacco advertising. On May 1, 2010 Switzerland imposed a ban on smoking in public places to protect non-smokers from the effects of passive smoking.

Why does health insurer AXA have €1.8 billion invested in tobacco?

http://www.businessrevieweurope.eu/finance/865/Why-does-health-insurer-AXA-have-18-billion-invested-in-tobacco

It may come as a surprise to discover that AXA, one of the largest providers of health and life insurance, has €1.8 billion in assets in the smoking/tobacco industry.

The French insurance company has revealed it is planning to sell its tobacco assets, citing the impact it has on public health.

A sensible move, but why invest so heavily in an industry that is sure to contribute to health and life insurance pay outs? The fact that AXA admits the divestment will cost the company reveals that it was a profitable venture, despite the obvious connection between smoking and ill health. A change of hearth, it seems, is behind the decision.

Chief Executive Thomas Buberl said in a company statement: “We strongly believe in the positive role insurance can play in society, and that insurers are part of the solution when it comes to health prevention to protect our clients. Hence, it makes no sense for us to continue our investments within the tobacco industry.

“With this divestment from tobacco, we are doing our share to support the efforts of governments around the world. This decision has a cost for us, but the case for divestment is clear: the human cost of tobacco is tragic; its economic cost is huge. As a major investor and a leading health insurer, the AXA Group wants to be part of the solution, and our hope is that others in our industry will do the same.”

AXA will sell its equity holdings in tobacco companies and will stop all new investments, running off its existing bond holdings. The move should be welcomed, and has already been praised by health groups.

AXA released the below infogrpahic with the annoucement:

077bc8b7a5a332735db3c4f1fd12ac5ad07b7a29_axa_tabac-gb09