Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

November 1st, 2012:

Letter: Tobacco interests own Berg

http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/379151/group/Opinion/

blished November 01, 2012, 11:32 PM

Letter: Tobacco interests own Berg

A national group that tracks tobacco’s political influence, Action on Smoking and Health, reports that Rep. Rick Berg, R-N.D., has accepted $18,000 in campaign contributions from the tobacco industry.

By: Becky Anderson, Fargo, INFORUM

A national group that tracks tobacco’s political influence, Action on Smoking and Health, reports that Rep. Rick Berg, R-N.D., has accepted US$18,000 in campaign contributions from the tobacco industry. The tobacco industry is not just any business. It is a manipulative business that pushes a highly addictive product that, when used as intended, kills.

The latest surgeon general’s report states that 80 percent of adult smokers begin smoking by age 18 and that tobacco companies spend billions of dollars promoting cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Much of this promotion is designed to attract new users from the ranks of children and young adults so they become addicted early and make them customers for life. One-third of the kids who keep smoking into adulthood will die prematurely from smoking.

As a respiratory therapist, I see the daily suffering of adults who started smoking as kids. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is the third-leading cause of death in this country, and smoking is by far the most common risk factor for causing this chronic disease. Eighty to 90 percent of all people diagnosed with COPD are either current or former smokers. The link between tobacco use and disease has been well-known for 50 years.

Surely, Berg knows that tobacco use costs North Dakota hundreds of lives and millions of tax payer dollars each year in tobacco-related health care costs. Tobacco companies put profits over human life. By taking a tobacco contribution, Berg is directly benefiting from tobacco’s addiction of our residents and of our kids in particular. This, in my opinion, should disqualify Berg from representing North Dakotans

http://ash.org/map/

see who is getting paid by Big Tobacco

http://ash.org/big-tobacco-buys-big-political-influence/

Customs swoops on telephone-order illicit cigarette activities

Hong Kong Customs has conducted special anti-illicit cigarette operations targeting the telephone ordering of illicit cigarettes over the past seven months and has seized about 3 million sticks of illicit cigarettes with a total value of about $7.2 million and a duty potential of $5.2 million.

Acting on intelligence analysis and investigation, Customs found most of the illicit cigarettes offenders had used telephone ordering to sell illicit cigarettes and distributed leaflets in public housing estates to the targeted customers.

Officers of the Customs’ Telephone Order Task Unit subsequently took enforcement actions and effected a total of 96 cases via telephone order from April to October. During the period, Customs officers arrested 119 persons aged from 18 to 73, including 61 illicit cigarette buyers. Forty-one vehicles suspected to be involved in delivering illicit cigarettes were also seized.

The Divisional Commander (Anti-Illicit-Cigarette Investigation) of the Revenue and General Investigation Bureau, Mr Wan Hing-chuen , said today (November 2) at a press conference, “Under the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance, both buying and selling illicit cigarettes are illegal. The maximum penalty is a fine of $1 million and imprisonment for two years.”

Mr Wan also said that if flats at public housing estates were found to be involved in illicit cigarette activities, Customs would notify the Housing Department for follow up action after the conclusion of court proceedings.

In the first ten months of this year, Customs detected 14 significant smuggling cases and smashed 208 illicit cigarette distribution centres, resulting in the seizure of a total of 55 million sticks of illicit cigarettes valued at $135 million.

Customs will continue to closely monitor the situation and conduct stringent enforcement actions against illicit cigarette activities.

Members of the public are urged to report any suspected illicit cigarette activities on the Customs’ hotline at 2545 6182.

Ends/Friday, November 2, 2012
Issued at HKT 17:29

NNNN

The tobacco industry is costing the Scottish economy £1.1 billion a year

http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/letters/the-tobacco-industry-is-costing-the-scottish-economy-11-billion-a-year.19289931

ANDREW McKie is right to point out that pension scheme investments in tobacco companies stand at odds with the promotion of public health (“Don’t confuse consumer choice with ethical issues”, The Herald, October 29).

ANDREW McKie is right to point out that pension scheme investments in tobacco companies stand at odds with the promotion of public health (“Don’t confuse consumer choice with ethical issues”, The Herald, October 29).

CUSTOM BYLINE TEXT:

He is however wrong when he says that tobacco taxation underwrites public health. Our Up in Smoke report showed that with the combined costs of healthcare, loss in productivity, litter and fires brought about by smoking, tobacco actually costs the Scottish economy almost £1.1 billion a year – around £129 million more than the tax revenue it generates.

In choosing tobacco to illustrate his argument against Government “interference” he has in fact chosen badly. Intervening to prevent this addictive and deadly substance being promoted to young people, or to protect bystanders from the harm caused by second-hand smoke, are valid actions for politicians to take. Unfortunately for Andrew McKie’s argument, people in Scotland understand the need for this approach – with support for the Government’s introduction of smoke-free public places now at around 83%, including a majority of Scotland’s smokers.

In choosing tobacco to illustrate his argument against Government “interference” he has in fact chosen badly.

Intervening to prevent this addictive and deadly substance being promoted to young people, or to protect bystanders from the harm caused by second-hand smoke, are valid actions for politicians to take.

Unfortunately for Andrew McKie’s argument, people in Scotland understand the need for this approach – with support for the Government’s introduction of smoke-free public places now at around 83%, including a majority of Scotland’s smokers.

Sheila Duffy,

Chief executive,

ASH Scotland,

8 Frederick Street,

Edinburgh

UK income stars cut tobacco as regulatory threat emerges

http://www.investmentweek.co.uk/investment-week/news/2220304/uk-income-stars-cut-tobacco-as-regulatory-threat-emerges

Top UK equity income managers have been cutting their weighting in tobacco stocks as concerns over earnings momentum and new rules on plain packaging put pressure on share prices.

Tobacco firms, which are among the top performing of all UK-listed companies over the last decade, have become income staples for many investors.

While other income stocks have suffered catastrophes in recent years – banks were badly hit by the credit crisis, while BP lost more than 50% of its value after the Gulf of Mexico disaster – tobaccos have continued to perform strongly for income funds.

As a result, the equity income sector’s leading lights continue to hold the stocks in abundance, with British American Tobacco (BAT) appearing among the top 10 of 44% of funds in the UK Equity Income sector, according to data from FE.

Managers’ positions in tobacco stocks have paid off as British American Tobacco produced a total return of 661.44% over the last 10 years, while Imperial Tobacco returned 230.54%, according to Morningstar.

Tobacco features heavily in the largest of all the income funds, making up 15.5% in Invesco Perpetual’s £9bn Income fund, and 16% in the £12bn High Income fund, both run by Neil Woodford.

However, managers are now starting to turn against the sector on fears over the impact of new regulation.

PSigma’s Bill Mott, as well as Liontrust’s Stephen Bailey and RLAM’s Martin Cholwill, have significantly cut their tobacco holdings in recent weeks.

Australia, a key market for cigarette manufacturers, is bringing in plain packaging rules in December, meaning brand names will be removed from packets, and other countries are poised to follow suit.

The move means brand loyalty – and therefore reliable income streams – could come under pressure, and managers have reacted by scaling back exposure to the sector.

Bailey and co-manager Jan Luthman of Liontrust have halved their exposure to tobacco in the last six months as they feel there has been a hardening of attitudes towards smoking worldwide.

Bailey said this is happening even in places where smoking is culturally acceptable, such as Russia and Indonesia.

“We can see further bans being imposed on a global basis in future, and we have seen the issues such as plain packaging which have arisen in Australia.

“There are very few small to medium tobacco companies available worldwide as most of them have already been acquired, meaning the earnings momentum such acquisitions has created is perhaps coming to an end,” he said.

“We would argue there are quite a few headwinds facing the tobacco companies and, quite frankly, there are better places to be exposed to.”

At the end of August there was just over 8% in tobacco in the pair’s Macro Equity Income fund, but this has been cut to 5% and both BAT and Imperial have fallen out of the pair’s top ten.

Mott, who runs the £393m Income fund, has cut back his holding in BAT to 3.5%, down from 4.4% at the start of the year and is now underweight against the index “for the first time in recent memory”.

“The latest assault is the introduction of plain packaging in Australia, and other countries are likely to follow Australia’s lead,” he said.

“While regulation in the industry is not new, and companies have been masters at pushing prices up to cover volume declines, this gets harder as prices go ever higher.

“Even though smoking is addictive, customers cannot be totally price insensitive. At today’s prices in the UK of over £8 a pack, even the well-heeled must baulk at the price.”

Cholwill is also pulling back and said BAT in particular no longer represents good value for income funds as its yield is declining.

Following a strong run up in price, he said BAT’s yield is only at a slight premium to the broader stock market, and with yet more regulation on the cards, he is cutting back his exposure.

“Historically it has always been on a decent yield premium and actually with the shares having performed well, the yield has slipped,”Cholwill said.

BAT’s dividend grew around 9% last year but consensus growth forecasts for this year have fallen to just over 6%. Meanwhile, Imperial’s dividend grew by 11.5% last year, but this too is predicted to come down in 2012.

“Tobacco companies are usually bought for their defensive merits and resilient qualities in difficult economic times. If they are suffering downgrades, that to me is a bit of a flag, as are a number of changes in overseas markets,” Cholwill added.

The stocks still offer a defensive yield however, and some managers – particularly those who were running underweight positions – have been tempted back by the perceived safety they offer.

Adrian Frost, manager of the £4.5bn Artemis Income fund, considerably reduced his holding in BAT throughout the summer, but has recently been buying back in.

“We repurchased some of the BAT position after a period of lacklustre performance. Yield continues to look attractive, relative to other assets,” he said.

Threadneedle’s Richard Colwell, who manages the £1.48bn UK Equity Income fund with Leigh Harrison, also took some profits from BAT earlier in the year, but the duo is not concerned about plain packaging.

“Our central assumption is that plain packaging will spread to more markets, in particular New Zealand, the UK and France.

However, we do not believe this poses a threat to the future earnings of tobacco companies,” Colwell said. “Imperial trades on a P/E of 11x and BAT on 14x; both offer high single digit earnings growth and high, sustainable dividend yields.”

Key Points

Plain packaging

Australia is going to implement its plain packaging law as of 1 December 2012, making it the first country in the world to require tobacco products to be sold in this way.

The new packaging removes brand colours and logos and will be covered in graphic images warning of the consequences of smoking.

Many other countries such as New Zealand, India, the UK and even some states in the US have been contemplating taking similar measures in a bid to reduce the number of smokers.

Russian Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev has also voiced support for a proposed ban on public smoking by 2015 in Russia, where close to a third of the population smokes

Read more: http://www.investmentweek.co.uk/investment-week/news/2220304/uk-income-stars-cut-tobacco-as-regulatory-threat-emerges#ixzz2B1mBHunn

© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093.

UK cigarette prices 2012

Download PDF : UK cigarette prices

The Role of Public Policies in Reducing Smoking:

http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(12)00546-6/abstract

The Minnesota SimSmoke Tobacco Policy Model

AFFILIATIONS

  • ·        Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • ·        Address correspondence to: David T. Levy, PhD, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street NW, suite 4100, Washington DC 20007

,

AFFILIATIONS

  • ·        ClearWay MinnesotaSM, Minneapolis, Minnesota

,

AFFILIATIONS

  • ·        The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Washington DC
  • ·        Department of Health, Behavior and Society, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Background

Following the landmark lawsuit and settlement with the tobacco industry, Minnesota pursued the implementation of stricter tobacco control policies, including tax increases, mass media campaigns, smokefree air laws, and cessation treatment policies. Modeling is used to examine policy effects on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths.

Purpose

To estimate the effect of tobacco control policies in Minnesota on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths using the SimSmoke simulation model.

Methods

Minnesota data starting in 1993 are applied to SimSmoke, a simulation model used to examine the effect of tobacco control policies over time on smoking initiation and cessation. Upon validating the model against smoking prevalence, SimSmoke is used to distinguish the effect of policies implemented since 1993 on smoking prevalence. Using standard attribution methods, SimSmoke also estimates deaths averted as a result of the policies.

Results

SimSmoke predicts smoking prevalence accurately between 1993 and 2011. Since 1993, a relative reduction in smoking rates of 29% by 2011 and of 41% by 2041 can be attributed to tobacco control policies, mainly tax increases, smokefree air laws, media campaigns, and cessation treatment programs. Moreover, 48,000 smoking-attributable deaths will be averted by 2041.

Conclusions

Minnesota SimSmoke demonstrates that tobacco control policies, especially taxes, have substantially reduced smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. Taxes, smokefree air laws, mass media, cessation treatment policies, and youth-access enforcement contributed to the decline in prevalence and deaths averted, with the strongest component being taxes. With stronger policies, for example, increasing cigarette taxes to $4.00 per pack, Minnesota’s smoking rate could be reduced by another 13%, and 7200 deaths could be averted by 2041.