Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

October, 2011:

Current Smoking Rates Could Lead to Millions of TB Deaths

http://www.webmd.com/smoking-cessation/news/20111004/current-smoking-rates-could-lead-to-millions-of-tb-deaths

Oct. 4, 2011– If smoking is not controlled worldwide, the habit could produce 18 million newtuberculosis (TB) cases and 40 million deaths from TB between 2010 and 2050, according to a new study.

Tobacco and tuberculosis are linked, with tobacco smoking a risk factor for the disease.

The research is published online in the journal BMJ.

Researcher Sanjay Basu, MD, PhD, and his team created a mathematical model of TB epidemics. They wanted to compute the impact of tobacco on TB cases and deaths.

They plugged in the incidence of TB and deaths from it. They took into account changing trends in smoking, TB treatment, and other factors.

The completed model predicted that smoking, if not controlled, could produce the 18 million new TB cases and 40 million TB deaths. The number of TB cases would rise by 7%, from 256 million to 274 million. The number of TB deaths would increase by 66%, from 61 million to 101 million.

13 Best Quit-Smoking Tips Ever

Global Smoking Rates

Nearly one-fifth of the world’s population smokes, the researchers say. A moderate increase in individual risk, in this case, translates to a large risk in the population because so many people smoke.

The areas most likely to be affected by new TB cases linked to smoking include Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean, and Southeast Asia.

The researchers also estimated the effect of decreasing the use of tobacco. If smoking rates were aggressively lowered, the TB deaths linked to smoking could decrease by 27 million by 2050. Aggressive lowering was defined as a decrease of 1% per year, until smoking is eliminated.

Way to snuff out habit

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/10/4/focus/9623523&sec=focus

FOR centuries, tobacco has been considered an ideal consumer good for taxation.

The World Bank report 1999 showed how increased taxation affected the demand for cigarettes and other tobacco products.

It was found that demand for tobacco, while inelastic, was still strongly affected by its price.

On average, a price rise of 10% a pack of cigarettes would be expected to reduce demand for cigarettes by about 4% in high-income countries and by about 8% in low and middle income countries (Jha & Chaloupka, 1999).

In a local study done in 2004, the estimated cigarette price elasticity in Malaysia was 0.38. This means that every 10% increase in cigarette prices will result in a 3.8% decline in cigarette consumption (Nabilla, Ross & Zarihah, 2006).

This is a close estimate to the average price elasticity for developed countries which is 0.4.

The same study also showed the income elasticity of cigarette demand in Malaysia was estimated to be +10. This means that every 10% increase in income will lead to 10% increase in cigarette demand.

Another local study by Aljunid et al., (2006) found that the cost of treating lung cancer, ischemic heart disease (IHD) and chronic obstructive airway diseases (COAD) wasRM116mil, RM630mil and RM2.3bil, respectively.

It is estimated that in 2010, the cost of treating these three smoking-attributable causes of death increased to about RM4.1bil or 0.84% of the country’s GDP.

This translates to nearly 70% of the cost of treating these diseases being borne by the Government using mainly tax-payers money!

It can then be expected that the tobacco epidemic in Malaysia will spread with income growth if no stringent tobacco control measures are taken.

Increasing tax and price of tobacco products has been identified as an effective strategy to reduce tobacco demand and consumption, as outlined by Article 6 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), of which Malaysia is a signed member.

The World Bank Report recommended that in order for tobacco tax increase to be effective, the tax component of the price of a pack of cigarettes be between 2/3 and 4/5 (67 to 80%) of the retail cost.

Currently, tax makes up about 54% of the retail price of cigarettes sold in Malaysia. Thus, there is still much room to increase it to ensure that cigarettes become unaffordable, especially to the youth.

Therefore, if the Government is serious about tackling the tobacco epidemic, the next tax increase must be significant enough to be effective, not just a few sen per stick as previously seen.

Counter arguments from pro-tobacco sectors that the increase in cigarette price will lead to increased smuggling needs to be substantiated with solid evidence, not just based on reports from sources with vested interest.

After all, protecting the health and lives of the rakyat from tobacco epidemic should be the main priority of our policy makers.

ASSOC. PROF DR. M. HANIKI NIK MOHAMED,

Hon. Secretary,

Initiative of Malaysian Health Professionals’ Alliance on Cessation of Tobacco (IMPACT)

Cigarette plain-packaging plan is spreading to other tobacco products

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/cigarette-plain-packaging-plan-is-spreading-to-other-tobacco-products/story-fn7x8me2-1226157575894

tobacco

The proposed design for plain packaging of cigarettes released by Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon. Source:Supplied

CIGARS, cigarillos and loose and chewing tobacco are the next targets of the Federal Government’s plain-packaging campaign.

Health Minister Nicola Roxon yesterday released a consultation paper explaining how plain-packaging rules for tobacco products other than cigarettes would work.

Legislation requiring plain, olive green tobacco packaging is before Parliament.

This new consultation will help the Government develop regulations on how that legislation, once law, would apply to products other than cigarettes.

The consultation paper proposes that the packaging in which tobacco products are sold would be in the same colour, with no company branding or logos.

They would still have dominant and graphic health warnings.

Submissions on the proposals are open until October 28.

Net link: www.yourhealth.gov.au.

Tobacco law gets kick in the butt

http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/tobacco-law-gets-kick-in-the-butt-1.1149482

iol pic Cigarette oct 3

All cigarettes in South Africa will have to extinguish themselves automatically if the smoker does not puff after a few minutes, if an amendment to the tobacco act is passed.

The amendment, due to be introduced into the Tobacco Products Control Act from November next year, is aimed at reducing house fires caused by negligent smokers.

“Cigarettes cause 6 percent of fires in South Africa and are the leading cause of fires in homes,” said Dr Yussuf Saloojee, executive director of the National Council Against Smoking.

Retailers would have 18 months to get rid of old stock.

Also on the cards are more severe limitations on tobacco advertising. “Although tobacco advertising is illegal in South Africa, retailers still use posters in their shops to encourage customers to buy the products,” said Saloojee. “Retailers will still be allowed to sell tobacco products, but they must not advertise (them).”

The council and the Department of Health will host a workshop in Joburg on Wednesday to assess the Tobacco Products Control Act, “where we will review the current status of the amendment, such as how many people it affects, and the prevalence of it in South Africa”, said Saloojee.

The act, passed in 1993, aimed to regulate smoking in public places and ban tobacco sales to under-16s. Some aspects of advertising, such as labelling, were regulated.

The act was amended in 1999 and all advertising of tobacco products was banned, and laws regarding smoking in public became more severe. It was amended again in 2007, to bring it in line with international conventions.

Measuring the effect of cigarette plain packaging on transaction times and selection errors in a simulation experiment

http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2011/09/23/tobaccocontrol-2011-050087.abstract

Abstract

Introduction Australia has introduced legislation to force all cigarette packaging to be generic from 2012 onwards. The tobacco retail industry estimates this will result in transaction times increasing by 15–45 s per pack and is spending at least $A10 million of tobacco industry funds on an advertising campaigns claiming that the increased time and errors associated with plain packaging will ultimately cost small businesses $A461 million per annum and endanger 15 000 jobs. We undertook an objective experiment to test these claims.

Methodology Participants (n=52) were randomly assigned to stand in front of a display of either 50 plain or coloured cigarette packets and then were read a randomly ordered list of cigarette brands. The time participants took to locate each packet was recorded and all selection errors were noted. After 50 ‘transactions’, participants repeated the entire experiment with the alternative plain/coloured packs. Afterwards, participants were asked in an open-ended manner whether plain or coloured packaging was easier to locate and why.

Results The average transaction was significantly quicker for plain compared with coloured packs (2.92 vs 3.17 s; p=0.040). One or more mistakes were made by 40.4% of participants when selecting coloured packaging compared with only 17.3% for plain packaging (p=0.011). Qualitative results suggested that the colours and inconsistent location of brand names often served to distract when participants scanned for brands.

Conclusion Rather than plain packaging requiring an additional 45 s per transaction, our results suggest that it will, if anything, modestly decrease transaction times and selection errors.

Cigars to get plain packaging

http://bigpondnews.com/articles/Finance/2011/10/03/Cigars_to_get_plain_packaging_668868.html

Oct. 3, 2011

The Govt has released details of how plain-packaging would work for tobacco products other than cigarettes.

The Govt has released details of how plain-packaging would work for tobacco products other than cigarettes.

Cigars, cigarillos and loose and chewing tobacco are the next targets in the federal government’s plain-packaging campaign.

Health Minister Nicola Roxon on Monday released a consultation paper explaining how plain-packaging rules for tobacco products other than cigarettes would work.

Legislation requiring plain, olive green tobacco packaging is now before parliament.

This new consultation will help the government develop regulations on how that legislation, once law, would apply to products other than cigarettes.

The consultation paper proposes that the packaging tobacco products are sold in would be in the same colour with no company branding or logos.

They would still have dominant and graphic health warnings.

Ms Roxon said the government wanted the approach to plain packaging to be the same as far as possible across all tobacco products.

‘Whether you are talking about cigarettes, cigars or pipe tobacco, all are addictive and all are harmful,’ she said in a statement.

As many of these products are manufactured overseas, the government’s proposals would allow them to be imported without the plain packaging.

But they must be covered in the drab colour before they go on sale.

Options discussed for this include stickers that completely cover the product’s original packaging, or purpose-made sealed bags or cigar tubes.

Cigar bands would have to be removed, replaced or covered with a sticker.

The government proposes that brand names and variants could be printed on the plain packaging, as with cigarettes, or they could be handwritten on a white rectangle on the packaging or a white sticker.

Submissions on the proposals are open until October 28.

The discussion paper can be found at www.yourhealth.gov.au.

R-rated film viewing and adolescent smoking.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17707897

Source Health New Zealand.

Abstract OBJECTIVES:

As smoking is very common in R-rated films, we sought to determine if viewing R-rated films is associated with adolescent smoking.

METHODS:

Three annual cross-sectional surveys conducted of 88,505 Year 10 students of largely European, Maori, Asian or Pacific Islander ethnicity in secondary schools in New Zealand between 2002 and 2004. Outcomes of interest were: intention to smoke among never smokers; past experimentation with smoking among current non-smokers; current smoking status; and current frequency of smoking.

RESULTS:

Dose-response relationships were observed between the frequency of viewing R-rated films and all outcome measures controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, peer smoking, parental smoking, socioeconomic status, pocket money and household smoking rules. Compared to never viewing R-rated films, viewing at least weekly nearly tripled the relative risk (2.81; 95% confidence interval 2.57, 3.09) of never smokers being susceptible to smoking, and more than doubled the risk of both past experimentation (2.28; 95% CI 2.12, 2.45) and smoking>/=monthly (2.31; 95% CI 2.10, 2.54). Each of these risks was seen across all ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results extend the association that has been demonstrated between viewing R-rated films and current smoking in American youth by demonstrating the same association in youth of different ethnic and cultural backgrounds in New Zealand.

Tobacco industry relying on movies for brand promotion

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tobacco-industry-relies-on-movies-for-brand-promotion/1/153397.html

Actor Kangna Ranaut

The tobacco industry in India used actor Kangna Ranaut to promote the vice.

The tobacco industry is increasingly leaning on movies for the promotion of its business in India and several other countries following the ban on tobacco advertising, the WHO has warned.

Of late, the industry has also been denied the sponsorship of sports and music events, compelling it to shift its focus to films, the global health body observes in the report “Smokefree movies: From evidence to action”.

Hollywood actor Sharon Stone

Hollywood actor Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct glamourised smoking.

A survey of popular films has shown that tobacco brand displays exploded in Bollywood after its advertising was banned in the media in 2004. Of the 395 top grossers in 1990-2002, 76 per cent depicted the use of tobacco. The percentage of scenes showing lead actors or heroes using tobacco increased from 22 in 1991 to 54 in 2002. Of the 110 Hindi movies produced in 2004-2005, 89 per cent depicted tobacco use. The lead actors were shown smoking in 76 per cent of these movies.

The brand display was more or less even between premium cigarette brands belonging to the British American Tobacco, its Indian partner (the Indian Tobacco Company) and competing brands belonging to the Philip Morris International, whose entry into the Indian market coincided with the ban on tobacco advertising.

Using movies to promote smoking is a global phenomenon. In the UK, where almost all forms of tobacco advertising are prohibited, youth-rated films from the US contained 83 per cent of all tobacco visuals in 2001-2006. In Australia, a study in 2008 found that 70 per cent of the total movies showed smoking scenes, including 75 per cent of the most popular films. In Canada, a 2009 survey revealed that 75 per cent of tobacco-related shots appeared in youth rated movies.

The on-screen smoking images – branded or otherwise – are generally consistent with cigarette advertising than with the authentic representations of the dire health consequences of tobacco use, the WHO states. Such images benefit the tobacco industry and increase among the youth the initiative to smoke, the report adds.

Hamish Maxwell, the then president of Philip Morris International and later the CEO of Philip Morris Companies, had recognised this fact in 1983, the report states, quoting him as saying the important thing was to “continue to exploit new opportunities to get cigarettes on screen” in order to keep smoking socially acceptable.

WHO suggests adult rating for movies with tobacco scenes to lower the chances of their influence on the youths. An exception can be made for the movies depicting dangerous consequences of tobacco use, it adds.

Reel effect for real

– Movies have been linked to youth smoking in India, China, Hong Kong, England, Germany, Thailand, The Netherlands, Poland, Scotland, Italy, Mexico and Iceland

– Of the 395 top-grossing films in 1990-2002 in India, 76 per cent depicted tobacco use

– Scenes showing lead actors/heroes using tobacco increased from 22 per cent in 1991 to 54 per cent in 2002

– Of the 110 Hindi movies produced in 2004 and 2005, 89 per cent depicted tobacco use. Lead actors were seen smoking in 76 per cent of the movies

Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/tobacco-industry-relies-on-movies-for-brand-promotion/1/153397.html

Foreign prisons seek details of smoking ban

http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/87065/foreign-prisons-seek-details-of-smoking-ban

Foreign prisons seek details of smoking ban

Updated at 3:02 pm on 2 October 2011

Overseas prisons are approaching the New Zealand Corrections Department, wanting to know how it made prisons smokefree without any major trouble.

After a lead-in lasting a year, cigarettes, lighters, matches and tobacco were banned in July this year for more than 8500 inmates and their visitors.

Corrections has since reported a smooth transition from two-thirds of prisoners smoking, to zero.

It says prisons in several Australian states and Hong Kong now want to find out about the implementation of the ban.

For Chinese Students, Smoking Isn’t All Bad

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/for-chinese-students-smoking-isnt-all-bad-09292011.html

The government tobacco maker sponsors schools, earning goodwill

Chinese kids smoking on the outskirts of Shaoyang in Hunan province

In dozens of rural villages in China’s western provinces, one of the first things primary school kids learn is what helps make their education possible: tobacco. The schools are sponsored by local units of China’s state-owned cigarette monopoly, China National Tobacco. “On the gates of these schools you’ll see slogans that say ‘Genius comes from hard work—tobacco helps you become talented,’” says Xu Guihua, secretary general of the Chinese Association on Tobacco Control, a privately funded lobbying group. “They are pinning their hopes on young people taking up smoking.”

Anti-tobacco groups say efforts in China to reduce sales, including a ban on smoking in public places introduced in May, have been hampered by light penalties, a lack of education about the dangers of smoking, and the fact that the regulator, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, also runs the world’s biggest cigarette maker.

While Chinese law bans tobacco advertising on radio, television, and in newspapers, they “do not have clear restrictions on sales and sponsorship activities,” according to a report published in January by Yang Gonghuan, a former deputy director of China’s Center for Disease Control & Prevention, and Tsinghua University professor Hu Angang. Regional units of the monopoly funded construction of more than 100 primary schools throughout China, such as the Sichuan Tobacco Hope Primary School, the official Xinhua News Agency reported in May. Some schools are named after local tobacco companies such as Hongta or top-selling cigarette brands like Zhongnanhai, named after the compound next to the Forbidden City where China’s top leaders live and work. The state tobacco company in September 2010 announced it was sponsoring an additional 42 primary school libraries in Xinjiang and 40 in Tibet, and in November made a ¥10 million donation to a women’s development fund for a “Healthy Mothers’ Express” campaign.

China National Tobacco lists charitable activities on its website. In a survey of more than 2,000 adults conducted in 2009 by the Association on Tobacco Control, 7 percent had a good impression of the tobacco industry due to its charity work, while 18 percent said they would pick a cigarette brand because of its good works. State Tobacco’s press office didn’t respond to interview requests or faxed questions about sponsorship.

China has more than 320 million smokers, a third of the world’s total, and 53 percent of men there smoke. About 1 million Chinese die from tobacco-related illnesses every year. The tobacco industry grew at an average annual rate of 19 percent from 2006 to 2010, according to State Tobacco. Last year, earnings rose 17 percent, to ¥605 billion ($95 billion), including ¥499 billion paid in taxes.

China created the tobacco monopoly in the 1980s, when the industry supplied more than 10 percent of government revenue. Today, tobacco contributes 6.7 percent, according to Yang and Hu’s report. “Especially in tobacco-growing provinces like Yunnan and Guizhou, the tobacco industry is a very important part of local government income,” says Wang Shiyong, the World Bank’s senior health specialist in Beijing. “There is a lot of internal government lobbying to make sure the health consequences of smoking are not addressed.”

A government survey in 2010 found that two in five male doctors light up every day in China. Pfizer (PFE), whose Champix is the main prescription anti-smoking drug sold in China, funded a three-year program in 2008 to set up 60 smoke-free hospitals in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Smoking among the hospitals’ leadership fell to 8.4 percent, from 19.1 percent, while overall rates for doctors fell to 6.8 percent from 10.7 percent, says Pfizer spokeswoman Neena Moorjani.

Still, the education drives have a long way to go. Only one in four adults in China believe exposure to tobacco smoke causes heart diseases and lung cancer, and the percentage among smokers is even lower—22 percent—according to the 2010 Global Adult Tobacco Survey for China.

“We’ve been trying to get the Ministry of Education to stop the tobacco companies from sponsoring these schools,” says Xu, a former deputy director at the Chinese Center for Disease Control & Prevention. “But the ministry wants us to show them proof that this is causing harm.”

The bottom line: China’s tobacco monopoly funds schools. About 18 percent of Chinese say they’d pick a cigarette brand because of its charitable works.