Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

Cigarette Smuggling

Clear The Air Letter to Hong Kong Customs Commissioner

Dear Commissioner,

In previous correspondence with your anti illicit tobacco taskforce it became clear that for contraband cigarette seizures in Hong Kong approx 30-40% seized was counterfeit, meaning that 60-70% of the seizures were genuine products.

This means the tobacco companies are repeatedly conspiring with their distributors to sell DNP products by failing to control their supply chain networks.

Even the local tobacco front organisation HKUAIT-Stopit states that counterfeit seizures are only 40% of the total.

Given that such genuine DNP/General cargo products emanate from

  1. Transnational tobacco corporations with local HKG representative offices
  2. Mainland corporations

Why is no action taken against such companies and their directors under the Organised and Serious Crimes Ordinance and for common law offences such as conspiracy to defraud HK Govt of excise taxation?

In cases where criminal prosecution might be hindered such as in offending companies based in South Korea, why is no civil action raised against them by Hong Kong Government?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/tobacco-firms-to-pay-550m-over-smuggling-1.902510

http://www.cityam.com/1415884123/british-american-tobacco-whacked-650000-fine-hmrc-oversupplying-belgium-cigarette-market

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/16/bat-fined-for-oversupplying-tobacco-in-low-tax-european-jurisdictions

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tobacco-industry-accused-of-fueling-cigarette-smuggling-to-boost-profits-10287003.html

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2004/jul/09/smoking.europeanunion

https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/collections/japan-tobacco-international-smuggling/

http://www.theguardian.com/bat/0,,191282,00.html

 

Kind regards,

James Middleton

Chairman

http://cleartheair.org.hk

Download (PDF, 2.36MB)

Survey Shows Majority of Hong Kong Citizens Believe Excessive Tax Increases Fuels Black Market Cigarettes

Results highlight the need to continue tackling illicit tobacco trade as a governing priority

Latest survey shows nearly nine in ten Hong Kongers see illicit cigarettes as a problem and believe Government should continue combating the problem, and the majority believes excessive tax increases contributes to the problem. Worryingly, overwhelming majorities of respondents believe that illegal cigarettes are easily accessible to underage children and adults alike. The survey highlights the need for the Government to continue tackling illicit tobacco trade as a priority before considering extreme tax and regulations such as 85% graphic health warnings which could make the problem worse.

“The message is clear. Hong Kongers want tackling black market cigarettes to be a Government priority. It harms the livelihood of grassroots hawkers, contributes to youth smoking, fuels criminal activities and disrupt social order”, said Jeff Herbert, former Senior Superintendent with the Hong Kong Police and Advisor of Hong Kong United Against Illicit Trade (HKUAIT).

He adds that excessive tax hikes and other extreme tobacco control measures, such as 85% graphic health warning labels, would only make the problem worse. “These measures will not necessarily drive smokers to quit smoking, but will certainly fuel the black market tobacco trade,” added Mr. Herbert.

“Nearly 90% of respondents see black market cigarettes stays as a problem for Hong Kong and believe Government should focus more on combating illicit cigarettes. 68% believe illicit cigarettes are easily accessible to children under 18,” said Janakan Ramalingam, Director of IPSOS. “Most Hong Kongers also see excessive tax increases, insufficient penalty and sophisticated criminal networks as contributing factors to the issue.”

With an aim to measure the public’s view on the illicit tobacco issues in Hong Kong, the survey, which was conducted by international research agency IPSOS and commissioned by HKUAIT, interviewed 1,007 Hong Kong adult citizens in December 2015. Similar surveys were conducted in 2013 and 2014.

The survey results echo the findings of the Asia-16: Illicit Tobacco Indicator 2014 study, conducted by Oxford Economics and published last year, which found that Hong Kong’s illicit cigarettes consumption rate stood at an alarming 28% of all cigarettes consumed in Hong Kong, costing the Government HK$2.5 billion in foregone excise tax revenues.

Ahead of the upcoming Budget Speech, HKUAIT has prepared a formal submission recommending measures to tackle the roots of the illicit trade problem.

http://hkuait.org/supporting-organizations/

Supporting organizations of the Hong Kong United Against Illicit Tobacco:

• Mega Hospitality International (MHI)
• Infinitum Technology Co., Ltd.
• Millennium Wells Ltd.
• Coalition of Hong Kong Newspaper and Magazine Merchants
• Hong Kong Newspaper Hawker Association
• Kampo Employment Agency
• Coalition on Tobacco Affairs (CTA)
• Philip Morris Asia Limited
• The Office of Wong Tai Sin District Councillor Lai Wing-Ho
• The Office of Legislative Councillor Paul Tse Wai-chun
• The Office of Tsuen Wan District Councillor Kot Siu-Yuen
• The Office of Tsuen Wan District Councillor Man Yu-Ming
• The Office of Tsuen Wan District Councillor Timmy Chow
• The Office of Eastern District Councillor Marcus Tse
• The Office of Kwun Tong District Councillor Poon Chun-yuen
• Tsuen Wan Kwai Ching District Women’s Association
• Hong Kong Shippers’ Council

Truth about illicit tobacco reveals decline

http://www.scotsman.com/news/sheila-duffy-truth-about-illicit-tobacco-reveals-decline-1-3989150

BUT IT still needs robust enforcement to keep it in check, says Sheila Duffy

Illicit tobacco is one of those subjects (like e-cigarettes) where the quantity of the media coverage is not always matched by the quality.

To be fair to hard-pressed journalists it is hard to resist a succession of helpful public relations companies providing them with ready-made news stories which can support dramatic headlines on the “booming” illicit trade, corner shops closing, “unhealthy” fake fags and international crime networks.

At the same time leaked documents have revealed details of tobacco industry plans to use the media to scaremonger over illicit as part of their effort to oppose plain, standardised packaging for tobacco.

Those seeking an unbiased estimate of the scale and trends in illicit tobacco should use the annual figures from Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), which is as close as we’re going to get to an expert, unbiased voice. So we’re always keen to see the annual Tax Gaps report from HMRC, and the 2014-15 figures were published recently.

Anyone who had been following the tobacco-industry sourced media stores must have found the figures a bit surprising. So let’s set them out clearly.

The best estimate of the illicit market remains static at 10 per cent of manufactured cigarette sticks.

The best estimate of the illicit share of the hand-rolling tobacco market was down from 39 per cent to 35 per cent.

These are percentages of an overall tobacco market which continues to decline.

So a static percentage of the market actually relates to a decline in the amount of illicit tobacco used (for example, the reported rise in illicit market share in cigarette sticks from 9 per cent to 10 per cent in 2013-14 actually related to a 7 per cent drop in numbers of illicit cigarettes).

These figures indicate that the illicit tobacco market is at historically low levels – in 2000-1 HMRC estimates were that 22 per cent of cigarettes and 61 per cent of hand-rolling tobacco was illicit.

The decline in overall volume since then has been 76 per cent in illicit cigarette sticks and 33 per cent in illicit hand-rolling tobacco. Could any unbiased observer conclude that these figures are “booming”?

This is not to play down the importance of illicit tobacco, which brings criminal elements into communities, bypasses health regulations we have worked long and hard to achieve and deprives the Exchequer of much-needed tax revenue.

Nor is it to say that everything’s in hand – the reduction in illicit tobacco is the planned and deliberate result of robust enforcement measures, including restrictions on the tobacco companies themselves.

To keep the lid on illicit tobacco we need to ensure that robust enforcement is not hampered by budget cuts and austerity.

And we need to generate a community discussion, to lower the demand for the product, with NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde having created useful tools to support that. What it does mean is that the idea of a “booming illicit trade” at the centre of tobacco company campaigns against public health measures is, appropriately enough, not the real deal.

• Sheila Duffy is chief executive of ASH Scotland

European watchdog is failing to hold tobacco industry to account over smuggling

Download (PDF, 490KB)

Raising Tobacco Tax Substantially to Lower Smoking Prevalence

Download (PDF, 1019KB)

Tobacco industry lobbying: the scandal of the century

Download (PDF, 489KB)

Hong Kong Customs detects suspected illicit cigarettes smuggling case in Lok Ma Chau Control Point

http://7thspace.com/headlines/522159/hong_kong_customs_detects_suspected_illicit_cigarettes_smuggling_case_in_lok_ma_chau_control_point.html

Hong Kong (HKSAR) – Hong Kong Customs stepped up enforcement actions against illicit cigarettes before Christmas. A suspected case of using cross-boundary truck to smuggle about 2.7 million sticks of illicit cigarettes was detected today (December 19).

Early this morning, Customs officers intercepted an incoming cross-boundary truck. After X-ray examination and thorough inspection by Customs officers, about 2.7 million sticks of suspected illicit cigarettes were found in 212 carton boxes mix-loaded with other goods.

The total market value of the cigarettes was about $7.6 million with a duty potential of about $5.3 million. A 42-year-old male driver was arrested and the truck involved was detained. Investigation is ongoing.

Customs will continue to undertake stringent enforcement against illicit cigarette activities to protect government revenue.

Under the Import and Export Ordinance, smuggling is a serious offence.

The maximum penalty is a fine of $2 million and imprisonment for seven years.

Members of the public are urged to report any suspected illicit cigarette activities by calling the Customs’ 24-hour hotline 2545 6182.

Hong Kong Customs detects two suspected transshipment smuggling cases of illicit cigarettes

http://7thspace.com/headlines/521994/hong_kong_customs_detects_two_suspected_transshipment_smuggling_cases_of_illicit_cigarettes.html

Hong Kong (HKSAR) – Hong Kong Customs smashed two suspected transshipment smuggling cases of illicit cigarettes at Tuen Mun River Trade Terminal and Kwai Chung Customhouse Cargo Examination Compound on December 12 and yesterday (December 15) respectively. A total of about 19 million sticks of suspected illicit cigarettes were seized.

Through overseas intelligence exchange and risk assessment, Customs officers inspected two 40-foot containers declared to contain furniture arriving in Hong Kong from the United Arab Emirates. During the inspection, Customs officers discovered a total of about 19 million sticks of suspected illicit cigarettes inside the two 40-foot containers, with a market value of about $52 million and duty potential of about $36 million.

The unmanifested illicit cigarettes were seized for further investigation.

A Customs spokesman said, “The operation showed the effectiveness of our enforcement through a strategy of international co-operation and intelligence exchange. Hong Kong Customs will continue co-operation with other enforcement agencies as well as escalated enforcement actions against smuggling activities at source to combat illicit cigarette syndicates.”

Under the Import and Export Ordinance, smuggling is a serious offence. The maximum penalty is a fine of $2 million and imprisonment for seven years.

Members of the public are urged to report suspected illicit cigarette activities by calling the Customs’ 24-hour hotline 2545 6182.

United Nations agency gives EU a tobacco warning

http://www.politico.eu/article/united-nations-eu-tobacco-warning-smuggling-health-lobbying/

Top official tells Commission to steer clear of the industry as it works on new smuggling controls.

The United Nations public health agency in charge of tobacco control has warned EU policymakers to keep their distance from industry as they consider reforms to fight cigarette smuggling.

The head of the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control secretariat, Vera Da Costa e Silva, wrote senior European Commission officials earlier this month, saying the EU’s close working relationship with tobacco companies to fight cigarette smuggling may violate Europe’s international commitments.

Citing a recent report in POLITICO, Costa e Silva said the “continuation of an illicit trade agreement with a major tobacco company” on the part of the Commission could be in contravention of international commitments, which state that obligations to clamp down on smuggling “shall not be delegated to the tobacco industry.”

One of the letters, addressed to Commission Vice President Kristalina Georgieva and Health and Food Safety Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis, points to growing concern over the Commission’s position on two key reform areas, in which the Commission is considering working closely with the world’s four largest tobacco companies.

The first area of concern is the anti-smuggling agreements which the Commission and EU national governments signed with tobacco producers Philip Morris, Japan Tobacco International, British American Tobacco and Imperial Tobacco Limited between 2004 and 2010.

The agreements are legally binding, enforceable anti-fraud deals involving EU and national counterfeit investigators and have been used as a way to compel tobacco companies to take responsibility for genuine tobacco products that end up on EU black markets, avoiding tax. The Philip Morris agreements expire in 2016 and Georgieva is now deciding whether to renew them.

In another letter, Costa e Silva raised concern about POLITICO’s revelations that anti-smuggling officials within the European anti-fraud office OLAF are both in favor of the Philip Morris deal being renewed and of a controversial packet-tracing technology being promoted by a consortium of tobacco companies.

“I have raised concerns regarding these matters with both [the directorate general for health and food safety] and OLAF,” Costa e Silva wrote, adding that OLAF investigators had expressed to POLITICO a preference for a “track and trace” technology being promoted by tobacco companies.

“I believe this to be of some importance, especially in light of the future membership of OLAF in the Panel of Experts on the Protocol,” Costa e Silva said.

Asked about the letters from Costa e Silva, a Commission official said: “As we said on numerous occasions, there are no negotiations with PMI, or any other companies about the ‘track and tracing’ in the tobacco agreement.”

The European Union is a signatory to the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, an international treaty which came into force in 2005.

Under the convention’s framework, governments around the world are now considering an additional protocol, signed in 2012, which targets the illicit trade of tobacco products. That protocol must now be ratified and accepted by the 53 states and the European Union that have signed it.

The text of the protocol requires signatories to avoid outsourcing enforcement requirements to the tobacco industry and commits competent authorities to “interact with the tobacco industry and those representing the interests of the tobacco industry only to the extent strictly necessary” to implement the track and trace requirements.

The Commission is considering how best to balance its own “track and trace” provisions under the EU’s 2012 revised Tobacco Products Directive and the requirements of the World Health Organization protocol.

Under the directive, the EU will be required by 2019 to “ensure that all unit package of tobacco products are marked with a unique identifier” which will be “irremovably printed or affixed” to cigarette packets. The Commission is preparing a second feasibility study to examine which type of technology it should recommend EU member states employ.

The tobacco companies are lobbying vigorously for the adoption of their in-house technology, called Codentify. However, other packaging and printing companies are also in the running, including the Swiss-based Sicpa, a high-tech printing company which provides package tracking technology in a number of countries.

The European Carton Makers Association is also watching the process keenly, with a number of its members preparing to counter bids of both SICPA and Codentify if and when public tenders are issued.

EU Tobacco Agreement Hasn’t Significantly Slowed Smuggling

The landmark deal with Philip Morris International was supposed to greatly reduce the influx of illegal and counterfeit cigarettes.

http://www.nacsonline.com/News/Daily/Pages/ND1204155.aspx#.VmFZFeKE4hw

BRUSSELS – Eleven years after the European Union inked a landmark deal with Philip Morris International (PMI) to curb cigarette smuggling, some are questioning its effectiveness, the EU Observer reports. “We have concluded an agreement with PMI, which is quite unique in its scope. and I am not afraid to use the term ‘landmark’ agreement here,” Michaele Schreyer, European Union (EU) commissioner for budgetary affairs, said in July 2004. “We have built an efficient system to fight against future cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting.”

Now, that arrangement is close to expiring and the EU has been conducting an assessment of the agreement. “The main objective of the PMI agreement to reduce the presence of smuggled PMI products on the EU black market has been achieved,” said Kristalina Georgieva, head of the European Union’s budget office. “Between 2006 and 2014, the volume of illegal PMI products seized by member states under the agreement has dropped by 85%. That substantially exceeds the overall downward trend in seizures. This drop applies equally to both genuine and counterfeit PMI products.”

EU members reported seizing 4.5 billion illegal cigarettes in 2005, which dropped to 3.1 billion contraband cigarettes in 2013. During the same time period, PMI brands also plummeted among the seized smokes.

However, some say that because some member states only started reporting smuggled cigarette numbers in 2005, there’s a lack of accuracy as to contraband numbers before the agreement. The amount of estimated lost taxes because of smuggling has stayed steady since 2010, at €10 billion.