Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

Clear The Air

Raise tobacco tax to be on par with other cities

SCMP, Lisa Lau, chairwoman, Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health

3rd Feb, 2010

In his 2009 budget speech a year ago, Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah announced a 50 per cent increase in tobacco duty “with immediate effect”.

He said: “We will also continue to step up our efforts on smoking cessation, as well as publicity and enforcement in tobacco control.” But Mr Tsang’s determination is yet to be proved until we see a continuation of a tax increase policy in this year’s budget.

The tobacco tax was increased by 5 per cent in 2001, but there was no rise for the next seven years.

If we want to continue our efforts on tobacco control for public health, besides enforcement and publicity as well as cessation services, we need to see a regular tax increase policy in place.

Some people may argue that raising tobacco tax will only raise the sale price of cigarettes, which are already very expensive.

But is this the case? Hong Kong ranked the 29th most-expensive place among other world cities, while New York ranked 31st, in a recent cost-of-living survey by an international employment agency.

However, cigarettes remain cheaper in Hong Kong than in many of these countries.

Clear the Air anti-tobacco committee chairman James Middleton compared cigarette prices in Hong Kong with those in other high-income cities.

He found that cigarettes in Hong Kong were only 60 per cent of the price in Singapore, 53 per cent of the cost in New York, and 43 per cent of the price in London.

The government should now prove its determination, for the sake of public health and to protect our children.

Therefore, I urge people to support a regular tobacco tax increase policy of 15 per cent annually so that cigarette prices in Hong Kong are on a par with similar cities within five years.

No exception on cigarettes advertisements, the same as newspaper stands

Display boxes of cigarettes can have the same impact as cigarettes advertisements.

Display boxes of cigarettes can have the same impact as cigarettes advertisements.

Advertisements may have great influence on our next generation, especially the cigarette advertisements. According to the statistic from the American Cancer Society, since the cigarettes advertising ban began in 2001, the proportion of Hong Kong primary school pupils who could recognize different cigarette brands dropped from 95 per cent in 1990 to 20 per cent in 2001. So we can see how powerful advertisements can be.

Although tobacco advertisements have been banned in newspapers, magazines, radio, television and public spaces in the 1990s, we can still find them in some places, for instant the newspaper stands and hawkers. In Hong Kong there are 600 newspaper stands which still allowed displaying cigarette banners and posters till 1st November. This is the last phase of the cigarette advertising ban in Hong Kong, which we cannot find them anymore form now on.

However, newspaper stands using another method to replace the advertisement. They set up display boxes showing cigarette packets, and claims that “It is not an advertisement if there are no words”.

Certainly it is not the case. They could contravene the Smoking (Public Health) Ordinance if the packets were displayed in a way that “induces or suggests people to buy tobacco”. And the most serious problem is they are destroying the efforts we put in protecting our next generations from the tobacco for years.

It is no doubt that cigarette is not good for health, for the air, even for the economic development. We understand selling tobacco is one of the income sources of the newspaper stands; however it does not mean that we should put them into exception.

If you want to read more about the harm of the tobacco, please hit the jump.

(more…)

Price tobacco out of reach

SCMP

World Health Organisation and World Bank data shows that a 10 per cent increase in tobacco tax reduces overall smoking by 4 per cent and youth smoking by up to 7 per cent.

Hong Kong must regularly increase its tobacco tax on the grounds of health care, to a level at least 80 per cent of the retail price.

This would be the nemesis of the tobacco industry; price-conscious youths are the most affected by tobacco taxation.

Front organisations paid for with tobacco industry money must not be granted charity status and must be banned from approaching schools and youths with the intention of stimulating a rebellious interest in tobacco rather than steering young people away from it.

Youths must see that tobacco control laws are meant to be obeyed and the enforcement staff of the Tobacco Control Office must be increased to achieve this.

Brand-stretching promotions should be banned and smoking in vehicles with children present outlawed.

Young people need to be made aware that smoking will take 15 to 20 years off their lifetime and that it is not cool to be a nicotine addict when nicotine is a pesticide.

James Middleton, chairman, anti-tobacco committee, Clear the Air

Blitz operations against smoking offence in FEHD venues

Source: http://7thspace.com/headlines/321687/blitz_operations_against_smoking_offence_in_fehd_venues.html

Hong Kong (HKSAR) – The Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) and the Tobacco Control Office (TCO) of Department of Health jointly carried out a blitz operation at the Cooked Food Centre of (1)Shek Wu Hui Market tonight (September 28). Joint blitz operations were mounted at the Cooked Food Centres of (2)Lockhart Road Market and (3)Pei Ho Street Market and (4)Woosung Street Temporary Cooked Food Hawker Bazaar last week. A total of five Fixed Penalty Notices (FPNs) were issued during the operations.

Indoor areas of public markets and hawker bazaars under FEHD have been designated as no smoking areas and authorised public officers of FEHD, in addition to officers of the TCO, are empowered to issue FPNs to smoking offenders under the Fixed Penalty (Smoking Offences) Ordinance which took effect on September 1 this year. “Apart from monitoring the situation of no smoking areas in markets and hawker bazaars and taking enforcement action on a daily basis, we would also mount joint blitz operations with the TCO to enhance the deterrent effect as and when necessary,” a spokesman for the FEHD added.

Source: HKSAR Government – 

CLEAR THE AIR SAYS:

If 5 FPN smoking tickets issued in 4 different sites is a ‘Blitz’ then proper enforcement should be termed ‘Selective Enforcement by the Hypocritically sensory affected non willing trouble avoiders’

IT IS HIGH TIME HK GOVERNMENT FOLLOWED OVERSEAS JURISDICTIONS AND MADE LICENSEES AND MANAGERS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENFORCING BANS IN THEIR PREMISES, OR FACE LOSING THEIR PREMISES’ LICENCES IF THEY DO NOT.

THIS WILL IMMEDIATELY ADD MORE THAN 11,000 ENFORCERS TO THE TOBACCO CONTROL OFFICE SUPPORT.

Holyrood

An email sent from Sheila Duffy, Chief Executive, ASH Scotland

To James Middleton, Clear The Air

I wanted to drop you an email to let you know how the Holyrood conference went and to thank you for your help with our background investigations.

It was a very polarised debate. Around 70 or 80 delegates, including a lot of Trading Standards Officers, a number of pharma reps, about 10 delegates from the retail trade and representative bodies, and big guns from Big Tobacco (TMA, Imperial, JTI, vending machine orgs Sinclair Collis & NACMO as well as FOREST and F2C Scotland).

We had a good showing in the morning and were backed by Scottish Youth Parliament representative in advocating the measures. Patrick Basham (the academic that was recommended by FOREST) played a canny game portraying tobacco use as a natural 4 stage process linked to growing wealth and social perceptions of risk-taking (aspire to smoke, get wealth and take it up, trade up to premium brands, perceive longer term health risks, reduced levels of smoking ending up at around 20-25%) and claiming tobacco control measures are brought in by govts after the natural decline occurs – that they are just putting a ribbon on something taking place anyway and that there’s no evidence to support their effectiveness of tobacco control measures. Scottish Conservatives argued there’s no evidence base for effectiveness of point of sale, so we shouldn’t do it – and if it is done retailers ought to be compensated. EamonnRossi from the Office of Tobacco Control in Ireland was ambushed by a flown-in contingent of Irish retailers (‘Retailers against Smuggling’) protesting against the cost of registration (50 euros) and saying the display ban had led to increased smuggling, but he fielded it well. Our Health Minister was strong on the measures in the bill including ending point of sale and banning self service vending machines, and as you will have seen our Parliament voted through the first stage general approval of the principles in the bill.

Kind regards

Sheila

Sheila Duffy
Chief Executive
ASH Scotland
8 Frederick Street
Edinburgh, EH2 2HB

Tel: 0131 220 9487
Fax: 0131 225 4759
Web: http://www.ashscotland.org.uk

ASH Scotland is a registered Scottish charity (SC 010412) and a company limited by guarantee (Scottish company no 141711).

As a charity, we need your donations to continue working towardsa tobacco-free Scotland.  You can donate to us securely online athttp://ashscotland.workwithus.org

Email your enquiries on tobacco and smoking to the ASH Scotland Information Service: enquiries@ashscotland.org.uk
Visit Tobacco Information Scotland: your national gateway to tobacco control information: http://www.tobaccoinscotland.org.uk

Cigarette firms feeling burned by rise in tax

Dan Kadison, SCMP

Several tobacco companies are feeling the burn from the government’s anti-smoking efforts, according to a member of an industry group.

Deanna Cheung, executive secretary of the Tobacco Association of Hong Kong, said some companies were estimating that sales of duty-paid cigarettes had dropped 20 to 40 per cent so far this year, in part because of February’s excise increase.

Those figures were “alarming”, she said, especially since the association believed the tax increase had done little to persuade Hongkongers to quit but had encouraged them to seek cheaper alternatives, such as purchasing duty-free cigarettes or buying smuggled or counterfeit packs.

“It doesn’t mean that people are consuming less,” Cheung said. “They can change to the illegal product, the cheaper product that’s defeating [the government’s] health objectives.”

In the first eight months of this year, duty had been paid on 1.96 billion cigarettes in Hong Kong, compared with 2.46 billion over the same time frame a year earlier, according to Cheung, citing data from the Customs and Excise Department.

The 20 per cent drop was in line with what Cheung’s employer, British American Tobacco, was experiencing, she said, although companies that handled smaller volumes were complaining of steeper declines.

The Tobacco Association – whose members include British American, Japan Tobacco, Pacific Cigar and smaller outfits – planned to schedule a meeting with government officials once it had “a detailed number on total consumption” and other research findings, Cheung said.

One alternative would be for the government to incrementally raise taxes when needed, rather than impose “a drastic tax increase”, which forced people to flee the duty-paid market, she added.

James Middleton, the chairman of Clear the Air’s anti-tobacco committee, said he was not surprised the number of cigarettes sold in Hong Kong was dwindling.

He credited the 50 per cent rise in the tobacco tax, which added HK$8 to a pack of cigarettes, with the decline.

The increase “has had a direct effect on duty-paid sales and that is shown through the figures”, Middleton said. “When taxation goes up, that’s the nemesis of the tobacco companies. That’s the worst thing that can happen to them.”

Middleton rejected the Tobacco Association’s claim that smokers were buying their cigarettes elsewhere, saying it was impossible for so many to be purchased from the duty-free or illicit markets.

There were restrictions on duty-free cigarettes, customs and excise officers were on the prowl looking for smuggled tobacco, and people were generally wary of buying counterfeit products, he said.

The Customs and Excise Department said it “has strengthened enforcement actions” as a result of the tax increase.

A Health Department spokesman said higher taxes turned people off smoking – not just in Hong Kong, but around the world.

“Cigarette pricing is well established as a key factor influencing tobacco consumption and smoking prevalence,” the spokesman said.

“According to the World Bank, on average a price rise of 10 per cent on a pack of cigarettes is expected to reduce demand by about 4 per cent in high-income countries and by about 8 per cent in low and middle-income countries, where lower incomes tend to make people more responsive to price changes.”

The spokesman said the effect of the tax increase “may be further reinforced by our extension of no-smoking areas, enhanced publicity and education, deterrent effects of the fixed-penalty system and so forth”.

He said there were 4,800 calls to the Health Department’s smoking cessation hotline within a month of the tax increase. That compared to 4,300 calls in the whole of last year.

Smoking GI Joes will be a dying breed if report has its way

Agence France-Presse – SCMP

The iconic image of the US soldier, muddy and tired, with a cigarette hanging from his mouth could become a thing of the past if the Pentagon accepts new calls for a ban on tobacco products in the military.

An Institute of Medicine report, requested by the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs, says an anti-tobacco policy could make the military “virtually tobacco-free within 20 years”. The report found the proportion of smokers in the US armed forces was higher than in the civilian population, with 32 per cent of military personnel using tobacco products, compared with 20 per cent of civilians.

Troops on deployment were twice as likely to be smokers than home-based counterparts. The Defence Department spent US$564 million in 2006 treating tobacco-related illness.

“There are numerous reasons the military would support the goal of becoming tobacco-free, such as improved military readiness, better health of [the] force, and decreased health care costs,” the report said.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the Department of Defence had long recognised the health effects of smoking.

“The federal government and the US military were the first to go smoke-free in their office buildings,” he said.

But the study criticised the military for its continued subsidies of tobacco products sold on military bases.

“The committee believes the department should not sell products that are known to impair military readiness and health,” the report said.

But it acknowledged the difficulty of phasing out smoking, noting the habit had “long been associated with the image of a tough, fearless warrior”.

_________

CLEAR THE AIR SAYS :  DID YOU KNOW THAT THE FIRST KNOWN  SMOKING  BAN WAS BY THE NAZI PARTY IN THE 1930’S ?

THE NEW SMOKING BAN – what it means to Hong Kong and what still needs to happen

hkoutdoorsmoke

Government statistics show more restaurants and licensed premises opened after the smoking ban was enacted here

letterstatspanelhs

Give Me Five

RTHK, http://www.rthk.org.hk/rthk/radio3/give_me_five/20090705.html

Presenter : Andrew Dembina
Lively local and international personalities pick five pieces of music that have impacted their lives.

James Middleton, chairman of the Anti-Tobacco Committee of Clear the Air shares his five musical favourites with Andrew Dembina.