Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

July, 2016:

‘Suara Hati Anak’ Anti-Smoking Campagin Aims to Increase Public Awareness of Tobacco- Caused Diseases

Jakarta. Indonesia’s health ministry and Vital Strategies, an international organization focusing on research activities on priority public health issues, launched a campaign called “Suara Hati Anak” (Voices of Children), to increase public awareness of the impacts of smoking.

In a statement to the Jakarta Globe recently, Vital Strategies said the campaign involves placing advertisement in national media from May 27 until June 10 this year, uploading campaign videos on YouTube, promoting the hashtag #SuaraTanpaRokok on social media and updating the website www.suaratanparokok.co.id.

This is the fourth collaboration between Indonesia’s health ministry and the organization.

“Tobacco consumption creates public health problems that will require priority assistance. Cigarettes contribute as one of the main causes of deaths in Indonesia. We can prevent this by encouraging the younger generation to give up smoking,” Health Minister Nila Moeloek said in a statement from Vital Strategies.

Vital Strategies is an affiliate of The Union, an international nonprofit scientific organization based in the United States that helps low-and-middle income nations fight tuberculosis, HIV, asthma and other lung diseases through technical assistance, education and research.

According to Vital Strategies President and Chief Executive Officer José Luis Castro, “the poorest families in Indonesia spend nearly 12 percent of their income on cigarettes. As shown in the campaign, their welfare and the kids’ future prospects will be affected if the breadwinner falls sick from smoking.”

Castro cited a report from the World Economic Forum which showed smoking is one of the main factors of non-contagious diseases that could drain $4.5 trillion from the Indonesian economy from 2012 until 2030.

Meanwhile, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Tobacco Atlas showed more than 217,400 people die every year in Indonesia from smoking-related diseases.

As an attorney general, I sued the tobacco companies. ExxonMobil is nothing like them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/as-an-attorney-general-i-sued-the-tobacco-companies-exxonmobil-is-nothing-like-them/2016/07/14/b5e04f82-492f-11e6-acbc-4d4870a079da_story.html

I was one of 46 state attorneys general who signed the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement in November 1998. On behalf of New York’s taxpayers, I filed one of the suits that eventually pushed the cigarette makers to settle. I can tell you from experience that our fight against the tobacco industry has almost nothing in common with today’s campaign by several state attorneys general against ExxonMobil — despite what supporters of the effort would like you to believe.

In the case of tobacco, we made a powerful argument that decades of lying by the companies had led to intractable addiction of millions of Americans who suffered devastating illnesses and death, all of which cost the states billions every year in Medicaid expenses. In the current action, a group of Democratic attorneys general, acting as part of a campaign launched by well-heeled special interest groups and financial backers of alternative energy companies, have a different goal: using the power of state attorneys general to curb honest debate. (Disclosure: My law firm is representing two New York state municipalities that are challenging the siting of wind turbine projects on the shore of Lake Ontario.)

The tobacco campaign was highly successful. The settlement agreement included not only direct payments to the states (currently $9 billion a year) but also imposed severe marketing restrictions to limit outreach to young smokers. Largely as a result, the proportion of high school student smokers dropped from 36 percent in 1997 to just 16 percent in 2013; adult smokers, from 25 to 17 percent. I was proud to play a major role in holding tobacco companies responsible for the damage they caused and in setting America on a healthier path. We had a clear, convincing legal case and a noble cause. The same cannot be said for attorneys general involved in the current crusade.

It’s unlikely they will be successful in their legal actions, and their actions may have already chilled free speech in this country.

ExxonMobil was subpoenaed last fall by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (D) in an effort to find out whether the company misled investors and the public on the impact of climate change. Massachusetts joined in. Then, in March, the Virgin Islands, a U.S. territory, started investigating ExxonMobil, as well as think tanks and other institutions that received the company’s support, under an anti-racketeering law. Later that month, 16 state attorneys general, all Democrats, held a news conference under the banner, “AGs United for Clean Power,” to announce they too will pursue energy companies that challenge the global-warming orthodoxy.

But increasingly, Schneiderman appears to be on his own. Last week, Claude Walker, the attorney general for the Virgin Islands who opened a racketeering probe of ExxonMobil, withdrew his subpoena. And Maura Healey, attorney general for Massachusetts, delayed action on her own subpoena of ExxonMobil, meaning that case has paused.

It is important to note that the fight against the tobacco industry was bipartisan and that never, during our battle to require the tobacco companies to meet their obligations, did we align ourselves with the industry’s business competitors. In the current campaign, the attorneys general have linked up with investors in renewable energy in an unseemly alliance that presents serious conflicts of interest. As a June 15 letter signed by 13 AGs critical of their colleagues noted, “The media event [in March] featured a senior partner of a venture capital firm that invests in renewable energy companies. If the [AGs’] focus is fraud, such alignment by law enforcement sends the dangerous signal that companies in certain segments of the energy market need not worry about their misrepresentations.”

Attorney General Schneiderman’s theory is apparently that ExxonMobil pulled the wool over America’s eyes by manipulating public opinion. “There is confusion,” he said, “sowed by those with an interest in profiting from the confusion and creating misperceptions in the eyes of the American public.” One could argue that the same confusion and misperception has been caused by alternative energy proponents. Causing confusion — if that’s what happened — is hardly a crime, but to hold one party to a national debate to a higher standard tilts the debate unfairly in the other direction.

Opinions newsletter

Thought-provoking opinions and commentary, in your inbox daily.

Notably, the attorney general is pursuing his investigation under the Martin Act, a sweeping New York law that I know well. It gives the attorney general broad subpoena power, and it allows charges to be filed even without evidence that the defendant intended to commit fraud. It is a powerful tool to protect investors but can have unintended negative implications to the very investors it seeks to protect.

In the case of tobacco, we found that the companies knew about the life-threatening, addictive nature of smoking but covered up that knowledge. In the case of global warming, ExxonMobil began research as early as the 1970s and was open about what it found in more than 50 papers published in scientific journals between 1983 and 2014, according to company documents. ExxonMobil’s scientists have participated in the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change since its inception and were involved in the National Academy of Sciences review of the third U.S. National Climate Assessment Report.

In its news pages, even the New York Times, a forceful environmental advocate, has drawn a clear line between the tobacco and energy industries. Reporters Justin Gillis and Clifford Krauss wrote in a Nov. 5 article, “In the 1950s and ’60s, tobacco companies financed internal research showing tobacco to be harmful and addictive, but mounted a public campaign that said otherwise. . . . The history at ExxonMobil appears to differ, in that the company published extensive research over decades that largely lined up with mainstream climatology.”

The tobacco companies were deceivers. ExxonMobil has been open. But that doesn’t seem to matter to the politicized attorneys general pursuing the company. A chilling impact on public debate is not in our collective interest.

Indonesia on track to become world’s largest tobacco market

If current trends hold, Indonesia is on track to become the world’s largest market for tobacco. As other countries move to regulate the industry, why is Indonesia having such a tough time kicking the habit?

http://sea-globe.com/indonesia-largest-tobacco-market-smoking/

Few smells are as ubiquitous to Indonesia as that emitted by the popular kretek cigarette. A mix of cloves and tobacco, its soft-smelling smoke can be found in cafés, bars and warungs in every corner of the archipelago – and in the hands of Indonesians of all ages.

“If you go into local communities, you often see small kids smoking,” said Mark Hurley, Indonesia programme director for the Campaign For Tobacco-Free Kids. “There’s a real cultural norm – anywhere you go, you’ll see someone smoking.”

This is no accident. The global tobacco industry has, with the acquiescence of the country’s government, used a mix of advertising, marketing and cigarettes flavoured with cloves and chocolate to turn Indonesia into a nation of smoking addicts – and one of the most valuable tobacco markets in the world.

Addict: two-year-old Aldi Suganda Rizal smokes a cigarette at his family home in Indonesia.

Addict: two-year-old Aldi Suganda Rizal smokes a cigarette at his family home in Indonesia.

“The Indonesian government is absolutely failing to protect the health of its citizens by allowing tobacco products to be heavily marketed across the country,” said Action on Smoking & Health executive director Laurent Huber. “They are favouring the interests and profits of Big Tobacco.”

The end result is a looming public health disaster. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), Indonesia has one of the highest male smoking rates in the world at 67% – and the number of women lighting up is rising fast as well, partly due to role models such as the popular, chain-smoking fisheries minister Susi Pudjiastuti breaking down gender norms. The impacts are already huge, with the WHO estimating that smoking claims about 425,000 Indonesian lives each year – nearly a quarter of the country’s annual deaths. Some media outlets have even begun referring to the country as ‘Tobaccoland’.

“Cigarettes are still cheap, freely promoted and available on every street. Indonesia has to raise taxes on tobacco”

Smoking rates began to fall in the global north due to huge scandals surrounding revelations in the 1990s that US tobacco companies not only knew about the harmful effects of smoking, but had hidden this information from consumers for years. This, along with concerted anti-smoking campaigns, has led to steady declines in smoking rates in many developed countries in recent decades, including the US, much of Western Europe and Japan. It is little surprise, therefore, that according to Huber, “low-income countries are where tobacco companies see their biggest potential growth”.

Today, Philip Morris’ local subsidiary Sampoerna is one of Indonesia’s largest companies, occupying one of the most imposing towers in a prime spot on Jakarta’s main boulevard, Jalan Sudirman. The firm is free not only to advertise, but also to pursue corporate social responsibility programmes and even sponsor educational events.

“The [government] does not make any restrictions on how and when tobacco advertisements can be published or broadcast,” said Tuti Roosdiono from Indonesian Woman Against Tobacco, an NGO fighting for stronger tobacco regulations. “The [youth] are the target of the tobacco industry, through musical and sport promotions.” Roosdiono added that a huge percentage of the media’s profits come from tobacco adverts, one reason the industry appears loathe to support any advertising restrictions. In contrast, nearby Cambodia, Laos and Singapore have all banned direct advertising, promotion and sponsorships, and all have lower smoking rates than Indonesia.

Compounding the challenge are tobacco companies’ cosy relationships with government, and many anti-smoking advocates believe this is why Indonesia is lagging far behind its neighbours in passing even the most basic tobacco control legislation. Taxes, for example, remain very low by global standards, at just 46% of the retail price, according to the Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance (SEATCA). Thailand’s rate is 70%, while Singapore’s is 72%.

“Cigarettes are still very cheap, freely promoted and available on every street and at every corner shop,” said Mary Assunta, a senior policy advisor with SEATCA. “Indonesia has to raise taxes on tobacco and make cigarettes more expensive.”

Indonesia is now the world’s fifth-largest tobacco market, with 340 billion cigarettes produced in 2014

On the flip side, tobacco farming is a valuable source of jobs, with an estimated 500,000 farmers growing the valuable cash crop and another 600,000 working in manufacturing, in what is now a multibillion-dollar industry. The majority of tobacco is grown in the fertile soils of East Java province, where, according to the WHO, the number of smallholder farms growing the crop has increased over the past decade due to growing demand both within the country and for exports, which totalled $295m last year. For a country with rampant rural poverty, tobacco is, for many families, an important livelihood. It is also an important source of tax revenue, sending $12.91 billion into state coffers last year, the third-largest contributor of any industry.

Besides still allowing advertising and flavoured cigarettes – which many tobacco control experts believe operate as gateways to addiction for children – the country is also the only nation in Southeast Asia that has not yet ratified the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the primary international mechanism for cooperation on implementing public health responses to limit smoking.

“The promotion of public health in Indonesia, especially on the danger of tobacco against people’s health, is very limited compared with the marketing promotion of the tobacco industry,” said Roosdiono. “A strong treaty on tobacco control would provide a legally binding counterforce to the tobacco industry’s expansion.”

Now, the tobacco lobby is pushing for kretek cigarettes to receive ‘national heritage’ designation in a bill currently being considered by parliament, despite the fact that tobacco is not native to Indonesia and that kreteks only emerged in the 19th century. According to Tobacco-Free Kids, the real reason the lobby wants to do this is not to preserve any heritage, but to maintain its special status and market access, even if Indonesia begins to control tobacco more.

“Clove cigarettes pose a particular challenge,” said Hurley. “If this move goes forward, it would take Indonesia backwards in the fight against smoking.” Anti-tobacco campaigners are concerned that, even if strong tobacco control legislation is passed in the future, this ‘heritage’ designation could open up a major advertising loophole for the industry. Though a similar proposal was rejected last year, the industry is trying to make this designation part of an expected tobacco bill that, for now, is focused more on protecting farmers than addressing public health.

Despite a lack of public health action by bureaucrats in the central government ministries of Jakarta, those at the local and regional levels, empowered by decentralisation, are taking tobacco control measures into their own hands.

“We’ve seen a real shift in the awareness of the harms and dangers in tobacco use over the [eight] years we’ve been working [in Indonesia],” said Huber. “Cities and provinces throughout Indonesia are increasingly moving to make public indoor places smoke-free.”

The latest example is Surabaya, Indonesia’s second-largest city, which is considered a model for effective governance in the developing world and is led by its independent governor Tri Rismaharini, who plans to ban smoking in all public spaces. And in Jakarta, another popular independent governor, Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama, has banned tobacco advertising in the city.

Anti-tobacco proponents are optimistic that action at the regional level will filter up to the national government and force, for the first time, real change. The question is whether or not this will happen fast enough to avoid the lingering, harmful health impacts of tobacco. “So far, pointing out at an intellectual level that tobacco use is harmful is only slowly transforming into the public movement that is necessary,” said Hurley.

If Indonesia needs a model, it only has to look across the Celebes Sea to its neighbouring island nation, the Philippines. Also plagued with rapidly rising smoking rates and a powerful tobacco lobby, the country began turning the tide by signing the FCTC and passing a tobacco tax in 2012 that reduced cigarette sales from 5.76 billion packs to 4.97 billion packs the year after its introduction.

“As a result of their public health policies, the Philippines has experienced a decrease in smoking prevalence and increasing revenue from tobacco taxes,” said Huber.

As things stand, Indonesia is far from adopting this model and, for now, remains a key moneymaker for the global tobacco industry. It is now the world’s fifth-largest tobacco market, with 340 billion cigarettes produced in 2014, a number that is expected to grow. Only time will tell whether the government will join numerous other nations in tackling this public health challenge, or end up, if current trends hold, in the inglorious position of being the country with the most smokers in the world.

Up in Smoke: Why China has Banned Foreign Investment in Tobacco

China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) recently announced regulations barring foreign investment in the country’s enormous tobacco industry, blocking foreign-invested enterprises and individual businesses from participating in tobacco wholesale, retail, and alternative forms of trading. These new restrictions come on the heels of various government efforts to reduce China’s rampant tobacco use, with middling results to date.

http://www.chinabusinessreview.com/up-in-smoke-why-china-has-banned-foreign-investment-in-tobacco/

By Alexander Chipman Koty

China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) recently announced regulations barring foreign investment in the country’s enormous tobacco industry, blocking foreign-invested enterprises and individual businesses from participating in tobacco wholesale, retail, and alternative forms of trading. These new restrictions come on the heels of various government efforts to reduce China’s rampant tobacco use, with middling results to date.

There are more than 320 million smokers in China, making it the world’s largest producer and consumer of tobacco products. While comprising about 20 percent of the world’s population, China is responsible for 45 percent of all cigarettes consumed globally. With an ageing population, a shrinking workforce, and an increasingly prosperous society, China faces mounting pressure to look after the wellbeing of its constituents, but that comes at a significant price.

Tobacco cessation products and healthcare services stand to benefit from increased supervision of the tobacco industry. Although China is moving toward regulation, wavering government commitment because of the industry’s huge profitability and deep-seated use within society stand in the way of stamping out tobacco’s pervasive presence. The country remains a challenging market for tobacco cessation products and services.

Tobacco use in China

Tobacco use is firmly entrenched in Chinese society, with applications ranging from day-to-day use to deeper cultural practices. Usage is starkly divided between the sexes — 68 percent of Chinese men smoke, compared to only 3.2 percent of women. However, all are exposed to the negative health effects of smoking. Ineffective smoking restrictions in indoor and public places such as restaurants and offices means about 740 million Chinese are exposed to secondhand smoke. As a result of widespread tobacco use and the country’s issues with pollution, China has the most lung cancer diagnoses and fatalities in the world.

Social pressure for men to smoke is significant; those who refuse cigarettes are often met with curious looks and the offerer loses face. In China, offering cigarettes is a symbolic way of establishing trust and forming relationships, particularly among strangers. Similarly to the deep-rooted drinking culture among business people, expensive cigarettes and tobacco products are commonly presented as gifts, and there is often pressure to smoke with coworkers and business partners. Compounded with these practices are ill-informed myths and misconceptions about tobacco, including beliefs that Asians are less susceptible to tobacco’s negative health effects, that it is easy to quit, and that smoking is an ancient part of Chinese culture, according to the Lancet medical journal.

Government involvement in the tobacco industry

The Chinese tobacco market is dominated by the China National Tobacco Corporation (CNTC), a state-owned enterprise (SOE) that is responsible for 98 percent of all cigarettes sold in China. The CNTC owns more than 900 brands, from large ones such as Hong Shuangxi, Yun Yan, and Zhongnanhai, to smaller regional brands and derivatives. The CNTC’s state monopoly has made the penetration of foreign brands largely unsuccessful, and only a small number of them have been manufactured in China. Foreign companies are only able to manufacture and sell their tobacco products through a joint venture with the CTNC. For example, Marlboro, one of the world’s largest tobacco brands, only started manufacturing in China in 2008 after coming to an agreement with the CNTC to promote Chinese brands overseas.

Government restriction of foreign competition is largely explained by tobacco’s extraordinary profitability. Further, restricting foreign companies’ access to China increases the CNTC’s leverage to access international markets and compete with established brands. An incredible 7-10 percent of all government revenue is through tobacco sales, giving the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA) vast power. Chinese Premier Li Keqiang’s younger brother headed the STMA until February 2015, demonstrating its stature. While the long-term costs of medical services and premature losses of workers is higher than immediate profits, it is difficult for the government to jettison a steady source of revenue by committing to tobacco dissuasion at a time when other streams are slowing.

The uneven implementation of recent reforms points to this reluctance. The government issued a draft law for public consultation in late 2014 banning smoking in all indoor places and some outdoor ones, as well as restricting advertising, and in 2015 raised taxes on wholesale cigarettes from 5 to 11 percent. However, the government ultimately backtracked on many of its initial proposals, allowing restaurants, bars, hotels, and airports to have smoking sections and allowing smoking in individual offices. Combined with infrequent enforcement of existing restrictions, the laws do little to dissuade smoking.

The tobacco cessation market

Government efforts to discourage smoking, however halfhearted, combined with China’s massive smoking population offer immense but difficult-to-grasp potential for tobacco cessation products.

Tobacco cessation products encounter a variety of challenges when attempting to penetrate the Chinese market. Nicotine patches are the most popular cessation product in China; other products with varying degrees of scientific credibility that are also used include e-cigarettes, toothpaste, cigarette holders, and Chinese medicines. Product use is low. In 2014, Johnson & Johnson stopped selling its leading Nicorette product there due to poor sales. Other companies like Pfizer and Novartis have entered the Chinese market calculating a long timeframe before costs can be recovered. Despite the lack of profits, foreign pharmaceutical companies face relatively little competition, as Venturepharm is the only Chinese company producing tobacco cessation medication.

Although e-cigarettes are often marketed as an anti-smoking product, many dispute this, arguing that they are just as bad, or even worse than regular cigarettes. Regardless, there is little awareness of e-cigarettes in China, and those who use them generally do so as a fashion statement. While about 90 percent of the world’s e-cigarettes are made in the southern city of Shenzhen, almost all are exported to foreign markets. The e-cigarette industry is currently unregulated, but the National Health and Family Planning Commission has stated its intent to regulate production, sale, and use of e-cigarettes.

The disappointing performance of tobacco cessation products is in part explained by high costs. E-cigarettes in China are decidedly more expensive than regular cigarettes, and a full round of medication costs upward of RMB 2,000. The deeper cause of the tobacco cessation industry’s poor performance is the lack of awareness and desire for smokers to quit. Fewer than 25 percent of Chinese adults understand the specific health hazards of tobacco use. Additionally, fewer than 10 percent of Chinese smokers quit by choice, in comparison to more than 50 percent in many high-income countries where there are more former smokers than smokers.

Observations

China is slowly addressing its tobacco problem. In 2015, cigarette sales in China declined for the first time in two decades, demonstrating some success in smoking dissuasion. However, this is mostly due to higher taxes curtailing frequent use, rather than reducing the number of individual smokers.

As is commonplace for foreign investors doing business in emerging economies, the specter of SOEs such as the CNTC often complicates business. Vested interests ranging from pure profits to sprawling bureaucracies and payrolls to corruption in the form of kickbacks make it difficult for foreign companies to compete with SOEs who benefit from preferential treatment. This phenomenon has tragic consequences in China’s tobacco industry, where the state’s lucrative monopoly hinders efforts to curb tobacco use, resulting in exploding cancer rates and premature deaths.

While China presents an enormous opportunity for tobacco cessation products, success will be difficult to achieve without genuine government efforts to spread awareness of tobacco’s adverse health effects. With growing healthcare costs and productivity losses, however, China is gradually moving toward tighter control of tobacco use. Although China is not yet primed for tobacco cessation products, it is a question of time before the public comes to grips with the ramifications of its smoking habit, making it essential for producers to create an entry strategy.

About the author: This article originally appeared in China Briefing, a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN. For further information, please emailchina@dezshira.com or visit www.dezshira.com.

Economic burden of smoking: a systematic review of direct and indirect costs

Download (PDF, 375KB)

Letter on $110 million funding cut for CDC and OSH

Download (PDF, 942KB)

Sunbury’s foodie precinct calls for permanent smoking ban

http://www.starweekly.com.au/news/sunburys-foodie-precinct-calls-for-permanent-smoking-ban/

A trial smoking ban in Sunbury’s foodie precinct has been hailed a tremendous success, with restaurateurs calling for a permanent ban ahead of statewide restrictions from late 2017.

The east side of O’Shanassy Street will stay smoke free between Station and Brook streets until at least April next year after Hume council passed a proposal put by Sunbury Community Health, Sunbury Business Association and traders.

District 3429 owner Ami Tran and Vic’s Food and Wine’s Vic Scerri said reaction to the trial ban, which started on April 4, had been overwhelmingly positive, even though the ban had been largely self regulated.

“It means families, parents, old people … they can actually enjoy their food without having to worry about smoke,” Ms Tran said.

“Smokers, too, have been good about it, just going elsewhere to have a cigarette. It’s been great for the area.”

Mr Scerri said diners had quickly adjusted to the change. “There’s no reason it shouldn’t continue.”

Council’s city communities director, Margarita Caddick, said the trial ban was being monitored and evaluated.

“Hume officers regularly patrol the area and we’re pleased that people have done the right thing and refrained from smoking,” she said.

“The trial is almost three months old, and no fines have been issued to date. Diners and local businesses have provided positive feedback.

“We think it’s going very well.”

A survey of more than 150 people last year found 88.5 per cent supported the trial ban.

In February, Cr Jack Medcraft said it could be the first step to a ban in other public places, such as carparks and shopping centres.

“We would cop flak over it from some people … but the survey with the O’Shanassy Street proposal showed the community is saying, if you want to smoke, go to another spot.”

Reaction to $2.1 million of streetscape improvements unveiled last November also continues to be favourable.

Powerlines were put underground and kerbs and drainage upgraded.

Wider paths have given traders more room for outdoor tables and chairs, while new council policies allow businesses to set up permanent structures.

But perhaps the most popular addition has been the fairy lights in the street’s elm trees.

Ms Tran, Mr Scerri and council planning and development director Kelvin Walsh said the project had helped solidify O’Shanassy Street’s growing reputation as a foodie destination and “a spectacular place to dine”

University of Waterloo receives grant for tobacco policy research

http://www.570news.com/2016/07/12/university-of-waterloo-to-receive-grant-for-effects-of-tobacco-research/

A big boost for researchers at the University of Waterloo.

The U.S National Cancer Institute has given the University $8.8 million to evaluate the public-health impact of government policies that aim to regulate tobacco products, including e-cigarettes.

The grant is for the University’s International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project– which has evaluated the impact of national-level tobacco control policies in 28 countries.

Waterloo and the Medical University of South Carolina are the two lead institutions in the larger research grant involving 11 institutions and totalling $20 million.

In a release, The University says “they are pleased to be one of two lead institutions involved in this large-scale international project that will further the strides already made in public health related to tobacco products, as well as evaluate the impact of government policies on public health.”

International tribunal upholds states’ rights to protect health through tobacco control

http://www.who.int/fctc/mediacentre/news/2016/international-tribunal-states-rights-to-protect-health-through-t/en/

GENEVA, 12 JULY 2016 – An international tribunal has upheld the sovereign authority of states to protect health through tobacco control. The World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has confirmed that tobacco control measures applied by the Government of Uruguay did not violate the terms of an investment agreement between Uruguay and Switzerland, under which the dispute was initiated.

The decision was informed by a joint submission or amicus brief, from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) Secretariat. The brief provided an overview of global tobacco control, including the role of the WHO FCTC. It set out the public health evidence underlying Uruguay’s tobacco packaging and labelling laws and detailed state practice in implementing similar measures.

The Tribunal accepted submission of the amicus brief on the basis that it provided an independent perspective on the matters in the dispute and contributed expertise from “qualified agencies”.1 The Tribunal subsequently relied on the brief at several points of the factual and legal analysis in their decision. 2

In accepting submission of the amicus brief the Tribunal noted that given the “public interest involved in this case” the amicus brief would “support the transparency of the proceeding”.3. Now that the decision of the Tribunal has been released, the WHO and WHO FCTC Secretariat make available below their submissions to the Tribunal.

The tribunal’s award affirms that Parties to the WHO FCTC can confidently implement the Convention and its Guidelines to protect present and future generations from the devastating consequences of tobacco consumption.

Footnotes

1. Philip Morris Brand Sàrl (Switzerland), Philip Morris Products S.A. (Switzerland) and Abal Hermanos S.A. (Uruguay) v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7), Procedural Order No. 3 (February 17, 2015) at paras. 25 and 28.

2. Philip Morris Brand Sàrl (Switzerland), Philip Morris Products S.A. (Switzerland) and Abal Hermanos S.A. (Uruguay) v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7), Decision on the Merits (July 8, 2016)

3. Abal Hermanos S.A. (Uruguay) v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7), Procedural Order No. 3 (February 17, 2015) at para. 28

Melbourne City Council to consider smoking ban on major streets

Melbourne City Council is considering a smoking ban on footpaths along Swanston, Russell, La Trobe, Victoria and Lygon streets.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/melbourne-city-council-to-consider-smoking-ban-on-major-streets/news-story/079f88298ee7c7339038e6fc2edbb20b

FOOTPATHS on some of Melbourne’s major streets, including Lygon St, could become smoke free in a city-first proposal.

Melbourne City Council is considering whether to stop people lighting up on footpaths along Swanston, Russell, La Trobe, Victoria and Lygon streets.

People would also have to butt out on the footpaths outside the City Baths.

Council’s chair of people city portfolio Richard Foster said the response to previous smoking bans, covering nine city areas, was “overwhelmingly supportive”.

But the new proposal hinges on community consultation, which is open now and closes August 19.

“Smoke-free areas allow people to breathe easy and support the health of children and young people, older adults and people with health conditions,” Cr Foster said.

The smoking ban could affect popular Lygon St.

“In previous consultations around 85 per cent of respondents were in favour of introducing more smoke-free zones.

“Our approach helps to de-normalise smoking and support people who are trying to quit, or have recently quit.”

The council is considering the bans after a plea for help from RMIT university, which has a campus-wide ban but borders Swanston and La Trobe streets.

Property services executive director Chris Hewison said the university received regular complaints about smoking on footpaths outside RMIT doorways.

“Passive smoking or exposure to second-hand smoke affects the health of both smokers and nonsmokers,” he said.

“It can cause serious health disease and conditions — there is no level of exposure to second-hand smoke that is free of risk.”

monique.hore@news.com.au