Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

December, 2015:

The fixer who helped expose a ‘clean’ BAT

http://sbeta.iol.co.za/business/international/the-fixer-who-helped-expose-a-clean-bat-1962408

London – The British American Tobacco (BAT) e-mail was for internal consumption only and never meant for outside eyes.

Paul Hopkins is “not your normal run-of-the-mill employee,” a senior company manager wrote, “but then he doesn’t do run-of-the-mill jobs for BAT.”

Run of the mill for Paul Hopkins during his 13-year tenure at BAT involved being shot at, saving the lives of board directors, providing security to VIPs and evacuating employees from war-torn countries.

It also involved fixing “various delicate issues” related to BAT and the tobacco industry. These ranged from unusual “reputational” issues, including retrieving container-loads of cigarettes sold to Iraq in breach of UN sanctions – and obscuring the fact that a BAT finance director, who died in a Nairobi hotel room, had passed away after a drug-fuelled orgy with two prostitutes.

Hopkins took such things in his stride. As a veteran of the Irish Army, including nine in its special forces unit, the Army Ranger Wing, he saw service with UN peacekeepers in Lebanon and Somalia.

What his military career had not prepared him for was the bribery and corruption in the corporate world. When he questioned BAT’s order to “facilitate” payments to law enforcement agents and government officials, he was told it was the “cost of doing business in Africa”.

Fruits of corruption

Such was BAT’s appetite for the fruits of corruption, he became good at it. Documents seen by The Independent show he facilitated payments on BAT’s account to cripple anti-smoking laws in several East African countries, “incentivised” law enforcement to arrest tobacco smugglers, as well as running a sophisticated corporate spying operation involving “black ops” to put rival cigarette-makers out of business.

At BAT’s behest, he cultivated a network of informants in the police and government throughout East and Central Africa, where he headed the AIT (anti-illicit trade) team. Their job was to take out smugglers who were undercutting BAT brands such as Pall Mall, Dunhill and Lucky Strike and 555.

He helped secure the arrest of Rwanda’s richest businessman Tribert Rujugiro Ayabatwa in London. Ayabatwa, who heads the cigarette-maker Mastermind, one of Africa’s biggest manufacturers and a major BAT rival, was wanted by the South African tax authorities as well as Interpol. BAT told its teams to close down his operations.

Through his network Hopkins learnt Ayabatwa, wanted for fraud and tax evasion in South Africa, was about to board a UK-bound flight. After a tip-off to Scotland Yard Ayabatwa was arrested. He was later released after agreeing to pay a $7.1 million (R107m) fine.

Deal with problem

As Hopkins’s skills became more widely appreciated he was asked to do more than just combat smuggling. When a senior British-born BAT finance director was found dead in one of Nairobi’s finest hotels after a company conference, Hopkins was asked to deal with the potential “reputational” problems. These surrounded the fact the executive who was married with two children, had returned to his hotel with drugs and two prostitutes after an evening of clubbing. He ensured the Kenyan police did not charge the sex workers as well as arranging that the autopsy report made no mention of the drugs found in the dead executive’s body.

However, a BAT spokesperson said: “All companies in the BAT group are required to operate in line with the group’s standards of business conduct and are obliged to ensure that all 57 000 employees around the world understand them and abide by them. Whenever we learn that there is the possibility there may have been a lapse in these standards, our policy is to take all appropriate action. This includes, where relevant, co-operating fully with the authorities. We do not tolerate corruption in our business anywhere in the world.”

The company’s appetite for such methods did not lessen even after the UK’s Bribery Act came into force in 2011. BAT updated its guidelines of the Act’s tough new provisions and sent a summary to employees to sign and return confirming they were aware of the new standards and legal obligations.

Nevertheless, senior managers continued to order him to facilitate payments to achieve BAT’s ends.

In recorded conversations with his director Gary Fagan, Hopkins openly reports back on these payments to senior Kenyan Revenue Authority (KRA) officials in return for confidential tax details belonging to a rival cigarette-making firm.

Hopkins would then send the information to Fagan from a bogus email via Fagan’s wife’s email. Fagan, who was BAT’s East and Central Africa’s area director, continues to work for BAT in Africa.

In telephone conversations and emails, Naushad Ramoly, BAT’s regional legal counsel who authorised the payments, never questions Hopkins when he talks about “paying off” people and even takes an active part in one meeting to discuss obtaining a confidential KRA contract. It was when BAT used Hopkins’s carefully built network to enable another department to make bribes that a row resulted and he left the company.

Hopkins was ordered to let the Corporate and Regulatory Affairs (Cora) department use his covert system to make £30 000 payments to “consultants” in Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and the Comoros Islands. The payments were made, but his contractors were alarmed to discover they were directly paying “sitting government ministers or employees in their respective countries”.

“I feel it is crucial that you are aware of the fact that, contrary to Cora’s stating they are purely consultants, they are not,” one warned Hopkins in writing.

In fact they were illegal payments to two members and one former member of the World Health Organisation’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), a UN initiative aimed at reducing the toll of tobacco-related deaths. BAT paid the insiders to subvert the FCTC proposals before they became law in those countries.

However, when Hopkins raised his concerns internally BAT’s management became silent. He escalated his concerns to London who sent a “whistleblowing” team down to interview him. Despite promises of confidentiality, news of what he had done quickly spread.

The Cora official, who made the payments authorised by her manager, left the company but shortly afterwards Hopkins, after 13 years of service, found himself the subject of a campaign of “harassment”.

His expenses were slow to be paid, his electricity at home cut off after BAT overlooked paying the bill and crucially his work permit was mysteriously delayed and his immigration file vanished.

Colleagues who supported him also suffered. One discovered a promotion he had previously been congratulated on suddenly evaporated. The colleague was later suddenly let go.

Hopkins himself was told he was also under threat of redundancy despite routinely exceeding all his targets. He was placed on gardening leave as rumours circulated he had been sacked.

When Hopkins tried suing BAT for unfair dismissal a London tribunal ruled his contracts, said to be governed by the laws of England and Wales, did not permit him to sue in the UK.

Details of BAT’s bribery first emerged during those hearings. Now Serious Fraud Office officials are examining the allegations it seems likely the secrecy BAT sought to cloak its African operations in may yet be lifted in court. for the region – The Independent

Tobacco case ‘should encourage plain packaging here’

http://www.voxy.co.nz/politics/tobacco-case-should-encourage-plain-packaging-here/5/240578

The MÄ ori Party is delighted that tobacco giant Philip Morris has lost one of its legal bids in Singapore to overturn Australian’s plain packaging laws. Philip Morris has initiated at least three international challenges against Australia which was the first country in the world to introduce plain packaging.

MÄ ori Party Co-leader Marama Fox says the legal action brought by international tobacco companies has dissuaded the New Zealand Government from passing similar legislation here.

“Dame Tariana Turia introduced a plain packaging Bill into Parliament more than two years ago and we are still sitting on our hands.

“I’m encouraged to hear the Trade Minister Todd McClay say he believes New Zealand is well positioned to defend a legal challenge if we were to pass plain packaging legislation here.”

Mrs Fox says the MÄ ori Party is hopeful that the Bill will be passed by Parliament next year.

MÄ ori Party Co-leader Te Ururoa Flavell says the Australian example has shown how stripping the branding off cigarettes packets has reduced smoking rates.

“The number of new smokers has dropped dramatically and if we want to prevent rangatahi from picking up smoking this appears to be an effective strategy,” he says.

According to the Ministry of Health, around 5000 individuals die each year from smoking or second-hand exposure.

MÄ ori Party Co-leader Te Ururoa Flavell says New Zealand has an international reputation for its smokefree reforms.

“The Government, with the support of the MÄ ori Party, has committed to a Smokefree Aotearoa by 2025.

“If we’re going to reach this target we need to show some courage. We should be doing everything we can to eliminate the harmful effects of smoking on our whÄ nau.”

Tasmanian plans to lift legal smoking age to 21 or 25 could be world first

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-21/state-plan-to-lift-tasmanias-legal-smoking-age-above-18/7044622

Civil Liberties Australia (CLA) says a plan by the Tasmanian Government to lift the legal smoking age as high as 25 could leave the state with the strictest tobacco laws in the world.

The Tasmanian Government revealed an ambitious plan that could result in Tasmania becoming the only state in Australia to raise the legal age for smoking above 18.

It is part of a five-year preventative health plan to try and make Tasmania Australia’s healthiest state by 2025.

The strategy has a specific focus on reducing Tasmania’s high obesity levels and smoking rates.

About 20 per cent of Tasmanians smoke, the second highest rate in Australia, and Health Minister Michael Ferguson said the Government wanted to stop young people lighting up.

“We are proposing that we lift the legal smoking age potentially above 18, to potentially 21 or potentially 25,” he said.

“[In Tasmania] we have unacceptably high rates of smoking, we know that every cigarette is doing you damage and, despite our best efforts through public health over a number of years, we’re still nowhere near we’re we need to be.

“We have over 20 per cent of Tasmanians regular smokers, we have very high rates of youth smoking and one-third of young teenage mothers smoking during pregnancy.

“We’ve got to own up to this and be willing to have a genuine community debate.”

Around Australia, people under 18 cannot buy, smoke or possess cigarettes and health professionals agreed raising the legal age, especially in Tasmania, was a step in the right direction.

CLA Chief executive Bill Rowlings said it was a surprising move to look at tobacco laws without considering other health factors.

“If you’re going to look at what age people are entitled to do things, you’ve got to look at driving and at drinking alcohol and other measures,” he said.

“If this is a health-based initiative, the big issue at the moment is domestic violence, and domestic violence is far more driven by alcohol-related problems then it is by tobacco.

“I think we should have a very broad-ranging debate on what the proper ages are for various activities.”

PLAN IS UNWORKABLE, SAYS BUSINESS SECTOR

The Tasmanian Small Business Council describes the plan as unworkable.

Executive director Robert Mallett said educational programs were preferable to a framework that puts the burden on retailers.

“The likelihood that a 22-year-old or a 25-year-old will intimidate a young 18-year-old standing at the counter of a country grocery store is high,” he said.

“What would that person do? You’d supply the product, wouldn’t you, rather than be intimidated by a much older person when you’re saying, ‘Can I have a look at your ID?'”

Mr Mallett was concerned such a proposal would be a burden to business.

“Tobacco products are a legal thing to sell and for lots of small businesses, especially in rural and remote areas, it’s a significant part of their daily income,” he said.

“It’s a major part of their convenience offering… it’s going to have a significant effect on their viability.

“The last thing we’re going to do is stop our regional areas from having any sort of good-quality businesses just for some idiot sort of policy like this.”

MORE YOUNG TASMANIANS TAKING UP SMOKING

Penny Egan from the Cancer Council said the percentage of young people smoking in Tasmania was much higher than other states.

“In the cohort of young people between 18 and 24, we know that about 32 per cent of those people are smoking,” she said.

“That’s double what that same cohort is doing in other states and territories.

“We need to get rid of that addiction [and] putting up the age may be one of the answers.”

An idea backed by the Australian Medical Association’s Tasmanian branch secretary Tim Greenaway.

“The important thing to realise is 100 per cent of habitual smokers have started smoking by the age of 25,” he said.

“Two-thirds of all smokers will die from smoking-related diseases and smoking causes more deaths than drug and alcohol abuse combined, so we must target smoking.”

The State Government’s entire health plan will not be put out for public consultation until the middle of February 2016.

WE SHOULD NOT CONDONE SMOKING AT ANY AGE: DEAN

Tasmanian MLC Ivan Dean said the State Government’s idea gazumped his plan to ban smoking for everyone born from the year 2000.

His bill is currently being considered by a Parliamentary Committee.

He was not convinced the State Government’s proposal would be more effective in reducing smoking rates.

“It really doesn’t change what we’ve got now,” he said.

“We’re saying at 18 years of age smoking is OK for you, that’s the anomaly in the law and that’s what raising it from 21 or 25 will do as well.

“It indicates or supports smoking at some age.”

Mr Dean said he did not want to see his plan ignored by the State Government.

“It’s still on the table and it will be coming back before the Parliament in early 2016,” he said.

But Mr Ferguson said it would still be considered when presented to Parliament.

“I think we all applaud the intent of that bill,” he said.

“It’s subject to a parliamentary process and the Government will absolutely reserve judgement on how it will respond to that.

“But it’s well documented — I mean, there are difficulties with that proposal.”

Tobacco industry lobbying: the scandal of the century

Download (PDF, 489KB)

Smoking age could be raised to 25 in Australian state Tasmania

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/smoking-age-could-be-raised-to-25-in-australian-state-tasmania-a6781161.html

State has country’s second highest smoking rate

Australian state Tasmania could raise its legal smoking age to 21 – or 25.

Unveiled as part of the government’s Healthy Tasmania proposal, it is hoped the plan will reduce the state’s high smoking rate – which is only second behind the Northern Territory, despite being one of the least populated states.

The consultation draft has been put forward by the state’s health minister, Michael Ferguson. It is included in the state’s five year preventative health plan in a bid to make Tasmania the healthiest Australian state by 2025.

The National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2013 found 19.3 per cent of Tasmanian adults smoked daily, while the national average rate was 13.3 per cent.

If successful, the move would be a first for Australia, while several US cities have already increased the legal smoking age to 21. Needham in Massachusetts changed the age to 21 in 2005 and New York City followed in 2013. Hawaii will also up the age from January 1, 2016.

In a statement accompanying the report, Mr Furgeson said: “We have unacceptably high rates of smoking.

“International evidence supports raising minimum legal smoking age as a means of targeting the most at-risk age category for smoking uptake.

“Studies show that most smokers take up the habit before the age of 25.

Tobacco fields no place for kids

https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/12/21/tobacco-fields-no-place-kids

A 16-year-old tobacco worker in North Carolina outside the mobile home where she lives with her mother, three sisters, two brothers, and nephew in North Carolina. Since she turned 12, she has spent her school summer vacations working as a hired laborer on tobacco farms to help support her family. “With the money that I earn, I help my mom. I give her gas money. I buy food from the tobacco [work] for us to eat,” she said. “Then I try to save up the money so I can have my school supplies and school stuff like clothes and shoes.”

A 16-year-old tobacco worker in North Carolina outside the mobile home where she lives with her mother, three sisters, two brothers, and nephew in North Carolina. Since she turned 12, she has spent her school summer vacations working as a hired laborer on tobacco farms to help support her family. “With the money that I earn, I help my mom. I give her gas money. I buy food from the tobacco [work] for us to eat,” she said. “Then I try to save up the money so I can have my school supplies and school stuff like clothes and shoes.”

I first met “Elena” two years ago at a pizza parlor in eastern North Carolina. She was 13 at the time, about to finish eighth grade and begin her second summer as a hired laborer on tobacco farms.

I was in North Carolina investigating hazardous child labor on tobacco farms in the United States, where under federal labor law, it’s legal to hire 12-year-olds to work on tobacco farms.

A 16-year-old tobacco worker standing in a tobacco field in North Carolina wearing her work clothes. “I don’t feel any different in the fields than when I was 12,” she said. “I [still] get headaches and … my stomach hurts. And like I feel nauseous…. I just feel like my stomach is like rumbling around. I feel like I’m gonna throw up.”

A 16-year-old tobacco worker standing in a tobacco field in North Carolina wearing her work clothes. “I don’t feel any different in the fields than when I was 12,” she said. “I [still] get headaches and … my stomach hurts. And like I feel nauseous…. I just feel like my stomach is like rumbling around. I feel like I’m gonna throw up.”

I asked Elena how she felt while she worked in tobacco, and she said, “Sometimes I felt like I needed to throw up. I felt like I was going to faint. I would stop and just hold myself up with the tobacco plant.”

This past July – more than two years later – I went back to North Carolina and interviewed Elena again. She was taller and more confident. She had gotten her braces removed, and finished two years of high school. But she was still spending her summers working in the tobacco fields. “I don’t feel any different in the fields than when I was 12,” she told me. “I get headaches and my stomach hurts. And I feel nauseous. I just feel like my stomach is like rumbling around. I feel like I’m going to throw up.”

“Sofia,” a 17-year-old tobacco worker, in a tobacco field in North Carolina. She started working at 13, and she said her mother was the only one who taught her how to protect herself in the fields: “None of my bosses or contractors or crew leaders have ever told us anything about pesticides and how we can protect ourselves from them….When I worked with my mom, she would take care of me, and she would like always make sure I was okay.…Our bosses don’t give us anything except for our checks. That’s it.”

“Sofia,” a 17-year-old tobacco worker, in a tobacco field in North Carolina. She started working at 13, and she said her mother was the only one who taught her how to protect herself in the fields: “None of my bosses or contractors or crew leaders have ever told us anything about pesticides and how we can protect ourselves from them….When I worked with my mom, she would take care of me, and she would like always make sure I was okay.…Our bosses don’t give us anything except for our checks. That’s it.”

The symptoms she described – headaches, nausea, dizziness – are consistent with acute nicotine poisoning, or “Green Tobacco Sickness,” which happens when workers absorb nicotine through the skin while handling tobacco.

The long-term effects of absorbing nicotine through the skin are uncertain, but research on smoking suggests exposure to nicotine during adolescence can be linked to mood disorders, and problems with memory, learning, impulse control, and attention later in life. Pesticide exposure has been associated with reproductive health problems, cancer, neurological problems, and other issues.

“Sara” (left) and “Susana,” 16-year-old twin sisters who worked together on tobacco farms in 2015, sit in their bedroom in the clothes they wear to try to protect themselves in tobacco fields. They described working near areas where pesticides were being applied. Susana said, “We are just working … and the worker is on the tractor spraying almost very close to us. But they don’t take us out of that area. They don’t even warn us that it is dangerous. Nothing. We are just working and we cover ourselves well because the smell is very strong, and we get sick with the smell of that spray.” Sara said, “I feel dizzy, very dizzy because the smell is unbearable. It’s very strong and my stomach begins to feel stirred. I feel as if I am going to faint right then and there from the smell.”

“Sara” (left) and “Susana,” 16-year-old twin sisters who worked together on tobacco farms in 2015, sit in their bedroom in the clothes they wear to try to protect themselves in tobacco fields. They described working near areas where pesticides were being applied. Susana said, “We are just working … and the worker is on the tractor spraying almost very close to us. But they don’t take us out of that area. They don’t even warn us that it is dangerous. Nothing. We are just working and we cover ourselves well because the smell is very strong, and we get sick with the smell of that spray.” Sara said, “I feel dizzy, very dizzy because the smell is unbearable. It’s very strong and my stomach begins to feel stirred. I feel as if I am going to faint right then and there from the smell.”

Even though Elena is 16 now, she says still gets sick in the tobacco fields. And even though she looks like a young woman, she is still a child under international law.

Each year, an unknown number of children work long hours as hired workers on U.S. tobacco farms, exposed to nicotine, toxic pesticides, extreme heat, and other dangers. My colleagues and I interviewed 141 children ages 7 to 17 for a report last year documenting hazardous child labor in tobacco farming. We urged the U.S. government and the world’s largest tobacco companies to ban anyone under 18 from hazardous work in the crop.

The U.S. government and Congress haven’t changed the law or regulations to protect child tobacco workers. But last year, two of the largest U.S.-based tobacco companies banned children under 16 from working on farms in their supply chains. This was an important step forward, but they left out 16- and 17-year-olds.

“Alejandro,” a 17-year-old almost six-feet-tall, has been working in tobacco farming since he was 14. He told Human Rights Watch he often loses his appetite while working in the fields, a symptom associated with nicotine exposure: “You don’t feel like eating … Sometimes when I eat, I don’t know, my stomach don’t take it…. And then the food that I eat makes me feel sick.”

“Alejandro,” a 17-year-old almost six-feet-tall, has been working in tobacco farming since he was 14. He told Human Rights Watch he often loses his appetite while working in the fields, a symptom associated with nicotine exposure: “You don’t feel like eating … Sometimes when I eat, I don’t know, my stomach don’t take it…. And then the food that I eat makes me feel sick.”

Other companies that buy tobacco from the United States ban children under 18 from the most dangerous tasks in tobacco farming, but some have loopholes that allow 16- and 17-year-olds to do hazardous work in certain circumstances. None of the companies have policies sufficient to protect all children from danger on tobacco farms.

We went back to North Carolina during the tobacco season this year to find out what was happening to the teenagers excluded from protection. Almost all of the teenagers we interviewed for a new report described the same symptoms Elena did: nausea, vomiting, headaches, and dizziness. Many also described being exposed to pesticides while they worked, and said they felt immediately ill after working near spraying.

An 18-year-old tobacco worker who started working in tobacco farming when he was 15. “We leave here at 5 a.m. and get there at 6 a.m. We get back at 6 or 7 p.m.,” he said. “I usually don’t eat until 10 or 11 [a.m.], and the smell [of the tobacco] and an empty stomach, you can’t hold it in. You vomit. It happened to me a couple days ago.”

An 18-year-old tobacco worker who started working in tobacco farming when he was 15. “We leave here at 5 a.m. and get there at 6 a.m. We get back at 6 or 7 p.m.,” he said. “I usually don’t eat until 10 or 11 [a.m.], and the smell [of the tobacco] and an empty stomach, you can’t hold it in. You vomit. It happened to me a couple days ago.”

Sixteen-year-olds are not the same as adults. Most of us probably intuitively know it’s true, remembering what we were like at 16. But research on the teen brain has shown that the prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain used for problem-solving and controlling impulses, continues developing throughout the teenage years and into the early 20s. The prefrontal cortex is particularly susceptible to the effects of stimulants like nicotine.

Most of the children I interviewed had no idea that the work they were doing could have long-term consequences for their health. No one had ever trained them on the hazards of tobacco farming and how to protect themselves.

Dr. Sara Quandt and Dr. Thomas Arcury are faculty at Wake Forest School of Medicine. “Children are not small adults,” Dr. Quandt said. Dr. Arcury added, “If we think about children as children, because that’s what they are, we’re putting them to work in the nation’s most hazardous industry: agriculture. We’re putting people who are not only biologically immature, but behaviorally immature and asking them to work with adults. We’re putting them into a situation in which they are exposed to pesticides, they’re exposed to machinery and sharp tools, they’re exposed to the heat.”

Dr. Sara Quandt and Dr. Thomas Arcury are faculty at Wake Forest School of Medicine. “Children are not small adults,” Dr. Quandt said. Dr. Arcury added, “If we think about children as children, because that’s what they are, we’re putting them to work in the nation’s most hazardous industry: agriculture. We’re putting people who are not only biologically immature, but behaviorally immature and asking them to work with adults. We’re putting them into a situation in which they are exposed to pesticides, they’re exposed to machinery and sharp tools, they’re exposed to the heat.”

Even with better training, research suggests that the most mature 16- and 17-year-old children may not be well-equipped to navigate dangerous situations – like pesticides being sprayed in the field next to them — when adults are in charge. Studies have shown teens feel less vulnerable to harm and do not always take the same safety precautions as adults, even when they have received the same training.

Despite the evidence, some companies appear to believe that 16-year-olds should be allowed to work in tobacco fields. Teenagers should have access to safe jobs where they can develop work ethic and skills and add to their family’s income. But not on tobacco farms, where they’ll be exposed to toxins that could have lasting consequences on their health.

Tobacco farms are no place for children. Even though 16- and 17-year-olds may look fully grown, they are not adults. And they deserve protection.

Dr. David Tayloe, Jr., a pediatrician in North Carolina, told Human Rights Watch that, “Green Tobacco Sickness is all about exposure of the skin to green tobacco…. And so the nicotine that’s on the plant, in the plant, gets secreted out the pores of the plant, can be absorbed by the skin of a human being. And the nicotine can make you sick.”

Dr. David Tayloe, Jr., a pediatrician in North Carolina, told Human Rights Watch that, “Green Tobacco Sickness is all about exposure of the skin to green tobacco…. And so the nicotine that’s on the plant, in the plant, gets secreted out the pores of the plant, can be absorbed by the skin of a human being. And the nicotine can make you sick.”

 

British American Tobacco paid union to disrupt production at one of its chief rivals, whistleblower claims

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/british-american-tobacco-paid-union-to-disrupt-production-at-one-of-its-chief-rivals-whistleblower-a6780011.html

Whistleblower says tobacco giant funded union organisers and sought confidential tax details

British American Tobacco (BAT) recruited and paid for a union to disrupt production at one of its chief rivals, according to a whistleblower. The union plan was part of a strategy to drive Mastermind Tobacco, an African rival, out of business.

The clandestine plot is revealed in internal BAT documents disclosed by whistleblower Paul Hopkins, who worked for the tobacco giant in Africa for 13 years. The strategy also involved bribing Kenyan tax officials to disclose its rival’s confidential tax dealings, paying company officials to disclose vital corporate secrets, and offering cash to port officials to “lose” or impound its rival’s export shipments and supplies of raw materials.

The damaging revelations will further embarrass Britain’s fifth biggest company, which generated profits of more than £4bn last year. In Kenya there are growing demands for an official investigation into Mr Hopkins’ revelations.

The union plot, codenamed Operation Snake, was an attempt to disrupt Mastermind’s factory production, the documents state. The confidential BAT report said Mastermind had operated without a registered union and claimed any attempt to register one had been “met with ruthless resistance from senior management”.

The result was “iron-fist management” and employees with “no formal channel of airing their grievances”, the report said. “Victimisation of employees is the order of the day,” it claimed. Previous attempts to unionise “lacked co-ordinated effort”, it stated.

Under the scheme, BAT recruited “vocal employees from various departments such as marketing, leaf [tobacco], transport and factory” to be union reps. They were approached with “a handsome offer”, the report said.

BAT budgeted 4.5 million Kenyan shillings (£30,000) for five union reps, it added. As the union reps might face violent opposition, the money “will be able to cater for risk including terminal benefits just in case”, it said.

The person recruited to organise the union was told the money was coming from an anti-tobacco campaign group. BAT also paid to officially register Mastermind workers with the Kenyan Commercial Food and Allied Workers Union. The company funded the union’s legal fees when it became involved in dispute with the management. After two years, BAT withdrew as the union funded itself from membership fees. Once legally recognised, the union was encouraged to start a series of disputes to disrupt Mastermind’s production.

According to Mr Hopkins, BAT came up with the union scheme after another campaign ran into difficulties. BAT had suspected Mastermind was not paying its taxes. Mr Hopkins, a former Irish special forces soldier, was told by BAT to “facilitate” bribes to Kenyan Revenue Authority (KRA) officials to obtain its rivals’ confidential tax details.

For more than five years, Mr Hopkins accumulated a detailed dossier of KRA tax demands and other legal documents which allegedly revealed that Mastermind regularly failed to pay its tax bill. The KRA documents and correspondence showed the Kenyan tax authority was demanding billions in unpaid taxes from Mastermind but collecting only a fraction of it. Mr Hopkins said senior BAT officials instructed him to leak some of the documents to Kenyan newspapers and parliamentarians to embarrass the company as well as force the KRA to be more aggressive in its tax collecting.

According to documents seen by The Independent on Sunday, the strategy was only partially successful and Mastermind paid millions more in taxes. However, when the KRA wrote to Mastermind’s bankers threatening to freeze accounts until the outstanding amounts were paid, officials in the office of former Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga stepped in and ordered them to suspend the demands.

Mr Hopkins also facilitated payments on BAT’s account to officials and politicians to cripple anti-smoking laws in several East African countries as well as making payments to undermine the World Health Organisation’s efforts to reduce deaths from smoking.

He also revealed how BAT made a secret campaign donation to a Presidential candidate, Martha Karua, in a bid to block a rival firm winning a multi-million pound contract to minimise cigarette smuggling.

Ms Karua has said she was unaware BAT had made a donation to her campaign. She believed Mr Hopkins had made a personal donation. She said she would have not accepted the donation if she had known it had come from BAT. “If any person within my campaign team, or beyond, purported to accept the donation in exchange for influence of government procurement was acting beyond the scope of their authority, without my knowledge and in their individual capacity, not for me or my campaign. I believe I lost the Presidential campaign in large part because of my unwavering commitment to rule of law and my position against corruption and impunity,” she said.

A BAT spokesman said: “All BAT companies are required to operate in line with the group’s standards of business conduct and are obliged to ensure that all 57,000 employees understand them and abide by them.”

For more on tobacco industry tactics and its efforts to influence public health policy and stall tobacco control laws read the work of the University of Bath’s Tobacco Research Control Group.

The simple trick Australia is using to reduce smoking rates

http://www.vox.com/2015/12/20/10629896/australia-plain-packaging

Australian cigarette packages have graphic health warnings. Cameron Spencer/Getty Images

Australian cigarette packages have graphic health warnings. Cameron Spencer/Getty Images

Cigarette packs in Australia look different from anywhere else in the world. There are no brand logos, no bright colors. Every pack is the same shade of dull brown, plastered with graphic images showing the health impacts of smoking. There’s the gangrenous foot, mouth cancer, and everyone’s favorite, the creepy sickly eye.

Tobacco companies don’t do this by choice. In 2011, Australia became the first country in the world to pass plain packaging laws that severely restrict what can appear on cigarette packs.

Naturally, Big Tobacco hates these laws and has done everything it can think of to get rid of them. On Friday, Australia defeated a challenge by cigarette giant Philip Morris after a four-year international trade dispute in Singapore.

Big Tobacco is clearly running scared — and it should be. The latest ruling is likely to open the door for plain packaging laws around the world. Already, 11 other countries — including England, New Zealand, France, Brazil, India, and South Africa — have plans to implement their own plain packaging rules.

Other countries, including the United States, should follow Australia’s lead. Plain packaging laws are a simple, cost-effective way to cut smoking rates. That’s why tobacco companies hate them.

Big Tobacco has been fighting plain packaging on many fronts

Philip Morris exploited an obscure clause in Australia’s free trade agreement with Hong Kong known as investor-state dispute settlement. President Obama’s controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement includes an ISDS provision, and it has caused a lot of controversy. Critics worried that big companies — like Philip Morris — could use the ISDS process to overturn countries’ democratically enacted laws.

Australia may have won this round, but its government now faces an estimated $50 million legal bill. And Philip Morris is not the only company to push back against plain packaging laws. In 2012, British American Tobacco (BAT) challenged the laws in Australia’s high court, alleging they infringed the company’s intellectual property. The court ruled in favor of the government.

Eyebrows were raised at the World Trade Organization when Ukraine — a country that doesn’t actually export tobacco to Australia — challenged plain packaging as anti-trade. Later, it was discovered BAT had footed the country’s legal bill.

It’s not clear whether similar challenges from Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and Honduras are also funded by Big Tobacco.

While in public the tobacco giants insist plain packaging laws won’t work, behind closed doors they have spent millions of dollars trying to discredit the laws.

In 2010, a newly formed group called the Alliance of Australian Retailers launched a media blitz criticizing plain packaging. It was a case of “astroturfing” — an attempt to give the impression of a widespread grassroots backlash against the laws that just didn’t exist

Australian investigative journalists unearthed that Philip Morris, BAT, and Imperial funneled more than A$5 million into forming the Alliance of Australian Retailers. The group’s argument against plain packaging was distilled into a simple message: “It won’t work, so why do it.”

Of course, the obvious response is: If it won’t work, why are you spending millions of dollars to fight it? The alliance wasn’t effective. In fact, one study found for some people the ads increased their support for plain packaging.

Early evidence suggests plain packaging is working

The goal of the plain packaging laws is to make cigarettes less attractive and reduce the glamour of smoking. In lab studies, researchers have found they achieve this. More than 20 studies, undertaken over two decades in five countries, strongly suggest that plain packaging increases the impact of health warnings and reduces the appeal of cigarettes.

The laws aren’t a silver bullet to make people stop smoking. Instead, they work alongside higher taxes, public health campaigns, and education to reduce smoking rates over time.

As Australia is the only country to have implemented the laws, real-world evidence on plain packaging is limited. However, there is a growing body of research gathered since the laws were enacted three years ago. While we don’t yet have long-term evidence pointing to changes in smoking rates, short-term shifts seem positive.

A large study in the Australian state of Victoria found that in just 12 months plain packaging both reduced the appeal of smoking and increased desire to quit for adult smokers. Another study found calls to Quitline, an Australian government service to help people quit smoking, rose by 78 percent after the plain packaging laws came into effect. Smoking in outdoor areas, where the graphic packaging is visible to more people, also declined.

British American Tobacco hit back with its own study by Deloitte, which argued health warnings haven’t been effective in reducing consumption of cigarettes. But this study wasn’t independent — it was commissioned and funded by BAT. The study itself admits the researchers were highly selective about what brands they included.

Tobacco taxes alone are not enough

If cigarettes were like any other product, high taxes would be enough to make people stop buying them. But cigarettes are highly addictive, so rising prices don’t have too much impact on a smoker’s decision to buy cigarettes.

It’s estimated that in rich countries, a 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes will only bring about a 4 percent drop in demand. In poor to middle-income countries, the figures vary quite a bit because of a host of cultural and economic factors. For some though this sizable price bump would reduce demand by just 2 percent.

Of course, smokers could just take their cigarettes out of the packs. They could smoke rollies and put their tobacco in a tin. However, the evidence suggests very few people do. So the plain packs are always there, a graphic reminder of the harms of smoking. It’s a behavioral nudge that smokers carry around with them.

Globally, tobacco kills around 6 million people every year. Smoking costs the US more than $300 billion a year through both direct medical bills and lost productivity. Taxes, education, and public health campaigns are all important in reducing harm. However, Australia has shown that plain packaging needs to be in the mix too. It’s a simple and effective tool in the fight against a deadly habit

Boston Raises Minimum Age to Buy Tobacco to 21 Years Old

http://www.jamaicaplainnews.com/2015/12/20/boston-raises-minimum-age-to-buy-tobacco-to-21-years-old/16034

Starting February 15th next year you must be at least 21 years old to purchase tobacco in Boston.

The new regulations are due to Boston’s Board of Health voting to approve amendments that raise the minimum age for purchasing tobacco, including e-cigarettes, from 18 to 21. You must also be at least 21 to enter adult-only retail tobacco stores and smoking bars.

“I am proud to stand with our Board of Health in support of updating Boston’s tobacco regulations. It is our responsibility to do what we can to guide our young people and create a healthier future for all Bostonians,” said Mayor Marty Walsh, who announced the initiative to raise the age in November. “We know the consequences of tobacco use are real and can be devastating. These changes send a strong message that Boston takes the issue of preventing tobacco addiction seriously, and I hope that message is heard throughout Boston and across the entire country.”

With the changes to the city’s tobacco regulations, Boston joins more than 85 other municipalities in Massachusetts, as well as New York City and Hawaii, in requiring the minimum age to be 21.

Boston has actually done a very good job in stopping high school students from using tobacco, with statistics showing the rate of cigarette use declined from 15.3 percent in 2005 to 7.9 percent in 2013, and is well below the national average of 15.7 percent.

Heavy crackdown needed on smoking in public places

http://www.gulf-times.com/opinion/189/details/467217/heavy-crackdown-needed-on-smoking-in-public-places

Though Qatar has a law banning smoking in public places, it is unfortunate that the implementation part is lacking, Dr Ahmed Mohamed al-Mulla, director of Anti-Smoking Clinic, Hamad Medical Corporation, had pointed out to Gulf Times earlier this year. We are approaching the end of the year and sadly nothing has changed in this regard.

“The Supreme Council of Health has deputed several officers to check the practice. But at the ground level, not much action is taking place. There must be a greater enforcement of the law,” the senior Qatari official had urged. It seems the powers that be are yet to listen to his fervent plea.

On the contrary, smoking in public places has gone up of late. Smokers are puffing away, as if with a vengeance, polluting the air and endangering the lives of non-smokers, who are helpless victims of a crime against good health and wellness.

It is very difficult for non-smokers to visit many public places in Qatar these days. Even a family-friendly recreation location such as the picturesque Museum of Islamic Art Park in Doha reeks of tobacco smoke. Entrances of all popular malls in the country are clouded with tobacco smoke as smokers crowd around and smoke.

Though the managements of malls generally succeed in enforcing the ban on smoking inside their premises, it is unfortunate that some individuals continue to violate the law with impunity, smoking in some coffee shops, sitting right under the ‘No Smoking’ signs. This is nothing but arrogance coupled with ignorance. The staff members at such outlets plead helplessness as the persons who break the law against smoking in public places happen to be “very influential.”

According to facts from the World Health Organisation, tobacco kills up to half of its users. Around 6mn people die each year because of tobacco use. More than 5mn of those deaths are the result of direct tobacco use while more than 600,000 are the result of non-smokers being exposed to second-hand smoke, which fills restaurants, offices or other enclosed spaces when people burn tobacco products such as cigarettes, bidis and water-pipes. There are more than 4,000 chemicals in tobacco smoke, of which at least 250 are known to be harmful and more than 50 are known to cause cancer.

There is no safe level of exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke. In adults, second-hand smoke causes serious cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, including coronary heart disease and lung cancer. In infants, it causes sudden death. In pregnant women, it causes low birth weight.

Almost half of children regularly breathe air polluted by tobacco smoke in public places. In 2004, children accounted for 28% of the deaths attributable to second-hand smoke.

A decision by Katara, the Cultural Village Foundation, earlier this year banning shisha smoking at restaurants at its premises, ought to be emulated elsewhere in Qatar. In an interview with Gulf Times, Dr al-Mulla had called for shifting shisha outlets out of the Doha city limits.

Also needed is a heavy crackdown on all other forms of smoking in public places. Every person should be able to breathe tobacco-smoke-free air. When will Qatar residents be able to breathe clean air? The ball is in the court of the authorities concerned.