Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

October, 2015:

It is time for a national smoke-free law in China: new WHO report

Download (PDF, 2.3MB)

Beijing law provides momentum towards national smoking ban

BEIJING, 19 October 2015 – A strong, comprehensive, national smoke-free law would protect all of China’s 1.34 billion citizens from the harms of second-hand tobacco smoke, and would be immensely popular with the public, including smokers, according to a new report launched today.

These findings are presented alongside policy recommendations in Smoke-free policies in China –Evidence of effectiveness and implications for action, from the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC Project) and the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“China’s addiction to tobacco is taking a dreadful toll on its health, its society, and its economy. And China’s smokers are not only hurting themselves, but also their friends, family, and others around them. The rates of exposure to second-hand smoke are extraordinarily high, with devastating health consequences for those affected,” said Dr Bernhard Schwartländer, WHO Representative in China.

“But it doesn’t have to be this way. There is a solution – and it starts with the adoption of a national smoke-free law. A national smoke-free law is the only way to effectively protect all of China’s population from the harms of tobacco smoke – and the report we are releasing today demonstrates the urgent importance of this,” Dr Schwartländer said.

More than 1 million people die each year in China from tobacco-related illnesses. If current smoking habits continue, this number is expected to triple by the year 2050.

In addition, involuntary exposure to second-hand smoke endangers the health of hundreds of millions of people in China every day. According to the report, 740 million non-smokers – including 182 million children – are exposed to second-hand smoke at least once a day in a typical week. Approximately 100,000 people die in China every year as a result. Second-hand smoke can make indoor venues more polluted than the air outside even on the most heavily polluted days.

“China is unfortunately a world leader in second-hand smoke exposure: among the countries we work in, China has the highest rates of smoking in workplaces and homes, and among the highest rates in restaurants and bars. This puts the health of millions of non-smokers at risk every single day,” said Dr Geoffrey T. Fong, Principal Investigator, ITC Project.

“Other countries have taken strong action to protect non-smokers from the smoke of others. When comprehensive smoking bans are effectively implemented and supported, indoor smoking virtually disappears,” Dr Fong explained.

The winds of change are blowing in China: on 1 June this year, a comprehensive smoke-free law came into effect in the nation’s capital. The law is the strongest smoke-free law adopted in China, and requires all indoor places, including workplaces, restaurants, hotels and airports to be 100% smoke-free, without any exceptions. Beijing’s smoke-free law sets an excellent precedent for other Chinese cities, and provides important momentum for the adoption of a national smoke-free law.

“Beijing’s comprehensive law sets an example for all of China. Although there have been some smoke-free policies in other Chinese cities, they have been partial and poorly enforced. We need stronger laws, effective enforcement and mass education campaigns to educate people about the dangers of inhaling second-hand smoke,” said Dr Xiaofeng Liang, Deputy Director, China CDC.

Crucially, the report demonstrates that there is likely to be strong popular support for a national smoke-free law. The ITC Project data shows that even smokers are supportive of smoke-free laws, particularly in workplaces. Support for smoke-free bars amongst smokers is higher in China than it was in other countries, such as Ireland, Scotland (United Kingdom), and France before such smoking bans were introduced.

“This is a critically important finding. It shows that lawmakers have nothing to fear from the adoption of a national smoke-free law. On the contrary: a comprehensive national smoke-free law is likely to be extremely popular in China, even among smokers themselves, as we have already seen in Beijing. It is time to get this done,” Dr Schwartländer said.

The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC), which came into force in China in 2006, requires that countries adopt laws and regulations to protect against exposure to second-hand smoke in all indoor public places. As well as protecting against harms caused by second-hand smoke, smoke-free laws also help to reduce tobacco consumption and motivate smokers to quit the deadly habit.

Note to editors:

The International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC Project)

The evidence presented in the report is primarily based on findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC Project), the first-ever international cohort study to evaluate the psychosocial and behavioural effects of tobacco control policies and the only research project that focuses on measuring the impact of key policies of the WHO FCTC.

The ITC Project conducts surveys of smokers and non-smokers in China and 21 other countries. Four waves of ITC China Survey data have been collected between 2006 and 2012 from 5600 adult smokers and 1400 non-smokers in seven cities in China. Findings from the ITC China Survey and other ITC countries can provide policy-makers with a roadmap to guide the adoption and implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law.

Download the full report: http://www.wpro.who.int/china/tobacco_report_20151019_en.pdf

About the World Health Organization (WHO)

WHO is the directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system. It is responsible for providing leadership on global health matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and standards, articulating evidence-based policy options, providing technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health trends.

About the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC)

China CDC is a nonprofit institution working in the fields of disease control and prevention, public health management and provision of service. China CDC is committed to strengthening research on strategies and measures for disease control and prevention; organizing and implementing control and prevention plans for different kinds of diseases; carrying out public health management; acting as the national working group for disease prevention, emergency relief, and construction of public health information systems.

For more information, please contact:

Ms WU Linlin
WHO China Office
E-mail: wul@who.int
Office Tel: +86 10 6532 7191

Download (PDF, 4.57MB)

世卫组织新闻稿

全国禁烟法规刻不容缓:世卫组织新报告

北京控制吸烟条例为全国禁烟创造势头

北京,2015年10月19日——严格而全面的全国禁烟法规将保护中国13.4亿人口不受二手烟的危害,这一规定将受到广大群众包括吸烟者的热烈欢迎——引自今天发布的最新报告。

以上研究结果来自世界卫生组织、国际烟草控制政策评估项目(ITC项目)和中国疾病预防控制中心联合发布的《中国无烟政策——效果评估及政策建议》。该报告还提出了政策建议。

“烟瘾给中国的健康、社会和经济造成了巨大负担。中国的吸烟者们伤害的不仅仅是他们自己,还有他们的朋友、家人、以及身边其他人。中国的二手烟暴露率特别高,接触二手烟的人承受着毁灭性的健康后果。”世界卫生组织驻华代表施贺德博士表示。

“但这是可以避免的。有现成的解药——第一步是通过全国禁烟法规。全国禁烟法规是保护所有中国人民不受烟草烟雾危害的唯一办法——今天发布的报告向大家展示了这一法规的重要性和紧迫性,”施博士表示。

中国每年有100多万人死于烟草相关疾病。如果当前的吸烟习惯继续下去,到2050年,死亡人数将是现在的三倍。

不仅如此,每天还有数亿人被迫接触二手烟并付出健康的代价。报告指出,中国有将近7.4亿非吸烟者(包括1.82亿儿童)在有代表性的一周里每天至少有一次机会接触二手烟。接触二手烟每年导致10万中国人死亡。二手烟能使室内污染情况更糟于重度污染日子里的室外环境。

“在二手烟暴露水平上,中国不幸成为全球首领:在本研究调查的所有国家之中,工作场所吸烟率及家庭吸烟率以中国最高,餐厅和酒吧的吸烟率中国也非常靠前。这一情况每天都危害着数百万非吸烟者的健康,” ITC项目首席科学家方德智博士表示。

“其他国家已采取强有力的措施来保护非吸烟者不遭受他人吸烟的危害。当全面禁烟规定得到有效实施并获得支持,几乎能够完全消除室内吸烟现象。”方博士解释。

中国控烟的风向正在改变。自2015年6月1日起,在中国首都北京,一部全面禁止室内公共场所吸烟的立法——《北京市控制吸烟条例》开始生效。该条例是迄今为止中国最严格的控烟立法,要求北京的工作场所、餐厅、宾馆、机场等所有公共场所的室内区域一律百分之百禁烟。《北京市控制吸烟条例》为中国其他城市树立了优秀典范,并为出台全国禁烟法规加足了马力。

“北京全面禁烟规定为全国作出了表率。中国其他城市虽然有一些禁烟政策,但要么不是全面禁烟,要么执行不力。我们需要严格的法律、有效的实施,还需要开展大众宣教活动让大家了解吸入二手烟的危害。”中国疾病预防控制中心梁晓峰副主任表示。

这份报告还有一个重要发现:全国禁烟法规很有可能会得到群众大力支持。ITC项目数据表明即便吸烟者也支持禁烟规定,尤其是在工作场所禁烟。中国吸烟者对酒吧禁烟的支持率高于爱尔兰、苏格兰(英国)、法国等国在通过禁烟令之前的支持率。

“这一调查结果非常重要。它表明立法者不必对通过全国禁烟法规有太多顾虑。相反,全国性的全面禁烟规定极有可能广受欢迎,即便是吸烟者们也会欢迎——我们在北京已经见证了这一点。现在全国律法时机成熟,该出手时就出手。”施博士表示。

世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》(2006年在中国生效)要求缔约方通过法律法规保护公众在室内公共场所免于接触二手烟草烟雾。禁烟法律法规不仅保护人们不受二手烟的危害,还有助于降低烟草消费并鼓励吸烟者戒除这一致死陋习。

编者按:

关于国际烟草控制政策评估项目(ITC项目)

本报告所采用的研究证据来自于国际烟草控制政策评估项目(简称ITC项目)。ITC项目是全球首个针对控烟政策所带来的心理及行为上的影响进行评估的国际性队列研究,也是唯一一个衡量《公约》核心政策影响的研究项目。

ITC项目在全球包括中国在内的22个国家,针对吸烟者和非吸烟者展开调查。在2006至2012 年间, ITC项目在中国的七个城市中针对5,600名成年吸烟者和1,400名非吸烟者进行了4轮调查。ITC 项目在中国及其他国家的研究结果能够为决策者绘制出一幅用以制定和实施全面禁止公共场所吸烟立法的路线图。

报告全文下载:http://www.wpro.who.int/china/tobacco_report_20151019_zh.pdf

关于世界卫生组织

世卫组织是联合国系统内的卫生指导与协调机构,负责在全球卫生健康相关工作中发挥领导作用,制定卫生健康研究议程,设立规范及标准,阐述循证的政策备选方案,向各国提供技术支持,以及监控和评估卫生健康趋势。

关于中国疾病预防控制中心(中国疾控中心)

中国疾控中心是实施国家级疾病预防控制与公共卫生技术管理和服务的公益事业单位。中国疾控中心致力于加强对疾病预防控制策略与措施的研究,做好各类疾病预防控制工作规划的组织实施,开展各项公共卫生业务管理工作,在防病、应急、公共卫生信息能力的建设等方面发挥国家队的作用。

更多信息请垂询

吴琳琳女士
世卫组织驻华代表处

电子邮箱:wul@who.int
办公电话:+86 10 6532 7191

FTC to Put E-Cigs Under the Microscope

http://www.cspnet.com/category-news/tobacco/articles/ftc-put-e-cigs-under-microscope

WASHINGTON — The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) plans to begin a study of the U.S. sales and marketing of electronic cigarettes. To conduct the study, the agency will issue information requests to e-cigarette marketers and will use the information as a basis for a report on the sales, marketing activities and expenditures in this “new and complex” industry.

Since the mid-2000s, the sale of battery-powered e-cigarettes has grown rapidly in the United States.

The FTC is seeking clearance from the Office of Management & Budget (OMB) to collect information from the e-cigarette marketers, which is the first step toward conducting the study. It will publish a Federal Register notice seeking public comment on the proposed collection of information from approximately five large and 10 smaller e-cigarette marketers.

The topics the FTC seeks comment on the following:

The need for the study and the practical utility of the information collected; the accuracy of the commission’s burden estimates; and ways to enhance the quality and utility of the information collected and to minimize the burden of that collection.

Whether the FTC should seek to collect data according to 1.) the various types of products sold and given away by industry members; 2.) the various flavors and nicotine strengths of those sales and giveaways; 3.) the various sizes and liquid capacities of disposable e-cigarettes, cartridges and e-liquids sold and given away; and 4.) whether the company sells directly to consumers or to wholesalers and distributors.

Whether industry members can provide data that distinguishes between, among other things: 1.) direct sales to consumers (e.g., online sales) and sales to retailers and distributors; 2.) sales and giveaways of disposable e-cigarettes and sales and giveaways of refillable e-cigarettes; and 3.) the various combinations of sizes, flavors and nicotine contents of their e-cigarettes and refill cartridges and e-liquids.

Whether the FTC should seek data on state-by-state sales of e-cigarettes and related products.

The FTC will accept public comments until 60 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register.

Side stream emissions from ‘heated tobacco’ products similar to secondhand cigarette smoke

http://www.sciencecodex.com/side_stream_emissions_from_heated_tobacco_products_similar_to_secondhand_cigarette_smoke-167647

Posted By News On October 19, 2015 – 3:00pm

London, 19th October 2015 – A new study published in the Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry today found that, despite claims made by some manufacturers, next generation ‘heated’ tobacco devices produce side-stream emissions similar to secondhand cigarette smoke.

The study, conducted by Imperial Tobacco, owner of market leading e-cigarette brand blu, tested a commercially available heated tobacco product called iQOS to assess whether the product generated side stream chemical emissions when activated.

“A number of tobacco manufacturers are promoting products where the tobacco is reportedly ‘heated’ rather than burned. It has been claimed these products don’t produce side stream emissions,” explained Dr. Steve Stotesbury, Head of Scientific Regulatory Engagement, Imperial Tobacco. “However, our findings suggest those claims are wrong and that actually, when activated, heated tobacco products release a large number of different chemical compounds into the surrounding airspace. Further research on heated tobacco products is clearly needed”

Heated tobacco devices are sometimes confused with e-cigarettes. However, unlike e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products actually contain blended or processed tobacco just like conventional cigarettes. Heated tobacco products are claimed to work by heating cigarettes at a lower temperature to vapourise nicotine and flavourings which are then inhaled.

“By way of comparison, we also investigated side stream emissions from a Nicorette inhalator and an e-cigarette,” said Stotesbury. “The findings highlight the fundamental differences between tobacco and non-tobacco products. While e-cigarettes and pharmaceutical nicotine inhalators share very similar chemical characteristics, the heated tobacco product emissions suggest these devices should fall under the same regulation as regular cigarettes when it comes to indoor use and smoke-free legislation.”

Expert evidence on tobacco taxes

Download (PDF, 451KB)

Billboards with cigarette ads to be dismantled in Indonesia

http://www.tobaccoreporter.com/2015/10/billboards-with-cigarette-ads-to-be-dismantled-in-indonesia/

Billboards that advertise cigarettes and are displayed around schools in North Jakarta, Indonesia, will be dismantled in the near future, according to a story in the daily Tempo.

Mustafa Kemal, head of North Jakarta Education Sub-Department Regional I, stated that the existence of such billboards is unethical and could potentially influence students to smoke.

“If there are students caught smoking, either inside or outside of schools during school hours, they will be sanctioned,” he said.

Such sanctions would include summoning a child’s parents and revoking their Jakarta Smart Card.

Graphic warnings on cigarette packs due in the Philippines

http://www.tobaccoreporter.com/2015/10/graphic-warnings-on-cigarette-packs-due-in-the-philippines/

Health groups in the Philippines have reminded the government and the public that graphic images and warning texts should be printed on the labels of all tobacco products by Nov. 5, in compliance with the Graphic Health Warnings (GHW) Law, according to a story in the Philippine Daily Inquirer.

Sections 6 and 15 of the GHW Law, or Republic Act (RA) No. 10643, give tobacco manufacturers no more than one year from the issuance of the initial set of templates to comply with the printing requirements, according to a statement issued jointly by HealthJustice, Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance and New Vois Association of the Philippines. Irene Reyes, managing director of HealthJustice, said the department of health published the templates in November 2014.

“The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, to which the Philippines is a party, mandates governments, within three years of entry into the agreement, to pass and implement a law requiring tobacco products to carry effective health warnings,” Reyes said.

Under RA 10643, which was signed into law by President Aquino last year, all tobacco products in the Philippines must display a photographic warning accompanied by text printed on 50 percent of principal display surfaces, such as the front and back of cigarette packs. The law also prohibits the use of “misleading” terms such as “light,” “mild,” “low tar” or other words that suggest a particular variant is less harmful.

The deadline for the Philippines to implement graphic warnings and text was September 2008, making the country seven years late in fulfilling its obligation.

Queensland to widen smoking bans in outdoor areas

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/queensland-to-widen-smoking-bans-in-outdoor-areas-20151017-gkbntw.html

Smokers will find it even harder to light up in Queensland under proposed new laws.

Health Minister Cameron Dick said the laws would ban smoking in and around childcare centres, children’s sporting events, bus stops and other areas.

It is already illegal to smoke inside pubs, clubs, restaurants and workplaces in Queensland.

Other areas such as major sports stadiums, outdoor eating areas and patrolled beaches are also off limits.

But Mr Dick said further restrictions were needed because more than 3700 Queenslanders were still dying each year because of smoking.

“Smoking, even second-hand smoke, is proven to cause cancer,” Mr Dick said on Saturday.

“That is why our government is taking strong action to support people who want to stop smoking and to protect the rest of us who choose not to smoke.”

Cancer Council Queensland chief executive Professor Jeff Dunn said the laws would be a positive step towards a smoke-free state.

“These proposed changes will safeguard people from second-hand smoke, encourage more smokers to quit and prevent more young people from taking up this lethal habit,” Prof Dunn said.

“Children and young people will benefit significantly through discouragement of generational smoking and reduced exposure to the harmful effects of second-hand smoke.”

The laws, which are being drafted, are expected to be introduced into the parliament next month.

NEW SMOKING LAWS FOR QUEENSLAND:

Smoking banned at or near children’s organised sporting events, childcare centres, skate parks, aged care facilities, pedestrian precincts near state government buildings, national parks, public swimming pools, outdoor pedestrian malls and public transport waiting points like bus stops;

Smoke-free buffers to be increased from four metres to five metres outside government, commercial and non-residential buildings;

Local councils empowered to ban smoking in other public spaces; and

Ban on sales of tobacco products by pop-up retailers like those at music festivals.

It is time to take on the multimillion e-cigarette industry that is damaging the nation’s health

Download (PDF, 211KB)

World Lung Foundation also congratulates the Chinese Association on Tobacco Control on its silver anniversary

http://www.worldlungfoundation.org/ht/display/ReleaseDetails/i/36828/pid/6858

(October 17th, 2015, Beijing, China and New York, USA) – World Lung Foundation (WLF) is delighted to announce that at an event today in Beijing, the Chinese Association on Tobacco Control (CATC) recognized both World Lung Foundation and Dr. Judith Mackay, WLF Senior Advisor for Tobacco Control, for their role in fighting the global tobacco epidemic. In addition, WLF congratulates CATC on its silver anniversary – marking 25 years of CATC playing a leading role in efforts to reduce tobacco use in China.

Sandra Mullin, Senior Vice President, Policy, Advocacy and Communication, WLF, said: “WLF is delighted to be recognized by the Chinese Association on Tobacco Control for its work to date and thanks CATC for this honor. We congratulate our valued colleague Dr. Judith Mackay on her individual award, which is further recognition of her tireless work in combating the global tobacco epidemic. And we congratulate the Chinese Association on Tobacco Control on its silver anniversary.

“For the past 25 years, CATC has played a leading role in efforts to reduce tobacco use in China, making a significant contribution to progress at a regional and national level. We particularly recognize CATC for actively advancing the implementation of WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.”

Mullin continued: “Amidst the celebration today, we acknowledge that much more needs to be done to reduce the terrible burden of tobacco, which kills more than 1.3 million people in China every year, and sickens and disables many more. CATC has an important role to play in helping to prevent needless tobacco-related disease and premature death.”

“We support CATC in this endeavor and also stand ready to play our part. According to the latest China City Adult Tobacco Survey, public awareness of the specific harms of tobacco remains low in China’s cities. To overcome this problem, WLF pledges to continue to support evidence-based, effective tobacco control campaigns at both national and subnational levels. Commitment and action from government, health advocates and civil society can and will save many lives.”

The burden of tobacco use in China

Today, the imperative to reduce tobacco use in China remains as urgent as ever. The Tobacco Atlas notes that more than 275,900,000 adults and more than 8,937,000 children continue to use tobacco each day. Every year, more than 1,384,200 of China’s people are killed by tobacco-caused disease. In addition, a paper recently published in The Lancet revealed that smoking initiation among men is happening at a younger age and that smokers continue to smoke for longer compared with previous generations, increasing their risk of disease and premature death.

Unless significant advances are made in reducing tobacco use, the study predicts that one in three of all young men in China will eventually die from tobacco use and smoking-related premature death – from conditions including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, stroke and heart disease – will claim two million lives every year by 2030.

WLF’s activities in China

CATC recognized WLF for helping governments around the world to deliver clear, hard-hitting messages about the harms of tobacco to more than two billion people. WLF uses best practice methodologies including pre-campaign message testing, careful media planning and post-campaign evaluation and – in line with WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control –– aims to help countries become self-sufficient in the use of counter-marketing strategies to increase support for and build compliance with tobacco control laws.

In China, WLF supports efforts to: increase public awareness of the specific harms of smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke, create support for the implementation of and compliance with tobacco control policies, and encourage behaviour change. Since 2008, WLF has supported over 50 evidence-based tobacco control mass media campaigns in China. Some were developed to promote national initiatives, like building support for a national smokefree law and a campaign to discourage giving cigarettes as gifts. City-specific campaigns like “Smoke free Olympics”, “Smoke free Tianjin”, “Smoke free Harbin”, ”Smoke free Shenzhen”, and most recently “Smoke free Beijing”, have run in more than 30 cities across China.

About World Lung Foundation

World Lung Foundation was established in response to the global epidemic of lung disease, which kills 10 million people each year. WLF advances global health by improving local health capacity, by supporting operational research, by developing public policy and by delivering public education through mass and social media campaigns. The organization’s areas of emphasis are road safety, tobacco control, maternal and infant mortality prevention, obesity, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, asthma, and child lung health. For more information, please visit worldlungfoundation.org or Twitter: @WorldLungFdn

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Tracey Johnston, World Lung Foundation, at +44.7889.081.170 or tjohnston@worldlungfoundation.org.

Oxford Economics (OE) study on illicit tobacco trade

http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/unreliability-of-the-study/

Unreliability of the study

IF there’s anything to learn from the latest Oxford Economics (OE) study on illicit tobacco trade released recently in Hong Kong to a selective group of mediamen, it is its unreliability as a reference for taxation as it drew a sharp retort from no less than Internal Revenue Commissioner Kim S. Jacinto-Henares.

Henares branded as biased and inaccurate the study that the government lost last year more than P22 billion in revenues due to rampant consumption of untaxed cigarettes.

She cited a World Bank study which showed that only 5 percent, not 19 percent as claimed by OE, of the total cigarette consumption yearly was sourced from the illicit cigarette trade.

Henares said the study made by OE is biased, because it was commissioned by a big cigarette producer who strongly opposed the passage of the “sin” tax law.

Although the revenue chief did not elaborate to avoid being dragged into a trade war between the multinational company and its small competitor, Mighty Corp., which the former has been repeatedly suspecting of engaging in trade malpractices to increase its market share and profits.

What prompted Henares to react quickly was that this is not the first time that OE came out with such an unreliable study, especially at a time when revenue collections from the sin-tax law tremendously increased over the past few months and in the previous years, and, thus, debunked advocates of illicit trade.

There were three other highly questionable studies and reports on illicit trade that were also discredited not only by Henares but by the World Bank, World Health Organization (WHO) and the South East Asia Tobacco Control Alliance, equally reliable authorities on tobacco taxation and illicit trade.

One, is the AC Nielsen Report, which “estimates” illicit cigarettes using a questionable survey method. To date, nobody, except the multinational company, has seen an actual copy of the study. No government agency has been furnished with one, as well.

Two, is the Asia-11 Illicit Tobacco Indicator that you can throw away after reading the disclaimer that says:

“ITIC [International Tax and Investment Center] and OE prepared the report in accordance with specific terms of reference agreed between Philip Morris Asia Ltd., an affiliate of Philip Morris International Inc. [PMI] and ITIC. PMI has provided financial support for the report. However, ITIC and OE assume all responsibility for the report’s analysis, findings and conclusions.

“The report is to serve as a public policy resource pursuant to ITIC’s mission. Nevertheless, should any party choose to rely on the report, they do so at their own risk. ITIC and OE will not accept any responsibility or liability to any claim in respect of the report.”

Three, is the Senate Tax Study-Research Office report that was obviously twisted by the PR guys of the multinational firm to its favor. The report itself offers the recommendations that the data therein is inconclusive and subject to further analysis whether there are taxes and duties leakages.

The Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance also found out that:

· The report failed to mention that, even according to its own results, the majority of countries (six out of 11) compared over time experienced a decline in the volume of illicit trade.
· Nowhere in the report is it mentioned that for the majority of countries (four out of seven) where the share of illicit consumption in total consumption of cigarettes increased between 2012 and 2013, there was no tax increase in 2013. Such result might have undermined the notion that tax increases drive increases in illicit trade, a key message of the report.
Finally, the report is full of errors and mistakes, which is rather surprising given the “commercial” quality and glossy graphical presentation of the results. For example, the report does not make any distinction between smoking incidence and smoking prevalence, even though these are two very different concepts: prevalence is the proportion of a population that smokes, while incidence measures how many people per year begin to smoke.

It also confuses “sales” and “consumption,” two fundamental concepts on which the calculations are based. In short, as was true for the prior Asia-11 Report, the reliance on potentially biased data, combined with the lack of transparency about methods employed, results in a study whose estimates are of questionable value. We would caution any stakeholders against relying on this report when assessing the trade in illicit cigarettes in their country or in the region.

Mighty’s rival should be reminded that it is violating not only laws made by Congress (Republic Act [RA] 9211 and its interagency committee, implementing regulations and RA 7394 on unfair competition and deception), memoranda between government agencies and Article 5.3 of the WHO-Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC).

The country is a signatory to this government noninterference convention in 2004.

In essence, the WHO-FCTC recognizes that tobacco industry interference poses the single greatest threat to tobacco control. It has been documented that the big ones (multinational) in the tobacco industry have used self-serving strategies to subvert, hinder and prevent tobacco-control efforts at the start of the illicit trade campaign.

To reach the writer, e-mail cecilio.arillo@gmail.com.