Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

April, 2013:

President’s Plan to Increase Tobacco Tax Will Protect Kids and Save Lives Meanwhile Hong Kong moves backwards in tobacco control with an absence of political will to save lives Inbox x

http://www.ibtimes.com/print/press-release/20130410/presidents-plan-increase-tobacco-tax-will-protect-kids-save-lives-1184405

Published on International Business Times (http://www.ibtimes.com)

President’s Plan to Increase Tobacco Tax Will Protect Kids and Save Lives

By IBTimes Staff Reporter | April 10 2013 2:22 PM

President’s Plan to Increase Tobacco Tax Will Protect Kids and Save Lives

April 10 2013 2:22 PM ET

WASHINGTON, April 10, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The following is a statement of Matthew L. Myers, President, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids:

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20080918/CFTFKLOGO )

President Obama today has taken bold action to protect our children from tobacco addiction and save lives by proposing to increase the federal cigarette tax by US 94 cents per pack and similarly increase taxes on other tobacco products.  We urge Congress to support this proposal, which would have as great an impact in reducing tobacco use among kids as any action the federal government has taken.  It would be a giant step toward winning the fight against tobacco, the nation’s number one cause of preventable death.

On top of the health benefits, the proposed tobacco tax increases would raise $78.1 billion over 10 years to fund early childhood education initiatives proposed by the President, according to the Office of Management and Budget.

Study after study has shown that increasing the tobacco tax is one of the most effective ways to reduce smoking and other tobacco use, especially among kids.  Even tobacco companies admit in their own documents that tobacco tax increases reduce youth smoking, which is why they vehemently oppose them.  Economic research has found that every 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes reduces youth smoking by six or seven percent and overall cigarette consumption by three to five percent.

The health and economic benefits of a federal tobacco tax increase were confirmed in a 2012 report by the highly respected Congressional Budget Office.  The CBO found that a 50-cent increase in the federal tobacco tax would raise substantial new revenue while prompting nearly 1.4 million adult smokers to quit by 2021, saving tens of thousands of lives and reducing health care costs, including for the Medicaid program. Based on the CBO’s statement that a $1 tax increase would roughly double those benefits, we estimate that a 94-cent cigarette tax increase would prompt 2.6 million adult smokers to quit and save 18,000 lives by 2021.

In addition to these gains from helping current smokers quit, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids estimates that a 94-cent increase in the federal cigarette tax would:

•Prevent 1.7 million kids from becoming addicted adult smokers

•Prevent 626,000 premature deaths from these reductions in youth smoking alone

•Save $42 billion in future health care costs from these reductions in youth smoking.

The increased taxes on other tobacco products would have additional health benefits, preventing kids from using harmful and addictive products such as cheap, sweet cigars and smokeless tobacco.

These benefits are also evident from the most recent increase in the federal tobacco tax, a 62-cent per pack increase enacted in 2009.  As a result, cigarette sales declined by 8.3 percent in 2009 – the largest drop since 1932.  Health economists at the University of Illinois at Chicago found an immediate decline in youth smoking after the 2009 increase – the percentage of students who reported smoking in the past 30 days dropped between 9.7 percent and 13.3 percent (reducing the number of youth smokers by more than 220,000).  In the 12 months after the increase (April 2009 to March 2010), federal cigarette tax revenue increased by 129 percent (from $6.8 billion to $15.5 billion), even as cigarette sales declined.

Furthermore, national and state polls consistently show strong public support for substantial increases in tobacco taxes, with most polls showing voters favoring tobacco tax increases by more than a two-to-one margin.  Polls consistently have found that large majorities of Democrats, Republicans and Independents and voters from a broad range of demographic and ethnic groups all support tobacco tax increases – as do significant numbers of smokers.

In short, a significant tobacco tax increase is a win-win-win for the country – a health win that will reduce tobacco use and save lives, a financial win that will raise revenue to fund an important initiative and reduce tobacco-related health care costs, and a political win that is popular with voters.

The President’s proposal is exactly the shot in the arm needed to accelerate progress in reducing tobacco use, which kills more than 400,000 Americans and costs the nation $96 billion in health care bills each year.  While the nation has greatly reduced smoking, 18.1 percent of high school students still smoke and nearly 1,000 kids become new regular smokers each day.  Tobacco companies spend $8.5 billion – nearly $1 million each hour – to market their deadly products, often in ways that appeal to kids.

The tobacco tax proposal builds on other important actions the Administration has taken, including FDA regulations to stop tobacco marketing and sales to kids, the government’s first-ever national media campaign to prevent and reduce smoking, and expanded insurance coverage and assistance to help smokers quit.  Continuation of these initiatives, along with enactment of the proposed tobacco tax increase, can help create a future free of the death and disease caused by tobacco.

SOURCE Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids

.Source URL: http://www.ibtimes.com/press-release/20130410/presidents-plan-increase-tobacco-tax-will-protect-kids-save-lives-1184405

How Obama’s tobacco tax would drive down smoking rates

By Sarah Kliff, Updated: April 11, 2013

President Obama’s proposal to nearly double the federal tobacco tax would help fund a universal pre-K program. And, if history is any guide, it would likely have a marked impact on driving down the country’s smoking rates.

“Increasing the price of tobacco is the single most effective way to discourage kids from smoking,” CDC director Tom Frieden told reporters Tuesday afternoon. “We estimate this would result in at least 230,000 fewer kids smoking than would have smoked if the tobacco tax does not go into effect.”

Researchers have conducted over 100 studies that have “clearly and consistently demonstrated that higher cigarette and other tobacco product prices reduce tobacco use,” Frank Chaloupka, a professor at the University of Illinois in Chicago, writes. While tobacco is an addictive substance, demand tends to be surprisingly elastic: Price increases have reliably shown to decrease cigarette purchases.

The Congressional Budget Office recently looked at what would happen if the country implemented a 50-cent per pack tax on cigarettes. It estimates, given the research we have on tobacco taxes, that the price increase would lead to 1.4 million fewer smokers by 2021.

smoking tax

Many of those gains would be concentrated among younger Americans, who would take up smoking at lower rates:

A few years after the hypothetical tax increase took effect, the number of 12- to 17-year-olds who smoked cigarettes would be about 5 percent lower than it would be otherwise, the number of 18-year-old smokers would be 4.5 percent lower, the number of 19- to 39-year-old smokers would be almost 4 percent lower, and the number of smokers age 40 or older would be about 1.5 percent lower.

The CBO data suggests that a cigarette tax is more successful at reducing tobacco use among shorter-term smokers, vs. older Americans who may have been smokers for a longer period of time.

Even among those who don’t fully quit, tobacco taxes do appear to effect the intensity of smoking. A 2012 study in the journal Tobacco Control interviewed thousands of smokers over a time period where states increased their tobacco taxes. It found that the most intense smokers — those who smoked 40 or more cigarettes per day — saw the steepest decline in cigarette consumption.

cigarette tax

“The dramatic reductions in daily smoking might be driven,at least in part, by heavier smokers’ desire to reduce the number of cigarettes they smoke per day,” lead study author Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg writes. “This could be because of their comorbid health problems and/or advice from influential persons (eg, doctors/friends/family) to try to quit and/or reduce smoking.”

© The Washington Post Company

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/04/11/how-obamas-tobacco-tax-would-drive-down-smoking-rates/?print=1

Smoking recommendation clears state House panel

6 hours ago • BY HANNAH DOUGLAS, JG-TC Springfield Bureau

SPRINGFIELD — A resolution recommending that Illinois motorists not smoke with children in the car cleared a House panel unanimously Tuesday.

State Rep. Marcus Evans, Jr., D- Chicago, sponsored the measure that seeks to address the dangers of secondhand smoke. Evans also introduced a proposal that would ban drivers from smoking with children under 13 in the car, but said it will not move this session.

“I want a discussion for action,” Evans said. “I want people to stop smoking around their children and lead healthier lives.”

Evans said there wasn’t official opposition to that ban, but there might have been had the measure advanced.

State Rep. Mike Bost, R- Murphysboro, was among those who said he’d have voted against the proposed law if it had come up for a vote.

Although it is good to advise parents and other drivers on this issue, state oversight on the issue isn’t necessary, Bost said.

“We can let parents be parents … I don’t think we need it,” Bost said.

However, Evans said that if people would stop smoking with children in the car, he wouldn’t need to introduce a measure that bans the behavior.

The resolution next moves to the full House.

And although the resolution is only a recommendation, currently five states — Arkansas, California, Louisiana, Maine, and Utah — ban smoking in vehicles with children at various ages, according to Global Advisors on Smokefree Policy, a New Jersey based non-profit organization.

A similar measure banning smoking in vehicles with children ages 8 and under was introduced in 2010, but it did not clear the House.

The legislation is House Resolution 146 and House Bill 2939.

Contact Douglas at hannah.douglas@lee.net or 217-528-1079.

<img src=”http://b.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=10345586&cv=2.0&cj=1” /> <div style=”display:none;”> <img src=”http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-700bcf3-jPMko.gif” border=”0″ height=”1″ width=”1″ alt=”Quantcast”/> </div>

ASH Daily News for 10 April 2013

HEADLINES

UK rises up Unicef child well-being ranking

The well-being of British children has improved in a number of areas in recent years but they still lag behind many of their European neighbours, a Unicef report says.

Action on smoking, drinking and obesity has seen success but concerns remain about further education and unemployment.
See also:
– British children facing bleaker future under coalition, says Unicef, The Guardian
The State of the World’s Children 2011, Unicef (pdf)

Source: BBC News – 10 April 2013
Link: http://bbc.in/YKM1yO

ASH Scotland says tobacco advertising drive shows industry ‘up to its same old tricks’

Health campaigners at Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) Scotland have responded to reports of a new advertising drive by Japan Tobacco International opposing the Scottish Government’s support for plain, standardised packaging for tobacco products.
Source: Talking Retail – 09 April 2013
Link: http://bit.ly/YKMvF7

Coventry: Council swoop on city shisha bars

A raid on Coventry shisha bars has resulted in the seizure of hundreds of packs of illegal tobacco, the closure of a number of bars for breaching the smokefree laws and other bars switching to selling tobacco free products.
Source: Coventry Telegraph – 09 April 2013
Link: http://bit.ly/YKMNf5

Gloucestershire: Shopkeeper jailed for selling illegal tobacco

A Stroud shopkeeper has been jailed for 18 weeks after pleading guilty for selling illegal tobacco. This follows a previous 12-week sentence suspended for 18 months and 120 hours of unpaid work.
Source: This is Gloucestershire – 09 April 2013
Link: http://bit.ly/YKMYHn

USA: Smoking in youth-rated movies doubles

Smoking scenes in youth-rated movies doubled in number between 2010 and 2012, and have returned to the same level as a decade ago, according to a new report.

The researchers said the increase — which comes just a year after the U.S. Surgeon General warned that watching movies with smoking scenes causes youngsters to start smoking — is a setback for national youth tobacco prevention goals.

The report found that half of youth-rated movies in 2012 delivered an estimated 14.8 billion “tobacco impressions” to audiences, a 169 percent increase from the historic low in 2010.

The study was funded by Legacy, a nonprofit, antismoking foundation based in Washington, D.C.

Source: Health – 09 April 2013
Link: http://bit.ly/YKN5Ta

JTI celebrates Camel centenary

Celebratory events will commence this month with events at duty-free locations in airports across Latin America. JTI has commissioned 20 international artists, designers, painters, musicians and DJs to create images and soundtracks for over 100 original artworks for the “Remix” celebrations.
Source: DFNI Online – 09 April 2013
Link: http://bit.ly/YKNcxY

Comparing tobacco fight to the Opium Wars – The Japan Times

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/04/09/commentary/comparing-tobacco-fight-to-the-opium-wars/

NEW YORK – To know if tobacco is the equivalent of the opium wars in China, it is useful to briefly review history. When Christopher Columbus explored the New World in 1492, he found the natives smoking a native plant, tobacco, which they did both for medicinal and ceremonial purposes. He was the first to introduce it in Europe.

From 1617 to 1793, tobacco was the most widely used and valuable staple export from the English American mainland colonies and the United States

Columbus could have never imagined that, shortly after its introduction in Europe, tobacco would become one of the main threats to health in several Latin American and Asian countries, just as opium would plague China in the 19th century.

Tobacco, one of the most addictive substances in the world, was introduced to China via Japan or the Philippines in the 1600s. In 1643, Fang Yizhi, a Chinese scholar, was one of the first to warn of the dangers of exposure to tobacco. He wrote that smoking tobacco for too long would “blacken the lungs” and lead to death. Chongzhen, the Chinese emperor at the time, outlawed growing tobacco and smoking its leaves.

In 1858, the Treaty of Tianjin (Tientsin) which ended the first part of the Second Opium War (1856-1860) not only legalized the import of opium but allowed cigarettes to be imported to China duty-free. By 1900, foreign companies thoroughly permeated China.

In 1929, Fritz Lickint, a German scientist from Dresden, published the first statistical evidence linking tobacco use and lung cancer, a finding that was confirmed in 1950 in an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Only in 1999 did the Phillip Morris tobacco company acknowledge that “there is an overwhelming medical and scientific consensus that cigarette smoking causes lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema and other serious diseases in smokers.”

Today, while its use has diminished considerably in industrialized countries, it is having a devastating effect on the health of the Chinese population.

As Dr. Bernard Lown, a famous cardiologist, already indicated in 2007, “the struggle against tobacco is not being won, it is being relocated.” He also denounced that cigarettes are becoming more addictive and more lethal because of the higher tar and nicotine content.

The state-owned China National Tobacco Corporation (CNTC), trading as China Tobacco and founded in 1982, accounts for roughly 30 percent of the world’s total production of cigarettes, and is the largest manufacturer of tobacco products. China National Tobacco Corporation falls under the jurisdiction of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA).

The STMA has been under constant pressure from the World Trade Organization to loosen its monopoly. Since 2001, increased access has been granted to foreign companies.

Today, although CNTC dominates China’s market, foreign brands can still be found in large cities in China. In 2007, it was estimated that CNTC had 32 percent of the world tobacco market.

Tobacco smoking still continues to place a heavy toll on the Chinese people’s health. It is estimated that every day roughly 2,000 Chinese die because of smoking. China has now approximately 360 million smokers — a number greater than the U.S. population — who consume 37 percent of the world’s cigarettes. In addition, almost 800 million people suffer the consequences of second-hand smoke.

According to the Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, smoking will be responsible for approximately 3.2 million deaths annually by 2030.

Tobacco is also costly to the country’s economy. Although tobacco companies paid 864.9 billion yuan in taxes in 2012, when the health care costs of the people made sick by tobacco are combined with lost productivity, the total cost is probably much higher. The increased health costs as a result of smoking are part of the tragic legacy of tobacco.

Paradoxically, while the U.S. government has been extremely successful in discouraging smoking at home, its pressure on Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Thailand to break their domestic tobacco monopolies has resulted in their markets being flooded with American cigarettes. This prompted former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. C. Everett Koop to state that “people will look on this era of the health of the world, as imperialistic as anything since the British Empire — but worse.”

By issuance of the China Tobacco Control Plan (2012-2015), the Chinese government has indicated its intention to lower the negative impact of smoking. The plan, however, has been widely criticized for its lack of concrete proposals.

To effectively combat smoking, it is necessary to mobilize communities, educate the people about the health risks and high costs of smoking, impose punitive fines in class action suits and increase tax on cigarettes.

Unless these measures are implemented, tobacco will end up causing more damage to the Chinese people than the Opium Wars did in the 19th century.

Cesar Chelala, M.D. and Ph.D., is an international public health consultant and the author of “Tobacco or Health,” a publication of the Pan American Health Organization.

Council considers withdrawing ‘awful’ £5m tobacco investments

10:20am Wednesday 10th April 2013

By Lauren May

The senior cabinet member for health has spoken out against a controversial £5m investment in the tobacco industry by Merton Council.

Last week the Wimbledon Guardian revealed the council has more than £5m invested in British American Tobacco, makers of Lucky Strike and Benson and Hedges cigarettes, and Imperial Tobacco, who make Lambert and Butler cigarettes.

This is despite Merton now planning to spend £163,000 on NHS stop smoking services this year.

But now, Councillor Linda Kirby, cabinet member for adult social health, has called for the council to look into rearranging its investment “triple quick”.

She said: “We don’t want to be investing in tobacco companies – I think it is awful.

“It’s happening at authorities up and down the country.

“Suddenly they will realise what’s going on and they will want to change it.”

The council has recently taken over a new public health role as part of the NHS shake-up making it directly responsible for improving people’s welfare by promoting healthy living, including running anti-smoking campaigns.

This year the council has earmarked £163,000 for NHS stop smoking services, despite having millions invested in tobacco companies.

Coun Stephen Alambritis, leader of Merton Council, said the council would be reviewing the council’s investments adding that the council should be “mindful” that it was not fighting to reduce something harmful on one hand, and on the other investing in it.

Coun Kirby added: “I don’t know how locked in the council is to these investments but now it’s been revealed there will be a real attempt to get out of it if we can.

“I just don’t think we should be doing it and if we can get out of it we need to get out triple quick.”

Coun Richard Williams, chairman of Merton’s Pension Fund Advisory Committee, has said the investment would be reviewed at their next meeting.

Back

© Copyright 2001-2013 Newsquest Media Group

http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk

http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/trade_directory/

Margaret Thatcher and Philip Morris

In 1992 Margaret Thatcher signed on as an international consultant to the Philip Morris tobacco company at a pay rate of US $500,000 annually, with half to be paid directly to Mrs. Thatcher and half to be paid to the Margaret Thatcher Foundation.[1].

According to the 19 July 1992 U.S. Sunday Times article, Ms. Thatcher’s “advice will be sought on controversial issues including the penetration of tobacco markets in Eastern Europe and the Third World. She will alsos be asked to help resist attempts to ban tobacco advertising in the European Community and to fight cigarette taxes and state-run tobacco monopolies.” Thatcher was a non-smoker who spoke out against tobacco several times while Prime Minister. [2]

The Independent (of London) reported that Philip Morris paid for a 70th birthday bash for Ms. Thatcher on 23 October 1995 in Washington, D.C. 800 guests attended and the estimated cost of the party was $1 million.[3]

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Margaret_Thatcher

http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/documentStore/k/n/s/kns71f00/Skns71f00.pdf+

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/27/obituaries/27THAT.html

All Party Parliamentary Group on Smoking and Health

Download PDF : APPGillicit2013

Cancer News — MPs dismiss tobacco industry claims about cigarette packs

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/news/archive/cancernews/2013-03-27-MPs-dismiss-tobacco-industry-claims-about-cigarette-packs?view=rss

Customs Officers examine the huge haul of illegal tobacco and cigarette-making materials seized from a container

There is “no good reason” to believe that introducing plain, standardised cigarette packs will lead to a rise in smuggled tobacco, an influential cross-party group of MPs and peers has said.

Tobacco firms claim that standardised packs will be easier for counterfeiters to copy, leading to an increase in smuggling and, ultimately, job losses in the industry.

Such arguments were dismissed as “tobacco industry propaganda” by Liberal Democrat MP Stephen Williams, chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Smoking and Health.

“The tobacco industry knows that standard packs will cut the number of children pulled into this lethal addiction – that’s why they are running an expensive and mendacious campaign to try to scare the Government off,” Mr Williams added.

Existing packaging is already “cheaply and readily” copied, while enforcement agencies do not rely on pack design to test whether packs are illegal, the parliamentary group said.

UK border agency officials use a number of security features to detect illicit tobacco, all of which could also be present on standardised packs.

Sarah Woolnough, Cancer Research UK’s executive director of policy and information, said: “This report is further evidence that the tobacco industry should not be listened to when developing health policies aimed at reducing the devastating impact of smoking.

“The most effective way to tackle counterfeit and smuggled tobacco is through coordinated enforcement action with border agencies and trading standards.

“Improvements in controlling the distribution and sale of tobacco are also key. We’ve already achieved success in reducing illicit tobacco in the UK from coordinated action and that must be built upon.”

The Government launched a consultation on plans to introduce mandatory standardised packaging for tobacco products last April.

The consultation closed in August and the information is still being considered by health officials.

As many as 567 children in the UK take up the habit each day, which means more than 75,000 have started smoking since the consultation began, data released last week revealed.

In December, Australia became the first country in the world to introduce standardised packaging, with all tobacco products sold in a single colour, with only the brand name and graphic warnings visible.

The group called on the health secretary to follow Australia’s lead and introduce plain packs in the next parliamentary session.

The level of tobacco smuggling and illegal trade is falling in the UK and uniform packs will have no effect on that downward trajectory, the group said.

But they said the move would discourage many children from starting to smoke, saving the health service vast sums of money.

Mr Williams, MP for Bristol West, said: “The UK has a good record in recent years in tackling the illicit tobacco trade, although it remains a serious challenge.

“Contrary to tobacco industry propaganda there is no good reason to think that standardised packs will increase illicit trade.”

Copyright Press Association 2013

JTI reveals its serious concern that plain packaging will actually work

Download PDF : JTI reveals its serious concern that plain packaging will actually work