Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

November, 2011:

Japan Tobacco’s Indian JV goes up in smoke

http://business-standard.com/india/news/japan-tobaccos-indian-jv-goesin-smoke/455047/

Surajeet Das Gupta / New Delhi November 10, 2011, 0:21 IST

Confronted with a stringent FDI regime in tobacco, the world’s third largest publicly traded tobacco company, Japan Tobacco Inc, is closing its joint venture in India from December 31. The venture, JT International Indian Pvt Ltd, has already surrendered its licence to manufacture five billion cigarettes per annum to the government.

Japan Tobacco has 50 per cent stake in JT International Indian Pvt Ltd jointly with a Mumbai-based partner. The company has closed its Hyderabad factory and sold most of the machinery. According to sources, nearly 70 employees are expected to lose their jobs, while several have already left the company.

The Indian company used to sell two international brands, Gold Coast and Winston, and during its peak hawked about 300 million sticks per annum in Kerala, Mumbai and Bangalore.

HUFF AND PUFF
JT’S YEAR OF ENTRY 1993
INVESTMENTS
$80-85 million
LOSSES $45 million
SALES 300 million sticks a year
INDIAN MARKET 102 billion
sticks per annum, dominated by ITC; other significant players include Godfrey Phillips and Golden Tobacco
FOREIGN BRANDS MANUFACTURED/ IMPORTED IN INDIA
555 (ITC), Benson & Hedges (ITC), Marlboro (Godfrey Phillips and India Philip Morris) and Davidoff (Imperial
Tobacco Company)

Confirming the development, JT International spokesperson Proful Lall said: “The decision (to close) is based on a significant accumulation of investment and an unsustainable business model in an operating environment where readymade cigarette demand has not evolved, with several foreign investment, regulatory, duty and tax-related uncertainties.”

Japan Tobacco has made several attempts to increase its stake in the Indian company from 50 per cent to 74 per cent and bring in $100 million to address its growing losses. However, with the ban on FDI in tobacco, its hopes to be a player of note in the Indian market ended. Its application was rejected in 2010.

The Indian JV also came under government scrutiny for bringing in money through the back door by issuing fresh equity of a face value of Rs 1 each to Japan Tobacco, the parent, but at a premium of Rs 298 a share, aggregating Rs 293 crore. It also issued an equal number of shares to the Indian partner, but at par, which meant it paid only Rs 1crore.

That way, Japan Tobacco was able to bring in the required money, but without changing the equity structure. In that case, there was no need under Indian law to take FIPB permission. It was only necessary to inform the government and the RBI, which was done. Foreign investments in Indian tobacco have long been a contentious issue. British American Tobacco had, in the recent past, made an unsuccessful attempt to increase its shareholding in ITC Ltd. Other companies such as Philip Morris and Rothmans have also tried to set up subsidiaries in India.

Govt won’t be bullied by tobacco: Roxon

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/govt-wont-be-bullied-by-tobacco-roxon-20111110-1n8ho.html

The federal government will not be bullied by tobacco companies into backing away from tobacco reforms due to be passed by the Senate on Thursday.

Australia will become the first country in the world to pass legislation requiring all cigarettes to be sold in plain packs devoid of branding, when it passes the Senate, as expected, following limited debate.

Big tobacco has vowed to challenge plain packaging in the courts once the legislation passes parliament.

Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon said the government and big tobacco were destined to disagree.

“But we’re not going to be bullied into not taking this action just because the tobacco companies say they might fight us in the courts,” she told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday.

“We’re ready for that if they take legal action. We hope that they don’t. We believe that this is a measure that’s in the interests of the community and it would be better off for tobacco companies to look at ways they could invest in something that’s not so harmful for the community.”

British American Tobacco Australia insists the Commonwealth will be unlawfully acquiring its intellectual property rights and could have to pay billions of dollars in compensation.

Ms Roxon said the government didn’t accept that argument.

“They’re using that as a way of threatening both the government and the Senate to try not to proceed with this law,” she said.

The coalition supports the main plain packaging legislation but not an associated trademarks bill.

The health minister urged the Liberal senators to support the entirety of the legislation, but said that ultimately the government was confident it had the numbers to pass it.

Report of the Bills Committee on Dutiable Commodities (Amendment) Bill 2011

Purpose
This paper reports on the deliberations of the Bills Committee on
Dutiable Commodities (Amendment) Bill 2011 (the Bills Committee).

PurposeThis paper reports on the deliberations of the Bills Committee onDutiable Commodities (Amendment) Bill 2011 (the Bills Committee).

Download PDF : bc050615cb1-2339-e

Provision and Enhancement of Smoking Cessation Services

Purpose
This paper briefs Members of our current efforts on smoking cessation in
Hong Kong and the Administration’s plan to expand smoking cessation services in the
coming years.

Download PDF : sc100408cb1-1819-3-e

Cigarettes and free speech: Judge blocks graphic smoking warnings

http://www.latimes.com/health/boostershots/la-heb-fda-cigarette-smoking-labels-20111107,0,5209487.story?track=rss

Graphic images cigarette warning labels

Shown are two of the nine graphic warning labels that cigarette makers would be required to use by the fall of 2012. A judge temporarily blocked that requirement Monday.

By Amina Khan, Los Angeles Times / for the Booster Shots blog

November 7, 2011, 1:52 p.m.

A federal judge has put a temporary block on new graphic warning labels for cigarette packages as a case concerning the constitutionality of requiring the labels proceeds.

£200m to tackle Scottish ill-health

http://www.publicservice.co.uk/news_story.asp?id=17947

07 November 2011

The Scottish Secretary for Health Nicola Sturgeon has pledged to continue tackling health inequalities – with more than £200m set aside over the next three years to spend on preventing the ill-health caused by alcohol misuse, smoking and obesity.

Smoking and alcohol costs Scotland an estimated £4.66bn a year in terms of lost productivity, impacts on health services and the criminal justice system as well as the toll on children, families and communities.

Smoking has long been recognised as the most important preventable cause of ill-health and premature death in Scotland. Each year it is linked to some 13,500 deaths and 33,500 hospital admissions.

And it is estimated that a one per cent increase in sport and physical activity would yield a £3.5 million saving each year from coronary heart disease, stroke and colon cancer alone.

Sturgeon confirmed that over the next three years the Scottish government will invest:
• £126m to support the continued implementation of the alcohol framework. This will include preventative measures such as alcohol brief interventions, diversionary activity for young people and services for those with existing alcohol problems and their families. The money will also be invested in reducing alcohol treatment waiting times
• £40m on a broad programme of smoking reduction measures including NHS cessation services and smoking prevention activities across
• £10.5m delivering weight management services including child healthy weight, which aims to change how children eat and how active they are to stop BMI increase
• £7.5m on projects to encourage healthy eating including the Health Living Award for caterers and the Healthy Living Programme for convenience stores. Work with the manufacturing industry is also underway to reduce the calories and salt content of food
• £3m on initiatives to support increasing physical activity building on current jogging and walking programmes and other projects aimed at encouraging people to get and stay active
• £34m rolling out the Keep Well health checks which offers all 40-64 year olds living in deprived communities the opportunity to attend a health check.

Sturgeon said: “Scotland’s long-standing problems cannot be addressed overnight but we are taking and will continue to take significant action to address them through our efforts to reduce alcohol consumption, cut smoking rates, encourage active living and healthy eating, and promote positive mental health.”

Clear the Air says:

http://www.scotland.org/facts/population/

The population of Scotland is 5.2 million, which is 2 million less than Hong Kong.

Yet Scotland is allocating HK$ 497 million on a broad programme of smoking reduction measures including NHS (ergo, free) cessation services and smoking prevention activities.

Clear the Air  asks why Hong Kong is not allocating a  similar level of funding which thereby shows a lack of political will by the Administration to eradicate smoking at a faster rate.

Meanwhile HK Customs Department statistics of duty paid cigarette sales in 2011 shows the retail elasticity of tobacco products remains too affordable here and is also not adjusted for inflation. We need the excise portion to be at least 75% of  retail price, adjusted for inflation  and to at least match the current cumulative Singapore taxation levels. (Marlboro / Singapore retail price HK$72 per packet)

Hong Kong Budget Speech 2011

Tobacco Control

161.      Studies by the World Health Organization have clearly shown that increasing tobacco duty is an effective means of tobacco control. For public health protection, I propose to increase the duty on cigarettes by $0.5 per stick or 41.5 per cent. Duties on other tobacco products will also be increased by the same percentage. The above adjustments take immediate effect by way of a Public Revenue Protection Order gazetted today. The Customs and Excise Department will step up law enforcement to contain cigarette smuggling. We will also make greater effort to provide smoking cessation services.

Additional HK$26 million for tobacco control

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hkedition/2011-02/24/content_12068415.htm

Survey finds half of Beijing’s restaurants ignore smoking ban

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-11/06/c_131232143.htm

Nov. 6, 2011

BEIJING, Nov. 6 (Xinhua) — A survey conducted by an environmental group finds that a government ban on smoking in indoor public venues has been completely ignored by half of Beijing’s restaurants, a finding that underscores the challenges of controlling tobacco in a country with 300 million smokers.

The Daerwen Nature Quest Agency, a civil environmental group, conducted the five-month survey of 51 mid-range and low-end restaurants in Beijing in May after the smoking ban was enacted by the Ministry of Health.

The survey, results of which were made public Sunday, found that a complete ban on smoking was imposed in only ten restaurants while it was completely ignored by 25 restaurants. The remaining 16 restaurants separated smoking and non-smoking areas.

China is the world’s largest cigarette consumer. The country has 300 million smokers, and more than 740 million non-smokers are regularly exposed to second-hand smoke, according to experts’ estimates. About 1.2 million people died of smoking-related illnesses each year.

The central government enacted a ban on smoking in indoor public venues, but experts say the ban, which fails to stipulate supervision and punishment, appears toothless and needs to be upgraded to a comprehensive tobacco control law, which would be the country’s first such legislation.

The survey also reveals that air quality was equally bad in restaurants that only partially banned smoking.

The concentration of fine particles (PM2.5), a measurement widely used to gauge air quality, was tested 114 ug/m3 in restaurants that did not ban smoking and 103 in restaurants that partially banned smoking. Both rated four times higher a World Health Organization (WHO) guideline on PM2.5 concentration for short-term exposure, the survey said.

Li Qiang, a researcher with China’s National Office of Tobacco Control, said second-hand smoke is a main source of indoor fine particle pollutants whose links with cardiac and respiratory diseases have been proved.

He said the survey also shows that a partial smoking ban, such as setting up smoking areas or smoking rooms, was as bad as no ban at all. “Only a complete ban on indoor smoking can markedly reduce the harm,” Li said.

Filmmakers must justify smoking scenes: Govt

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-11-05/mumbai/30363623_1_smoking-scenes-ban-tobacco

Malathy Iyer, TNN Nov 5, 2011, 02.36AM IST

MUMBAI: Actors can light up on screen but it’s going to be a drag. They will have to, before their film ends, mouth a 30-second-long dialogue underlining health risks associated with smoking.

This is one of the new directives in the amended law that governs advertising and marketing of tobacco products and depiction on screen.

After Bollywood’s persistent pleas about creative license, lawmakers seem to have moved away from an all-out ban on puffing and instead preferred a deterrent. For instance, a U/A certification is another price to pay for including a smoking scene. The rules say theatre owners must blur out scenes in old movies and shows, so if one were to watch ‘Casablanca’ in a theatre,Humphrey Bogart with a cigarette dangling from his lips would be made hazy. So would Dev Anand in ‘Jewel Thief’.

“The second amendment to the Act was published in the Gazette of India on October 27. The rules will be effective from November 14 for both the film and TV industry,” said a Union health ministry official.

The rules are precise – a federal health officer will sit in on Censor Board screenings to ensure that rules aren’t broken and a health-warning scroll runs across the screen when an actor lights up.

Health messages of at least 20 seconds will have to be shown twice–before and during the film or TV show. Also, it would be an offence to use pictures of stars smoking in promotional material.

The two-page amendment says filmmakers must justify to the Censor Board the need for smoking scenes, edit out logos of tobacco companies and ensure no tobacco-related scenes are used in promos.

“It’s possible that the film needs a smoking scene for creative reasons. But it would be out of context to show an actor smoking on the promotional posters,” said the health ministry official.

The new rules come more than five years after the then Union health minister Anbumani Ramadoss had sought a complete ban on on-screen smoking along with a ban on smoking at public places.

Health activists aren’t happy. “From a public health perspective, a complete ban would have been better. But the fact that an actor has to give a disclaimer is good enough,” said Delhi-based Monika Arora of the Public Health Forum of India.

Cancer surgeon Pankaj Chaturvedi from Tata Memorial Hospital said, “The new rules promote a more holistic approach rather than a moral policing one.”

He, however, hopes that filmmakers will so dread the prospect of providing in-film disclaimers that they will include fewer scenes with cigarettes and chewing of tobacco.

“We want to ensure that the habit isn’t promoted,” he added.

Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project

http://www.reportingproject.net/

OCCRP Home

Big Trouble at Big Tobacco

Opinion

Documents

By OCCRP

Reports piled up from Japan Tobacco International (JTI) investigators around the globe. Mobsters were doing business with the firm’s Russian distributorship while shipping tons of illegal cigarettes into Europe. Workers felt endangered. Accused smugglers and criminals ran some of its Middle East partnerships.

And when investigators received information that 13 JTI employees or distributors may have been working directly with smugglers, a senior executive at JTI blocked an investigation, according to company e-mails and internal memos.

JTI had some problems.

The company’s investigative team – experienced hands culled from the CIA, British police, U.S. Special Forces and elsewhere –chronicled and fought those problems for years. They went undercover, shut down smuggling routes and worked with European police to intercept shipments worth millions of Euro. The deeper they dug, the more evidence they say they uncovered against JTI’s employees and its distributors.

And that, according to thousands of pages of company records, e-mails and secret recordings obtained by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), along with interviews of a half-dozen past employees, created another problem for the world’s third largest tobacco company.

The investigators had become too successful, they say.

JTI’s own investigators say JTI and its parent Japan Tobacco did almost nothing when faced with reports their distributors smuggled tobacco through Russia, Moldova, the Balkans, Afghanistan and the Middle East. The apparently rampant smuggling occurred despite a 2007 agreement with the European Union mandating that JTI proactively investigate all claims of smuggling. The agreement prompted a public pledge by the company to adopt a zero-tolerance policy on illicit shipments. Those investigators say they were fired by management for doing their job.

This year, as Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad killed his own people and faced worldwide sanctions, JTI’s Middle East business partner IBCS poured cigarettes into duty free shops, according to invoices obtained by OCCRP.

The profits went to a company whose owner, Rami Makhlouf, according to a European Union sanctions order on May 23, “provides funding to the regime allowing violence against demonstrators.” Four days after the sanctions took effect, JTI’s partner and sole Middle East distributor shipped 9,000 cases – 90 million individual cigarettes — to Syria Duty Free.

In the same month, Syria Duty Free claimed to transfer ownership from the Mahklouf family although OCCRP could not verify this. However, a US Department of Treasury notice two months later says “the U.S. Government has reason to believe that Rami Makhluf (sic) is disassociating himself (in name only) from his businesses and looking to safely store his wealth outside of Syria.”

Simon Evans, a spokesman for rival Imperial Tobacco, said his company stopped selling to Syria Duty Free the instant sanctions took effect and hasn’t resumed.

“We do have some questions about the sale by Mr. Makhlouf and whether it is valid, but even if it is valid, we and the entire industry are required to do full and complete vetting on any new distributors. Obviously that can’t happen in a few days or months, so we can’t resume sales until this is sorted out,” Evans said.

Evans also said Imperial has stopped selling to the Syrian government-owned General Organization of Tobacco because of questions about its banking transactions, even though it is not on the sanctions list. JTI shipped more than 84,000 cases of cigarettes to GOT on May 27,including 20,000 cases free of charge. The bill totaled more than 11 million Euro, according to a JTI invoice.

JTI e-mails detail how widespread the smuggling had become across several regions. JTI Investigators caught anIsraeli distributor smuggling large quantities of cigarettes into Iraq and Belgium, but investigators say the company took no action. Contractors working for JTI paid officials in Iraq, Kurdistan and Iran to get information on smuggling routes, according to the company’s internal reports on Iraq, and interviews with contractors.

JTI is the international arm of cigarette giant Japan Tobacco, which, in turn is owned more than 50 percent by the Japanese government. JTI reported $25 billion in sales in their last fiscal year on brands including Winston, Camel and Benson & Hedges, according to its annual earnings report. At a shareholder meeting in February, President and CEO Pierre De Labouchere lamented a difficult financial environment but lauded the strength of its Russian and Middle East operations during 2010.

Those two markets are the hub of smuggling by JTI distributors, according to e-mails, investigative notes, and internal documents obtained by OCCRP. The internal JTI records and related materials were provided to OCCRP by sources close to the company. Six former employees confirmed the authenticity of the documents.

Executives at JTI headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, did not respond to specific questions, but did issue a written statement blaming a “former employee” for spreading false information. “We will decline your invitation (to comment). Our company does not wish to comment on the unfounded allegations raised in the various e-mails you sent us,” Guy Cote, a media relations vice president, wrote in an e-mail.

Deborah Arnott, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) in London, said the revelations against JTI prove that the tobacco industry hasn’t abandoned its old practices.

“JTI, Philip Morris International, BAT and Imperial, have signed legally binding agreements with the EU committing to preventing smuggling of their products anywhere in the world,” she stated. “If subsequently JTI has carried on aiding and abetting smuggling, then it’s clear that a regional agreement like that negotiated by the EU is insufficient. When you have smuggling, you undermine public health, you invite crime and you rob tax payers of millions of pounds of revenue every year.”

Blocked Investigations

plane

In 2009 and 2010 as JTI investigators uncovered what they called substantial evidence of illegal trade, managers repeatedly interfered with efforts to stop the trafficking. Mark Mulvey, a senior vice president, directly blocked an investigation into the Audeh Group, its Middle East distributor, according to company e-mails, and internal memorandums.

Kevin Tomlinson, the general manager in Russia, said that he wasn’t concerned about an increase in cigarette seizures at Baltic borders because profits outstripped potential EU-imposed fines for not stopping the smuggling, anemail from the compliance team reported. Tomlinson’s comment was also secretly recorded by the compliance team.

Tensions between company executives escalated. David Reynolds, the former vice president of brand integrity tasked with stopping smuggling, clashed heatedly with bosses who he said wanted to slow down investigations that could hurt their profitable partnerships, JTI internal correspondence show.

In April 2010, Reynolds wrote a blistering e-mail to Ryuichi Shimomura, senior vice president and chief legal officer for the parent company, Japan Tobacco. In it, he argued that not only were distributors smuggling its product, but that JTI executives knew about the problem and did nothing. He argued that even information on investigations was being leaked to smugglers.

“Shipments to unauthorized buyers have reached a massive scale exposing the company to fines potentially of around €30 million,” Reynolds wrote. “We have repeatedly reported our findings to JTI management … but have yet to elicit any concerted effort to halt these diversions.

“In recent months members of my team have been directed not to investigate several instances of smuggling related to specific JTI distributors … and the possible involvement of JTI employees with known smugglers,” Reynolds wroteon Friday, April 10, 2010.

On Monday, April 13, Reynolds was fired.

The company also removed his top assistant, Craig Douglas, that same day. Over the next several months, JTI phased out nearly a dozen contractors who knew about the smuggling and worked closely with Reynolds and his unit. By July of this year, nearly all of Reynolds’ team had been terminated.

“What happened was that Dave (Reynolds)’s group had figured the whole thing out, and they were going after various people,” said Cary Hendricks, a computer intelligence specialist who spent six years contracting at JTI. “Once they had gathered enough proof, they called in the cavalry (notifying senior executives). Then just like that, Dave and Craig were fired – a totally unexpected turn of events.”

“At that point, the entire culture of JTI investigations changed. You had this extremely professional, experienced team working together and sharing a lot of information,” said Hendricks. “There was a buzz in the office, and they were doing great work. And they were replaced by what appeared to be a bunch of office workers who would show up, sit at their computers and do nothing as far as real investigations. It was sad to see.”

They were replaced in part by former employees of the Gallaher Group, which JTI bought in 2007. Gallaher, a British company, was implicated repeatedly in smuggling operations and helped smugglers evade more than $1.5 billion in customs tax in Great Britain in the early 2000s, according to a lengthy UK court case.

“You have to ask yourself how serious they are when they bring in people from Gallaher to take over,” said a former employee who had knowledge of both companies. “The culture in Gallaher was very much, ‘Let’s not get caught, but if we do get caught, be prepared to defend ourselves.’ They didn’t take steps to stop smuggling, just to insulate themselves when it came out.”

Destroying Documents
Burning damaged cigarettes.

Tobacco is the world’s most smuggled legal product, in large part because profits are huge and penalties weak. Smugglers ship containers of tobacco from areas with low taxes such as Russia and Ukraine, or from duty free spots in Dubai and Panama, to high-tax countries in Western Europe and North America. A single container of cigarettes can bring a $1 million profit.

Unlike counterfeiting, smuggling actually benefits tobacco makers. High taxes sharply curtail smoking, studies have shown, so smuggled goods keep them affordable, creating new consumers and sustaining old ones. Smuggling cost government budgets throughout Europe about $14 billion per year in tax revenues, according to a June, 2011 report by the European Commission.

Since the mid-1990s, major cigarette companies have repeatedly been implicated in working with criminal groups to smuggle cigarettes, feeding billion-dollar black markets in contraband smokes. In the past eight years, tobacco makers have paid at least $5 billion in fines and signed agreements to stop participating in the illicit trade. JTI signed a compact with the European Commission in 2007 obliging it to crack down on smuggling and put in place what it called a “zero tolerance policy,” toward illicit shipments.

But evidence from JTI records suggests the company has been less than compliant with the EC agreement. In March, 2010, a private investigator in Belgrade compiled a computer spreadsheet from law enforcement sources listing the names and phone numbers of businesses and individuals worldwide who had shown up in the records of a large-scale smuggling operation conducted by European police agencies. It included 13 JTI employees and distributors.

The Serbian list raised troubling questions. First, the compliance team wanted to know if the investigator, on contract with JTI, bribed law enforcement officials for the information, or was it passed on as a tip to be investigated. Once they decided the document came legally, they would investigate the 13 named employees and contractors, according tocompany e-mails.

That never happened. Nigel Espin, the director of corporate security who came over from Gallaher, expressed concern about possessing proprietary police information and in a March 10, 2010 e-mail ordered the document returned to the contractor and the investigation halted. He also ordered the document listing the employees and contractors deleted from all records and the JTI computer system. The next day, Chief of Compliance Jean-Luc Perreard confirmed the order to end the investigation.

Michael Padilla, a JTI contractor who ran undercover operations in Iraq and around the Middle East, said the company was obsessed with gaining market share.

“At first I had a honeymoon phase and was free to go after smugglers in certain areas, but soon it became very apparent that they had relationships with some of the smugglers I was going after,” Padilla said. “JTI was trying to protect their market share. Market share, and controlling Iran and the Middle East, was the number one priority for them.”

Similar conflicts took place at JTI’s offices around the world. In Russia, JTI investigators reported that alleged mobsters had financial stakes in some of JTI’s largest Russian distributorships, according to company e-mails and auditing reports.

JTI investigators and quality control officers in Russia and the Baltics detailed massive smuggling by distributors, particularly of its St. George Brand. But no action was taken, according to internal memos filed by investigators in Russia and by Reynolds, the former brand integrity chief.

Zero Tolerance?

Helping fuel Japan Tobacco‘s growth over the past decade was its purchase of two companies long accused of smuggling, Gallaher and RJR Reynolds.

The governments of Canada and Ecuador sued RJR in the 1999 under U.S. anti-racketeering laws, claiming that the company actively smuggled. The European Commission filed a separate suit, accusing high level RJR executives of knowingly accepting criminal proceeds and laundering money with drug cartels in South America, working with terrorists in Northern Iraq and of breaking trade embargos to ship cigarettes to Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s government. U.S. judges dismissed all lawsuits, saying they didn’t have jurisdiction over foreign tax matters.

But between 2003 and 2007, Canada’s Royal Mounted Police and revenue collectors filed fraud charges against JTI-McDonald (formerly RJR-McDonald, the company’s Canadian division) and some of its executives for evading more than $1.36 billion of taxes in 2003 alone.

After a series of court judgments – JTI actually filed for court protection against creditors in 2004 after Canada won a $1 billion award – RJR and JTI-MacDonald agreed to pay about $475 million in 2010.

Gallaher was equally notorious. In 2005, Gallaher fired a distributor it accused of smuggling tobacco. The distributor filed a lawsuit, saying Gallaher systematically engaged in smuggling. Gallaher won its lawsuit, but testimony and a judge’s final order dismissing the lawsuit harshly rebuked Gallaher.

In testimony for the civil lawsuit, a former director of Gallaher, Norman Jack, testified the company routinely enabled smuggling and adopted a culture of “willful blindness”.

Against that backdrop JTI adopted what it called a zero tolerance policy on smuggling in 2007, the same year it acquired Gallaher. It also entered into a binding agreement with the European Union calling for it to spend $400 million on anti-smuggling measures over the next 15 years, and implemented steep fines for violations. Under the terms of the pact the company agreed train its employees, and enforce a broad strategy to crack down on illicit shipments.

JTI Chief Executive Officer Thomas McCoy and Paul Bourassa, a senior vice president charged with regulatory and compliance issues, outlined the procedures in a memo to employees on Aug. 16, 2007. Both men had been senior executives at RJR when it was accused of conspiring with smugglers.

“In light of the recent acquisition of the Gallaher group, steps were rapidly taken to ensure that certain practices that could potentially run afoul of JTI’s Code of Conduct were addressed,” the memo said. “JTI’s is committed …. to act swiftly and decisively in stopping actual or potential illegal sales of its product will be acted upon.”

Anton Stanaj from JTI distributor Rokšped being arrested at Belgrade airport.

Despite the announcement, incidents of wrongdoing by JTI’s distributors were reported almost monthly during 2009-10, according to company records, but former employees said no action was taken in the most profitable areas. The records show that investigators suspected tens of millions of cigarettes were being diverted to smuggling operations in Russia and the Middle East and elsewhere, often with the help of JTI’s own distributors.

In Montenegro, Rokšped served as JTI’s distributor for the Montenegro, and remains so today, despite a 2007 arrest and a recent conviction for cigarette smuggling of Anton Stanaj, a member of the powerful family that runs Rokšped.

Dubbed operation “Memphis” — after a pre-JTI Gallaher brand– the Balkan police operation tracked shipments of cigarettes from China, Dubai and other countries to Montenegro and on to the EU through Rokšped and other companies. According to the indictment, Stanaj used Rokšped as the smuggling base of operations.

Stanaj was convicted in May this year in Belgrade and sentenced to six-and-a-half years in prison. Rokšped is still JTI’s partner in Montenegro according to the firm’s website, and Stanaj is appealing his conviction.

Representatives of Rokšped and the Stanaj family did not respond to six telephone messages and five e-mails from OCCRP.

JTI also continued, and in fact expanded its relationship, with another alleged smuggler, IBCS Trading. In 2002, the European Union filed a lawsuit accusing IBCS of being a “co-conspirator” with RJR Reynolds in smuggling operations. A U.S. judge tossed out the lawsuit, citing a 100-year old law barring U.S. courts from hearing revenue disputes of other governments.

In 2001, JTI and Issa Audeh, owner of IBCS, went into business together to form JT International in Jordan, according to the Audeh-Group website.

JTI investigators in the Middle East and Asia documented what they called widespread smuggling by IBCS to Iraq, Iran Cyprus and elsewhere during 2009-2010.

IBCS did not respond to four telephone calls from OCCRP. An e-mail sent through the company’s website – at the request of an IBCS official – received no response.

Hacked Computers
Smuggling in Oman.

At the center of the investigations was David Reynolds, who ran JTI’s Asian-Pacific office of Brand Integrity for four years before being promoted to oversee global operations at the end of 2008.

A former analyst for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, Reynolds is brusque and demanding, according to several former JTI employees. He saw things in terms of black and white, good and bad, and clashed with executives who were interested only in superficial investigations, they said.

He quickly assembled a team of investigators, some of whom he had worked with before, others he knew only by reputation. By early 2010, the team was running an extensive undercover operation in Iraq and Kurdistan, and had broadly expanded the company’s investigative capabilities.

As the investigators compiled information on Audeh Group, ICBS, and others, the staff also uncovered evidence that its computers were being hacked. Cary Hendricks, a computer security specialist who spent six years as a JTI contractor, found a unique sort of “Trojan horse” had infected the team’s computers and allowed hackers to see what each operative was writing, according to company e-mails.

Hendricks traced the hacking to an empty warehouse in Mexico and eventually to a Canadian company, another JTI contractor whose staff includes former members of the CIA and French intelligence, according to company e-mails and memoranda. Invoices obtained by OCCRP show that JTI paid $300,000 to the Canadian company.

According to a November 2009 memo, Senior Vice President Mark Mulvey admitted ordering some of the hacking. Mulvey also ordered another company executive, Willem Van Aldrichem, to shut down all investigations of Audeh and IBCS, according to a secretly tape recorded conversation between JTI employees on Jan. 10, 2010.

By the spring of 2010, relations between the investigative team and its superiors had soured to the point where only one side would survive, according to interviews with several people involved in the investigations. On April 10, Reynolds made his pitch in a letter to Ryuichi Shimomura, the chief legal officer of the parent company.

“… JTI management has not lived up to the ‘zero-tolerance policy’ … and, in those cases that touch on smuggling into or via the European Union, has specifically and repeatedly violated (its obligations under the European Commission agreement of 2007).” Reynolds wrote. “In a few cases sensitive information from (brand integrity) investigations has even been passed back to the smugglers themselves by unknown persons in the company.”

Reynolds asked for support. Instead, he was gone. Other contractors were fired or phased out, and many accepted large settlement payments and signed confidentiality agreements.

Following his dismissal, Reynolds went to work at FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., where he is a senior analyst on organized crime.

In an e-mail to OCCRP, FBI press officer Amy J. Thoreson said the agency would not allow Reynolds to comment for the story.

Several other fired investigators were quickly snapped up by executives at rival companies. One senior investigator ousted with Reynolds said he turned down a JTI severance package worth $100,000 because it meant signing a non-disclosure agreement. “I have to look at myself in the mirror,” he explained.

He asked to remain anonymous because he is now working for a rival company.

“I don’t think they knew what they were getting into when they hired Dave,” the investigator said. “For years they had people who were content to collect their money and not do anything. That’s how the game worked.”

“And suddenly we come in and start doing real investigations and uncovering a lot of smuggling,” he said. “They didn’t like what we were doing, and we didn’t like what they were doing. It was great for a few months, but it couldn’t last. They just didn’t want us to do our jobs.”

Reported and written by John Holland, Bojana Jovanović and Stevan Dojčinović for OCCRP

Big Trouble at Big Tobacco Tales of Mobsters, Smugglers and Hackers

http://hetq.am/eng/articles/6099/big-trouble-at-big-tobacco-tales-of-mobsters-smugglers-and-hackers.html

15:19, November 3, 2011

By OCCRP

http://hetq.am/static/news/b/2011/11/6099.jpg

Reports piled up from Japan Tobacco International (JTI) investigators around the globe. Mobsters were doing business withthe firm’s Russian distributorship while shipping tons of illegal cigarettes into Europe. Workers felt endangered. Accused smugglers and criminals ran some of its Middle East partnerships.

And when investigators received information that13 JTI employees or distributors may have been working directly with smugglers, a senior executive at JTI blocked an investigation, according to company e-mails and internal memos.

JTI had some problems.

The company’s investigative team – experienced hands culled from the CIA, British police, U.S. Special Forces and elsewhere – chronicled and fought those problems for years. They went undercover, shut down smuggling routes and worked with European police to interceptshipments worth millions of Euro. The deeper they dug, the more evidence they say they uncovered against JTI’s employees and its distributors.

And that, according to thousands of pages of company records, e-mails and secret recordings obtained by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), along with interviews of a half-dozen past employees, created another problem for the world’s third largest tobacco company.

The investigatorshad become too successful, they say.

JTI’s own investigators sayJTI and its parent Japan Tobacco did almost nothing when faced with reports their distributors smuggled tobacco through Russia, Moldova, the Balkans, Afghanistan and the Middle East. The apparently rampant smuggling occurred despite a 2007 agreement with the European Union mandating that JTI proactively investigate all claims of smuggling. The agreement prompted a public pledge by the company to adopt a zero-tolerance policy on illicit shipments.Those investigators say they were let go because of their concerns.

This year, as Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad killedhis own people and faced worldwide sanctions, JTI’s Middle East business partner IBCS poured cigarettes into duty free shops, according to invoices obtained by OCCRP.

The profits went to a company whose owner, Rami Makhlouf, according to a European Union sanctions order on May 23, “provides funding to the regime allowing violence against demonstrators.” Four days after the sanctions took effect, JTI’s partner and sole Middle East distributor shipped 9,000 cases – 90 million individual cigarettes — to Syria Duty Free.

In the same month, Syria Duty Free claimed to transfer ownership from the Mahklouf family although OCCRP could not verify this.  However, a US Department of Treasury notice two months later says “the U.S. Government has reason to believe that Rami Makhluf (sic) is disassociating himself (in name only) from his businesses and looking to safely store his wealth outside of Syria.”

Simon Evans, a spokesman for rival Imperial Tobacco, said his company stopped selling to Syria Duty Free the instant sanctions took effect and hasn’t resumed.

“We do have some questions about the sale by Mr. Makhlouf and whether it is valid, but even if it is valid, we and the entire industry are required to do full and complete vetting on any new distributors. Obviously that can’t happen in a few days or months, so we can’t resume sales until this is sorted out,” Evans said.

Evans also said Imperial has stopped selling to the Syrian government-owned General Organization of Tobacco because of questions about its banking transactions, even though it is not on the sanctions list. JTI shipped more than 84,000 cases of cigarettes to GOT on May 27, including 20,000 cases free of charge. The bill totaled about $15 million, according to a JTI invoice.

JTI e-mails detail how widespread the smuggling had become across several regions. JTI Investigators caught an Israeli distributor smuggling large quantities of cigarettes into Iraq and Belgium, but investigators say the company took no action. Contractors working for JTI paid officials in Iraq, Kurdistan and Iran to get information on smuggling routes, according to the company’s internal reports on Iraq, and interviews with contractors.

JTI is the international arm of cigarette giant Japan Tobacco, which, in turn is owned more than 50 percent by the Japanese government. JTI reported $25 billion in sales in their last fiscal year on brands including Winston, Camel and Benson &Hedges, according to its annual earnings report.At a shareholder meeting in February, President and CEO Pierre De Labouchere lamented a difficult financial environment but lauded the strength of its Russian and Middle East operations during 2010.

Those two markets are the hub of smuggling by JTI distributors, according to e-mails, investigative notes, and internal documents obtained by OCCRP.The internal JTI records and related materials were provided to OCCRP by sources close to the company. Six former employees confirmed the authenticity of the documents.

Executives at JTI headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, did not respond to specific questions, but did issue a written statement blaming a “former employee’’ for spreading false information.“We will decline your invitation (to comment). Our company does not wish to comment on the unfounded allegations raised in the various e-mails you sent us,” Guy Cote, a media relations vice president, wrote in an e-mail.

Deborah Arnott, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) in London, said the revelations against JTI prove that the tobacco industry hasn’t abandoned its old practices.

“JTI, Philip Morris International, BAT and Imperial, have signed legally binding agreements with the EU committing to preventing smuggling of their products anywhere in the world,” she stated. “If subsequently JTI has carried on aiding and abetting smuggling, then it’s clear that a regional agreement like that negotiated by the EU is insufficient.When you have smuggling, you undermine public health, you invite crime and you rob tax payers of millions of pounds of revenue every year.”

Blocked Investigations

In 2009 and 2010 as JTIinvestigators uncovered what they called substantial evidence of illegal trade, managers repeatedly interfered with efforts to stop the trafficking. Mark Mulvey, a senior vice president, directly blocked an investigation into the Audeh Group, its Middle East distributor, according to company e-mails, and internal memorandums.

Kevin Tomlinson, the general manager in Russia, said that he wasn’t concerned about an increase in cigarette seizures at Baltic borders because profits outstripped potential EU-imposed fines for not stopping the smuggling, an email from the compliance team reported. Tomlinson’s comment was also secretly recorded by the compliance team.

Tensions between company executives escalated. David Reynolds, the former vice president of brand integrity tasked with stopping smuggling, clashed heatedly with bosses who he said wanted to slow down investigations that could hurt their profitable partnerships, JTI internal correspondenceshow.

In April 2010, Reynolds wrote a blistering e-mail to Ryuichi Shimomura, senior vice president and chief legal officer for the parent company, Japan Tobacco. In it, he argued that not only were distributors smuggling its product, but that JTI executives knew about the problem and did nothing.  He argued that even informationon investigations was being leaked to smugglers.

“Shipments to unauthorized buyers have reached a massive scale exposing the company to fines potentially of around €30 million,” Reynolds wrote. “We have repeatedly reported our findings to JTI management … but have yet to elicit any concerted effort to halt these diversions.

“In recent months members of my team have been directed not to investigate several instances of smuggling related to specific JTI distributors … and the possible involvement of JTI employees with knownsmugglers,” Reynolds wrote on Friday,April 10, 2010.

On Monday, April 13, Reynolds was fired.

The company also removed his top assistant, Craig Douglas, that same day. Over the next several months, JTI phased out nearly a dozen contractors who knew about the smuggling and worked closely with Reynolds and his unit. By July of this year, nearly all of Reynolds’ team had been terminated.

“What happened was that Dave (Reynolds)’s group had figured the whole thing out, and they were going after various people,” said Cary Hendricks, a computer intelligence specialist who spent six years contracting at JTI. “Once they had gathered enough proof, they called in the cavalry (notifying senior executives). Then just like that, Dave and Craig were fired – a totally unexpected turn of events.”

“At that point, the entire culture of JTI investigations changed. You had this extremely professional, experienced team working together and sharing a lot of information,” said Hendricks. “There was a buzz in the office, and they were doing great work. And they were replaced by what appeared to be a bunch of office workers who would show up, sit at their computers and do nothing as far as real investigations. It was sad to see.”

They were replaced in part by former employees of the Gallaher Group, which JTI bought in 2007. Gallaher, a British company, was implicated repeatedly in smuggling operations and helped smugglers evade more than $1.5 billion in customs tax in Great Britain in the early 2000s, according to a lengthy UKcourt case.

“You have to ask yourself how serious they are when they bring in people from Gallaher to takeover,”said a former employee who had knowledge of both companies. “The culture in Gallaher was very much, ‘Let’s not get caught, but if we do get caught, be prepared to defend ourselves.’ They didn’t take steps to stop smuggling, just to insulatethemselves when it came out.”

Destroying Documents

Tobacco is the world’s most smuggled legal product, in large part because profits are huge and penalties weak. Smugglers ship containers of tobacco from areas with low taxes such as Russia and Ukraine, or from duty free spots in Dubai and Panama, to high-tax countries in Western Europe and North America. A single container of cigarettes can bring a $1 million profit.

Unlike counterfeiting, smuggling actually benefits tobacco makers. High taxes sharply curtail smoking, studies have shown, so smuggled goods keep them affordable, creating new consumers and sustaining old ones. Smuggling cost government budgets throughout Europe about $14 billion per year in tax revenues, according to a June, 2011 report by the European Commission.

Since the mid-1990s, major cigarette companies have repeatedly been implicated in working with criminal groups to smuggle cigarettes, feeding billion-dollar black markets in contraband smokes. In the past eight years, tobacco makers have paid at least $5 billion in fines and signed agreements to stop participating in the illicit trade. JTI signed a compact with the European Commission in 2007 obliging it to crack down on smuggling and put in place what it called a “zero tolerance policy,” toward illicit shipments.

But evidence from JTI records suggests the company has been less than compliant with the ECagreement. In March, 2010, a private investigator in Belgrade compiled a computer spreadsheet from law enforcement sources listing the names and phone numbers of businesses and individualsworldwide who had shown up in the records of a large-scale smuggling operation conducted by European police agencies. It included 13 JTI employees and distributors.

The Serbian listraised troubling questions. First, the compliance team wanted to know if the investigator, on contract with JTI, bribed law enforcement officials for the information, or was it passed on as a tip to be investigated. Once they decidedthe document came legally, they would investigate the 13 named employees and contractors, according to company e-mails.

That never happened. Nigel Espin, the director of corporate security who came over from Gallaher, expressed concern aboutpossessing proprietary police informationand in a March 10, 2010 e-mail ordered the document returned to the contractor and the investigation halted. He also ordered the document listing the employees and contractors deleted from all records and the JTI computer system. The next day, Chief of Compliance Jean-Luc Perreardconfirmed the order to end the investigation.

Michael Padilla, a JTI contractor who ran undercover operations in Iraq and around the Middle East, said the company was obsessed with gaining market share.

“At first I had a honeymoon phase and was free to go after smugglers in certain areas, but soon it became very apparent that they had relationships with some of the smugglers I was going after,’’ Padilla said. “JTI was trying to protect their market share.Market share, and controlling Iran and the Middle East, was the number one priority for them.’’

Similar conflicts took place at JTI’s offices around the world. In Russia, JTI investigators reported that alleged mobsters had financial stakes in some of JTI’s largest Russian distributorships, according to company e-mails and auditing reports.

JTI investigators and quality control officers in Russia and the Baltics detailed massive smuggling by distributors, particularly of its St. George Brand. But no action was taken, according to internal memos filed by investigators in Russia and by Reynolds, the former brand integrity chief.

Zero Tolerance?

Helping fuel Japan Tobacco‘s growth over the past decade was its purchase of two companies long accused of smuggling, Gallaherand RJR Reynolds.

The governments of Canada and Ecuador sued RJR in the 1999under U.S. anti-racketeering laws, claiming that the company actively smuggled. The European Commission filed a separate suit, accusing high level RJR executives of knowingly accepting criminal proceeds and laundering moneywith drug cartels in South America, working with terrorists in Northern Iraq and of breaking trade embargos to ship cigarettes to Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s government.U.S. judges dismissed all lawsuits, saying they didn’t have jurisdiction over foreign tax matters.

But between 2003 and 2007, Canada’s Royal Mounted Police and revenue collectors filed fraud charges against JTI-McDonald (formerly RJR-McDonald, the company’s Canadian division) and some of its executives for evading more than $1.36 billion of taxes in 2003 alone.

After a series of court judgments – JTI actually filed for court protection against creditors in 2004 after Canada won a $1 billion award – RJR and JTI-MacDonald agreed to pay about $475 million in 2010.

Gallaher was equally notorious. In 2005, Gallaher fired a distributor it accused of smuggling tobacco. The distributor filed a lawsuit, saying Gallaher systematically engaged in smuggling. Gallaher won its lawsuit, but testimony and a judge’s final order dismissing the lawsuit harshly rebuked Gallaher.

In testimony for the civil lawsuit, a former director of Gallaher, Norman Jack, testified the company routinely enabled smuggling and adopted a culture of “willful blindness.”

Against that backdrop JTIadopted what it called a zero tolerance policy on smuggling in 2007, the same year it acquired Gallaher. It also entered into a binding agreement with the European Union calling for it to spend $400 million on anti-smuggling measures over the next 15 years, and implemented steep fines for violations. Under the terms of the pact the company agreed train its employees, and enforce a broad strategy to crack down on illicit shipments.

JTI Chief Executive Officer Thomas McCoy and Paul Bourassa, a senior vice president charged with regulatory and compliance issues, outlined the procedures in a memo to employees on Aug. 16, 2007. Both men had been senior executives at RJR when it was accused of conspiring with smugglers.

“In light of the recent acquisition of the Gallaher group, steps were rapidly taken to ensure that certain practices that could potentially run afoul of JTI’s Code of Conduct were addressed,”the memo said. “JTI’s is committed ….to act swiftly and decisively in stopping actual or potential illegal sales of its product will be acted upon.”

Despite the announcement, incidents of wrongdoing by JTI’s distributors were reported almost monthly during 2009-10, according to company records, but former employees said no action was taken in the most profitable areas. The records show that investigators suspected tens of millions of cigarettes were being diverted to smuggling operations in Russia and the Middle East and elsewhere, often with the help of JTI’s own distributors.

In Montenegro, Roksped served as JTI’s distributor for the Montenegro, and remains so today, despite a 2007 arrest and a recent conviction for cigarette smugglingof Anton Stanaj, a memberof the powerful family that runs Roksped.

Dubbed operation “Memphis”–after a pre-JTI Gallaher brand–the Balkan police operation tracked shipments of cigarettes from China, Dubai and other countries to Montenegro and on to the EU through Roksped and other companies. According to the indictment, Stanaj used Rokspedas the smuggling base of operations.

Stanajwas convicted in May this year in Belgrade and sentenced to six-and-a-halfyears in prison. Rokspedis still JTI’s partner in Montenegro according to the firm’s website, and Stanaj is appealing his conviction.

Representatives of Roksped and the Stanaj family did not respond to six telephone messages and five e-mails from OCCRP.

JTI also continued, and in fact expanded its relationship, with another alleged smuggler, IBCS Trading. In 2002, the European Union filed a lawsuit accusing IBCS of being a “co-conspirator” with RJR Reynolds in smuggling operations. A U.S. judge tossed out the lawsuit, citing a 100-year old law barring U.S. courts from hearing revenue disputes of other governments.

In 2001, JTI and IssaAudeh, owner of IBCS, went into business together to form JT International in Jordan, according to the Audeh-Group website.

JTI investigators in the Middle East and Asia documented what they called widespread smuggling by IBCS to Iraq, Iran Cyprus and elsewhere during 2009-2010.

IBCS did not respond to four telephone calls from OCCRP. An e-mail sent through the company’s website– at the request of an IBCS official – received no response.

Hacked Computers

At the center of the investigations was David Reynolds, who ran JTI’s Asian-Pacific office of Brand Integrity for four years before being promoted to oversee global operations at the end of 2008.

A former analyst for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, Reynolds is brusque and demanding, according to several former JTI employees. He saw things in terms of black and white, good and bad, and clashed with executives who were interested only in superficial investigations, they said.

He quickly assembled a team of investigators, some of whom he had worked with before, others he knew only by reputation. By early 2010, the team was running an extensive undercover operation in Iraq and Kurdistan, and had broadly expanded the company’s investigative capabilities.

As the investigators compiled information on Audeh Group, ICBS, and others, the staff also uncovered evidence that its computers were being hacked. Cary Hendricks, a computer security specialist who spent six years as a JTI contractor, found a unique sort of “Trojan horse” had infected the team’s computers and allowed hackers to see what each operative was writing, according to company e-mails.

Hendricks traced the hacking to an empty warehouse in Mexico and eventually to a Canadian company, another JTI contractor whose staff includes former members of the CIA and French intelligence, according to company e-mails and memoranda. Invoices obtained by OCCRP show that JTI paid $300,000to the Canadian company.

According to a November 2009 memo, Senior Vice President Mark Mulvey admitted ordering some of the hacking. Mulvey also ordered another company executive, Willem Van Aldrichem, to shut down all investigations of Audeh and IBCS, according to a secretly tape recorded conversation between JTI employees on Jan. 10, 2010.

By the spring of 2010, relations between the investigative team and its superiors had soured to the point where only one side would survive, according to interviews with several people involved in the investigations. On April 10, Reynolds made his pitch in a letter to Ryuichi Shimomura, the chief legal officer of the parent company.

“… JTI management has not lived up to the ‘zero-tolerance policy’ … and, in those cases that touch on smuggling into or via the European Union, has specifically and repeatedly violated (its obligations under the European Commission agreement of 2007).” Reynolds wrote. “In a few cases sensitive information from (brand integrity) investigations has even been passed back to the smugglers themselves by unknown persons in the company.”

Reynolds asked for support. Instead, he was gone. Other contractors were fired or phased out, and many accepted large settlement payments and signed confidentiality agreements.

Following his dismissal, Reynolds went to work at FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., where he is a senior analyst on organized crime.

In an e-mail to OCCRP, FBI press officer Amy J. Thoreson said the agency would not allow Reynolds to comment for the story.

Several other fired investigators were quickly snapped up by executives at rival companies. One senior investigator ousted with Reynolds said he turned down a JTI severance package worth $100,000 because it meant signing a non-disclosure agreement. “I have to look at myself in the mirror,” he explained.

He asked to remain anonymous because he is now working for a rival company.

“I don’t think they knew what they were getting into when they hired Dave,” the investigator said. “For years they had people who were content to collect their money and not do anything. That’s how the game worked.”

“And suddenly we come in and start doing real investigations and uncovering a lot of smuggling,” he said. “They didn’t like what we were doing, and we didn’t like what they were doing. It was great for a few months, but it couldn’t last. They just didn’t want us to do our jobs.”

Reported and written by John Holland, Bojana Jovanovic and Stevan Dojcinovic for OCCRP.