Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

July, 2011:

NZ bans POS display / Euromonitor webinar

NEW ZEALAND
Tobacco displays banned

14.07.2011. New Zealand’s parliament today passed legislation that bans the retail display of tobacco products, reports Radio New Zealand.
» read more

UNITED KINGDOM
Wales to ban smoking in cars

14.07.2011. First Minister Carwyn Jones proposed to ban smoking in cars carrying children, if children’s exposure to second-hand smoke did not reduce as a result of a campaign.
» read more

EVENTS
Euromonitor holds Webinar

14.07.2011. The London-based research provider Euromonitor International will hold a free online webinar under the title \”\”The Tobacco Industry in 2011 – The Battle Intensifies\”\” on 19 July 2011, 10am EST/ 3pm UK time.
» read more

BELARUS
Neman factory opens new production line

13.07.2011. A new EUR-5.3-million line for the production of super slim cigaretes was launched at the Grodno-based tobacco factory “Neman” on Wednesday.
» read more

Effect of excise tax

State’s low smoking rate masks ethnic disparities

http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/states-low-smoking-rate-masks-ethnic-disparities-11509

15 July 2011

California’s adult smoking rate hit a record low last year, 11.9 percent, state health officials announced this week. While smoking prevalence has fallen across the board, the number masks big disparities among demographic groups.

The state’s analysis [PDF] shows smoking prevalence by sex, age, school grade and four ethnic groups – white, African American, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander. But the state’s own research in recent years has revealed wide variations in smoking rates among and within Asian ethnic groups; lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender populations; and people on active military duty. The disparities underscore the challenges of combating tobacco use in different communities.

Take for example African Americans, who have the highest smoking rate of the four ethnic groups represented. More than 18 percent of African American men and nearly 15 percent of women were smokers last year. For African American women, smoking prevalence has remained relatively flat for the past five years.

“This is something we are really struggling with,” said Colleen Stevens, chief of the California Tobacco Control Program. “I don’t think we can clearly say we have all the answers, either to the cause of why it’s happening or the absolute solution.”

Research has shown that there is more advertising of tobacco products in African American communities, Stevens said. A recent study by Stanford University found that menthol cigarettes were marketed in a predatory manner to African American high schoolers in California.

Stevens said the state is working with community leaders and conducting focus groups to figure out how best to decrease smoking among African Americans.

At the other end of the spectrum are Asian/Pacific Islanders. Four percent of Asian/Pacific Islander women and 8.4 percent of men smoked last year – the lowest rates of any ethnic group. But those numbers obscure variations among specific ethnicities and generational differences.

Several years ago, after receiving a bump in funding, the program conducted smoking surveys of several specific populations, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender adults; active military personnel; and Vietnamese, Asian Indian, Chinese and Korean adults.

“We really felt we didn’t have a good handle on male, female, one Asian group to another,” Stevens said. “We really tried to figure out where the need was.”

The results revealed huge disparities. Smoking prevalence among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Californians was nearly double that of the general population in 2002. LGBT women, specifically, smoked at a rate of 32.5 percent, compared with 11.9 percent for adult women generally.

Similarly, the smoking rate among Californians actively serving in the military was 33.8 percent in 2002 – well above the 15.4 percent rate among the general population.

While about 12 percent of all Asian/Pacific Islanders smoked in 2002, surveys showed that as many as 41 percent of Korean men ages 18 to 24 were smokers, and assimilation affected Korean men and women differently.

“Korean men, the longer they’re in this country, the better their English, the lower they smoke. Korean women come in smoking very low; the longer they’re in this country … it starts to creep up. It’s a social norm that pulls people,” Stevens said.

Indeed, 36.1 percent of Korean men who spent less than 10 percent of their lives in the United States smoked, the survey showed. By the time they had spent 75 to 100 percent of their lives in the country, smoking prevalence dropped to 31.1 percent.

Korean women, on the other hand, have a smoking rate of 0 percent when they’ve been in the country less than 10 percent of their lives. Among those who had been in the U.S. 75 to 100 percent of their lives, smoking prevalence is 13.2 percent.

Perceptions of and attitudes toward smoking also varied substantially among different groups. Whereas 98.3 percent of Vietnamese men who smoked said they believed smoking harmed their own health, less than 80 percent of Korean smokers strongly agreed with this statement, and about 16 percent slightly agreed.

Aggregating demographic groups “is troubling – especially for populations where the rate is higher,” said S. Alecia Sanchez, director of state legislative advocacy for the American Cancer Society. “We’re very concerned about that because these people are gambling with their health in a way we know is really dangerous.”

Understanding and targeting disparities in smoking prevalence requires more resources, Sanchez said. The American Cancer Society is sponsoring the California Cancer Research Act, which would increase the tax on each pack of cigarettes from 87 cents to $1.87. The initiative has qualified for the next statewide ballot.

A majority of the revenue – $855 million in its first year, decreasing about 3 percent thereafter – would support research of tobacco-related disease and cancer. Funding for the California Tobacco Control Program would increase by three times, Sanchez said.

Since 1988, when California voters approved a 25-cent tax on tobacco products through Proposition 99, the proportion of adults who smoke has dropped 49 percent. A nickel from each pack of cigarettes has funded the state’s tobacco control efforts.

“A lot of progress that’s happened in the state of California has been a result of how that money was invested,” Stevens said. “But there are still 3.6 million smokers in California alone. … So even though our overall prevalence is marvelously low compared to everybody else, we still know we have a lot of work to do.”

California is the second state, behind Utah, to reach a federal target of reducing the adult smoking rate to 12 percent by 2020.

WHO official urges China to print graphic warning labels on cigarette packs

Xinhua – ‎Jul 15, 2011‎

9, 2009, in China. However, there are no warning pictures and specific words of warning on cigarette packs on the Chinesemainland. “The only improvement in China’s commitment to the WHO FCTC on packaging was the ambiguous warning ‘Smoking is Harmful’ 

Larger packet warnings fail to satisfy anti-smoking lobby Bangkok Post

Cigarette packs require graphic warning labels China.org.

Dying habit

South China Morning Post – 15 July 2011

Christine Loh is glad at least one country is moving beyond taking tougher action on smoking to thoughts of banning it altogether

Iceland is considering banning the sale of cigarettes except by prescription at pharmacies. The legislative proposal will be debated in its parliament this autumn, and some say it has little chance of succeeding.

What is important, though, is that this issue has been raised at a national level in one country: the idea of banning tobacco is now on the table and it will slowly seep into the global public consciousness.

Nicotine, the primary psychoactive chemical in cigarette, is addictive. All kinds of additives are mixed with tobacco making every inhalation a serious health risk. Iceland’s proposal would formally class nicotine as an addictive substance and tobacco smoke as carcinogenic.

Moreover, the habit not only injures the health of the smoker, but the inhalation of their smoke hurts those around them. The harm of second-hand smoking takes away the argument that a smoker has a right to smoke as he pleases, which is the reason for the increasing spread of smoke-free work and public areas. While there are estimated to be about a billion smokers in the world – with the largest number in China – they are far outnumbered by non-smokers.

If someone invented cigarettes today, it’s hard to believe that they would be approved by authorities around the world as safe, given what we know about the side effects of smoking, especially serious diseases of the lungs and heart.

However, the tobacco industry is huge and lobbies hard to stay in business for as long as possible, even though governments and health authorities know full well the risk it poses to public health.

Since the 1970s, the adverse health effects of smoking have become widely accepted. Governments began to require health warnings to be stated on cigarette packets, and today it is common for the warnings to be both in text and graphic forms.

The Australian government has gone the furthest by putting a bill to Parliament to force tobacco manufacturers to sell cigarettes by the middle of next year in plain packaging carrying graphic health warnings aimed at removing the glamour from tobacco products.

Likewise, cigarette advertising today faces many restrictions. Tobacco advertising and sponsorship of sports events have been outlawed in many places, or strictly regulated. Tobacco advertising is broadly banned in Hong Kong.

Further measures locally to discourage the habit include banning vending machines and sales to those under 18 years old, and imposing high tobacco taxes. Last month, the legislature raised the tobacco duty by 41.5 per cent on the basis of evidence showing that raising tobacco taxes was an effective way to reduce smoking, especially among the young.

Iceland’s proposal takes Australia’s lead in packaging a step further. If passed, cigarettes will be sold only by prescription in pharmacies to people aged at least 20.

Doctors would be encouraged to help smokers kick the habit, and if treatment doesn’t work, only then would a prescription be given.

Smoking is thus made to be seen for what it is – an unhealthy addiction that will be banned one day.

Christine Loh Kung-wai is chief executive of the think-tank Civic Exchange. cloh@civic-exchange.org

Govt’s anti-smoking budget ‘inadequate’  www.rthk.org.hk
15-07-2011
A patients rights group says the government’s budget of HK$42-million to get people to quit smoking is “inadequate”.

The Alliance of Patient Mutual Help Organizations said 12-percent of local people smoke, and the fund will not be able to cope with the possible increase in the number who quit, following the 41.5 percent increase in tobacco duty.

The director of the school of public health at the University of Hong Kong, Professor Lam Tai-hing, told Edna Tse that 7,000 people die of tobacco-related diseases each year, and it’s time for the government to improve cessation services.

PEDIATRICIANS CALL ON ALL MOVIE COMPANIES TO ADOPT SMOKE-FREE POLICIES THAT WORK

Smoking in Movies starts children smoking – AMA press release Smoking in Films

14 July 2011

CHICAGO?A new study in the CDC?s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,  ?Smoking in Top-Grossing Movies — United States, 2010,? shows promise for the ability of movie producers to positively affect young people’s health by reducing the number of teens who smoke. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) calls on all movie producers to adopt policies that create a healthier movie experience for kids.

According to the study, which looked at on-screen tobacco incidents in youth-rated movies released in 2010, the number of such incidents has declined 72 percent since 2005. And the movie studios that have published policies designed to reduce smoking in films were responsible for a 90 percent decrease in tobacco incidents in their films, demonstrating that such an approach is feasible.

Previous research has shown a link between onscreen smoking and adolescent smoking.

Since 2008, The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has supported the Smoke Free Movies campaign, which asks movie producers to l eave smoking imagery out of movies meant for kids.

The AAP also has asked the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) to adopt rating restrictions that would give an ‘R’ rating to any movie featuring tobacco imagery, with few exceptions.

‘As pediatricians and parents, we do our best to help kids understand the dangers of tobacco use. But if we’re competing with movies that glamorize smoking to kids, it’s an uphill battle,’ said AAP President O. Marion Burton, MD, FAAP. ‘Based on the evidence, on-screen smoking is one of the biggest media dangers to children. It’s possible for media companies to change the way they expose children to these images by embracing responsible policies, such as the R-rating, considered to be effective by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Those companies that have done so should be commended, and the others should follow suit.& quit;

The AAP also advocates for states to only subsidize those film producers that keep their youth-rated films free of tobacco imagery, which is discussed in the MMWR report.

The AAP?s Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence and the AAP Council on Communications and Media work jointly on issues related to smoking and movies for the AAP.

For more information, visit http://www.aap.org/richmondcenter/smokefreemovies.html AAP Contact: Gina Steiner, 847-434-7945,gsteiner@aap.org

AMA APPLAUDS PROGRESS IN EFFORT TO REMOVE SMOKING FROM YOUTH-RATED FILMS

Statement attributable to: Peter W. Carmel, M.D.

President, American Medical Association

“The American Medical Association (AMA) is gratified to see progress in the effort to remove smoking from youth-rated films by Disney, Time Warner and Universal, and we applaud the CDC for creating this important report. We urge the remaining studios to reduce smoking in their films, and we call on the Motion Picture Association of America to follow the CDC recommendation and give movies that depict smoking an “R” rating.

“Research shows that the more smoking young people see on screen, the more likely they are to become smokers. Each day, a staggering 4,000 children try their first cigarette, 1,000 of whom will become daily smokers and put themselves at risk for the serious health consequences associated with smoking. Removing the allure of smoking from youth-rated films is an important step toward keeping today’s youth from becoming tomorrow’s smokers.”

# # #

Janet Williams

Senior Policy Analyst

Prevention and Healthy Lifestyles

American Medical Association

515 N. State St.

Chicago, IL 60654

312-464-5073

Fax – 312-464-4111

July 14, 2011

CDC Study Finds Progress in Reducing Smoking in Movies, but R-Rating Still Needed to Protect Kids

Statement of Matthew L. Myers – Tobacco Free Kids

President, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids

WASHINGTON, DC (July 14, 2011) ? The amount of smoking in top-grossing, youth-rated movies has dropped significantly in the past five years, with far larger declines by studios that have published policies to reduce smoking in youth-rated films (those rated G, PG or PG-13), according to a new study published today by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This study shows that studios can reduce and even eliminate smoking in youth-rated movies, but have taken inconsistent approaches that still result in significant youth exposure to smoking in the movies.  It underscores the need for the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) to require an R-rating for any new movie with smoking, with the exception of movies that depict the health consequences of smoking or actual historical figures who smoked.  This study shows that studios have nothing to fear from such a policy and can effectively implement it to reduce a significant cause of youth smoking.

Key findings of the study include:

  • The total number of on-screen tobacco incidents in youth-rated movies decreased by 72 percent from 2,093 in 2005 to 595 in 2010.
  • The average number of tobacco incidents per youth-rated movie decreased by 66 percent, from 20.1 in 2005 to 6.8 in 2010.
  • The three major studios that have published smoking reduction policies (Comcast/Universal, Disney and Time Warner/Warner Bros.) have almost eliminated tobacco use from their youth-rated movies.  These studios on average reduced the number of tobacco incidents by 96 percent between 2005 and 2010.
  • In contrast, the three major studios (News Corporation/Twentieth Century Fox, Sony/Columbia/Screen Gems and Viacom/Paramount) and independent studios with no published smoking reduction policies have had much smaller reductions in tobacco depictions, averaging only 42 percent.
  • Despite this progress, 45 percent of top-grossing movies in 2010 still had tobacco incidents, including 31 percent of youth-rated movies.

We applaud Comcast/Universal, Disney and Time Warner/Warner Bros. for setting a positive example and nearly eliminating smoking from their youth-rated movies, and we urge the MPAA to take action to resolve this problem once and for all by requiring an R-rating for any new movie with smoking.  Research shows that youth who are exposed to smoking in movies are more likely to start smoking.  It?s time for the movies to end their long and harmful history of glamorizing tobacco use, the nation’s leading cause of preventable death.

The CDC study can be found at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/mmwrs/byyear/2011…

AMA APPLAUDS PROGRESS IN EFFORT TO REMOVE SMOKING FROM YOUTH-RATED FILMS

Statement attributable to: Peter W. Carmel, M.D.

President, American Medical Association

“The American Medical Association (AMA) is gratified to see progress in the effort to remove smoking from youth-rated films by Disney, Time Warner and Universal, and we applaud the CDC for creating this important report. We urge the remaining studios to reduce smoking in their films, and we call on the Motion Picture Association of America to follow the CDC recommendation and give movies that depict smoking an “R” rating.

“Research shows that the more smoking young people see on screen, the more likely they are to become smokers. Each day, a staggering 4,000 children try their first cigarette, 1,000 of whom will become daily smokers and put themselves at risk for the serious health consequences associated with smoking. Removing the allure of smoking from youth-rated films is an important step toward keeping today’s youth from becoming tomorrow’s smokers.”

# # #

Janet Williams

Senior Policy Analyst

Prevention and Healthy Lifestyles

American Medical Association

515 N. State St.

Chicago, IL 60654

312-464-5073

Fax – 312-464-4111

July 14, 2011

CDC Study Finds Progress in Reducing Smoking in Movies, but R-Rating Still Needed to Protect Kids

Statement of Matthew L. Myers – Tobacco Free Kids

President, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids

WASHINGTON, DC (July 14, 2011) ? The amount of smoking in top-grossing, youth-rated movies has dropped significantly in the past five years, with far larger declines by studios that have published policies to reduce smoking in youth-rated films (those rated G, PG or PG-13), according to a new study published today by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This study shows that studios can reduce and even eliminate smoking in youth-rated movies, but have taken inconsistent approaches that still result in significant youth exposure to smoking in the movies.  It underscores the need for the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) to require an R-rating for any new movie with smoking, with the exception of movies that depict the health consequences of smoking or actual historical figures who smoked.  This study shows that studios have nothing to fear from such a policy and can effectively implement it to reduce a significant cause of youth smoking.

Key findings of the study include:

  • The total number of on-screen tobacco incidents in youth-rated movies decreased by 72 percent from 2,093 in 2005 to 595 in 2010.
  • The average number of tobacco incidents per youth-rated movie decreased by 66 percent, from 20.1 in 2005 to 6.8 in 2010.
  • The three major studios that have published smoking reduction policies (Comcast/Universal, Disney and Time Warner/Warner Bros.) have almost eliminated tobacco use from their youth-rated movies.  These studios on average reduced the number of tobacco incidents by 96 percent between 2005 and 2010.
  • In contrast, the three major studios (News Corporation/Twentieth Century Fox, Sony/Columbia/Screen Gems and Viacom/Paramount) and independent studios with no published smoking reduction policies have had much smaller reductions in tobacco depictions, averaging only 42 percent.
  • Despite this progress, 45 percent of top-grossing movies in 2010 still had tobacco incidents, including 31 percent of youth-rated movies.

We applaud Comcast/Universal, Disney and Time Warner/Warner Bros. for setting a positive example and nearly eliminating smoking from their youth-rated movies, and we urge the MPAA to take action to resolve this problem once and for all by requiring an R-rating for any new movie with smoking.  Research shows that youth who are exposed to smoking in movies are more likely to start smoking.  It?s time for the movies to end their long and harmful history of glamorizing tobacco use, the nation’s leading cause of preventable death.

The CDC study can be found at: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/mmwrs/byyear/2011…

Adult smoking hits low of 11.9% | Sacramento Business Journal

http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2011/07/14/adult-smoking-hits-low-of-119.html

Sacramento Business Journal – by Kathy Robertson, Staff writer

Date: Thursday, July 14, 2011, 6:30am PDT – Last Modified: Thursday, July 14, 2011, 10:41am PDT

Related:

Health Care

California’s adult smoking rate has hit a record low — 11.9 percent in 2010, down from 13.1 percent in 2009 — public health officials announced Wednesday.

The most significant decrease occurred among adults ages 24 to 44, which dropped to 13.1 percent in 2010 from 15.2 percent in 2009.

Better to be blunt to combat tobacco

South China Morning Post – 12 July 2011

The campaign against smoking has come full circle in Hong Kong with a return to emphasis on the health risks highlighted in the mid-1990s. In the meantime, anti-tobacco advocates have won a long battle against passive smoking by having the habit banned in indoor public areas including restaurants and bars, and pressured the government into raising the tax on cigarettes to 70 per cent of the price of a packet, just short of the 75 per cent recommended by the World Health Organisation. And only an estimated one in eight or 12 per cent of Hongkongers still smoke.

But after years of subtle messages supportive of people wanting to quit, it has been judged time to refocus people’s minds on the harmful effects of smoking with explicit messages. The Tobacco Control Office will roll out fresh television advertisements next year, after being briefed on latest research by the World Lung Foundation. As one of its executives wrote in the Post last week, the foundation has tested campaign material in 12 countries and found that clear, blunt messages about how tobacco harms people are effective everywhere.

At the end of the day, as anti-smoking laws and tax increases show, sometimes only governments have the power and deep enough pockets to take on Big Tobacco. In that respect Hong Kong has an interest in a challenge by tobacco giant Philip Morris to the Australian government’s attempt to be the first to enforce plain, brandless packaging of cigarettes featuring only graphic health warnings. Philip Morris accuses Canberra of breaching a bilateral investment treaty with Hong Kong, where the company’s Asian arm is based, which it claims commits Canberra to protect investment in Australia by local investors and vice versa. The move faces numerous potential domestic and international legal challenges to defend intellectual property. Politically, however, there is an argument that so long as the majority has to fund the health costs of the smoking minority, governments and lawmakers have a duty to support measures to curb tobacco use

WHO pushes graphic cigarette warnings

July 10, 2011, 12:00am

MANILA, Philippines — The World Health Organization (WHO) has urged Asia-Pacific countries to boost the use of graphic health warnings on cigarette packs.

WHO Regional Director for the Western Pacific Dr. Shin Young Soo, speaking in Manila, said many developing countries have not yet started to put pictures of diseased organs or bold health warnings on their cigarette packs.

”People have a fundamental right to information about the harm that tobacco does, and countries have an obligation to provide it,” he said in a statement marking the release of a WHO report examining the status of global tobacco control.

The report showed that only 19 administrations in the world have implemented graphic health warnings on cigarette packs.

http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/326085/who-pushes-graphic-cigarette-warnings