Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

Passive Smoking

Our Opinion: Addressing the economic costs of addiction

http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/opinion/our_opinion/our-opinion-addressing-the-economic-costs-of-addiction/article_7312db39-6708-5fd1-8952-98726c75a2c8.html

Two recent studies offer proof that Indiana’s battle with tobacco and opioid addictions goes far beyond impacting public health; there are real economic consequences, too.

The studies, released by the Fairbanks Foundation and conducted by IUPUI’s Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, show addictions cost Indiana more than $8.2 billion a year.

The toll from tobacco alone comes to US$6.8 billion when taking into account health care costs, the impact of secondhand smoke, lost productivity on the job and other smoking-related diseases. The studies also found that opioid overdose deaths also cost the state $1.4 billion in 2014.

Indiana is not doing enough when it comes to addressing these critical health care issues. The state has shortchanged itself when it comes to tobacco prevention and cessation programs. The General Assembly has continually raided money intended to pay for smoking cessation efforts and public initiatives aimed at helping smokers. In 2014, lawmakers cut tobacco prevention and control funding to $5.8 million, which is about 7.8 percent of what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends spending to help Hoosiers kick the habit.

For the first time in at least six years, drug overdose deaths in 2015 in St. Joseph County outnumbered murders and fatal auto crashes combined, driven by a dramatic increase in lethal overdoses linked to heroin and related opiate painkillers.

Some say the studies represent increasing attention being paid to these issues. That’s good if that’s indeed the case. These deadly addictions can only be treated if they’re addressed openly with help from both the private and public sectors. It’s not only a critical public health issue, it’s also important for the economic vitality of Hoosiers.

One minute of secondhand marijuana smoke impairs cardiovascular function

http://universityofcalifornia.edu/news/one-minute-secondhand-marijuana-smoke-impairs-cardiovascular-function

One minute of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) from marijuana diminishes blood vessel function to the same extent as tobacco, but the harmful cardiovascular effects last three times longer, according to a new study in rats led by UC San Francisco researchers.

In a healthy animal, increased blood flow prompts arteries to widen, a process known as flow-mediated dilation (FMD). When FMD is compromised, as happens during SHS exposure, blood flow is impeded, and the risks of heart attack, atherosclerosis and other heart problems increase, said UCSF’s Matthew Springer, Ph.D., professor of medicine and senior author of the new study.

“Your blood vessels can carry more blood if they sense that they need to pass more blood to the tissues,” Springer said. “They dilate to allow more blood through. But that’s inhibited by exposure to smoke.”

Previous work by Springer and others has shown that as little as one minute of exposure to tobacco SHS diminishes FMD, but the effects of marijuana SHS hadn’t been examined. In the new research, published online in the July 27, 2016, issue of the Journal of the American Heart Association, a team of scientists in Springer’s laboratory measured rats’ FMD, which works similarly to FMD in humans, before and after exposure to both tobacco SHS and marijuana SHS.

The researchers found that rats exposed to marijuana SHS experienced a more than 50 percent reduction in FMD, similar to the reduction in artery function seen in both rats and humans exposed to tobacco smoke in previous studies. As with tobacco, the reduction occurred after just one minute of exposure to SHS from marijuana.

However, while rats exposed for one minute to tobacco SHS recover within 30 minutes – an observation that was reproduced in the new study – one minute of exposure to marijuana SHS still significantly affected FMD 90 minutes after the initial exposure.

Filling a void in secondhand smoke research

The research group used equipment designed to mechanically “smoke” cigarettes and fill a reservoir with the resulting smoke. In a series of experiments using marijuana ciagarettes, when the smoke in the collecting chamber was determined to be at a level roughly comparable to those found in restaurants that allow smoking, the rats were exposed to the marijuana smoke.

Using methodology that they developed for previous tobacco studies, the researchers temporarily blocked off blood flow to rats’ legs after they were exposed to SHS. They then let the blood rush back into the arteries and used ultrasound technology to measure the resulting widening of the femoral artery, a vessel similar to the human brachial artery of the arm, where FMD is typically measured in clinical studies.

The study fills a void in SHS research, as marijuana studies are difficult to undertake because of its illicit status and the numerous agencies, such as the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Food and Drug Administration, that must approve the use of the drug in experiments.

“The biggest reason that people believe marijuana secondhand smoke is harmless is because the public health community hasn’t had direct evidence of its harmful effects like it does with tobacco,” Springer said. “We hadn’t done the experiments, so I think there is definitely an underestimation of how harmful marijuana smoke is.”

To ensure the effect on FMD wasn’t a result of smoke from the rolling paper used in marijuana cigarettes or the cannabinoid compounds like tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, the main psychoactive substance in marijuana), the researchers also tested marijuana not rolled in paper and with cannabinoid compounds removed. Arterial function was still impaired in those situations, leading the team to conclude that smoke from burning marijuana plant matter itself caused the decline in FMD.

‘Just avoid smoke’

The rats were likely exposed to less SHS than people at certain rock concerts, such as one Springer attended in 2010, where there were so many people smoking marijuana that there was a haze in the air. This experience prompted his curiosity about whether marijuana SHS was really as benign as people made it out to be.

“It was really interesting to me, and distressing, because all these people in the stands would not tolerate it if the person next to them started smoking a cigarette,” Springer said, “but they were fine with the marijuana.”

Springer’s preliminary findings, presented at the November 2014 American Heart Association Annual Scientific Sessions, helped inspire California Assembly Bill 2300, a proposed law working its way through the State Legislature that would allow landlords to prohibit marijuana smoking —even for medicinal purposes—if smoking is already banned in their building. The medicinal use of marijuana complicates such public policy questions, Springer said, but he believes the current study solidifies the evidence that exposure to marijuana SHS carries risks.

“At this point, we’re saying that inhaling any smoke is detrimental to your health,” Springer said. “I think that people should avoid inhaling smoke whether it’s from tobacco or marijuana cigarettes, forest fires, barbecues—just avoid smoke.”

Study co-authors from Springer’s UCSF lab are Xiaoyin Wang, M.D.; Ronak Derakhshandeh, MS; Jiangtao Liu, M.D.; Shilpa Narayan; Pooneh Nabavizadeh, M.D.; Stephenie Le; Olivia M. Danforth; Kranthi Pinnamaneni, M.D.; Hilda J. Rodriguez; Emmy Luu; and Richard E. Sievers. Other UCSF co-authors include Suzaynn F. Schick, Ph.D., assistant adjunct professor of medicine, and Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D., professor of medicine.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the Elfenworks Foundation.

New tobacco advertising laws underway for Jakarta

http://www.marketing-interactive.com/new-cigarette-law-underway-jakarta/

The Jakarta Legislative Council (DPRD) is planning to pass yet another law on tobacco advertising, read an earlier report by The Jakarta Post.

Under the law, stores that sell cigarettes can no longer display them openly. The act of showing the name or logo of any brand of cigarettes will be prohibited. Once it takes effect, stores will sell cigarettes by only displaying a sign with a message, which reads “cigarettes are available here,” reported Tribune news.

Simultaneously, the Jakarta Legislative Council is looking to pass a law to implement and create no smoking zones across the city.

The council has reportedly handed the draft bylaw to the city administration in a plenary meeting on March 11 attended by Jakarta Governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, better known as Ahok.

The law aims to prohibit people from smoking and prevent the up-take of smoking to protect people from secondhand smoke exposure. This move is the latest measure taken by the Jakarta administration, after a series of regulations on tobacco control imposed in the city over the past few years, to curb cigarette smoking and exposure to tobacco smoke.

The law also targets to free Jakarta from outdoor and indoor cigarette ads before the end of this year. This despite the sharp criticisms from tobacco manufactures over the tougher restrictions on outdoor and indoor cigarette advertising.

Cigarette advertising laws tightened in Jakarta last year following the signing of the Gubernatorial Decree (Pergub) No.244/2015 on advertising guidelines that prohibits indoor cigarette advertising. The city has already been banning outdoor cigarette and tobacco product advertising since mid-January 2015 that saw the removal of all cigarette billboards from roadsides in areas across the city.

Earlier in 2012, the government issued tighter tobacco controls that put more limitations on cigarette advertising in all media. It only allowed cigarette commercial up to 72sqm in size and restricted the broadcasting of smoking ads on television to between 9.30 pm and 5 am. This came after former governor Fauzi Bowo imposed a bylaw banning smoking from all government buildings in 2010, where smoking in public buildings is prohibited.

In response to a potential drop on the city’s tax revenue amid the slowdown in economic activities- Balegda, which is the City Council’€™s Legislation Body, revealed that Jakarta has generated revenue from taxes on cigarette ads totaling around Rp 14 billion per year. This is much lesser than the amount spent on medical treatments for cigarette-related health problems.

According to the 2011 Global Adults Tobacco Survey, the prevalence of smoking among adults in Indonesia stands at 34.8% , including 40% of 13- to 15-year-old adolescents.

A breath of fresh air for diners: Smoking ban begins in all outdoor dining areas in South Australia

  • Smoking in all alfresco dining venues is now banned in South Australia
  • Cancer Council SA wants to protect the public from second hand smoke
  • If caught smoking – diners receive a $200 fine, businesses are fined $1,250

Smoking will be banned from all alfresco dining venues in South Australia, starting from Friday.

The new rules apply to pubs, clubs, café, restaurants and fast food outlets after years of campaigning to try and protect the public from second hand smoke.

Cancer Council SA’s chief executive Lincoln Size says he is pleased workers and diners can now be protected.

‘We believe that South Australians of all ages should be able to enjoy alfresco dining areas without putting their health at risk from second hand smoke,’ Mr Size said.

‘Tobacco smoke contains thousands of chemical compounds – at least 250 of these found in secondhand smoke are known to be toxic or carcinogenic.

The law now requires a two metre wall be installed to divide the two areas of smoking and nonsmoking if venues hope to continue allowing diners to smoke.

Those caught smoking in outside areas will be given a $200 fine while businesses will be fined $1,250.

Cigarettes, cigars, pipes, shisha, hookah and water pipes all fall under the no-smoking ban.

Mr Size said 21 people in South Australia are killed as a result of smoking every week and the ban will help ‘de-normalise the behaviour.’

Smoking will only be allowed in beer gardens where ‘pre-packaged food of a kind generally intended to be consumed between meals,’ is served.

Claim about no-smoking areas is absurd

I take exception to the ¬comment by public health ¬professor Lam Tai-hing, of the University of Hong Kong, that “Hong Kong is one of the leading places in the world in the anti-smoking area” (“Doctors want ban on sale of alcohol to under-18s”, June 4)

Surely he is joking? Walking around Lan Kwai Fong, Wyndham Street and Soho on a recent weekend, I failed to see a single “No Smoking” sign ¬posted anywhere, outside or ¬inside any restaurant or bar.

Smokers puffed away on the pavement under awnings less than a metre from where people were eating.

Smoke was being blown in over people’s food, ¬including that of young children, who were forced to ¬inhale poisonous secondary smoke.

Worse, I counted roughly 30 people that evening breaking the smoking laws. Perhaps this was done unwittingly, as no signs could be seen and ashtrays were placed for their convenience in illegal places.

Leading the world in anti-smoking rules? I think not. Perhaps leading the world in allowing smoking in public places would be more accurate.

And alcohol? David Yau Chak-wong, of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Wine and Spirits, said the age limit for the sale of alcohol should be set at 16, rather than 18.

According to Katherine Brown, policy director at the ¬Institute for Alcohol Studies, there is simply no evidence that ¬allowing teens to drink will help develop a sensible attitude to drinking.

In fact, studies show the complete opposite: the earlier children are introduced to alcohol, the more they will drink as adults. But I guess if you are in the business of selling alcohol, this would be exactly what you want.

You’ve got to “love” Hong Kong – profits first even ahead of health.

M. Bentley, Central
________________________________________
Source URL: http://www.scmp.com/comment/letters/article/1971733/letters-editor-june-12-2016

One In Six Children Hospitalized For Lung Inflammation Positive For Marijuana Exposure

http://www.science20.com/news_articles/one_in_six_children_hospitalized_for_lung_inflammation_positive_for_marijuana_exposure-171667

A new study to be presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies 2016 Meeting found that one in six infants and toddlers admitted to a Colorado hospital with coughing, wheezing and other symptoms of bronchiolitis tested positive for marijuana exposure.

The study, “Marijuana Exposure in Children Hospitalized for Bronchiolitis,” recruited parents of previously healthy children between one month of age and two years old who were admitted to Children’s Hospital Colorado (CHC) between January 2013 and April 2014 with bronchiolitis, an inflammation of the smallest air passages in the lung. The parents completed a questionnaire about their child’s health, demographics, exposure to tobacco smoke, and as of October 2014, whether anyone in the home used marijuana. Marijuana became legal in Colorado on January 1, 2014.

Of the children who were identified as having been exposed to marijuana smokers, urine samples showed traces of a metabolite of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive component of marijuana, in 16 percent of them. The results also showed that more of the children were THC positive after legalization (21 percent, compared with 10 percent before), and non-white children were more likely to be exposed than white children.

The findings suggest that secondhand marijuana smoke, which contains carcinogenic and psychoactive chemicals, may be a rising child health concern as marijuana increasingly becomes legal for medical and recreational use in the United States, said lead researcher Karen M. Wilson, MD, MPH, FAAP, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and section head at CHC. Most states with legal marijuana do not restrict its combustion around children, she said.

“Our study demonstrates that, as with secondhand tobacco smoke, children can be exposed to the chemicals in marijuana when it is smoked by someone nearby,” Dr. Wilson said. “Especially as marijuana becomes more available and acceptable, we need to learn more about how this may affect children’s health and development.” In the meantime, she said, “marijuana should never be smoked in the presence of children.”

Ombudsman probes mechanism for handling smoking offences

http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201603/10/P201603090732.htm

The following is issued on behalf of the Office of The Ombudsman:

The Ombudsman, Ms Connie Lau, announced today (March 10) a direct investigation into the mechanism of the Food and Health Bureau (FHB) and the Department of Health (DH) for handling smoking offences to examine whether there are any inadequacies.

There have been media reports and public complaints lodged with the Office of The Ombudsman about the Government’s ineffectiveness in combating smoking in prohibited places, rendering the smoking ban in some no-smoking areas practically useless. As a result, the public continue to suffer from the nuisance of second-hand smoke. In a number of complaints, the DH is criticised for failing to respond quickly or deploy plain-clothes officers to conduct inspections. Some complainants are also dissatisfied that other relevant departments have failed to co-operate with the Tobacco Control Office under the DH and support its enforcement actions.

A preliminary inquiry by the Office has revealed that the FHB and the DH, which is under the FHB’s policy overview, have put in place a mechanism for carrying out inspections in no-smoking areas and instituting prosecutions. They have also worked together with other statutory authorities (including the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, the Leisure and Cultural Services Department, the Housing Department and the Police Force) in tobacco control. However, the violation of the smoking ban in some no-smoking areas remains serious and many locations have become persistent black spots. This situation calls into question the adequacy of the existing mechanism.

Ms Lau said, “The Government’s current tobacco control policy aims at encouraging people to quit smoking and minimising the risks caused by second-hand smoke to the public. The designation of no-smoking areas is an integral part of that policy. If the purpose of no-smoking areas is defeated by ineffective enforcement, it would mean a failure to discharge the duty of safeguarding public health and thus a disappointment to the public.”

The ambit of this direct investigation includes:

(1) whether the mechanism of the FHB and the DH for handling smoking offences is effective;

(2) how the FHB and the DH co-ordinate their efforts with other statutory authorities in tobacco control; and

(3) areas for improvement and enhancement.

The Ombudsman welcomes views from the public on the above subject. Comments in writing should reach the Office of The Ombudsman by April 14, 2016:

Address: 30/F, China Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre
168-200 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong
Fax: 2882 8149
Email: complaints@ombudsman.hk
Ends/Thursday, March 10, 2016
Issued at HKT 11:00

Watchdog probes action over smoking-ban breach

http://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1247567-20160310.htm

The Ombudsman on Thursday launched an investigation into the handling of smoking offences in prohibited areas by the Food and Health Bureau and the Department of Health.

The watchdog said it is aware of media reports and public complaints about ineffective implementation of smoking ban in some places.

The complaints had to do with the Department of Health’s failure to respond quickly or deploy plain-clothes officers to conduct inspections. Other statutory authorities, such as the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, the Leisure and Cultural Services Department and the police also came under fire for failing to co-operate with the Tobacco Control Office.

As a result, many people continue to be subjected to second-hand smoke.

The Ombudsman, Connie Lau, said the shortcomings call into question the efficiency of the government’s overall tobacco control policy.

Hong Kong hotel with four major green building awards breaks smoking rules set by US body

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/health-environment/article/1912385/hong-kong-hotel-four-major-green-building-awards

The Post’s reporters find outdoor smoking permitted at restaurant in Holiday Inn Express Hong Kong SoHo despite smoke-free policy

A hotel which prided itself for winning four top green building awards worldwide for its designs and facilities was found by the South China Morning Post to have breached for years the tobacco smoke control requirement imposed by the United States Green Building Council.

Concerns were raised about the risk of proprietors turning green buildings into “non-green” ones if they failed to monitor their tenants for enforcement of green measures or best practices.

The Post’ s investigation found that Moon Thai Restaurant, on the second floor of the Holiday Inn Express Hong Kong SoHo in Sheung Wan, had allowed smoking at its outdoor terrace since the hotel was launched in late 2013.

The hotel is owned by Yau Lee Holdings, the vice-chairman of which is Conrad Wong Tin-cheung, who just stepped down as chairman of the Hong Kong Green Building Council at the end of last year.

The terrace of the restaurant is part of the hotel building and is divided by a sliding door, which was kept open very often when waiters and waitresses had to serve meals for customers at the outdoor terrace, causing second-hand smoke from customers smoking outdoors to drift inside, the Post observed.

The hotel was deemed a role model for green buildings as it had won four highest-rated green building awards worldwide, including a LEED Platinum from the US Green Building Council, a BEAM Plus Platinum award from the Hong Kong Green Building Council, BCA Green Mark from Singapore’s Building and Construction Authority and Green Building Design Label (3-Star) from the China Green Building Council.

However, the US Green Building Council website’s section on LEED criteria states that smoking is prohibited inside and outside the building except in designated smoking areas located at least 25 feet (7.6 meters) from all entrances, outdoor air intakes and operable windows. Smoking is also prohibited outside the property line in spaces used for business purposes.

The Post’s reporters visited the restaurant in November and December last year and sat in the terrace. A waiter automatically handed us an ashtray and said “certainly” when asked if smoking was allowed. Some customers were also found smoking on the terrace. A waiter told the Post that the restaurant allowed outdoor smoking all along.

In response to the Post’s enquiries, the hotel’s general manager Kaivin Ng said the restaurant was operated by a tenant, rather than “directly by the hotel”, but that “they are well aware of our green building status”.

Ng insisted they had adhered strictly to a full non-smoking policy, adding that they would investigate the matter seriously and would keep reminding the tenant of the hotel’s policy for a smoke-free environment.

The restaurant’s spokesman Mr Lo told the Post that as far as he knew, the hotel had failed to indicate its full non-smoking policy in its contract with the restaurant.

Its manager Mr Fan said the restaurant had started to adopt a smoking ban on the outdoor terrace.

World Wildlife Fund assistant manager Prentice Koo Wai-muk said the hotel should make every effort to ensure its tenants complied with its green policy.

“The hotel has absolute responsibility to make sure its tenants enforce its green measures and uphold best practices. It should stipulate this as a term in its contract with its tenants,” he said.

“Green building assessments deal only with the hardware of the buildings, their design and facilities. But it needs good management to keep the hardware green and sustainable, and to achieve the desired effects of green buildings.

“This showcases that without proper green management to ensure the enforcement of supporting measures, green buildings can no longer be green,” he added.

The hotel’s general manager Kaivin Ng said the restaurant was operated by a tenant, not directly by the hotel. Photo: SCMP Pictures

The hotel’s general manager Kaivin Ng said the restaurant was operated by a tenant, not directly by the hotel. Photo: SCMP Pictures

Conrad Wong, the then outgoing HKGBC chairman, did not reply to the Post’s enquiries. A HKGBC spokeswoman, however, said the BEAM Plus Platinum rating the hotel obtained was under the assessment of the new buildings category for the project’s “as built” condition in 2012.

“It does not, however, cover ongoing property management and operations by building owners and tenants such as the ‘smoking policy’ for the building,” she said.

Koo believed the city’s BEAM Plus assessment scheme should learn from the LEED assessment by including the tobacco smoke control requirement.

USGBC has not replied to the Post’s written enquiries made over a month ago.

Secondhand smoke exposure at home among one billion children in 21 countries

Download (PDF, 417KB)