Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

UK

Public Health England enlists children in campaign to emphasise smoking heart risk

A campaign launched today by Public Health England centres around NHS doctor and kids TV star Dr Ranj Singh working with children to encourage adults to stop
smoking.

Smokefree Health Harms launches today through a PR push across various media, and Facebook content.

The Facebook video content features Dr Singh working with primary school children to create images about the damage that smoking does to the heart and arteries.

These images are in the form of cigarette packets (below). Smokefree Health Harms launches as new rules come into force at the start of 2017 meaning that all cigarettes sold in the UK will be in unbranded standard packs that feature graphic image health warnings.

Dr Singh said: “We know that many people quit smoking for their family, and this film shows just how passionately children want to protect the health of smokers and want to help them quit.”

PHE’s campaign focuses on the fact that smoking increases the risk of heart disease by 24%, and doubles the risk of a heart attack or stroke, as well as highlighting that 45 people a day die of cardiovascular disease.

The campaign will direct people to support including an app, email, text and help in person from local stop smoking services.

As with other recent PHE campaigns, such as the One You diabetes and healthy living campaign launched on Monday. Creative agencies involved are M&C Saatchi, Ogilvy & Mather and 23red, with MEC handling media and Freud Communications for PR.

Visceral ads showing the impact of smoking on the body will continue to be shown in areas where there are higher rates of smoking.

Hard-hitting campaign warns of the dangers of smoking

http://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2016-12-30/hard-hitting-campaign-warns-of-the-dangers-of-smoking/

Health experts are warning that smokers are at a dramatically higher risk of heart disease and having a stroke.

Research released by Public Health England shows 45 people every day die from cardiovascular disease linked to smoking.

Despite recent campaigns, a sixth of people in the West Country still smoke.

15.5% People in the South West are smokers
25% Greater risk of heart disease for smokers
2x Risk of heart attack or a stroke for smokers

Public Health England has started a hard-hitting campaign to coincide with the first year when all cigarettes sold in the UK will be in standard packs with all attractive branding removed.

The packs, which will be mandatory from May, feature graphic picture and text health warnings, several of which illustrate how smoking causes cardiovascular disease and death.

Smoking is the biggest cause of premature death in England, accounting for almost 78,000 deaths a year.

For every death caused by smoking approximately 20 smokers suffer from a smoking-related illness.

However, you can change this. Stopping smoking will have a dramatic positive impact on your health and the health of those around you, especially children, and is the single best health decision you can make this new year.

– CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, PROFESSOR DAME SALLY DAVIES

Public Health England has found that the two biggest motivators for smokers to quit are for their health and their families.

It has released a short film featuring children’s TV doctor Dr Ranj Singh working with primary school children to create their own messages about the dangers of smoking.

But the NHS says there is hope – if you give up now.

We know smoking causes serious illnesses and death, but we also know that quitting will eventually lead to a much reduced risk of heart disease and stroke.

The Health Harms campaign will feature a lot of dramatic images of the damage tobacco smoking will cause; if that inspires anyone to quit there is a lot of local help available to them to break the habit.

– RUSS MOODY, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND SOUTH WEST

Imperial stubs out plans for Supreme Court battle on tobacco packaging rules

Big Tobacco’s battle against the Government’s crackdown on cigarette packaging has taken a blow after a second company stubbed out plans to take its case to the Supreme Court.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/12/17/imperial-stubs-plans-supreme-court-battle-tobacco-packaging/

The decision by Imperial, the ­maker of Gauloises and Lambert & Butler cigarettes, leaves just two of the big four tobacco companies still considering whether to take the Government to the Supreme Court over the rules, which came into force in May.

Since then, cigarette firms have been required to manufacture products in standardised “plain” khaki packaging sporting prominent health warnings. All tobacco products sold in the UK from next May must comply with the rules.

Imperial joins Philip Morris International in reluctantly accepting the tobacco branding crackdown after a failed court challenge in May lead to an unsuccessful legal appeal last month.

A spokesman for Imperial told the Sunday Telegraph: “We maintain our firmly held view that plain packaging is not an effective tobacco control policy but we have chosen not to seek permission to escalate our legal challenge in the UK to the Supreme Court.”

British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco International (JTI) will reveal “any day now” whether they will continue to fight the rules which came into effect in April, an industry source said.

But Imperial’s decision to walk away from the fight despite relying on the UK for around 15pc of its total earnings raises questions over the commitment of BAT which earns less than 1pc of its takings from Britain.

JTI also has a 15pc exposure to the market and has been the most outspoken against the legislation which its UK boss Daniel Sciamma has branded “commercial vandalism” which “sets a dangerous precedent for other targeted industries”.

Imperial said it plans to focus on maintaining its market share in the face of rising legislation and will invest more heavily in its specialist brands such e-cigarettes and non-tobacco vaping products.

UK public health experts move to quash e-cigarette fears in wake of US report

https://www.onmedica.com/newsarticle.aspx?id=be447bf6-8e2a-430a-9ba1-7783e5078bd8

UK public health experts have moved to quash fears about the potential dangers of e-cigarettes in the wake of the US Surgeon General’s report* setting out the urgent need to curb the rising popularity of vaping among young people in the US.

Clinicians should not be put off from helping smokers to quit or cut their risk of harm by switching to vaping, they insist.

In his report,* published earlier this week, Dr Vivek Murthy pointed to the evidence on the impact of nicotine on the developing brain, and its ability to trigger lifelong addiction, as well as the potentially harmful additives found in some e-cigarettes.

Use of e-cigarettes among high school students in the US had soared by 900% in the past five years, surpassing all other forms of conventional tobacco use, he said.
“We must protect our nation’s young people from a lifetime of nicotine addiction and associated problems by immediately addressing e-cigarettes as an urgent public health problem. Now is the time to take action,” he urged.

But Professor Kevin Fenton, national director of health and wellbeing at Public Health England, said that while he understood the concern about the rapid uptake of e-cigarettes in the US, attempts to regulate these products in the US had been difficult, and the situation in the UK was very different.

“We have comprehensive regulations in place, including a ban on selling e-cigarettes to under-18s and tough restrictions on advertising, as well as minimum standards for safety, maximum nicotine levels and health warnings on packs,” he said.

“Our review of the evidence found e-cigarette use carries a fraction of the risk of smoking, a conclusion reiterated by the Royal College of Physicians earlier this year. No new evidence has been published to contradict this, however we are closely monitoring any emerging evidence,” he added.

Professor Peter Hajek, Director of the Tobacco Dependence Research Unit at Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), reiterated the findings of the Royal College of Physicians report, which identified vaping “as a great public health opportunity,” rather than a threat.

“The new US report’s conclusions do not tally with what the actual data show. It is simply not true that e-cigarettes are a tobacco product or that vaping lures children to smoking or that it creates dependence in non-smokers,” he insisted.

“The prevalence of smoking among young people is at an all-time low and regular use of nicotine containing e-cigarettes among never-smokers is extremely rare. Ongoing vigilance is needed, but so far, e-cigarettes have acted as a gateway away from smoking, for adults and adolescents alike,” he continued.

The report also ignores the huge benefits of vaping for adult smokers in helping them switch from “deadly smoking,” he added.

“The worst part of the report is its policy recommendations. They may be well meant, but no consideration is given to their likely unintended consequences. Limiting smokers’ access to the much less risky option of vaping is likely to contribute to keeping smokers smoking and smoking-related disease and death going at the current rate,” he said.

Linda Bauld, Professor of Health Policy at the University of Stirling and Co-Chair of the Smoking in Pregnancy Challenge Group, said the evidence presented in the report on the potential harms of vaping during pregnancy had been fundamentally misunderstood, and was based on studies in rats and mice, not people.

“While we need more research on e-cigarettes, pregnant women who find it difficult to stop smoking should not be discouraged from using them. This is the position and current advice in the UK endorsed by a range of organisations,” she pointed out.

The Surgeon General’s report might make clinicians more hesitant about discussing e-cigarettes with pregnant women who smoke. “That would be harmful to maternal and child health and must be avoided,” she insisted.

E-cigarette use threatens years of US anti-smoking gains, says report

Top US health officials have war ned that the gr owing use of e-cigarettes among young adults will undo decades of pr ogr ess in ending the ‘tobacco epidemic’

Growing e-cigarette use among young people threatens decades of progress in shrinking tobacco use, top US health officials warned in a report released on Thursday.

The US surgeon general’s report is the first federal government review of the public health impact of e-cigarettes on young people across the country.

“Preventing tobacco use in any form among youth and young adults is critical to ending the tobacco epidemic in the United States,” said surgeon general Vivek Murthy.

E-cigarettes don’t contain tobacco, but do contain nicotine and are considered “tobacco products” by the US government.

Advocates say e-cigarettes could replace traditional cigarettes, while critics are concerned they are a gateway to tobacco use – especially in young people, who are more vulnerable to the addictive impact of nicotine.

The debate over the potential harms and benefits of e-cigarettes is a live one in the US and the UK. Many public health professionals in the UK believe that vaping is the best available option for those who would otherwise smoke tobacco, and that it is saving thousands of lives by enabling hardened smokers to quit. Public Health England has said it is 95% safer, and that the young people experimenting with e-cigarettes are the same people who try smoking tobacco.

“Evidence from the US is the same as in the UK in crucial respects,” said Professor John Britton, director of the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies at Nottingham University. “Children experimenting with e-cigarettes are by and large those who are already experimenting with cigarettes or are smokers.”

The surgeon general’s report said e-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco product among the young and are more popular than cigarettes, cigars and hookahs in the US. The use of e-cigarettes and other nicotine products by under-18s has jumped significantly after decades of declining rates of cigarette smoking.

Young people are not using the products for the same reasons as adults, the report said: “Although adults report using e-cigarettes as a cessation device, the evidence supporting the effectiveness of e-cigarettes as an aid for quitting conventional cigarettes remains unproven and nonexistent among youth.”

The most common reasons for young people to use e-cigarettes are curiosity, to avoid indoor smoking restrictions and as a less harmful alternative to conventional cigarettes, according to the report.

In 2014, use of e-cigarettes by young adults aged 18 to 24 surpassed that of adults aged 25 and older.

Sylvia Burwell, the US Department of Health and Human Services secretary, said the US must ensure progress in combatting traditional cigarette use isn’t compromised by the use of new tobacco products like e-cigarettes.

“The findings from this report reinforce the need to support evidence-based programs to prevent youth and young adults from using tobacco in any form, including e-cigarettes,” Burwell wrote. “The health and wellbeing of our nation’s young people depend on it.”

Kevin Fenton, national director of health and wellbeing at Public Health England, said the group recognised the concern in the US, where it had proved difficult to impose restrictions on the marketing of e-cigarettes. By contrast, England had put in place a ban on marketing to under-18s, advertising controls and quality standards. But, he said, “our review of the evidence found e-cigarette use carries a fraction of the risk of smoking, a conclusion reiterated by the Royal College of Physicians earlier this year.

No new evidence has been published to contradict this, however we are closely monitoring any emerging evidence.”

The US report’s findings pull from existing research on e-cigarette use among people aged between 11 and 24 to show patterns of use and how it affects health.

This report was crafted in a similar vein to earlier surgeon general reports on youth tobacco use. The most recent of those was released in 2012, when e-cigarettes were less popular than they are now.

E-cigarette sales in the US grew to an estimated $3.5bn in 2015, according to Nielsen, but have been falling significantly since the end of last year.

The e-cigarette industry is dominated by traditional tobacco companies, who were targeted in the report for using similar tactics as those used to lure young users to tobacco. “Companies are promoting their products through television and radio advertisements that use celebrities, sexual content, and claims of independence to glamorize these addictive products and make them appealing to young people,” said Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director, Thomas Frieden, in the report’s foreword.

The report concludes with recommendations for combatting e-cigarette use among young people, including incorporating e-cigarettes into smoke-free policies, preventing youth access to e-cigarettes and significant increases to taxes and prices affiliated with e-cigarettes.

Murthy said: “Preventing tobacco use in any form among youth and young adults is critical to ending the tobacco epidemic in the United States.”

The report was launched on Thursday morning in Washington DC at an event where the surgeon general unveiled a new e-cigarette website and public service announcement. Speakers included Murthy, 16-year-old health activist Tyra Nicolay and American Academy of Pediatrics president Benard Dreyer.

Tyra, a member of the Navajo Nation, described how she was first introduced to e-cigarettes with a sour green apple flavored product but has since quit using e-cigarettes.

“Today, I call on my peers to reject tobacco products, including e-cigarettes,” she said.

Dreyer said e-cigarette use “has raised alarm among pediatricians, tremendously”.

In October 2015, the AAP issued recommendations for e-cigarette public policy and regulations and guidance for physicians on how to speak with families about tobacco and “nicotine delivery devices” such as e-cigarettes.

“That’s why this report is so necessary and welcome at this time,” Dreyer said. “Because as you’ve heard, e-cigarettes have the potential to addict the next generation of children. It’s a major public health crisis, as far as we’re concerned.”

The British campaigning organisation Action on Smoking and Health said it was puzzled by the surgeon general’s concerns. “In the US as in the UK, young people are experimenting with e-cigarettes but vaping has not been associated with an increase in smoking, a point which is not made sufficiently clear in the report,” it said.

“While nicotine is not completely harmless, it is smoking that is lethal. In the UK we have a regulatory system that restricts advertising and controls sales to young people.

There is no evidence of significant regular use by nonsmoking children and, as in the US, smoking rates are going down, not up.”

Britton, the Nottingham University academic, attributed a drop in the UK smoking rate, down three percentage points in three years, to people taking up e-cigarettes in order to quit. “It is falling fast in the UK, almost certainly related to e-cigarettes.”

Tobacco giants lose legal battle over plain-packaging rules as new rules means packets of 10 will disappear

Some of Britain’s biggest tobacco firms have lost a legal battle in the Court of Appeal against plans for new plain-packaging rules

The companies were appealing a high court decision which upheld new rules to force firms to use plain and standardised packing for all their products.

The new rules ban tobacco companies from prominently branding their cigarettes and require that picture health warnings take up 65 per cent of the front and back of every packet.

Packets of 10 cigarettes are no longer allowed, as they do not have enough room for health warnings.

Additionally, promotional messages on packets like “is less harmful than other brands” are also banned.

Firms and shops have a year to get rid of their old stock and implement changes – after that, they will face penalties for breaking the law.

In May, they suffered what anti-smoking campaigners described as a ”crushing defeat” at the High Court.

The day before new regulations come into force, a judge in London had declared that they were ”valid and lawful in all respects”.

Mr Justice Green rejected a judicial review action brought against Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt.

Leading companies then took their case on to the Court of Appeal.

But on Wednesday, three judges in London rejected their challenge against the High Court’s decision.

A number of companies, including British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco and Japan Tobacco International, challenged the legality of the ”standardised packaging”
regulations.

They argued that the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations 2015 would destroy valuable property rights and render products indistinguishable from each other.

Dismissing the appeal, Lord Justice Lewison, Lord Justice Beatson and Sir Stephen Richards ruled that the Health Secretary had “lawfully exercised his powers”.

UK court rejects tobacco companies’ appeal on plain packaging

http://in.reuters.com/article/us-tobacco-court-appeal-idINKBN13P1ED

A UK court has dismissed an appeal brought by some of Britain’s largest tobacco companies over the government’s new plain packaging rules.

In its decision handed down on Wednesday, the court dismissed all appeals brought by British American Tobacco, Japan Tobacco, Imperial Brands and several paper manufacturers.

The companies argued that the law, which went into effect in May, unlawfully deprives them of their intellectual property by banning the use of all marketing on packages, including logos, colors and special fonts.

“This is a victory for public health and another crushing defeat for the tobacco industry,” said Deborah Arnott, chief executive of health charity Action on Smoking and Health.

“This ruling should also encourage other countries to press ahead with standardized packaging, now that the industry’s arguments have yet again been shown to be without foundation.”

BAT, the world’s second-biggest tobacco company, called the decision “disappointing” and said it was considering its options carefully.

(Reporting by Martinne Geller in London; Editing by Louise Heavens, Greg Mahlich)

Big Tobacco threatens Supreme Court fight after losing plain packaging appeal

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/11/30/big-tobacco-threatens-supreme-court-fight-losing-packaging-appeal/

The world’s largest tobacco companies have threatened to take their battle against the Government’s plain packaging policy to the UK’s highest courts after losing their latest appeal against the branding crackdown.

The court of appeal today upheld legislation that forces all tobacco products to use uniform packaging in a ruling described by anti-smoking groups as a “crushing defeat” for the tobacco industry.

The latest blow to cigarette-makers British American Tobacco, Imperial, Japan Tobacco International and Philip Morris International follows their failed court challenge in May this year, one month after the new anti-tobacco legislation came into effect.

Under the new rules all tobacco packaging must be olive green and include large images showing the negative health consequences of smoking as a visual deterrent.

Tobacco companies have repeatedly branded the move unlawful and say it will be ineffective at reducing smoking rates. They will continue to oppose the regulation despite a second legal defeat. The exception to the industry-wide defiance is PMI, which said in May that it would focus on developing its smoke-free products rather than fight the case.

Daniel Sciamma, the UK managing director of Japan Tobacco, said that the company was already considering an appeal to the Supreme Court.

“This commercial vandalism sets a dangerous precedent for other targeted industries, who must be concerned that their brands will now be under threat. We obviously disagree with the court’s decision as it endorses the confiscation of our brands,” Mr Sciamma said.

Meanwhile BAT warned that the court decision “does not necessarily mark the end of the challenge” and a spokesman for Imperial said that it was reviewing the judgement before considering its legal position.

Jefferies analyst Owen Bennett said the impact of plain packaging would weigh most heavily on Imperial and Winston and Camel maker Japan Tobacco, which both rely on the UK for around 15pc of their overall earnings

For Marlboro maker PMI and BAT, the UK market makes up less than 1pc of their business.

Despite the minority exposure to the UK market the tobacco companies still have a strong incentive to fight the clampdown, which could spur similar legislation in other markets.

“Seeing results such as this may actually encourage other markets to follow suit,” said Mr Bennett, adding that should other countries wish to implement plain packaging in the years ahead then the outcome of any challenges would most likely be the same.

Smoking parents linked to severe asthma

A third of children who have potentially fatal asthma attacks are being exposed to tobacco smoke, a new report has found.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/33355337/smoking-parents-linked-to-severe-asthma/#page1

Children’s doctors have become “complacent” in the need to advise parents about the hazards of smoke exposure among children with asthma, according to a new audit from the British Thoracic Society (BTS).

The review has prompted a call for health workers to do more to inform parents about the health risks of second-hand smoke to their children.

Experts reviewed data on 5,500 children admitted to 153 hospitals across the UK with severe asthma attacks in November 2015.

They found that 32 per cent had been exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.

The authors point out that passive smoking is “recognised as an important factor in asthma attacks in children that lead to hospitalisation”.

But two in five hospitals failed to record data on this issue, meaning doctors might need to pay greater attention to asking about exposure to tobacco smoke, they said.

The authors conclude: “Paediatricians may have become complacent about the need to record and advise parents about the hazards of smoke exposure in children with wheezing/asthma.”

Dr James Paton, reader in paediatric respiratory medicine at the University of Glasgow, who led the BTS audit, said: “It’s very worrying that a third of children were potentially exposed to tobacco smoke at home, although more data is needed here.

“When discharging children, health professionals should take the opportunity to talk about the issue with their parents or carers – and offer smoking cessation support as appropriate.”

British American Tobacco says a minimum excise tax in the Autumn Statement would only fuel the black market

UK smokers face a triple whammy in 2017 ahead of Philip Hammond’s Autumn Statement, a British American Tobacco spokesperson said.

http://www.cityam.com/254049/british-american-tobacco-says-minimum-excise-tax-autumn

With a duty escalator expected and more limitations to come from the EU’s tobacco products directive, BAT said the minimum excise tax proposed by former chancellor George Osborne should be dropped.

The minimum excise tax is effectively a floor price that would hike the price of value-for-money brands in an effort to encourage smokers to quit rather than switch to cheaper brands.

Will Hill is a spokesperson for BAT who said the company, which has a stake in low cost options, would urge the government not to introduce the proposed tax.

Research for the tobacco company by KPMG also showed the tax could increase activity in illicit trading. The study said British smokers who buy low cost brands are more likely to fall into the black market than to quit smoking.

If set at the wrong level, the research shows the tax could cost the Treasury £1.2bn between 2017 and 2020.

The Treasury lost more than £31bn in tax revenue between 2010 and 2015 due to high taxes on alcohol and tobacco, a report by the TaxPayers’ Alliance said.

The company also said the minimum excise tax would run counter to Theresa May’s assurances of a government that works for the many and not just the privileged few.