Cigarette Smuggling
Tobacco Industry Lobbying Pays Rich Dividends
SCMP – Mar 22, 2005
Financial Secretary Henry Tang Ying-yen’s failure to implement an increase in tobacco duty will be accompanied by a colossal sigh of relief by the tobacco industry. Their intensive lobbying of the Treasury, behind closed doors over many years, has paid a handsome dividend. Cheaper tobacco sells much more easily to youth. On RTHK on February 17 Mr Tang gave his reasons for this disastrous decision, as follows:
Cigarettes are already ‘expensive’.
An increase in duty will ‘increase smuggling’.
He wanted to create a budget free of tax increases.
It will be apparent to most people, in view of the huge burden of disease and net economic loss caused by tobacco, that his reasoning is flawed.
First, cigarettes in Hong Kong are not expensive given our average gross domestic product per capita. Tax as a proportion of price is about 50 per cent. The World Health Organisation (WHO) clearly states that for effective tobacco control it should be 65 to 80 per cent. The government has lost a valuable opportunity to prevent nicotine addiction in children and adolescents.
Second, worldwide studies reported by the World Bank and WHO have shown that most smuggling is a result of organised crime and corruption rather than cross border differentials in tobacco duty, and that petty smuggling can be dealt with by disciplined services with additional support from increased tobacco tax revenues.
Finally, is the financial secretary seriously telling us that he has traded off a sizeable and preventable proportion of illness and health care costs against the cosmetic appearance of a budget free of tax increases? If it had been consulted, the Health, Welfare and Food Bureau would surely have pointed to both the short and long term benefits of a rise in tobacco duty this year.
In the new government is there any possibility of making real progress in protecting public health?
ANTHONY J. HEDLEY and MARCUS YU, Tobacco Control Research and Policy Unit, Department of Community Medicine, University of Hong Kong
Bail For Blue-Chip Chief
Standard 26 August 2004 – Vanson Soo
A hearing has been adjourned into four senior executives, including the deputy chief executive officer of blue-chip Shanghai Industrial Holdings, for their alleged involvement in a HK$116 million cigarette smuggling case.
Further arrests are likely in the probe by the Independent Commission Against Corruption, which is investigating another 16 suspects, an ICAC spokeswoman said.
The four executives, who were arrested in Hong Kong in February, appeared in Eastern Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday, charged with laundering HK$50.3 million from suspected cigarette smuggling and corrupt activities.
They include Shanghai Industrial deputy chief executive and executive director Lu Dayong.
Lu, 57, is also chairman of Nanyang Brothers Tobacco, the wholly owned, cigarette-making arm of Shanghai Industrial, which makes the top-selling Double Happiness cigarette brand in China.
Hong Kong-listed Shanghai Industrial is one of the mainland’s biggest listed conglomerates, a behemoth with interests ranging from dairies, property and tobacco to microchips and cars.
When the company went public in 1996, it was oversubscribed 158 times and helped to ignite a massive boom in China shares. Its market capitalisation is HK$12.8 billion.
The other three are director Ko Kit, 35, sales manager Chan Kai-san, 36, and former director Lin Jianding, 38 – all of Hang Chun Trade Development.
No pleas were taken and the case was adjourned to November 23. The four were released on bail ranging from HK$100,000 to HK$500,000 each.
The executives were among 20 arrested by the ICAC for alleged involvement in cigarette smuggling activities.
At the time, the ICAC said it had charged an individual with accepting HK$11.4 million in bribes in connection with the smuggling of 116 containers of cigarettes into China.
ICAC investigators also said the alleged bribes – ranging from HK$18,000 to HK$150,000 per container of cigarettes – had been paid since last December by at least six syndicates in return for the continued supply of cigarettes, which were smuggled through Southeast Asia to China. According to the mainland magazine Caijing earlier this year, the import plan of China National Tobacco Import and Export Corp (CNTIEC) showed the Nanyang Brothers Tobacco factory in Tuen Mun was limited to exporting only 24,720 units of cigarettes, each worth 4,000 yuan (HK$3,772), to the domestic market in the first half of 2004.
Although their official export value was supposed to total no more than 100 million yuan, the ICAC discovered the December, January and February shipments alone exceeded that, the magazine claimed.
Shanghai Industrial spokesman Derek Fung said Lu has been suspended from all his executive duties since February 27.
The group said recently the case will not have any material impact on its operations.
Fung said although Nanyang Brothers Tobacco is a subsidiary of Shanghai Industrial, he does not know how the three Hang Chun employees are related to Nanyang Brothers Tobacco, except that they are probably business partners.
Lu, who graduated from the Party School of Shanghai in industrial enterprise management, was previously deputy general manager of Shanghai Tobacco Holdings and director of Shanghai Cigarette Factory.
Caijing said Lu has more than 35 years’ experience, mostly in Shanghai, in the tobacco industry.
Bloomberg records show that Lu held 0.28 per cent of Shanghai Industrial shares in December last year.
Shanghai Industrial is expected to release its interim results on Monday. Its shares closed 0.75 per cent higher at HK$13.50 on Tuesday.
4 Charged For Money Laundering
News.gov.hk – 23 August 2004
A tobacco executive and three others have been charged for allegedly laundering $50.3 million, believed to be proceeds of suspected cigarette smuggling and corrupt activities.
Nanyang Brothers Tobacco Chairman Lu Dayong, 57, Hang Chun Trade Development Director Ko Kit, 35, Hang Chun Sales Manager Chan Kai-san, 36, and former Hang Chun Director Lin Jianding, 38, will appear at Eastern Magistracy tomorrow to face a joint holding charge under the Organised & Serious Crimes Ordinance.
The charge alleges that between December 1 last year and February 23, the defendants conspired together to deal with sums of money, knowing or having reasonable ground to believe the money, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, represented proceeds of an indictable offence.
Independent Commission Against Corruption enquiries have found the money was allegedly generated through corruption and smuggling.
Inquiries into the corruption aspects of the case are underway.
European Commission and Philip Morris International sign 12-year Agreement to combat contraband and counterfeit cigarettes
Brussels, 9 July 2004
The European Commission, together with 10 Member States of the European
Union1 and Philip Morris International (PMI), today announced a multi-year
agreement that includes an efficient system to fight against future cigarette
smuggling and counterfeiting and which ends all litigation between the
parties in this area. Through the Agreement, Philip Morris International will
work with the European Commission, its anti-fraud office OLAF, and law
enforcement authorities to help in the fight against contraband, including the
rapidly growing problem of counterfeit cigarettes. The agreement includes
substantial payments by Philip Morris International, which could total
approximately USD 1.25 billion over twelve years. “I welcome the conclusion
of the negotiations of this important agreement. This agreement is to the
advantage of the EU to protect its financial interests,” said Commission
President Romano Prodi. “This Agreement represents a major step forward
in the battle against contraband and counterfeit cigarettes,” said
Commissioner Michaele Schreyer, responsible for budget and the fight
against fraud “We believe that it will enhance the ability of the European
Commission and the Member States to combat the illegal trade in cigarettes,
which results in the loss of substantial tax and customs revenues each year.
Contraband and counterfeit products cheat everyone: governments,
consumers and legitimate businesses”, she added.
Fight against counterfeit
The Commission and the EU Member States point to several reasons why they view
expanded anti-counterfeit and anti-contraband efforts as requiring significant priority.
Among other reasons, the European Community and the Member States are losing
hundreds of millions of Euros in unpaid taxes from counterfeit cigarettes. In addition,
counterfeit and other forms of contraband create a parallel illegal supply chain that
invades and compromises legitimate distribution channels and competes unfairly
with genuine products distributed through legitimate channels.
Over the last few years, the incidence of contraband Philip Morris cigarettes has
been greatly reduced, but during the same time period, counterfeit cigarettes have
become a growing threat to the European Community and the Member States. The
Commission has therefore announced that it will build on existing efforts to combat
the illegal trade in cigarettes by:
– Vigorously investigating cigarette counterfeiting in close cooperation with the
Member States and law enforcement officials in critical locations worldwide;
1 Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal,
and Spain.
2
– Targeting and interrupting the production of counterfeit cigarettes with the goal
of preventing counterfeit cigarettes from being introduced into the European
Community; and
– Recording and pursuing seizures of counterfeit cigarettes in the European
Community to identify the source of the product and other relevant information.
Fight against contraband and money laundering: Know your
customers and tracking and tracing
The Agreement builds on the efforts of all parties and introduces new and innovative
procedures to combat the diversion of Philip Morris International’s products into
contraband channels in Europe and around the world. Today’s agreement reflects
the reality that success in defeating the contraband and counterfeit cigarette trade
can be aided greatly through a joint agreement whereby major manufacturers like
Philip Morris International and European law enforcement combine their resources
and enhance their coordination in combating contraband and counterfeiting.
In addition to Philip Morris International’s already existing fiscal compliance policy,
the Agreement contains strong provisions, approved by all parties, which provide
them with a mechanism for the long-term prevention of any large-scale smuggling of
genuine Philip Morris cigarettes in the European market. The Agreement requires
Philip Morris International to build on its existing review process for selecting and
monitoring customers, to enhance its capabilities to track and trace certain
packaging, and to provide expanded support to European law enforcement in its
battle against the illegal trade in cigarettes. Under the Agreement, Philip Morris
International agrees to continue limiting its sales to volumes commensurate with
legitimate market demand. The Agreement also incorporates and builds into a
comprehensive contractual framework Philip Morris International’s existing antimoney
laundering policies.
Historically, a key concern for the European Community has been the introduction of
contraband cigarettes into the European Community. For that reason, the European
Community has taken aggressive action to address cigarette smuggling. European
law-enforcement efforts have resulted over the past several years in the reduction of
the amount of cigarettes that enter the EU as contraband. The European
Commission has determined that constructive agreements, such as this Agreement
with Philip Morris International, are a useful tool in addressing these issues.
The initiative includes far-reaching product tracking procedures that will facilitate law
enforcement efforts to determine the point at which any genuine product is diverted
from the authorised sales channel. Consistent with the Agreement, Philip Morris
International will mark certain packaging with information indicating the intended
market of retail sale, mark “master cases” of cigarettes with machine-scannable
barcode labels, and implement other procedures useful for the tracking and tracing
of its products.
These obligations embody the first major joint tracking and tracing initiative and are
consistent with the anti-contraband provisions of the WHO Framework Convention
on Tobacco Control.
Payments under the Agreement
The European Community and ten Member States will receive substantial payments
over a number of years. The amount of Philip Morris International’s payments under
the Agreement will vary based on a number of factors, and could total approximately
USD 1.25 billion.
3
The Agreement also includes an initiative whereby PMI has agreed to make
payments in the event of future seizures in the European Community of its genuine
products above defined quantities. These payments will be made without regard to
fault or wrongdoing by Philip Morris International. If other Member States sign the
Agreement, including the new Member States, they will also be entitled to receive
these payments.
Ending past disputes
While all these provisions are forward-looking, the Agreement also contains the
parties’ resolution of all past disputes relating to contraband cigarettes. In particular,
the Agreement also brings to an end all litigation between the European Community
and the ten Member States and Philip Morris International relating to contraband
cigarettes. The Agreement also resolves Philip Morris International’s case against
the European Commission pending on appeal before the European Court of Justice.
The Commission is always prepared to have discussions with manufacturers who
are willing to commit the necessary resources to improve ways to combat illegal
trade in their products and associated criminal activity, such as money laundering.
Producers also have a responsibility to fight illegal trade in their products. This
Agreement should therefore serve as a model for other cigarette companies.
Background
In the negotiations with Philip Morris International, the Commission represented the
European Community and the ten Member States. The Legal Service and OLAF
conducted the negotiations for the Commission.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/olaf/index.htm
Elisabeth Werner: 02/295 95 06
Nanyang Brothers Tobacco Faces Smuggling Probe
By Staff Reporter Lu Yanzheng – 20th March 2004 – Caijing
Lu Dayong, chairman of Nanyang Brothers Tobacco (NBT), was recently arrested by the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in Hong Kong. Lu was suspected of involvement in cigarette smuggling.
The news came as a surprise to the industry. Qi Mijia, vice manager of Huangpu division at Shanghai Tobacco (Group) Corp., said: “Lu Dayong is a smart man, hard-working and well-paid. Personally, I don’t believe he would under any circumstances help others smuggle.”
But the fact is that Lu was arrested by ICAC in one of its recent efforts to combat smuggling.
Based on information it had received, ICAC arrested 20 people on February 23, including Lu. Three days later, ICAC announced that the suspects might have been involved in HK$ 116 million (US$ 14 million) worth of cigarette smuggling.
Lu is accused of taking HK$ 11.4 million (US$ 1.4 million) in bribes and helping smugglers obtain cigarette sales quotas. The other 19 arrested include two employees of NBT and board directors members or employees in other five companies.
Shanghai Industrial Investment (Holdings) Co. Ltd (SIIC), a famous red-chip company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HK00363), wholly owns NBT. Lu is the managing director and deputy CEO of SIIC. Feng Qiming, spokesman of SIIC, told Caijing on March 8 that “presently Lu is only a suspect and ICAC’s investigation is still underway; no accusation has been made, and the board will not take any actions for now.”
However, on SIIC’s website, Lu Dayong’s name has already been removed from the list of managers. SIIC, whose stock transactions were suspended on February 27, made an announcement confirming Lu’s suspected involvement in “bribery” and suspension of Lu’s positions in all of the group’s companies. On March 1, SIIC’s stock resumed trading, but its price declined more than 10% in 3 days.
According to the ICAC’s investigation report, Lu has taken bribes from at least six smuggling groups since December 2003. For each container of smuggled cigarettes, Lu took bribes between HK$ 18,000 (US$ 2,169) and HK$ 150,000 (US$ 18,072). Altogether Lu was alleged to have taken HK$ 11.4 million (US$ 1.4 million) for helping to smuggle 116 containers of cigarettes. In an effort to hide the transactions, Lu and other suspects registered several companies to receive bribe money.
ICAC found HK$ 2 million (US$ 256,000) in cash and six luxurious watches in Lu’s bank coffer. ICAC suspects that Lu received the cash and watches as bribes.
In the import plan of China National Tobacco Import & Export Corp. (CNTIEC), NBT’s factory in Hong Kong should export only 24,720 units of cigarettes to the domestic market in the first half of 2004. Roughly, one unit of export is worth 4000 yuan (US$ 482) and the total amount is only 100 million yuan (US$ 12 million). Based on the ICAC’s discoveries, the value of cigarettes smuggled in December, January and February alone already exceeded that amount. It is unclear why NBT’s sales system reported no effects from the huge waves of smuggled cigarettes flooding its market.
According to Feng Qiming, most cigarettes produced by NBT’s Hong Kong factory are sold in the mainland market. NBT’s major business with the mainland is the export and sale of its own Double Happiness brand cigarettes. NBT itself cannot export cigarettes made in China or trade other Chinese brands. Therefore, a large number of smuggled cigarettes would have an enormous negative impact on NBT’s legal sales channels in the mainland.
A sales agent of NBT in eastern China told Caijing that under normal procedures, a tobacco company chooses agents following a formal appraisal system. If the tobacco company finds that a sales agent owns smuggled cigarettes, the company will immediately disqualify the agent in order to prevent harmful effects on its normal sales channels. Under such a system, if cigarettes produced by NBT were smuggled into the mainland market, NBT’s representatives in the mainland should have felt the impact and tracked the smuggled cigarettes. But surprisingly, it appears as though NBT did not feel any shock from the huge number of smuggled cigarettes on the market.
ICAC accused Lu of helping smugglers obtain cigarette sales quota and taking bribes in return. The cigarette sales quota is related with NBT’s sales system: NBT gives different sales quota to its partners according to their different qualifications. Since the quota is controlled by NBT itself, there exists the possibility of internal corruption and serious management defects.
Lu, aged 56, has worked in the tobacco industry for more than 35 years, mostly in Shanghai.
Unsurprisingly, Lu’s suspected involvement in this smuggling case has negatively impacted SIIC. SIIC is 58% controlled by Shanghai Industrial Investment Group, a window corporation of Shanghai in Hong Kong and a veteran red-chip company. On March 12, the stock price of SIIC was HK$ 18.45 (US$ 2.22) per share, down 10% from HK$ 20.5 (US$ 2.47) on February 27, when its stock transactions were temporarily suspended.
Feng said that SIIC might release a report in April to better explain the event.
Tobacco Executive Suspended Over Probe
SCMP A3 – February 28, 2004 – BENJAMIN WONG
Shanghai Industrial (Holdings) has confirmed one of its directors has been suspended following an ICAC probe into a multimillion-dollar cigarette smuggling case.
Without naming the director, the company said the man was an executive director of the company and executive deputy CEO.
He was suspended from all his duties and trading in the company’s shares were suspended at the company’s request.
A source said the director worked for the Nanyang Brothers Tobacco Company – a wholly owned subsidiary of Shanghai Industrial (Holdings) – which makes the Double Happiness brand.
The statement from Shanghai Industrial said it had formed a committee to “ensure normal operations at Nanyang Tobacco”.
The Independent Commission Against Corruption arrested a senior Nanyang executive after he allegedly took $11.4 million in bribes to facilitate several smuggling syndicates’ operations.
The investigators said with the man’s help, the six syndicates smuggled cigarettes worth $116 million into the mainland via Southeast Asia.
A further 19 people were also arrested in connection with the case.
Tobacco Executive Arrested In ICAC Probe
Suspect accused of taking more than $11m in bribes to help syndicates smuggle cigarettes worth $116m into the mainland
South China Morning Post, February 27, 2004, page A1 -BENJAMIN WONG
A senior executive of a state tobacco manufacturer owned by the Shanghai Industrial (Holdings) conglomerate has been arrested by the ICAC for allegedly helping several syndicates smuggle $116 million worth of cigarettes into the mainland.
The Independent Commission Against Corruption believes the executive was paid more than $11 million in bribes for giving the smugglers preferential treatment in supplying his company’s cigarettes.
An ICAC statement described the firm as a wholly owned subsidiary of a listed Hong Kong company. Sources confirmed it was the Nanyang Brothers Tobacco Company, producers of the famous Double Happiness brand.
A spokesman for Shanghai Industrial said last night the company had been notified about the case and was monitoring its developments. But he refused to confirm whether the company was involved in the case.
The ICAC alleges that with the executive’s help, the syndicates managed to buy 116 containers of cigarettes from the company. It alleges the executive knew the cigarettes would be smuggled into the mainland. The tobacco manufacturer had offered to help investigators, the ICAC said.
The ICAC believes the executive was bribed by six syndicates and received between $18,000 and $150,000 for each container of cigarettes.
In addition to the senior executive, the ICAC arrested 19 others – 12 men and seven women aged between 20 and 50.
Two of the suspects are the executive’s associates, two are employees of the tobacco manufacturer, 11 are employees of five other companies and four are suspected smugglers.
The officers also seized more than $2 million of the suspected bribe money, as well as jewellery and watches. The operation, code-named “Golden Dragon”, began on Monday.
Sources said the money and goods were found in a safe belonging to one of the two arrested associates of the executive.
The investigators believe several companies were set up by the suspects to transfer the bribe money and cover up their activities.
The ICAC believes the cigarettes supplied to the syndicates were ultimately smuggled into the mainland via Southeast Asian countries.
All those arrested have been released on bail.
Investigations are continuing.
why has Hong Kong not followed suit ? as a result Big Tobacco is paying billions in a settlement and with further punitive agreed fines for contraband seizures of their products in EU
EU launches lawsuit against Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds
November 6, 2000
The European Union has filed a civil suit against two large U.S.-based tobacco companies, Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds, alleging the tobacco industry was involved in smuggling cigarettes into the EU.
Like the Canadian suit against R.J. Reynolds (and others), filed in December 1999, the EU suit is being made under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. Both were filed in New York State, though in different judicial districts.
R.J. Reynolds used to be sole owner of Canada’s RJR-Macdonald, makers of Export ‘A’. Internationally, it is best known for the Camel brand. However, last year the company sold off all its international interests to Japan Tobacco, and RJR-Macdonald was re-named JTI-Macdonald. Japan Tobacco is also named as a co-defendant in the lawsuit.
Philip Morris is the world’s largest tobacco company outside of China, and is best known for its Marlboro brand. Canada is one of the few markets in the world where Marlboro is not available, for trademark reasons. However, Philip Morris is present in Canada through its 40% share in Rothmans, Benson & Hedges, this country’s second-largest cigarette manufacturer.
See:
- Statement of Claim: European Community -v- RJR Nabisco et al
- Statement by EU Commissioner Michaele Schreyer (Nov. 6th, 2000)
- Philip Morris, Reynolds Accused (AP, Nov. 6th, 2000)
- EU sues tobacco giants (BBC News, Nov. 6th, 2000)
- Brussels sues US tobacco groups in crackdown (Financial Times, Nov. 6th, 2000)
- Tobacco firms sued over EU smuggling(Guardian, Nov. 7th, 2000)
- Germany mulls joining E.U.suit against tobacco giants(Handelsblatt, Nov. 8th, 2000)
- Tabakmultis sind schwer kriminell [“Tobacco multinationals are highly criminal”], Der Spiegel, Nov. 10th, 2000 [on-line edition]. Germany’s most important news weekly provides extensive coverage of details of the EU statement of claim. The beginning of the article, in rough translation:
The EU Commission is suing the world’s largest tobacco companies. Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds are allegedly involved in drug deals, money laundering and cigarette smuggling, according to the statement of claim, which SPIEGEL ONLINE has obtained. The companies face billion-dollar penalties.
(Brussels) — What do managers of tobacco company R.J. Reynolds (“Camel”, “Winston”) have to do with Columbian drug dealers? Quite a lot, according to the EU Commission’s statement of claim against the two U.S. tobacco companies Philip Morris (“Marlboro”, “Benson & Hedges”) and RJR, that was filed last Friday in New York. In the 188-page document, lawyers from Fort Lauderdale, New York, Madrid and New Orleans, retained by the EU Commission, have compiled a list of sins by the tobacco companies that reveals a new dimension in economic crime in the Western world…
See also two sidebars: Scheinunternehmen und “Schutzgelder” [Shell companies and “protection money”] and Aktenvernichtung und Kokaindealer [“Document destruction and cocaine dealers”].
- Schlag gegen Big Tobacco [Blow against big tobacco], Der Spiegel [print edition], Nov. 13th, 2000. An equally hard-hitting article, from other reporters. Includes interesting background on smuggling developments in Switzerland.
- Case against tobacco industry like crime thriller, Irish Times, Nov. 14th, 2000. Ireland’s upmarket daily reports on Der Spiegel‘s report on the EU lawsuit.