Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

Cigarette Smuggling

Customs seizes 1,400 kilogrammes of illicit tobacco (with photos)

http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201112/14/P201112140383.htm

Hong Kong Customs last week seized 72 parcels containing around 900 kilogrammesof illicit tobacco at the Airmail Centre, which was waiting to be airmailed to the United Kingdom.

This morning (December 14), after in-depth investigations, Customs officers cracked down on an illicit tobacco storage centre inside an industrial building in Kwai Chung and arrested three men. During the operation, a total of 1,400kilogrammes of illicit tobacco valued at about $3.9 million with a duty potential of $2.4 million was seized.

Customs officers first seized some 900 kilogrammes of illicit tobacco from the 72 parcels destined for the United Kingdom. The seizures were worth about $2.5 million, with a duty potential of about $1.4 million.

After investigation, it was found that the smugglers had attempted to send the illicit tobacco by airmail, and tried to avoid the Customs investigation by posting the parcels at different post offices.

Following further investigation, Customs officers today cracked down on an illicit tobacco storage centre inside an industrial building in Kwai Chung with the arrest of three men, aged between 33 and 49. Two of them were preparing to send parcels containing tobacco by airmail.

Some 500 kilogrammes of illicit tobacco valued at $1.4 million with a duty potential of $1 million were seized at the storage centre. The three men were detained for further investigation.

To deter smuggling activities by airmail, officers of the Customs Airport Command inspect inbound and outbound airmail using advanced equipment such as X-ray machines and ion scanners. The Customs also maintain intelligence exchange with overseas counterparts to fight against smuggling activities.

The department reminded members of the public that using airmail for illicit purposes is an offence and will be prosecuted.

Under the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance, anyone involved in dealing with, possession, selling and buying of illicit cigarettes or tobacco commits an offence. The maximum penalty on conviction is imprisonment for two years and a fine of $1 million.

Hong Kong Customs will spare no effort in combating illicit cigarette or tobacco activities. Members of the public are urged to report any such activities to the Customs’ 24-hour hotline 2545 6182 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 2545 6182end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

Ends/Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Issued at HKT 21:21
PhotoPhoto
NNNN

New laws needed to fight tobacco: lawyer

http://www.theage.com.au/national/new-laws-needed-to-fight-tobacco-lawyer-20111117-1nl2l.html

Australia should introduce far-reaching corruption and racketeering laws to fight the “dirty tactics” of tobacco firms, according to a leading lawyer.

Slater and Gordon senior partner Peter Gordon told an audience in Perth yesterday the federal government needed to get tough on the industry that “killed 15,000 Australians a year” and had proven to be deceptive.

He said Canberra should also hold firm on its plain-packaging legislation, passed last week, believing it would defeat any High Court action brought against it by the tobacco industry.

Advertisement: Story continues below Addressing an Australian Council on Smoking and Health forum at the University of Western Australia, Mr Gordon said the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations (RICO) Act had been used by the US government to win a $US13 billion judgment against US tobacco firms in 2006, and Australia should do the same.

A US federal court judge found the tobacco firms had conspired to dupe consumers about the health risks of smoking.

“A lot of the practices which were found to be corrupt or wrongful practices within the meaning of the act were found by the judge to have happened in Australia,” Mr Gordon said.

“If there were such an act in Australia, there’s no reason why the same kind of redress could not be obtained here.”

Mr Gordon believed the government was on solid ground when it came the tobacco industry’s threats to sue it over plain-packaging laws.

“The tobacco companies say it is acquiring their property, which is a breach of the Constitution without just compensation,” he said.

“As I view it, no one wants to take their property away – they just want to stop them using it in a harmful way.”

AAP

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/new-laws-needed-to-fight-tobacco-lawyer-20111117-1nl2l.html#ixzz1gNwjWLe1

Cigarette Smuggling Burns

http://www.nacsonline.com/NACS/News/Daily/Pages/ND1212111.aspx

U.S. Rep. Peter King says that the federal and state governments, along with manufacturers, must prioritize the fight against cigarette smuggling.

WASHINGTON – U.S. Rep. Peter King (R-NY), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, shared his opinions about the proliferation and consequences of contraband cigarettes last week in Politico, a Capitol Hill publication.

King wrote that the “failure to strongly combat the growing crime of contraband cigarette smuggling deprives governments of billions of dollars in tax revenues — siphoned off by terrorist and criminal organizations.”

Using his home state of New York as an example — which has the highest cigarette excise tax in the United States — King suggests that as cigarette taxes increase, so has the illegal activity by some retailers to bypass wholesalers and acquire and sell counterfeit-stamped cigarettes. “This allows the smuggler and retailer to sell at substantial discounts — and still profit thanks to the margin created by unpaid taxes,” the representative wrote.

“In New York, contraband cigarettes are typically trafficked from southern states, which have lower or no taxes, or across federal tribal lands, where taxes are not collected,” wrote King, adding that tax-free cigarettes sold on tribal lands account for as much as one-third of all brand name cigarettes sold in New York — sales that are “supposed to be limited to tribal members.”

One result of cigarette smuggling, notes King, is that both the federal government and state governments are missing out on tax revenue collected from tobacco sales. “Nationwide, the annual loss is estimated at $5 billion at the state level, and a further $3.8 billion loss at the federal level,” he wrote.

King also cites that in 2008, a House Homeland Security Committee investigation found “a terrifying nexus” between cigarette smuggling and terrorism.

“We uncovered far too many examples,” said King, noting that counterfeit cigarette tax stamps “were found in an apartment used by members of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad cell that carried out the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. The notorious ‘Lackawanna Six’ Islamic-terrorist cell received $14,000 from a former gas station operator, who was subsequently convicted for cigarette trafficking and money laundering. …Last year, the U.S. comptroller general and the Justice Department verified that cigarette smuggling provides financial support for international terrorist groups including Hezbollah and Al Qaeda.”

Citing his support for the Smuggled Tobacco Prevention Act (STOP), King says that cigarette smuggling has presented a security threat for years that has not been addressed. “With the revenue-starved governments across the country – including in New York — facing huge shortfalls, there is even more incentive to address the problem. The era for tolerating cigarette smuggling with ineffective tax enforcement must end.”

The STOP Act was introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate in October, which seeks to significantly hamper the proliferation of black market cigarettes through stiffer penalties on smugglers who avoid taxes. NACS is working to make sure that certain provisions contained in the STOP Act do not adversely affect retailers. NACS is also advocating that the legislation is drafted in a manner that will apply to all contraband tobacco, including Native American tribes.

Tougher penalties to curb tobacco smuggling

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_737094.html

Description: http://www.straitstimes.com/STI/STIMEDIA/image/20111122/ST_IMAGES_YCBURN.jpg

Contractors dumping cartons of contraband cigarettes seized by Singapore Customs into a refuse truck before taking them for incineration. — ST PHOTO: ALPHONSUS CHERN

By Tessa Wong

Tobacco and cigarette smugglers now face stiffer penalties, including mandatory jail time and increased fines.

These were among several changes made in Parliament on Tuesday to laws on Customs, goods and services tax (GST), and stamp duty.

Minister of State for Finance Josephine Teo explained the need to increase Customs enforcement.

She noted that from 2005 to last year, the number of tobacco-related Customs offences went up by 24 per cent. These offences range from smuggling and buying to selling and possessing cigarettes and tobacco products which have not had their duties paid.

Sydney city’s secret ring of illegal smoke sales

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sydney-citys-secret-ring-of-illegal-smoke-sales/story-e6freuy9-1226206807890

smokes

Up in smoke: Bronwen Gora buys illegal cigarettes from a kiosk. Picture: Anthony Reginato Source: The Daily Telegraph

CHEAP duty free cigarettes are being sold illegally in the CBD for as little as $8 a packet – half the cost of a regular brand.

The sellers are risking 10 years behind bars and hefty tax fines by flogging the under-the-counter smokes at news and magazine kiosks on George St.

Brands range from established labels to overseas names.

The Sunday Telegraph was last week able to buy a range of popular brands that had been imported from China, Korea and Hong Kong.

Most had “for duty free sale only” written on the side. Some had health warnings but no graphic pictures.

The trade in smuggled duty free cigarettes from other countries has doubled in the past six months, according to one of the large tobacco companies.

Popularity of illegal loose-leaf tobacco _ referred to as “chop chop’ was falling as demand for more convenient ready-made cigarettes rose, a spokesperson for British American Tobacco Australasia (BATA) said.

Rising quantities of illegal duty free cigarettes are another blow to the tobacco industry which faces the reality of plain packaging laws.

All cigarettes will be sold in olive-brown packs emblazoned with health warnings from December next year. Police are more likely to seize illegal tobacco at import level said Simon Chapman, professor of public health at the University of Sydney.

The large scale Operation Polaris, a joint effort by NSW and Federal Police, Customs and Border Protection Service and the NSW Crime Commission last month cracked a major tobacco smuggling ring.

More than 60 tonnes of illegal tobacco and 25 million counterfeit cigarettes were seized in Sydney and two men charged with bribery, dealing in proceeds of crime, and obtaining financial advantage by deception.

But fewer prosecutions occurred at retail level, BATA’s anti illicit trade manager Barry Wilson said, as illegal tobacco was so hard to track once it slipped through the net into circulation.

Former deputy mayor of Northampton jailed for part in cigarette smuggling ring ordered to pay £250,000

http://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/news/crime/former_deputy_mayor_of_northampton_jailed_for_part_in_cigarette_smuggling_ring_ordered_to_pay_250_000_1_3274944

Published on Thursday 24 November 2011 15:40

A FORMER deputy mayor of Northampton, who was jailed for his part in an international cigarette-smuggling ring, must pay a £250,000 confiscation order, despite telling top judges his arrest was the “biggest shock of his life”.

Jozef Raca, who runs Raca International in The Mounts, was handed a four-year sentence after being convicted of conspiracy to evade duty on tobacco products at Worcester Crown Court in February 2005.

At the same court, in March 2007, the ex-Tory councillor for Abington was ordered to pay nearly £250,000 when a judge found millions of cigarettes had been hidden in a shipment of holy water, delivered to Raca’s Northampton-based haulage firm in 2001.

The 78-year-old businessman, of Abington Park Crescent, Northampton, who was once freed after a dramatic kidnapping in South Africa, continued to protest his innocence as he challenged his confiscation order at London’s Criminal Appeal Court, claiming he was an innocent dupe.

But his appeal was dismissed by top judges, who said he had been convicted of the offence and it was likely – on the balance of probabilities – that the holy water shipment had also contained cigarettes.

The court heard Raca was convicted of being involved in a plot which was masterminded by a man named Robert Cooper, from Dudley, West Midlands, who was jailed for six years after admitting his role. Customs officers seized more than 20 million cigarettes in Finland, Austria, Felixstowe and Dover.

The jury found Raca, who owns a European haulage firm, was involved in the plot despite no cigarettes being found at his business premises.

At his later confiscation hearing, a judge ruled the cigarettes had been smuggled into the UK with the holy water which was delivered to Raca’s firm.

Giving evidence before three senior judges, Raca continued to deny any guilt and insisted there were no cigarettes. He said: “When I was arrested and ended up in the court, I thought I was on a different planet. It was the biggest shock of my life.”

His lawyers argued the Crown Court judge who made the confiscation order was wrong to find cigarettes had been stashed with the holy water, suggesting it could have been a “trial run” by Cooper to see whether that method of smuggling was safe.

They also said there was no basis for the judge to set the confiscation order at almost £250,000, as no cigarettes had been found in the shipment.

Dismissing the appeal, Lord Justice Hooper said it was likely cigarettes were in the container and the tax evaded would “certainly” have been £250,000.

Sitting with Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart and Judge Michael Mettyear QC, he added: “Of course, only Raca, along with Cooper, knows how many cigarettes were in the container.

But he denied any cigarettes being in the container, so we have to do our best to decide, on the balance of probabilities, what the quantity was. In our view it was such that the evaded duty and VAT would certainly amount to £250,000.”

Tougher penalties to curb tobacco smuggling [2011] 23 Nov_ST

http://www.singaporelawwatch.sg/remweb/legal/ln2/rss/legalnews/74099.html?utm_source=rss%20subscription&utm_medium=rss

Title: Tougher penalties to curb tobacco smuggling
Source: Straits Times
Author: Tessa Wong

Legal News Archive

TOBACCO and cigarette smugglers now face stiffer penalties, including mandatory jail time and increased fines.

These were among several changes made in Parliament yesterday to laws on Customs, goods and services tax (GST), and stamp duty.

Minister of State for Finance Josephine Teo explained the need to increase Customs enforcement.

She noted that from 2005 to last year, the number of tobacco-related Customs offences went up by 24 per cent. These offences range from smuggling and buying to selling and possessing cigarettes and tobacco products which have not had their duties paid.

Meanwhile, the number of repeat offenders in the same period increased by more than six times.

All repeat offenders now face an increased minimum court fine of S$4,000.

Repeat offenders caught with more than 2kg of tobacco products also face mandatory imprisonment.

First-time offenders caught with duty-unpaid cigarettes now face a minimum court fine of S$2,000.

Also, anyone who furnishes incorrect information to another for making declarations is now liable for prosecution.

This means Singapore Customs can now go after traders who use third- party agents to declare their consignments.

Information declared by traders can now be made available to domestic government agencies, in situations concerning public interest. But agencies will have to seek approval from the Finance Ministry, and the information would still be governed by the Official Secrets Act.

Some changes were made to improve administration and provide legal clarity.

These include the introduction of a summons system for minor offences; allowing agents to be appointed to recover unpaid duties; and allowing traders to keep electronic images of records instead of only the original hard copies.

Compressed natural gas (CNG) has now been made dutiable. The three-quarter tank rule for Singapore-registered vehicles going into Malaysia now applies to vehicles with CNG tanks too.

Dr Fatimah Lateef (Marine Parade GRC) asked about the extent of Singapore Customs’ investment in new technology and information technology, how it keeps up with international trade alerts, and how Customs officers handle passengers with infectious diseases.

Mrs Teo said that Singapore Customs ‘intensively leverages’ on IT to improve operation efficiency, and, on Jan 1, it will launch the latest version of an electronic system for the clearance of trade documentation, called TradeNet.

It also actively monitors trade and sanction decisions by the United Nations, and enforces them through compliance and audit checks on companies.

Also passed yesterday were changes to laws on GST and stamp duty, some of which were announced in the Budget statement earlier this year. These include GST measures to promote the marine and biomedical sectors.

Among the changes was one to encourage people overseas to store high-value goods such as art pieces, antiques and gold in specialised facilities in Singapore, and to purchase related services such as auction, insurance and valuation of these goods.

Another change expands the scope for GST recovery – allowing local agents to recover GST on goods imported on behalf of overseas clients.

Where the Stamp Duty Act is concerned, the Government now allows for stamp duty relief for companies converting into a limited liability partnership, and has removed most $2 and $10 nominal and fixed stamp duties on documents.

Laws on stamp duty relief for mergers and acquisitions have been tweaked for greater consistency, and the Finance Minister can now waive conditions for any relief, remission or exemption of stamp duty for specific cases.

Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.

Contraband seizures

Hong Kong (HKSAR) – Hong Kong Customs has smashed two transshipment smuggling cases during the past two days (November 16 and 17) involving unmanifested cargoes violating different ordinances with a total value of about $6.8 million.

Through risk assessment, Customs officers on November 16 selected for cargo examination a 20-foot container declared to contain bath tubs and crafts goods from a river trade vessel destined for Thailand.

Upon inspection, the officers found various contraband goods, including over 310,000 suspected aphrodisiac pills and Chinese medication, 500 cans of refrigerant suspected to be ozone-depleting substances, 498 crossbows suspected to be used as arms, over 50,000 suspected counterfeit vehicle parts with false trade descriptions and 10,000 illicit cigarettes.

In another case on November 17, Customs officers selected for X-ray examination a 40-foot container declared to contain lace and tableware boxes from another river trade vessel destined for Kenya. It was found to contain over 800 unmanifested television sets bearing suspected forged trademarks and/or false trade origin descriptions.

A Customs spokesman said today (November 18) that investigation of both cases was continuing and no arrests had been made so far.

“Hong Kong Customs will continue to fulfill its international obligations by actively detecting contraband and the department will step up efforts in combating transnational smuggling crimes,” he added.

Under the following ordinances, any person found guilty of the following offences can be penalised:

(1) “Importing unmanifested cargoes” is liable to a maximum fine of $2 million and imprisonment for seven years under the Import and Export Ordinance;

(2) “Importing prohibited article not under and in accordance with an import licence” is liable to a maximum fine of $0.5 million and imprisonment for two years under the Import and Export Ordinance and Pharmacy and Poisons Ordinance;

(3) “Dealing in arms by way of trade or business without a dealer’s licence” is liable to a maximum fine of $0.1 million and imprisonment for 10 years under the Firearms and Ammunition Ordinance;

(4) “Importing scheduled substances without a licence” is liable to a maximum fine of $1 million and imprisonment for two years under the Ozone Layer Protection Ordinance;

(5) “Importing goods to which a false trade description or forged trade mark is applied” is liable to a maximum fine of $0.5 million and imprisonment for five years under the Trade Descriptions Ordinance; and

(6) “Importing goods to which Dutiable Commodities Ordinance applies” is liable to a maximum fine of $1 million and imprisonment for two years.

Source: HKSAR Government

Revision of the Tobacco Products Directive : false claims made by the tobacco industry

Cancer Research UK has produced a briefing note rebusting some of the false claims made by thetobacco industry about the ’Tobacco Product Directive’. The Tobacco Product Directive is beingrevised by the EU since September 2010, with intensive lobbying from the tobacco industry to preventits strengthening.

The Cancer Research UK briefing provides an outline of the key issues related to the Tobacco Products Directive and addressessome of the false claims (myths) that are being made by the tobacco industry.

Lobbying from the tobacco industry is so intense that representatives from the tobacco indutry even threatened to launch legal actionshould the European Commission proposes plain packaging.

Trying to limit, as much as possible, the possible outcomes of the Directive’s revision, the tobacco industry is using a series of arguments to convince policy makers such as

” Smuggling will rise with plain packaging”,

“It will be more difficult for retailers to differentiate products”,

“This is against property law”,

“They want to ban burley tobacco”,

“There is no evidence that flavours make tobacco products more attractive” etc.

However, several of them are not substantiated, as demonstrated by Cancer Research UK – an EPHA member.

For all stakeholders interested in public health, the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive represents one of 2011-12biggest challenge. If the European Commission goes for plain packaging, if tobacco flavours are banned, this could have a greatimpact on people’s health but also a considerable impact on the tobacco industry. And the more than 85 000 responsesreceived by the European Commission during the consultation process demonstrate clearly there is a lot at stake.

According to Cancer Research UK, a stronger Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) requires, in particular, larger warnings (includingpictures) on both sides of the packet, plain packaging and regulation of flavourings and additives, is needed to protect children andyoung people from the marketing of this highly addictive and seriously harmful product.

NB : Tobacco causes 650,000 deaths each year in Europe.


For further information

European Commission launches public consultation on revision of Tobacco Products Directive 2001/13/EC

EPHA responds to European Commission Consultation on possible revision of Tobacco Products Directive 2011/37/EC

SFP/ENSP Recommendations for the Tobacco Products Directive review

WHO publishes its 2011 Report on tobacco


The Tobacco Products Directive : Myth Busting

Last modified on novembre 15 2011.

Other articles you might find interesting

Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project

http://www.reportingproject.net/

OCCRP Home

Big Trouble at Big Tobacco

Opinion

Documents

By OCCRP

Reports piled up from Japan Tobacco International (JTI) investigators around the globe. Mobsters were doing business with the firm’s Russian distributorship while shipping tons of illegal cigarettes into Europe. Workers felt endangered. Accused smugglers and criminals ran some of its Middle East partnerships.

And when investigators received information that 13 JTI employees or distributors may have been working directly with smugglers, a senior executive at JTI blocked an investigation, according to company e-mails and internal memos.

JTI had some problems.

The company’s investigative team – experienced hands culled from the CIA, British police, U.S. Special Forces and elsewhere –chronicled and fought those problems for years. They went undercover, shut down smuggling routes and worked with European police to intercept shipments worth millions of Euro. The deeper they dug, the more evidence they say they uncovered against JTI’s employees and its distributors.

And that, according to thousands of pages of company records, e-mails and secret recordings obtained by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), along with interviews of a half-dozen past employees, created another problem for the world’s third largest tobacco company.

The investigators had become too successful, they say.

JTI’s own investigators say JTI and its parent Japan Tobacco did almost nothing when faced with reports their distributors smuggled tobacco through Russia, Moldova, the Balkans, Afghanistan and the Middle East. The apparently rampant smuggling occurred despite a 2007 agreement with the European Union mandating that JTI proactively investigate all claims of smuggling. The agreement prompted a public pledge by the company to adopt a zero-tolerance policy on illicit shipments. Those investigators say they were fired by management for doing their job.

This year, as Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad killed his own people and faced worldwide sanctions, JTI’s Middle East business partner IBCS poured cigarettes into duty free shops, according to invoices obtained by OCCRP.

The profits went to a company whose owner, Rami Makhlouf, according to a European Union sanctions order on May 23, “provides funding to the regime allowing violence against demonstrators.” Four days after the sanctions took effect, JTI’s partner and sole Middle East distributor shipped 9,000 cases – 90 million individual cigarettes — to Syria Duty Free.

In the same month, Syria Duty Free claimed to transfer ownership from the Mahklouf family although OCCRP could not verify this. However, a US Department of Treasury notice two months later says “the U.S. Government has reason to believe that Rami Makhluf (sic) is disassociating himself (in name only) from his businesses and looking to safely store his wealth outside of Syria.”

Simon Evans, a spokesman for rival Imperial Tobacco, said his company stopped selling to Syria Duty Free the instant sanctions took effect and hasn’t resumed.

“We do have some questions about the sale by Mr. Makhlouf and whether it is valid, but even if it is valid, we and the entire industry are required to do full and complete vetting on any new distributors. Obviously that can’t happen in a few days or months, so we can’t resume sales until this is sorted out,” Evans said.

Evans also said Imperial has stopped selling to the Syrian government-owned General Organization of Tobacco because of questions about its banking transactions, even though it is not on the sanctions list. JTI shipped more than 84,000 cases of cigarettes to GOT on May 27,including 20,000 cases free of charge. The bill totaled more than 11 million Euro, according to a JTI invoice.

JTI e-mails detail how widespread the smuggling had become across several regions. JTI Investigators caught anIsraeli distributor smuggling large quantities of cigarettes into Iraq and Belgium, but investigators say the company took no action. Contractors working for JTI paid officials in Iraq, Kurdistan and Iran to get information on smuggling routes, according to the company’s internal reports on Iraq, and interviews with contractors.

JTI is the international arm of cigarette giant Japan Tobacco, which, in turn is owned more than 50 percent by the Japanese government. JTI reported $25 billion in sales in their last fiscal year on brands including Winston, Camel and Benson & Hedges, according to its annual earnings report. At a shareholder meeting in February, President and CEO Pierre De Labouchere lamented a difficult financial environment but lauded the strength of its Russian and Middle East operations during 2010.

Those two markets are the hub of smuggling by JTI distributors, according to e-mails, investigative notes, and internal documents obtained by OCCRP. The internal JTI records and related materials were provided to OCCRP by sources close to the company. Six former employees confirmed the authenticity of the documents.

Executives at JTI headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, did not respond to specific questions, but did issue a written statement blaming a “former employee” for spreading false information. “We will decline your invitation (to comment). Our company does not wish to comment on the unfounded allegations raised in the various e-mails you sent us,” Guy Cote, a media relations vice president, wrote in an e-mail.

Deborah Arnott, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) in London, said the revelations against JTI prove that the tobacco industry hasn’t abandoned its old practices.

“JTI, Philip Morris International, BAT and Imperial, have signed legally binding agreements with the EU committing to preventing smuggling of their products anywhere in the world,” she stated. “If subsequently JTI has carried on aiding and abetting smuggling, then it’s clear that a regional agreement like that negotiated by the EU is insufficient. When you have smuggling, you undermine public health, you invite crime and you rob tax payers of millions of pounds of revenue every year.”

Blocked Investigations

plane

In 2009 and 2010 as JTI investigators uncovered what they called substantial evidence of illegal trade, managers repeatedly interfered with efforts to stop the trafficking. Mark Mulvey, a senior vice president, directly blocked an investigation into the Audeh Group, its Middle East distributor, according to company e-mails, and internal memorandums.

Kevin Tomlinson, the general manager in Russia, said that he wasn’t concerned about an increase in cigarette seizures at Baltic borders because profits outstripped potential EU-imposed fines for not stopping the smuggling, anemail from the compliance team reported. Tomlinson’s comment was also secretly recorded by the compliance team.

Tensions between company executives escalated. David Reynolds, the former vice president of brand integrity tasked with stopping smuggling, clashed heatedly with bosses who he said wanted to slow down investigations that could hurt their profitable partnerships, JTI internal correspondence show.

In April 2010, Reynolds wrote a blistering e-mail to Ryuichi Shimomura, senior vice president and chief legal officer for the parent company, Japan Tobacco. In it, he argued that not only were distributors smuggling its product, but that JTI executives knew about the problem and did nothing. He argued that even information on investigations was being leaked to smugglers.

“Shipments to unauthorized buyers have reached a massive scale exposing the company to fines potentially of around €30 million,” Reynolds wrote. “We have repeatedly reported our findings to JTI management … but have yet to elicit any concerted effort to halt these diversions.

“In recent months members of my team have been directed not to investigate several instances of smuggling related to specific JTI distributors … and the possible involvement of JTI employees with known smugglers,” Reynolds wroteon Friday, April 10, 2010.

On Monday, April 13, Reynolds was fired.

The company also removed his top assistant, Craig Douglas, that same day. Over the next several months, JTI phased out nearly a dozen contractors who knew about the smuggling and worked closely with Reynolds and his unit. By July of this year, nearly all of Reynolds’ team had been terminated.

“What happened was that Dave (Reynolds)’s group had figured the whole thing out, and they were going after various people,” said Cary Hendricks, a computer intelligence specialist who spent six years contracting at JTI. “Once they had gathered enough proof, they called in the cavalry (notifying senior executives). Then just like that, Dave and Craig were fired – a totally unexpected turn of events.”

“At that point, the entire culture of JTI investigations changed. You had this extremely professional, experienced team working together and sharing a lot of information,” said Hendricks. “There was a buzz in the office, and they were doing great work. And they were replaced by what appeared to be a bunch of office workers who would show up, sit at their computers and do nothing as far as real investigations. It was sad to see.”

They were replaced in part by former employees of the Gallaher Group, which JTI bought in 2007. Gallaher, a British company, was implicated repeatedly in smuggling operations and helped smugglers evade more than $1.5 billion in customs tax in Great Britain in the early 2000s, according to a lengthy UK court case.

“You have to ask yourself how serious they are when they bring in people from Gallaher to take over,” said a former employee who had knowledge of both companies. “The culture in Gallaher was very much, ‘Let’s not get caught, but if we do get caught, be prepared to defend ourselves.’ They didn’t take steps to stop smuggling, just to insulate themselves when it came out.”

Destroying Documents
Burning damaged cigarettes.

Tobacco is the world’s most smuggled legal product, in large part because profits are huge and penalties weak. Smugglers ship containers of tobacco from areas with low taxes such as Russia and Ukraine, or from duty free spots in Dubai and Panama, to high-tax countries in Western Europe and North America. A single container of cigarettes can bring a $1 million profit.

Unlike counterfeiting, smuggling actually benefits tobacco makers. High taxes sharply curtail smoking, studies have shown, so smuggled goods keep them affordable, creating new consumers and sustaining old ones. Smuggling cost government budgets throughout Europe about $14 billion per year in tax revenues, according to a June, 2011 report by the European Commission.

Since the mid-1990s, major cigarette companies have repeatedly been implicated in working with criminal groups to smuggle cigarettes, feeding billion-dollar black markets in contraband smokes. In the past eight years, tobacco makers have paid at least $5 billion in fines and signed agreements to stop participating in the illicit trade. JTI signed a compact with the European Commission in 2007 obliging it to crack down on smuggling and put in place what it called a “zero tolerance policy,” toward illicit shipments.

But evidence from JTI records suggests the company has been less than compliant with the EC agreement. In March, 2010, a private investigator in Belgrade compiled a computer spreadsheet from law enforcement sources listing the names and phone numbers of businesses and individuals worldwide who had shown up in the records of a large-scale smuggling operation conducted by European police agencies. It included 13 JTI employees and distributors.

The Serbian list raised troubling questions. First, the compliance team wanted to know if the investigator, on contract with JTI, bribed law enforcement officials for the information, or was it passed on as a tip to be investigated. Once they decided the document came legally, they would investigate the 13 named employees and contractors, according tocompany e-mails.

That never happened. Nigel Espin, the director of corporate security who came over from Gallaher, expressed concern about possessing proprietary police information and in a March 10, 2010 e-mail ordered the document returned to the contractor and the investigation halted. He also ordered the document listing the employees and contractors deleted from all records and the JTI computer system. The next day, Chief of Compliance Jean-Luc Perreard confirmed the order to end the investigation.

Michael Padilla, a JTI contractor who ran undercover operations in Iraq and around the Middle East, said the company was obsessed with gaining market share.

“At first I had a honeymoon phase and was free to go after smugglers in certain areas, but soon it became very apparent that they had relationships with some of the smugglers I was going after,” Padilla said. “JTI was trying to protect their market share. Market share, and controlling Iran and the Middle East, was the number one priority for them.”

Similar conflicts took place at JTI’s offices around the world. In Russia, JTI investigators reported that alleged mobsters had financial stakes in some of JTI’s largest Russian distributorships, according to company e-mails and auditing reports.

JTI investigators and quality control officers in Russia and the Baltics detailed massive smuggling by distributors, particularly of its St. George Brand. But no action was taken, according to internal memos filed by investigators in Russia and by Reynolds, the former brand integrity chief.

Zero Tolerance?

Helping fuel Japan Tobacco‘s growth over the past decade was its purchase of two companies long accused of smuggling, Gallaher and RJR Reynolds.

The governments of Canada and Ecuador sued RJR in the 1999 under U.S. anti-racketeering laws, claiming that the company actively smuggled. The European Commission filed a separate suit, accusing high level RJR executives of knowingly accepting criminal proceeds and laundering money with drug cartels in South America, working with terrorists in Northern Iraq and of breaking trade embargos to ship cigarettes to Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s government. U.S. judges dismissed all lawsuits, saying they didn’t have jurisdiction over foreign tax matters.

But between 2003 and 2007, Canada’s Royal Mounted Police and revenue collectors filed fraud charges against JTI-McDonald (formerly RJR-McDonald, the company’s Canadian division) and some of its executives for evading more than $1.36 billion of taxes in 2003 alone.

After a series of court judgments – JTI actually filed for court protection against creditors in 2004 after Canada won a $1 billion award – RJR and JTI-MacDonald agreed to pay about $475 million in 2010.

Gallaher was equally notorious. In 2005, Gallaher fired a distributor it accused of smuggling tobacco. The distributor filed a lawsuit, saying Gallaher systematically engaged in smuggling. Gallaher won its lawsuit, but testimony and a judge’s final order dismissing the lawsuit harshly rebuked Gallaher.

In testimony for the civil lawsuit, a former director of Gallaher, Norman Jack, testified the company routinely enabled smuggling and adopted a culture of “willful blindness”.

Against that backdrop JTI adopted what it called a zero tolerance policy on smuggling in 2007, the same year it acquired Gallaher. It also entered into a binding agreement with the European Union calling for it to spend $400 million on anti-smuggling measures over the next 15 years, and implemented steep fines for violations. Under the terms of the pact the company agreed train its employees, and enforce a broad strategy to crack down on illicit shipments.

JTI Chief Executive Officer Thomas McCoy and Paul Bourassa, a senior vice president charged with regulatory and compliance issues, outlined the procedures in a memo to employees on Aug. 16, 2007. Both men had been senior executives at RJR when it was accused of conspiring with smugglers.

“In light of the recent acquisition of the Gallaher group, steps were rapidly taken to ensure that certain practices that could potentially run afoul of JTI’s Code of Conduct were addressed,” the memo said. “JTI’s is committed …. to act swiftly and decisively in stopping actual or potential illegal sales of its product will be acted upon.”

Anton Stanaj from JTI distributor Rokšped being arrested at Belgrade airport.

Despite the announcement, incidents of wrongdoing by JTI’s distributors were reported almost monthly during 2009-10, according to company records, but former employees said no action was taken in the most profitable areas. The records show that investigators suspected tens of millions of cigarettes were being diverted to smuggling operations in Russia and the Middle East and elsewhere, often with the help of JTI’s own distributors.

In Montenegro, Rokšped served as JTI’s distributor for the Montenegro, and remains so today, despite a 2007 arrest and a recent conviction for cigarette smuggling of Anton Stanaj, a member of the powerful family that runs Rokšped.

Dubbed operation “Memphis” — after a pre-JTI Gallaher brand– the Balkan police operation tracked shipments of cigarettes from China, Dubai and other countries to Montenegro and on to the EU through Rokšped and other companies. According to the indictment, Stanaj used Rokšped as the smuggling base of operations.

Stanaj was convicted in May this year in Belgrade and sentenced to six-and-a-half years in prison. Rokšped is still JTI’s partner in Montenegro according to the firm’s website, and Stanaj is appealing his conviction.

Representatives of Rokšped and the Stanaj family did not respond to six telephone messages and five e-mails from OCCRP.

JTI also continued, and in fact expanded its relationship, with another alleged smuggler, IBCS Trading. In 2002, the European Union filed a lawsuit accusing IBCS of being a “co-conspirator” with RJR Reynolds in smuggling operations. A U.S. judge tossed out the lawsuit, citing a 100-year old law barring U.S. courts from hearing revenue disputes of other governments.

In 2001, JTI and Issa Audeh, owner of IBCS, went into business together to form JT International in Jordan, according to the Audeh-Group website.

JTI investigators in the Middle East and Asia documented what they called widespread smuggling by IBCS to Iraq, Iran Cyprus and elsewhere during 2009-2010.

IBCS did not respond to four telephone calls from OCCRP. An e-mail sent through the company’s website – at the request of an IBCS official – received no response.

Hacked Computers
Smuggling in Oman.

At the center of the investigations was David Reynolds, who ran JTI’s Asian-Pacific office of Brand Integrity for four years before being promoted to oversee global operations at the end of 2008.

A former analyst for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, Reynolds is brusque and demanding, according to several former JTI employees. He saw things in terms of black and white, good and bad, and clashed with executives who were interested only in superficial investigations, they said.

He quickly assembled a team of investigators, some of whom he had worked with before, others he knew only by reputation. By early 2010, the team was running an extensive undercover operation in Iraq and Kurdistan, and had broadly expanded the company’s investigative capabilities.

As the investigators compiled information on Audeh Group, ICBS, and others, the staff also uncovered evidence that its computers were being hacked. Cary Hendricks, a computer security specialist who spent six years as a JTI contractor, found a unique sort of “Trojan horse” had infected the team’s computers and allowed hackers to see what each operative was writing, according to company e-mails.

Hendricks traced the hacking to an empty warehouse in Mexico and eventually to a Canadian company, another JTI contractor whose staff includes former members of the CIA and French intelligence, according to company e-mails and memoranda. Invoices obtained by OCCRP show that JTI paid $300,000 to the Canadian company.

According to a November 2009 memo, Senior Vice President Mark Mulvey admitted ordering some of the hacking. Mulvey also ordered another company executive, Willem Van Aldrichem, to shut down all investigations of Audeh and IBCS, according to a secretly tape recorded conversation between JTI employees on Jan. 10, 2010.

By the spring of 2010, relations between the investigative team and its superiors had soured to the point where only one side would survive, according to interviews with several people involved in the investigations. On April 10, Reynolds made his pitch in a letter to Ryuichi Shimomura, the chief legal officer of the parent company.

“… JTI management has not lived up to the ‘zero-tolerance policy’ … and, in those cases that touch on smuggling into or via the European Union, has specifically and repeatedly violated (its obligations under the European Commission agreement of 2007).” Reynolds wrote. “In a few cases sensitive information from (brand integrity) investigations has even been passed back to the smugglers themselves by unknown persons in the company.”

Reynolds asked for support. Instead, he was gone. Other contractors were fired or phased out, and many accepted large settlement payments and signed confidentiality agreements.

Following his dismissal, Reynolds went to work at FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., where he is a senior analyst on organized crime.

In an e-mail to OCCRP, FBI press officer Amy J. Thoreson said the agency would not allow Reynolds to comment for the story.

Several other fired investigators were quickly snapped up by executives at rival companies. One senior investigator ousted with Reynolds said he turned down a JTI severance package worth $100,000 because it meant signing a non-disclosure agreement. “I have to look at myself in the mirror,” he explained.

He asked to remain anonymous because he is now working for a rival company.

“I don’t think they knew what they were getting into when they hired Dave,” the investigator said. “For years they had people who were content to collect their money and not do anything. That’s how the game worked.”

“And suddenly we come in and start doing real investigations and uncovering a lot of smuggling,” he said. “They didn’t like what we were doing, and we didn’t like what they were doing. It was great for a few months, but it couldn’t last. They just didn’t want us to do our jobs.”

Reported and written by John Holland, Bojana Jovanović and Stevan Dojčinović for OCCRP