Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

Japan Tobacco International

Reilly to restrict tenders from firms linked to tobacco group

http://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/reilly-to-restrict-tenders-from-firms-linked-to-tobacco-group-1.2119288

Arthur Cox threatened action against State over plain cigarette packaging

Minister for Children James Reilly is taking steps to prevent any firm which has a contract with a tobacco group from tendering to work for bodies under his remit, among them the child and family agency Tusla.

The development comes on foot of the Minister’s disquiet that solicitors Arthur Cox are simultaneously working as corporate legal adviser to Tusla while acting for Japan Tobacco in threatened legal action against the State over plain cigarette packaging.

The corporate element of Arthur Cox’s work for Tusla is worth €800,000 per annum including VAT, and the company manages some €12 million in annual legal expenditure for Tusla through a network of 31 local solicitors.

Arthur Cox carries out similar work for the Health Service Executive, another of many public clients.

The chief civil servant in Dr Reilly’s department, Fergal Lynch, said in correspondence to the Minister on Wednesday that the it would be “extremely problematic” for Tusla to withdraw from its arrangements with Arthur Cox before its contract expires next February.

All agencies

However, Mr Lynch said the Minister might wish to consider asking all agencies in his remit “to consider a requirement in all future procurements” that firms tendering for services must sign a declaration confirming they have no contractual arrangements with tobacco companies.

“This would send an important message about the principle of non-involvement with the tobacco industry. If you wish I will immediately seek legal advice about the scope for including such a requirement in all future tendering processes, to ascertain if it is legally feasible.”

On Dr Reilly’s instruction this option is now under examination within his department.

It remains unclear, however, whether the introduction of such requirements are permissible within the framework of the law on tendering and competition.

Dr Reilly had instructed Mr Lynch to examine whether Arthur Cox and solicitors McCann FitzGerald, which works for Imperial Tobacco in similar threatened action against plain cigarette packs, had any contractual relationships with his department.

There was no such relationship with either firm – and Arthur Cox’s contract with Tusla is the only arrangement that either company has with any of the agencies under the department’s aegis.

“While it might be argued that there is no direct conflict of interest in these arrangements from a purely legal perspective, you have made very clear your view that it is of concern from a policy perspective for an agency such as Tusla to be advised or represented by a legal firm that also represents international tobacco companies,” Mr Lynch said.

Separately, the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund said it held investments in international tobacco companies which were worth some €10 million at the end of 2014. These investments were previously held by the National Pension Reserve Fund. Only assets covered by the Cluster Munitions and Anti-Personnel Mines Act of 2008 are barred from the fund

JTI tobacco ad banned following complaint from Cancer Research UK

http://www.thedrum.com/news/2015/01/07/jti-tobacco-ad-banned-following-complaint-cancer-research-uk

A press ad for Gallaher-owned JTI tobacco has been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) after 13 complaints, including one from Cancer Research UK, were submitted to the body over misleading information.

The advert, which appeared in April 2013, included an e-mail from the UK Department of Health to the Australian Department of Health and Ageing. The email featured text, which stated, “I work on the UK Government’s Tobacco Policy Team … you will be aware that the UK Government is considering the introduction of plain packaging of tobacco products. As I’m sure you’re aware, one of the difficulties regarding this is that nobody has done this and therefore, there isn’t any hard evidence to show that it works”.

The text “there isn’t any hard evidence to show that it works” was highlighted in the ad followed by wording “We couldn’t have put it better ourselves”.

The majority of complainants felt that the email, which predated research and the introduction of standardised packaging in Australia, there misleading implied that no evidence existed to support plain packaging of tobacco products.

Gallaher said the ad was intended to question the rationale of the Department of Health’s (DoH) approach in 2011 and said at the time the ad appeared, JTI’s UK managing director publicly stated “We are using this media campaign to demonstrate that in 2011 even the DoH accepted that these proposals are not supported by any hard evidence”.

They company added that the ad did not state or imply that at the time the ad appeared there existed no evidence to support the introduction of plain packaging.

However the ASA disagreed and said the ad was likely to give readers the misleading impression that there was no hard evidence of any kind to support the introduction of plain packaging in 2013.

The transnational tobacco companies’ strategy to promote Codentify

Download (PDF, 166KB)

 

JTI·s response to the Australian Government·s Consultation Paper on the Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill 2011

Download (PDF, 312KB)

Response to the UK Department of Health’s Consultation on the Future of Tobacco Control

Download (PDF, 470KB)