Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

Health Risks

Even One THC Hit Carries Risk for Inducing Psychosis

Meta-Analysis: Even One THC Hit Carries Risk for Inducing Psychosis
— Evidence suggested adding CBD does not ameliorate these effects

https://www.medpagetoday.com/psychiatry/generalpsychiatry/85472?xid=nl_mpt_morningbreak2020-03-18&eun=g220600d0r

The psychoactive components of cannabis were linked to new-onset psychotic symptoms even at low doses, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Across nine studies involving 196 healthy young adults, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) was associated with significantly increased total symptom severity on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale compared with placebo (standardized mean change 1.10, 95% CI 0.92-1.28, P<0.0001) even at low doses, ranging from 1.25 mg to 10 mg, reported Oliver Howes, MD, PhD, of King’s College London, and colleagues.

Also, just one of four studies in which cannabidiol (CBD) was administered concurrently with THC found CBD administration reduced these symptoms, they wrote in the Lancet Psychiatry.

“Our findings highlight the risk of psychiatric symptoms after even a single dose of some THC-containing cannabis products,” Howes told MedPage Today in an email.

These findings add to the “growing scientific consensus” in support of the psychosis-cannabis link, an association that appears to be bidirectional, wrote Carsten Hjorthøj, PhD, and Christine Merrild Posselt, PhD, both of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, in an accompanying commentary.

“In some people, cannabis leads to incident psychosis, whereas in other people, psychosis leads to incident cannabis use,” they wrote.

Hjorthøj and Posselt cautioned against extrapolating these findings to assume “single doses of THC will eventually lead to schizophrenia,” but also emphasized that “caution should not be thrown to the wind.”

For example, CBD in particular has been touted as a potential “wonder drug” with antipsychotic, anxiety-reducing effects, but the findings here suggest the usefulness of CBD and other cannabis extracts “might be somewhat exaggerated compared with what we can expect in clinical practice,” they continued.

This meta-analysis involved double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of healthy participants administered IV, oral, or inhaled THC with or without CBD. Individuals were generally in their mid-20s and predominantly male.

Of the 15 studies included, 13 were considered to have a “low” risk of bias and two studies had a “moderate” risk, as measured through the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The authors calculated the SMR scores for “positive (including delusions and hallucinations), negative (such as blunted affect and amotivation), and general (including depression and anxiety) symptoms,” they explained.

Compared with placebo, THC was associated with significantly increased positive symptom severity scores in 14 studies (SMC 0.91, 95% CI 0.68-1.14, P<0.0001), negative symptom severity scores in 12 studies (SMC 0.78, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, P<0.0001), and general symptoms in eight studies (SMC 1.01, 95% CI 0.77-1.25, P<0.0001), researchers reported.

THC was also associated with increased total symptom severity versus placebo regardless of whether it was administered intravenously or inhaled (P=0.37), and regardless of whether participants were frequent or current cannabis users (P=0.73, P=0.95, respectively), the authors noted.

However, intravenous THC was associated with slightly “more pronounced” increased symptoms than inhalation, although this may be confounded by dose, they added.

The induction of psychotic symptoms was also lower in people with higher versus lower tobacco use, suggesting tobacco use may be a “protective factor,” the authors noted, although they cautioned against using tobacco to “counter” THC effects.

Howes told MedPage Today that “[another] possibility suggested by other evidence is that tobacco reduces the levels of the protein in the brain that THC binds to so it has less effect. This needs testing, and it is important that people don’t think tobacco will protect against the effects of THC containing cannabis.”

Many of the meta-regression analyses used involved fewer than 10 studies and were underpowered to detect small or moderate effects, which is a limitation, the authors noted. More participants were male than female, so the generalizability of these findings is also limited, they added. Researchers were additionally unable to differentiate the effects of THC on specific symptoms, like hallucinations or delusions.

Smoking or Vaping May Increase the Risk of a Severe Coronavirus Infection

Download (PDF, 280KB)

Young People Have No Idea How Much Nicotine They Vape: Study

Download (PDF, 29KB)

Smokers and vapers at greater risk of dying from coronavirus

Download (PDF, 1.4MB)

The influence of neuroticism in terms of E-cigarette dependence

The influence of neuroticism in terms of E-cigarette dependence and beliefs about use and quitting among dual users of combustible and electronic cigarettes

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306460320301106

Abstract

Objective

Dual use of combustible and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is increasing in prevalence and may be related to an increased risk for health problems. Accordingly, dual users represent a particularly vulnerable group. Neuroticism is an individual difference factor that demonstrates robust relations to combustible cigarette use. Yet, no work has examined neuroticism in relation to e-cigarette dependence or cognitions among dual users.

Methods

To address this limitation, the present study examined neuroticism in relation to e-cigarette dependence, expectancies about the negative effects of e-cigarettes, and perceived barriers for quitting e-cigarettes. The present study analyzed data collected from a cross-sectional survey of 437 dual combustible cigarette and e-cigarette users (49.9% female, Mage = 35.12 years, SD = 10.04).

Results

Results indicated that neuroticism was significantly, positively related to e-cigarette dependence (ΔR2 = 0.02, p < .001), expectancies about the negative effects of e-cigarettes (ΔR2 = 0.03, p < .001), and perceived barriers for quitting e-cigarettes (ΔR2 = 0.10, p < .001).

Conclusions

These novel findings suggest there may be merit in further exploring the role of neuroticism in the maintenance of concurrent combustible cigarette and e-cigarette use.

E-cigarettes and their impact on health: from pharmacology to clinical implications

Download (PDF, 228KB)

Smoking or vaping increases risks for those with coronavirus

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-vaping/smoking-or-vaping-increases-vulnerability-to-coronavirus-says-nyc-mayor-idUSKBN20V0Z0

(Reuters) – Smoking or vaping makes people more vulnerable to suffering severe illness once infected by coronavirus, a spokeswoman for New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said on Sunday.

De Blasio told a press conference earlier on Sunday that people who smoke or vape are at higher risk.

“If you are a smoker or a vaper that does make you more vulnerable,” de Blasio said, urging New Yorkers to seek help in quitting. “If you are a smoker or a vaper this is a very good time to stop that habit and we will help you.”

De Blasio also said people over the age of 50 and with heart disease, lung disease, cancer, immune system vulnerability or diabetes face increased risks.

Associations Between Nicotine Metabolite Ratio and Gender With Transitions in Cigarette Smoking Status and E-Cigarette Use

Findings Across Waves 1 and 2 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study

https://academic.oup.com/ntr/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ntr/ntaa022/5802027

Abstract

Introduction

Nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR), the ratio of trans 3′-hydroxycotinine to cotinine, is a biomarker of nicotine metabolism. Discrepant findings among clinical trials and population-based studies warrant replication on whether higher NMR, or faster nicotine metabolism, is associated with quitting cigarette smoking. Associations of NMR and e-cigarette use are largely unknown, as well as the relationship between NMR and gender on quitting cigarette smoking or e-cigarette use.

Methods

The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study is a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort study assessing tobacco use in the US population. In the current study, the PATH (waves 1 and 2; adult interviews) was used to evaluate longitudinal predictions in relationships among NMR and gender and their association with transitions (quit vs. current stable) in cigarette smoking status and e-cigarette use status across waves 1 and 2 of the PATH study.

Results

NMR and gender were not significantly associated with quit behavior for combustible cigarettes. Regarding e-cigarettes, a significant two-way interaction demonstrated that women with higher NMR were less likely to quit e-cigarette use compared to women with lower NMR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02–0.57; p = .01).

Conclusions

Findings identify that women with faster nicotine metabolism were 10 times less likely to quit e-cigarettes compared to women with slower nicotine metabolism across waves 1 and 2 of the PATH study. Results suggest that NMR may be used as a biomarker for transitions in e-cigarette quit behavior for women.

Implications

Findings identify that women with faster nicotine metabolism were 10 times less likely to quit e-cigarettes compared to women with slower nicotine metabolism. Results suggest that NMR may be used as a biomarker for transitions in e-cigarette quit behavior for women. Establishing parameters for NMR collection and for the use of NMR as a biomarker for cigarette smoking behavior and e-cigarette use is an important next step, and may have implications for early intervention and treatment for cessation.

Vaping, lung damage, and cytopathology: A new twist in the medical mystery

Download (PDF, 1.01MB)

E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use–Associated Lung Injury Among Clusters of Patients Reporting Shared Product Use

Download (PDF, 138KB)