Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

July 1st, 2015:

Clearing the Smoke around the Chamber’s ‘Tobacco Related’ Advocacy

https://www.uschamber.com/blog/clearing-smoke-around-chamber-s-tobacco-related-advocacy

U.S. Chamber Staff

Recent articles in the New York Times have falsely alleged that the U.S. Chamber is working around the world to promote the use of tobacco. Let’s be very clear: This organization is not in the business of promoting cigarette smoking at home or abroad, period.

Smoking is a clear hazard to one’s health. As an employer we strongly encourage our own staff to avoid tobacco products, and we offer various cessation products and services to them through our health provider.

It’s disappointing that the New York Times gathered a number of letters the Chamber sent to governments around the world for its recent articles but then doesn’t seem to have bothered to read them. Our communications to governments concerning tobacco have explicitly made clear that we support their efforts to address public health concerns.

Yet while we do not support tobacco use, we still believe that governments should uphold intellectual property rights, adhere to international commitments, and promulgate rules that are sensible and effective. It is these concerns that have been the focus of our advocacy efforts on behalf of this and many other industries.

To be more specific:

Intellectual Property – Companies invest in their brand which is why they seek trademark protection from governments. Trademark protection isn’t selectively granted on an industry by industry basis. It’s available to all legal industries and should be respected.

Discriminatory Treatment – Legal industries, even those that are unpopular, should not be targets of discriminatory treatment, nor should proposed government measures target those who conduct business with an out of favor industry. Such attempts are unfair and like most ill-conceived government policies come with unintended consequences.

Tax – Upon occasion we have weighed in regarding excise taxes in cases where we believe the proposals are excessive and where the proposed use of the resulting government windfall is fiscally questionable. It is well known that tobacco taxes can reach a level where they become a key driver of illicit trade.

To underscore, these very same policy principles apply not just to the tobacco industry but to all industries. We routinely advocate them in our communications to governments around the world and at home, on behalf of the broad American business community.

The Chamber believes that public health policy aimed at curbing smoking can yield positive results, while still upholding intellectual property protections, honoring international agreements, and not singling out any specific industry for discriminatory treatment or destruction of company brands.

Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Key Facts CDC Office on Smoking and Health

Download (PDF, 895KB)

U.S. Chamber Fights Smoking Laws While Hospitals and Insurers Sit on Its Board

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/02/business/international/many-board-members-fight-smoking-even-as-chamber-opposes-tobacco-laws.html?ref=topics&_r=0

Anthem, one of the nation’s largest health insurers, wants its members to stop smoking.

It reimburses those who enroll in smoking-cessation programs or who buy products, like nicotine patches, intended to help people quit. It has even offered to arrange sessions with a coach who talks smokers through the process of quitting.

“Smoking is an unhealthy habit,” the insurer proclaimed in one of its publications. “It’s a smart business decision to urge your employees to quit smoking.”

But Anthem’s executive vice president, Wayne S. DeVeydt, serves on the board of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is engaged in a worldwide campaign to block antismoking laws. These include taxes on cigarettes in the Philippines, graphic health warnings on cigarette packs in Jamaica and Nepal, a plan to prohibit the display of cigarettes by retailers in Uruguay and restrictions on smoking in public spaces in Moldova.

The chamber’s global opposition to antismoking measures, reported by The New York Times this week, poses a challenge for many of the members of the organization, particularly hospitals and health insurers. Four executives of leading health care organizations, including Mr. DeVeydt, are members of the chamber’s board. The other three executives come from the Health Care Service Corporation, an insurer based in Chicago, the Steward Health Care System of Boston and the Indiana University Health system.

“Smoking is one of the leading causes of death,” Brooke Thurston, a spokeswoman for Steward, said in a statement, adding, “If the chamber is in fact advocating for increased smoking we do not agree with them on this public health issue.”

The other three companies declined to comment.

Their silence stands in contrast to opposition to the chamber’s tobacco lobbying from a surprising source: the public relations firm Burson-Marsteller.

“It’s pretty obvious that you don’t want to be seen doing the bidding of an interest which is no longer legitimate,” said David Earnshaw, president of the Brussels office of Burson-Marsteller, a company that long worked for the tobacco industry. He tried unsuccessfully to prevent a major affiliate of the chamber, based in Brussels, from issuing a position paper targeting a European proposal on plain packaging.

In a statement Tuesday, the chamber said, “we know that smoking carries obvious health risks,” but added that “we are concerned that a number of governments have acted in ways that are inconsistent with their international obligations.”

The statement said the chamber had raised “substantive concerns” about “the destruction of intellectual property and the dangerous precedent of discrimination against a legal product possibly spreading to other sectors.” It added, “We make no apology for asking governments to keep their word.”

The chamber has not addressed why it has opposed health measures like restricting smoking in public places.

The Times reported this week that the chamber lobbies against antismoking laws in many countries, pits countries against one another on tobacco issues in trade forums, and, in Washington, defends the ability of the tobacco industry to sue under future trade deals.

The chamber, which claims more than three million members, previously encountered friction over its policies. Apple abandoned the chamber in 2009 over its rejection of climate change regulation. The construction giant Skanska left in 2013 after protesting the chamber’s resistance to green building codes.

Last year, when the branch of the American Chamber of Commerce in Brussels, known as AmCham EU, drafted its paper outlining opposition to plain packaging, the only inkling of dissent came from a footnote.

“This position paper does not represent the views of all members of AmCham EU,” it said, in an italicized note at the end.

Burson-Marsteller, which has had its share of controversial clients, was an unlikely rebel against the chamber’s position. The firm developed public relations and marketing campaigns for RJR Reynolds like “Project SPA,” the introduction of its failed Premier brand of cigarettes in the 1980s. Burson, a member of AmCham EU, also worked extensively for Philip Morris U.S.A., now part of Altria, developing campaigns that included a strategy to beat back criticism of the cigarette maker’s sponsorship of women’s tennis.

But in 2010 the firm renounced tobacco. Last year, Mr. Earnshaw raised objections with AmCham EU about aligning with tobacco interests, especially with many members in the cross hairs of European regulators and lawmakers facing concerns about privacy, the dominance of technology companies based in the United States and negotiations over a trans-Atlantic trade treaty.

“I tried to stop AmCham from shooting itself in the foot,” Mr. Earnshaw said. “It’s particularly crazy at a time when there are such big issues that American companies need to be involved in.”

“AmCham is extremely influential in public affairs,” he added. “If it starts producing position papers defending big tobacco on plain packaging, it’s going to make itself look ridiculous.”

The chamber’s E.U. branch proceeded with the position paper, arguing that plain packages unfairly harmed tobacco maker’s intellectual property and posed a broader threat to trademarks, representing “a potential precedent for other sectors and consumer goods or services.”

The chamber’s argument sounded as if it could have been written by the tobacco industry. An unpublished early version of the position paper, which was obtained by The Times, reveals that the rapporteur, or primary author, was Anne-Laure Covin, an executive of Philip Morris International, which is now separate from Philip Morris U.S.A. The company had no comment.

Philip Morris was not the only company involved. The paper came from a committee at the chamber’s European Union branch run by a Time Warner executive, Vincent Jamois, whose name and corporate affiliation are on the draft version of the paper, right above Ms. Covin’s name.

In other forums, Time Warner has expressed concern about cigarettes; in 2005 the company introduced a Tobacco Depiction Policy that sought to limit the number of times people were shown smoking in movies. The goal was “to reduce or eliminate the depiction of smoking and tobacco products/brands in their feature films, unless there is a compelling creative reason for such depictions,” the policy said.

Time Warner even undertook a detailed study of the effectiveness of the policy, finding that total depictions of smoking in its movies fell to 534 in 2013 from 1,346 in 2006.

The committee Mr. Jamois leads deals with intellectual property. The tobacco industry has attracted broader corporate support by framing opposition to plain packaging as a defense of intellectual property rights.

A spokesman for Time Warner declined to comment.

Other companies and institutions whose executives are listed on the U.S. Chamber’s board include Pfizer, which markets the smoking-cessation drug Chantix.

“Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in the world,” Sharon Castillo, a spokeswoman for Pfizer, said in response to questions. But she continued, “Our membership of any group comes with the clear understanding that we may not always agree with all the positions of the organization.”

Part of the chamber’s campaign seeks to discredit antismoking efforts by claiming they lack scientific evidence of effectiveness, particularly requirements that cigarettes be sold in plain packages shorn of corporate logos, or that they be covered with graphic health warnings, or sometimes a combination of the two. A letter from the chamber to the prime minister of Jamaica in 2013 was typical, contending that graphic health warnings “are not effective in reducing smoking prevalence.”

But many studies have found that plain packaging and packages covered with diseased lungs and other disturbing images make smoking less palatable.

“Graphic warnings do work, they motivate people to quit smoking,” said Seth Noar, an author of an analysis by researchers at the University of North Carolina of 37 tobacco studies.

For health care companies, a prominent role in a group that antismoking advocates see as the tobacco industry’s biggest ally can be particularly awkward. Like Anthem, the Health Care Service Corporation encourages members to stop smoking.

One video on its website called “Da Couch Potato” features an overweight man who smokes, drinks beer and watches the Chicago Bears but wants to get back in shape. A news release highlights that “smoking one pack of cigarettes per day can add up to $1,825.00 each year and tobacco use accounts for more than $96 billion a year in medical costs.”

John Cannon, HCSC’s executive vice president and chief administrative officer, is a member of the chamber’s board.

Dr. Ralph de la Torre, a cardiac surgeon and the chairman and chief executive of the Steward health system, also is a board member. One of Steward’s hospitals advertises a smoking-cessation program by saying, “There are a million reasons to quit smoking but it only takes one.”

Daniel F. Evans Jr., chief of the Indiana University Health system, is another member of the chamber’s board. His health system offers a program called “Beat Tobacco” taught by “qualified tobacco educators” who “understand the struggles and side effects of tobacco cessation.”

Lisa Gilbert, who tracks the chamber for Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group founded by Ralph Nader, said the health companies were conflicted.

“It’s interesting to think of a company giving money to another organization to lobby while publicly proclaiming the opposite policy position,” she said. Such companies either “have no idea what’s being lobbied on and would be appalled to learn that something is diametrically opposed to what they support,” or “there is some actual reason to invest in tobacco control publicly but work to keep laws just as they are in private.”

Call for tobacco levy to fund non-smoking advertising as those quitting through NHS drop by a third in a year

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/call-for-tobacco-levy-to-fund-non-smoking-advertising-as-those-quitting-through-nhs-d.130615462

CAMPAIGNERS have called for a levy on tobacco industry profits to fund mass media advertising of official smoking services as the numbers trying to quit using NHS assistance in Scotland fell by almost a third in a year.

Martin Williams

Scots made 73,338 attempts to give up cigarettes using health service help last year according to provisional official figures, a fall of 31per cent from 2013.

It also reveals that there were 2,876 quit attempts made by pregnant women, a drop of 73 on 2013, although an NHS statistics report says this may be partly accounted for by incomplete submissions.

The NHS report says a “plausible explanation” for the fall in quit attempts through NHS services would be the rise in the use of e-cigarettes.

A poll carried out by the ASH Scotland anti-smoking charity in April 2014 found that 45 per cent of current smokers in Scotland had tried an e-cigarette in 2014, compared to only seven per cent in 2010.

Data from a survey done in England showed a “marked increase in use of e-cigarettes for quitting” from around eight per cent of smokers trying to give up in 2012 to 35 per cent now, overtaking Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) for the first time as the most popular aid for giving up smoking. The report added that “trends in Scotland may well be similar”.

ASH Scotland, however, believed another major factor of the drop in the use of NHS smoking cessation services is a lack of promotion.

Sheila Duffy, chief executive of the anti-smoking charity, described the figures as “alarming” because they showed a “real, significant drop” in the number of people setting quit dates through stop smoking services.

“Some years ago the government decided there wasn’t the funding to do mass media TV advertising of the kind that has driven people to use these services and take advantage of their expertise and the free support that is available,” she said. “I believe the lack of mass media advertising on smoking cessation over the last few years has left these vital services largely invisible to the people who need them most.

“We need to look at that again and I am calling for a levy on tobacco company profits to support smokers to quit smoking and to fund mass media advertising of stop smoking services in Scotland.”

Health organisations say smoking costs the NHS at least £2bn a year and a further £10.8bn in wider costs to society, including social-care costs of more than £1bn.

Ms Duffy added: “Scotland’s NHS stop smoking services are expert and effective in helping smokers to quit. These services matter because tobacco is responsible for about a quarter of the recorded adult deaths in Scotland every year.”

The data shows that around seven per cent of the adult smoking population in Scotland made a quit attempt with an NHS smoking cessation service in 2014. In 2013 it was 10per cent.

The proportion of smokers using NHS smoking cessation services in individual NHS boards was highest in East Dunbartonshire (12 per cent) and East Renfrewshire (10.3 per cent) and lowest in the Western Isles (3.5 per cent) and Orkney (3.7 per cent).

Simon Clark, director of the smokers’ group Forest added a tobacco levy would not work as it would “almost certainly be passed on to consumers forcing some smokers further into poverty”.

He also pointed out that smokers wanting to give up were increasingly using e-cigarettes “which mimic the act of smoking, unlike nicotine patches and other quit smoking aids”.

He added: “You can’t force people to use NHS smoking cessation services so unless the public sector learns from the private sector and embraces products that encourage more smokers to switch from traditional cigarettes, the idea is doomed to fail.”

Giles Roca, director general of the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association said: “Tobacco control measures such as a levy would cost the Treasury billions over the next parliament and would simply provide government funding for this group to continue lobbying the government. All this comes on top of a number of tobacco control measures that have not even been implemented, let alone evaluated.

“Aside from the unwarranted intrusion on individual freedoms, this continued drive to over-regulate the UK tobacco market will simply create greater opportunities for organised crime groups involved in smuggling on a massive scale. These proposals are an unprecedented, un-evidenced, dogmatic attack on a legal industry that would have hugely damaging consequences.”

Maureen Watt, minister for public health, said the NHS stop smoking services continue to support “significant numbers of smokers” to give up despite the rise of the e-cigarette.

“Importantly, the largest number of quit attempts have come from our most deprived areas, where smoking rates are highest. This proves that stop smoking services are effective in reaching deprived groups,” she said.

U.S. Chamber Fights Smoking Laws While Hospitals and Insurers Sit on Its Board

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/02/business/international/many-board-members-fight-smoking-even-as-chamber-opposes-tobacco-laws.html?_r=0

By DANNY HAKIM

Anthem, one of the nation’s largest health insurers, wants its members to stop smoking.

It reimburses those who enroll in smoking-cessation programs or who buy products, like nicotine patches, intended to help people quit. It has even offered to arrange sessions with a coach who talks smokers through the process of quitting.

“Smoking is an unhealthy habit,” the insurer proclaimed in one of its publications. “It’s a smart business decision to urge your employees to quit smoking.”

But Anthem’s executive vice president, Wayne S. DeVeydt, serves on the board of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is engaged in a worldwide campaign to block antismoking laws. These include taxes on cigarettes in the Philippines, graphic health warnings on cigarette packs in Jamaica and Nepal, a plan to prohibit the display of cigarettes by retailers in Uruguay and restrictions on smoking in public spaces in Moldova.

The chamber’s global opposition to antismoking measures, reported by The New York Times this week, poses a challenge for many of the members of the organization, particularly hospitals and health insurers. Four executives of leading health care organizations, including Mr. DeVeydt, are members of the chamber’s board. The other three executives come from the Health Care Service Corporation, an insurer based in Chicago, the Steward Health Care System of Boston and the Indiana University Health system.

Capture

Letters from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington to governments all over the world:

Australia
In a May 2011 letter, the chamber says it is “deeply concerned” about a plain packaging proposal, saying it would not improve public health.

Jamaica
A September 2013 letter to the prime minister protests a new regulation, claiming graphic warning labels “are not effective” and create “unnecessary obstacles to international trade.”

Moldova
In a February 2014 letter, the chamber called a number of proposals “extreme measures” including bans on menthol and slim cigarettes, a ban on advertising at the point of sale and restrictions on smoking in public places.

Nepal
In a January 2015 letter, the chamber says a proposal to increase graphic health warnings on cigarette packs is “of concern to American companies,” and there is not “science-based evidence” it will have an impact.

Uruguay
In an April 2014 letter to the president of the Senate, the chamber expresses concern over new legislation that would bar retailers from displaying tobacco products, calling it “a serious threat to intellectual property.”

New Zealand
In a March 2014 letter, the chamber says new plain packaging legislation “sets a dangerous precedent” by violating trade laws.

 

jamaica_1-720 jamaica_2-720 jamaica_3-720 jamaica_4-720

Letters and documents from the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce’s foreign affiliates

These generally refer to legislation within their own country, but not always.

New Zealand (and Indonesia)
In a March 2014 letter sent to the parliamentary health committee in Ireland, the American Chamber of Commerce in Indonesia objects to the plain package proposal, calling the evidence “questionable.”

Croatia
In a September 2014 position paper, the American Chamber of Commerce in Croatia outlined its opposition to legislation requiring cigarettes be sold in plain packages in other European Union member states.

Estonia
A paper outlining the policy priorities of the chamber affiliate quotes a Philip Morris executive who says protecting intellectual property in Estonia is crucial “to maintain its competitive position in the global economy.”

Ireland (and Poland)
In a July 2014 letter to the prime minister, the Polish affiliate says both countries “would all be losing out” if Ireland imposes plain packaging requirements.

Ukraine
In May, the prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, said that his country began a trade case against Australia’s plain packaging law in 2012 because of a complaint by the U.S. Chamber.

croatia_to_ireland_1-720

croatia_to_ireland_2-720

croatia_to_ireland_3-720

croatia_to_ireland_4-720

croatia_to_ireland_5-720

 

Letters from the U.S. Chamber with other business groups

European Union
In an April 2013 letter to the European Union’s ambassador to the United States, the U.S. Chamber joined other American business groups in opposing “arbitrary product prohibitions” in new tobacco legislation.

White House
In a June 2012 letter to the then chief of staff, Jacob Lew, the chamber, with five other business groups, objects to the Draft Tobacco Proposal for the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations.

U.S. Trade Representative
The chamber, in August 2013 letter with more than 15 other business groups, objects to a “product-specific reference to tobacco or any other product” in relation to the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations.

white_house_1-720 white_house_2-720

“Smoking is one of the leading causes of death,” Brooke Thurston, a spokeswoman for Steward, said in a statement, adding, “If the chamber is in fact advocating for increased smoking we do not agree with them on this public health issue.”

The other three companies declined to comment.

Their silence stands in contrast to opposition to the chamber’s tobacco lobbying from a surprising source: the public relations firm Burson-Marsteller.

“It’s pretty obvious that you don’t want to be seen doing the bidding of an interest which is no longer legitimate,” said David Earnshaw, president of the Brussels office of Burson-Marsteller, a company that long worked for the tobacco industry. He tried unsuccessfully to prevent a major affiliate of the chamber, based in Brussels, from issuing a position paper targeting a European proposal on plain packaging.

In a statement Tuesday, the chamber said, “we know that smoking carries obvious health risks,” but added that “we are concerned that a number of governments have acted in ways that are inconsistent with their international obligations.”

The statement said the chamber had raised “substantive concerns” about “the destruction of intellectual property and the dangerous precedent of discrimination against a legal product possibly spreading to other sectors.” It added, “We make no apology for asking governments to keep their word.”

The chamber has not addressed why it has opposed health measures like restricting smoking in public places.

The Times reported this week that the chamber lobbies against antismoking laws in many countries, pits countries against one another on tobacco issues in trade forums, and, in Washington, defends the ability of the tobacco industry to sue under future trade deals.

The chamber, which claims more than three million members, previously encountered friction over its policies. Apple abandoned the chamber in 2009 over its rejection of climate change regulation. The construction giant Skanska left in 2013 after protesting the chamber’s resistance to green building codes.

Last year, when the branch of the American Chamber of Commerce in Brussels, known as AmCham EU, drafted its paper outlining opposition to plain packaging, the only inkling of dissent came from a footnote.

“This position paper does not represent the views of all members of AmCham EU,” it said, in an italicized note at the end.

Burson-Marsteller, which has had its share of controversial clients, was an unlikely rebel against the chamber’s position. The firm developed public relations and marketing campaigns for RJR Reynolds like “Project SPA,” the introduction of its failed Premier brand of cigarettes in the 1980s. Burson, a member of AmCham EU, also worked extensively for Philip Morris U.S.A., now part of Altria, developing campaigns that included a strategy to beat back criticism of the cigarette maker’s sponsorship of women’s tennis.

But in 2010 the firm renounced tobacco. Last year, Mr. Earnshaw raised objections with AmCham EU about aligning with tobacco interests, especially with many members in the cross hairs of European regulators and lawmakers facing concerns about privacy, the dominance of technology companies based in the United States and negotiations over a trans-Atlantic trade treaty.

“I tried to stop AmCham from shooting itself in the foot,” Mr. Earnshaw said. “It’s particularly crazy at a time when there are such big issues that American companies need to be involved in.”

“AmCham is extremely influential in public affairs,” he added. “If it starts producing position papers defending big tobacco on plain packaging, it’s going to make itself look ridiculous.”

The chamber’s E.U. branch proceeded with the position paper, arguing that plain packages unfairly harmed tobacco maker’s intellectual property and posed a broader threat to trademarks, representing “a potential precedent for other sectors and consumer goods or services.”

The chamber’s argument sounded as if it could have been written by the tobacco industry. An unpublished early version of the position paper, which was obtained by The Times, reveals that the rapporteur, or primary author, was Anne-Laure Covin, an executive of Philip Morris International, which is now separate from Philip Morris U.S.A. The company had no comment.

Philip Morris was not the only company involved. The paper came from a committee at the chamber’s European Union branch run by a Time Warner executive, Vincent Jamois, whose name and corporate affiliation are on the draft version of the paper, right above Ms. Covin’s name.

In other forums, Time Warner has expressed concern about cigarettes; in 2005 the company introduced a Tobacco Depiction Policy that sought to limit the number of times people were shown smoking in movies. The goal was “to reduce or eliminate the depiction of smoking and tobacco products/brands in their feature films, unless there is a compelling creative reason for such depictions,” the policy said.

Time Warner even undertook a detailed study of the effectiveness of the policy, finding that total depictions of smoking in its movies fell to 534 in 2013 from 1,346 in 2006.

The committee Mr. Jamois leads deals with intellectual property. The tobacco industry has attracted broader corporate support by framing opposition to plain packaging as a defense of intellectual property rights.

 

Other companies and institutions whose executives are listed on the U.S. Chamber’s board include Pfizer, which markets the smoking-cessation drug Chantix.

“Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in the world,” Sharon Castillo, a spokeswoman for Pfizer, said in response to questions. But she continued, “Our membership of any group comes with the clear understanding that we may not always agree with all the positions of the organization.”

Part of the chamber’s campaign seeks to discredit antismoking efforts by claiming they lack scientific evidence of effectiveness, particularly requirements that cigarettes be sold in plain packages shorn of corporate logos, or that they be covered with graphic health warnings, or sometimes a combination of the two. A letter from the chamber to the prime minister of Jamaica in 2013 was typical, contending that graphic health warnings “are not effective in reducing smoking prevalence.”

But many studies have found that plain packaging and packages covered with diseased lungs and other disturbing images make smoking less palatable.

“Graphic warnings do work, they motivate people to quit smoking,” said Seth Noar, an author of an analysis by researchers at the University of North Carolina of 37 tobacco studies.

For health care companies, a prominent role in a group that antismoking advocates see as the tobacco industry’s biggest ally can be particularly awkward. Like Anthem, the Health Care Service Corporation encourages members to stop smoking.

One video on its website called “Da Couch Potato” features an overweight man who smokes, drinks beer and watches the Chicago Bears but wants to get back in shape. A news release highlights that “smoking one pack of cigarettes per day can add up to $1,825.00 each year and tobacco use accounts for more than $96 billion a year in medical costs.”

John Cannon, HCSC’s executive vice president and chief administrative officer, is a member of the chamber’s board.

Dr. Ralph de la Torre, a cardiac surgeon and the chairman and chief executive of the Steward health system, also is a board member. One of Steward’s hospitals advertises a smoking-cessation program by saying, “There are a million reasons to quit smoking but it only takes one.”

Daniel F. Evans Jr., chief of the Indiana University Health system, is another member of the chamber’s board. His health system offers a program called “Beat Tobacco” taught by “qualified tobacco educators” who “understand the struggles and side effects of tobacco cessation.”

Lisa Gilbert, who tracks the chamber for Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group founded by Ralph Nader, said the health companies were conflicted.

“It’s interesting to think of a company giving money to another organization to lobby while publicly proclaiming the opposite policy position,” she said. Such companies either “have no idea what’s being lobbied on and would be appalled to learn that something is diametrically opposed to what they support,” or “there is some actual reason to invest in tobacco control publicly but work to keep laws just as they are in private.”

FDA seeks data on e-cigarettes after surge in poisoning cases

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/health/fda-seeks-data-on-e-cigar/1952276.html

REUTERS: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said it is seeking additional data and comments on liquid nicotine as it considers warning the public about the dangers of its exposure amid a rise in electronic cigarette use.

The agency has evaluated data and science on the risks, especially to infants and children, from accidental exposure to nicotine and liquid nicotine that is used in e-cigarettes. (http://1.usa.gov/1GXeSo4)

More Americans are using e-cigarettes and other vaporizing devices than a year ago, a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed in June.

The surge in e-cigarette use comes as conventional cigarette smoking has declined in the United States to about 19 percent of adults, prompting tobacco companies such as Altria Group Inc, Philip Morris International Inc and Reynolds American Inc to rush into the e-cigarette market.

(Graphic on global market: http://link.reuters.com/kuk83w)

Recent increases in calls and visits to poison control centers and emergency rooms involving liquid nicotine poisoning have raised public health concerns, FDA said.

The health regulator is now considering if it should warn the public about the dangers of nicotine exposure and require that some tobacco products be sold in child-resistant packaging.

Among high school students, e-cigarette use jumped to 13.4 percent in 2014 from 4.5 percent in 2013, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette use over the same period fell to 9.2 percent from 12.7 percent, the largest year-over-year decline in more than a decade.