Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

June, 2012:

Study supports use of graphic warning labels on tobacco packs

http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/interactive/news/study-supports-use-of-graphic-warning-labels-on-tobacco-packs-id801385918-t116.html

http://pictures.directnews.co.uk/liveimages/x_554_801385918_0_0_7041816_300.jpg

Smokers are more likely to remember the health risks associated with smoking if the warnings on tobacco packets are accompanied by a graphic image, new research shows.

Scientists at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine recruited 200 smokers who were shown one of two warning label advertisements – one with a graphic image accompanied by a written health warning, and a text-only version.

Eye-tracking technology was used to see how long each person looked at different components of the ads.

Participants were then asked to recall the text on the warning label and write it down to see whether they remembered it accurately.

The researchers found that 83 per cent of people who were shown the graphic warning label correctly recalled the text, compared with just 50 per cent of those who saw the text-only version.

In addition, the longer a person viewed the graphic image, the more likely they were to remember the text.

Dr Andrew Strasser, whose findings are published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, said: ‘Based on this new research, we now have a better understanding of two important questions … – do smokers get the message and how do they get the message?

‘In addition to showing the value of adding a graphic warning label, this research also provides valuable insight into how the warning labels may be effective, which may serve to create more effective warning labels in the future.’

Some experts argue that introducing plain packaging for tobacco products would further enhance the effectiveness of warning messages.ADNFCR-554-ID-801385918-ADNFCR

Health campaign councils invest £167m in tobacco firms

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-18414801?print=true

Cigarettes in an ashtray

Council pension funds must adhere to rules on which types of firm they can invest in

Continue reading the main story

Related Stories

Council tobacco shares ‘must go’

Council’s £7m in tobacco shares

Councils across the East of England that are to take on a lead role in NHS anti-smoking campaigns, have invested more than £167m in tobacco firms.

The figure was revealed after a BBC Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request made to county councils about their pension fund investments.

In the eastern region, Hertfordshire has the highest amount of money in tobacco firms with £44.6m invested.

Buckinghamshire has the lowest with £6m of investments.

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

We will research carefully the issues brought up by the pension fund investing in tobacco companies”

End Quote David Finch Essex County Council

Anti-smoking group Ash (Action on Smoking and Health) said it was concerned at the investments.

Martin Dockrell, director of research and policy at Ash, told the BBC: “From 2013, local councils will have responsibility for leading local efforts to reduce the burden of death and disease from smoking, yet many of them are the largest tobacco shareholders in the area.

“Despite what some pension managers would have us believe there is no obligation to invest in the tobacco industry.”

The FOIA request shows Suffolk’s pension fund has invested £42.3m in tobacco companies including £18.3m in the giant British American Tobacco, the world’s second largest cigarette maker.

Norfolk has invested £25.9m in cigarette firms while Northamptonshire has invested £14m and Essex £9.1m.

Cambridgeshire figures show the county council administered pension fund, which also includes district council’s pensions, has invested £25.3m in tobacco firms.

Mr Dockrell said ethical investment rules means fund managers are permitted to say they will only “invest in tobacco when they can prove that there is no other investment that can match the value”.

‘Global business’

David Finch, deputy leader of Essex County Council, said: “We will research carefully the issues brought up by the pension fund investing in tobacco companies.

“We will take the findings to the pension investment board for it to make a decision on whether the fund continues to invest in tobacco firms, in the light of Essex County Council taking on public health duties next year.”

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

Placing constraints on fund managers could [leave us not getting] the best return on our pension investments”

End Quote David Lloyd Hertfordshire County Council

Frank Downes, chairman of Buckinghamshire County Council Pension Fund Committee, said: “As with most local authorities we don’t invest directly ourselves, but we employ the expertise of fund managers to do so on our behalf.

“This is a global business and they invest in bonds, equities and other asset classes, but they are aware of sensitivities in local authority pension fund investments, hence our very low investment in this class.”

A spokesman for Norfolk County Council said: “While Norfolk Pension Fund is administered by the county council, this is on behalf of over 130 employers, 26,000 contributing employees, and 43,000 pensioners and deferred members.

“Administration of the fund is overseen by a pension committee, which is charged with overseeing strategies to obtain the best return on investment for members and employers while maintaining an appropriate level of investment risk.

‘Investment principles’

“Any change in investment policy would be a matter for the Pension Committee, but their decisions would have to be compatible with the duties placed upon them to ensure that the fund is properly managed to protect the interests of employers and members.”

Continue reading the main story

How common is pension fund investment in tobacco?

Ian Gwinnell is a pensions and investment expert who is the director of financial services company All Counties Financial.

He said pension funds investing in tobacco firms is commonplace although more and more people are choosing to take an ethical stance and avoid investing in certain types of companies.

He said: “A number of companies choose not to take a moral approach to investing but a few years ago there was an uproar about funds investing in these (tobacco) companies and as a result a number of ethical investment products were created.

“Tobacco firms don’t make a bad return – they are blue chip companies and their profit margins and turnover far exceed anything close to them.”

But he added investors tended to only ever put a small percentage into tobacco firms because it is important to build a diverse portfolio across a number of different industries.

David Lloyd, Hertfordshire County Council cabinet member for resources, said fund managers are expected to make “sound investment decisions”.

“[This is] to secure the best long-term returns for the pension fund,” he said.

“Placing constraints on the fund managers who act on the council’s behalf could put us in a position where we do not get the best return on our pension investments.”

A spokeswoman from Northamptonshire County Council said the £14m represented only 1% of the pension fund.

“The pension scheme is operated within a set of clear investment principles which includes guidance on socially responsible investment,” she said.

“However, it’s important to be aware that there is a legal duty to maximise income for the pension fund.”

Cambridgeshire county councillor Steve Count, who chairs the Cambridgeshire Local Government Pensions Fund Committee said: “I called for the Cambridgeshire Local Government Pension Fund to look into ethical investment.

“After careful consideration of the financial implications and legal advice the committee, made up of representatives of the 174 employers, decided not to remove our funds from the tobacco industry.

“If we had decided to alter our strategy we would run the risk of losing millions of pounds, that ultimately would have had to be paid for by tax payers.”

Suffolk county councillor Peter Bellfield, chairman of the Suffolk Pension Fund Committee, said: “We do acknowledge the issues around public health however, ultimately, restricting choice for the fund managers limits their abilities to do their jobs. Suffolk’s approach is entirely in line with many other areas around the UK.”

BBC © 2012 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

Michigan Mayor Janice Daniels Compares Being Gay To Smoking

http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/michigan-mayor-janice-daniels-compares-being-gay-to-smoking/politics/2012/06/14/41466

by David Badash on June 14, 20

Not The First Time Troy, Michigan Mayor Has Attacked The Gay Community

Janice Daniels, the embattled Troy, Michigan mayor, on a local radio program yesterday said homosexuality was dangerous and compared homosexuality to cigarette smoking. Daniels, whose short tenure as mayor has been marked by comments she made on Facebook against gay people, has attempted to defend her comments and her extreme anti-gay positions, and continually seems to make matters worse, not better. Unsurprisingly, the unrepentant Daniels is facing a recall election.

Wednesday, Daniels told Charlie Langton of Talk Radio 1270 that the comments which initially began the firestorm against her were made before she was mayor and therefore, Daniels insists, shouldn’t count. The comments were not discovered until after she was elected.

CBS Detroit reports yesterday’s conversation:

“What I said while I was mayor … I was in a business meeting, I come from a business perspective … I said that I would bring a doctor into a meeting that would say that the homosexual lifestyle is dangerous,” Daniels said, adding,”Had I been with a group of smokers I might have said I would like to bring a doctor into this meeting to say that smoking is dangerous.”

Is it dangerous to be gay? Langton asked.

“I think that doctors can make a case for it certainly,” the mayor said, adding that she “had no opinion” on whether being gay is more dangerous than smoking.

“I don’t think this is productive for the city of Troy… This is just a diversion,” Daniels told Langton. “I would ask that these people come together with me to find mutual common ground.”

Langton asked if she had an issue being the mayor of Troy, a place that includes gay people.

“I realize that I am the mayor of all the people of Troy and I love all people … It was a pithy comment that I made, it was an in-the-moment kind of comment and I certainly wouldn’t have wanted to bring this kind of controversy upon myself.”

Daniels, who works in real estate when she’s not fulfilling mayoral duties, added:

“I am refinancing a home mortgage for a man who I would suspect could potentially be homosexual and we get along famously … In fact he brought papers into the office the other day and we actually grabbed each other’s arms and kind of stood together in solidarity because we’re refinancing his home loan …”

In January, Daniels wanted to bring psychologists with her to a high school gay-straight alliance forum to testify that homosexuality is a mental disease. The students withdrew the invitation and Daniels never stated that she actually had any psychologists who would deliver false testimony.

Customs swoops on illicit cigarette smuggling syndicates in Man Kam To and Lok Ma Chau

Hong Kong (HKSAR) – Hong Kong Customs yesterday (June 13) and today (June 14) swooped on two illicit cigarette smuggling syndicates in Man Kam To and Lok Ma Chau Control Points respectively. On board two cross-boundary lorries, a total of 240 boxes containing 1.75 million sticks of duty-not-paid cigarette were found. The total value is about $4.4 million with a duty potential of $3 million. In the operations, five men aged 28 to 45 were arrested and three lorries used in smuggling and distribution of illicit cigarettes were seized.

At about 9.20pm yesterday, Customs officers at Man Kam To Control Point intercepted a vehicle loaded with goods which declared to contain “fresh fruit”.

Upon x-ray examination, 450,000 sticks of duty-not-paid cigarettes were found concealed inside 106 cartons of fresh fruit. The driver was arrested immediately.

At about 9am today, Customs officers at Lok Ma Chau Control Point intercepted a logistics lorry. Upon X-ray examination, 1.3 million sticks of duty-not-paid cigarettes were found while the driver and three more men were arrested.

In the above cases, cigarettes of various brands, which had been sorted and packed, could be speedily delivered for sale. Customs believes that the illicit cigarette syndicates continues to manipulate the “swift distribution” mode with an attempt to lessen the risk of being detected.

Under the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance, anyone involved in dealing with, possession, selling and buying illicit cigarettes commits an offence. The maximum penalty on conviction is imprisonment for two years and a fine of $1 million.

Customs will continue to take stringent enforcement against cigarette smuggling activities to protect government revenue.

Members of the public are urged to report any suspected illicit cigarette activities to the Customs’ 24-hour hotline 2545 6182.

Source: HKSAR Government

News

Council fired up for 2013 smoking ban

Illawarra Mercury – 20 hours ago

Wollongong councillors are hoping to start 2013 with a healthy New Year’s resolution – a ban on smoking in alfresco dining areas in Crown St 

Diesel fumes as bad as passive smoking

The Canberra Times – 1 day ago

”It’s on the same order of magnitude as passive smoking,” said Kurt Straif, director of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 

Diesel exhaust fumes pose cancer risk just like passive smoking ‎ Rush Lane
Diesel fumes cause cancer: World Health Organization; ‘On the ‎ New York Daily News
Diesel fumes deemed as cancerous as asbestos and passive smoking‎ Scotsman
Business Standard– New Zealand Herald
all 440 news articles »

Councillors butt heads on smoking

Northern Star – 9 hours ago

THE lack of proposed designated smoking areas in Lismore’s city centre is concerning business owners who employ smokers.

Smoke-free CBD policy‎ Northern Rivers Echo
all 2 news articles »

Smoke gets in your eyes

Vancouver Sun – 12 hours ago

If there weren’t already compelling enough reasons for you to quit smoking, think about the risk.

Smoking can cause blindness‎ Sacramento Bee
all 8 news articles »

SUNY trustees seek smoking ban

Newsday – 16 hours ago

State University of New York trustees want tobacco banned on all 64 campuses.

SUNY trustees approve ban on smoking‎ Albany Times Union
SUNY trustees request system-wide campus smoking ban‎WatertownDailyTimes.com
SUNY votes to ban smoking across college system‎ Hornell Evening Tribune
CBS Local– NY1
all 44 news articles »

More than 60% of Israel’s nonsmokers smoke passively, study finds

Haaretz – 12 hours ago

While only about 20 percent of Israel’s adult population smokes cigarettes, passivesmokers are equally exposed to the risks of developing cancer, the study 

Detroit Medical Center will not hire smokers, plans to test applicants 

Detroit Free Press – 16 hours ago

While several states have passed laws banning such hiring policies, Michigan has not, leaving smokers without legal grounds to challenge 

Detroit Medical Center will no longer hire smokers as of July 1‎ The Detroit News

Trade pact could weaken Australia’s tobacco fight

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-14/trade-pact-could-weaken-australia27s-tobacco-fight/4071344

Description: One example of the 'ugly' cigarette packet packaging unveiled by the Federal Government

Photo: Ukraine and Honduras contend the planned packaging laws unfairly restrict trade. (Supplied)

Related Story: Plain packaging hearing wraps up in High Court

Related Story: NZ set to follow Australia’s lead on plain packaging

Map: Australia

There are concerns a new trade agreement between the US, Australia and several other Pacific nations could weaken Australia’s defences against challenges to its planned tobacco packaging laws.

Australia looks set to be hit with a third complaint at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) about its planned tobacco packaging laws.

British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco and Philip Morris have launched High Court challenges against the Australian legislation, which would force them to use drab packaging with disturbing images of the health impacts of smoking.

Ukraine and Honduras have already launched trade disputes over the issue, and there are reports the Dominican Republic is about to join the complaint.

None of those three countries has a significant share of the Australian tobacco market, but they contend the planned laws unfairly restrict trade.

The head of the Federal Health Department, Jane Halton, says the tobacco companies are providing legal advice to WTO members to encourage them to take action against Australia.

She spoke about it in a video message for the World Health Organisation.

“All of these actions are designed to try to intimidate the Australian Government and Australian officials to actually ask us to relent in our efforts to protect the public health of our citizens,” she said.

Associate Professor Andrew Mitchell, from the University of Melbourne Law School, says big tobacco is concerned that if Australia is allowed to introduce new restrictions on tobacco advertising, other countries that have more lucrative markets will follow.

“And also, by using other countries as a proxy, it creates the appearance that plain packaging is opposed by entities other than just big tobacco,” he said.

Professor Mitchell’s colleague, Associate Professor Tanya Voon, says the WTO challenge is likely to slow down any knock-on effect the Australian initiative may have.

Audio: Trade deal may blunt tobacco fight(PM)

“They can have a chilling effect because of the time taken and the resources spent in defending the challenge,” she said.

“And that’s true regardless really of whether the challenges have a legal basis and whether they succeed or not.”

Dr Matthew Rimmer, associate professor in intellectual property at the Australian National University, says this challenge is unlikely to succeed.

“The Ukraine would have more chance of winning the UEFA Cup football competition then they would of winning this WTA action,” he said.

But he says Australia needs to ensure its plain packaging regime is not vulnerable to challenge under the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Negotiations over the Trans-Pacific Partnership have been going on behind closed doors for more than two years.

Today, a key chapter was leaked, showing Australia has refused to agree to a system of tribunals which would be used by private companies to sue governments for breaches of trade conditions.

Australia’s objection to investor-state dispute settlement provisions is already on the public record.

In the WTO case, Australia also has a public health defence, but Dr Rimmer is worried the Trans-Pacific Partnership will not leave any room for one.

“There’s a concern that a very expansive intellectual property chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership might help tobacco companies,” he said.

“There is a concern about the regime limiting the array of tobacco control measures that could be taken by a member of the partnership.

“I guess the problem is further complicated by the fact that the negotiations are being held in secret.”

The Federal Government has vowed to defeat the current challenge at the WTO.

A spokeswoman for Attorney-General Nicola Roxon says the measures are not anti-trade, they are anti-cancer

Why work with Big Tobacco?

14 June 2012

http://theconversation.edu.au/why-work-with-big-tobacco-6604

Wysr8239-1335237804

Big Tobacco’s desperate efforts to oppose the introduction of tobacco plain packaging have been supported by a potpourri of consulting, legal, advertising, public relations and lobbying organisations.

Consulting groups, lawyers and lobbyists are free to choose their clients, and it is still legal to sell tobacco products to adults (even though many retailers knowingly break the law prohibiting sales to children). But legal or not, the question remains: why, in 2012, would anybody want to work for or with the tobacco industry?

When I was first involved in tobacco control 40 years ago, the people leading tobacco companies had started their careers long before the dangers of smoking were identified or publicised. They took some wrong decisions early, setting the industry off on a long road of denying evidence, opposing effective action, promoting their lethal products wherever they could, and in my case offering to set me up handsomely to work on some other campaign. At least one could understand their approach, however misguided.

2012 is different. The overwhelming evidence about the dangers of smoking has been known and widely publicised for more than sixty years, confirmed over and again by evidence of the role cigarettes play in a galaxy of lethal and painful conditions. We know – as does anyone working for and with the industry – that cigarettes are the only commercial product that kills one in two of its regular users when consumed precisely as intended, and that passive smoking is a major cause of death and disease.

As long ago as 1967 the late Senator Robert Kennedy said, “the tobacco industry is peddling a deadly weapon. They are dealing in people’s lives for financial gain”.

The tobacco industry is more than lethal. It has been exposed over the years as dishonest and manipulative. Once-confidential industry internal documents show in fine detail that the major companies have been guilty of everything their most cynical critics suspect – and more.

They have lied and deceived. They have been found guilty in the United States of racketeering. In Australia, the main tobacco industry association even paid for people to go through the garbage of anti-smoking organizations.

Marionzetta/Flickr

Not surprisingly, Big Tobacco finishes rock bottom in global surveys of industry credibility.

Tobacco companies still market their products in developing countries in ways that would be unthinkable now in countries such as Australia. They promote to the vulnerable, just as once they targeted the youth market here.

In developed countries, they are mainly reduced to working in the shadowy half-light of lobbying and public relations. When they surface, as in their current desperate and misleading campaigns against plain packaging, they open themselves up to yet more cynicism and ridicule.

They cannot resist “dirty tricks” campaigns. They establish and fund front organisations. They pay consulting groups to produce substandard or one-sided reports that they then use for lobbying purposes. They use loopholes in the tobacco advertising ban legislation to run “political” media campaigns.

So why would anybody want to work with companies where success will result in more lung cancers, more heart disease, more respiratory disease, more suffering, more premature deaths? Who would want to work for a disreputable industry where even the suggestion of a “dirty tricks” campaign has instant plausibility?

Why would spokespeople and lobbyists for the companies want to expose themselves publicly as peddlers of Australia’s most lethal drug? How do people whose job is to ensure maximum possible cigarette sales sleep at night, knowing that so many of their consumers are suffering and dying? How do they tell their children and families that they work for companies long described as “merchants of death”?

Even if tobacco industry executives can close their eyes to the deaths for which they are responsible, why would large and respectable consulting groups, advertising agencies, legal firms, or even public relations and lobbying companies, which presumably can choose their clients, agree to act as hired guns for this pariah industry? Why do they not take the approach recommended by the World Health Organization and adopted by universities and other research groups and have nothing to do with the tobacco industry – no matter how much money is offered?

aaedf faa b/Flickr

It is true that cigarettes are a legally sold product – albeit so harmful that parliaments around the country have decreed that they may not be sold to minors. But that is a historical accident: if they were a new product, they would not be would be allowed on the market.

There is a long-standing and worthy legal tradition that any client – no matter how evil – is entitled to a defence. There is no such noble tradition or rationale for consulting firms, advertising, public relations and lobbying companies, or even lawyers who advise on means of circumventing legislation and putting pressure on health groups.

Anyone who now works for and with the tobacco industry knows beyond a shadow of doubt that their work will result in unnecessary death and disease.

That is clearly not a concern for tobacco company executives, who know that they are in the business of peddling a lethal drug. But the outcomes of the work done by otherwise respectable consulting, advertising, public relations, lobbying and legal companies that work for Big Tobacco are no different. They should take policy decisions to eschew this evil business.

Failing such a decision, when their executives go to sleep at night they should spare a thought for the suffering, death and disease they are helping to promote. They too are, in Robert Kennedy’s words, dealing in people’s lives for financial gain. Is it really worth the money?

Related articles

24 May 2012 Why petrol bowsers deserve the same treatment as cigarette packs20 April 2012 Big Tobacco’s box fetish: plain packaging at the high court29 February 2012 Trade agreement threatens Australia’s tobacco and medicine policies30 January 2012 Chew on this, smokers: nicotine replacement therapies rarely work

Light up the track

SCMP

SMOKING: ATHLETES
Sasha Gonzales (healthpost@scmp.com)
Jun 12, 2012

Talking to Petrina Wong, you would hardly guess that she was a smoker. Fit and active, the 32-year-old journalist regularly takes part in triathlons and plays tennis and golf weekly. It is baffling why she would damage her body by smoking.

But for Wong (whose name has been changed for reasons of confidentiality), smoking seems to give her what nothing else can: a feeling of relaxation. “I’m usually very anxious, and smoking calms my nerves,” she says. “I know it’s not healthy, but I’m addicted and I’m lucky I have no breathing issues.

“I find that a stick just before a big race boosts me emotionally, and that helps me perform better. Cigarettes are like a legal steroid,” she adds.

It is well known that smoking is detrimental to human health. But that has not stopped top athletes like footballer Wayne Rooney, basketball legend Michael Jordan and tennis star Anna Kournikova from lighting up. So why do competitive athletes smoke when they know the habit is bad for them?

Dr James Oliver from Island Health Family Practice says that, according to some reports, about 4 per cent of marathon runners smoke. But it is unlikely that the reason is to relieve race anxiety.

“If it was, the smoker would suffer slower times and lower stamina levels due to the effects of smoking, as opposed to the negative effects of stress,” he says. “Stress induces adrenalin, and this helps the body go into flight mode, which could be beneficial to running speed.”

Wong thinks that a cigarette before a race is calming. But it’s no more than a psychological security blanket. “Smoking decreases oxygen intake by up to 10 per cent during exercise training,” says Dr Winnie Mui from Dr Lauren Bramley and Partners in Central. “So it’s not true that smoking before a race can help improve one’s performance.”

Carbon monoxide is among the most poisonous of the chemicals in cigarettes. It binds to haemoglobin in the blood and interferes with oxygenation. According to Mui, “decreased oxygen to the brain, heart, lungs and muscles can increase mental and physical fatigue. For athletes, this translates to decreased endurance, stamina, performance, strength, recovery and overall quality of training.”

Oliver adds that smoking also causes blood vessels to constrict, making it more difficult to get adequate blood flow to the muscles. This, combined with decreased oxygenation throughout the body, can result in athletes experiencing fatigue faster, thereby affecting their endurance. Smoking also causes shortness of breath. In asthmatic athletes, this can be disastrous.

Nicotine puts pressure on the cardiovascular system as it increases heart rate and blood pressure.

Passive smokers, and even those who smoke occasionally, are also at risk, says Mui. In the short term, passive smokers may also experience headaches, eye irritation, wheezing, sore throat and/or dizziness, all of which can affect training and athletic performance.

“Although there are no conclusive studies on the effects, one can expect that the negative effects on [sporting] performance will be half or slightly less than that of an active smoker’s,” says Oliver.

Iggy Cheung, a 32-year-old dragon boat paddler, smokes “just a few cigarettes a week”. Cheung says that he makes up for his bad habit by exercising at the gym daily and eating a plant-rich diet.

But Oliver says exercise and diet will not counter the effects of smoking. The only solution is to quit.

The great thing about stubbing out is that you notice the benefits right away. Quitters experience significant increases in oxygen concentration and exercise duration.

Mui suggests medication such as Zyban or Chantix/Champix, psychotherapy, acupuncture, hypnotherapy or hypnosis, or traditional Chinese medicine. There are also programmes at Smoking Cessation Clinics run by the Hospital Authority, which is part of the Department of Health.

As for nicotine replacement therapy, Oliver says that these products do have their place in stopping smoking. But they are only useful if the dose is gradually reduced until cessation.

“The aim should always be the resolution of all cigarette and nicotine addiction,” he says.

Absurd smoking ban widely ignored

SCMO – Laisee

With the arrival of the hot weather and al fresco drinking and dining, the absurdity of the smoking laws is becoming increasingly obvious.

As we know, smoking is banned inside bars and restaurants, but the outside areas in some of these venues remain contentious.

If the area is covered only by a roof of some sort, typically a canvas canopy, then smoking is not banned. But if it is enclosed, say, at least 50 per cent of the total area on all sides, then smoking is prohibited.

The law is widely flouted. As anyone knows, there is not a great deal of difference between sitting inside or in the middle of an outside area under a canopy in which there can be anywhere from 20 to 50 people.

The law was designed to protect staff working at these establishments, but in its present cockeyed form, it doesn’t have much effect.

The Tobacco Control Office under the Department of Health takes several days to react to a complaint. The process is similar to that with the ineffective engine idling law.

That is why anti-smoking groups would like Hong Kong to make all public areas smoke-free, including outside areas where members of the public are served food and drinks, whether roofed or not.

They also want the landlords of these establishments to be responsible for banning smoking as they are in other parts of the world, such as Japan, Australia, the United States and Britain, among others. If one of them persists in allowing smoking, then he loses his liquor licence.

The present arrangements are akin to having a non-urinating section in a swimming pool

708% ‘sin tax’ hike stuns Big Tobacco

MANILA, Philippines – A 708% tax increase on low-priced cigarettes in the country, as set by the lower House-approved “sin tax” bill, has been described as “unprecedented” by the head of the country’s largest tobacco company.

Philip Morris Fortune Tobacco Corp. (PMFTC) president Chris Nelson, in an interview with ANC Friday night, said no other country in Asia has come close to the tax rate hikes that House Bill 5727 wants to impose on tobacco products in the Philippines.

“If you look at what’s being proposed, the rate increase is 708% on low-tier (cigarette brands) over 2 years, 150% on the high tier, and on the medium it goes up nearly 300%,” Nelson said.

“Seven hundred percent on the low, that’s unprecedented. I can’t think of any country that has done that,” he said.

He said the tax hike will have a detrimental effect on tobacco farmers, workers, and the entire industry.

“Let us not destroy this industry,” he said.

Nelson said PMFTC does not oppose taxes, but any additional levy should be moderate.

He said the tobacco giant earlier advocated a P1 across-the-tier increase in 2004.

“The reason for that is we recognize the dynamic of the market,” he said.

“We’re not against the tax increase. In fact, Philip Morris is working with the government. What we’re recommending is a tax increase sustainable for the industry and which gives future revenue streams for the government,” he added.

“We are looking for moderate tax increases. We like increases that are planned out because we can plan our business,” Nelson said.

He said that under House Bill 5727, the tax increase for beer is between 8% to 32%.

“That is what we call a moderate increase, as opposed to 700%,” he said.

Consequences

PTFMC said if the Senate approves a similar measure to HB 5727 and the proposal is signed into law by President Benigno Aquino, the cigarette manufacturer expects a 50% drop in demand for tobacco for domestic consumption.

This, in turn, will affect the livelihood of around 22,000 farmers nationwide, the company said.

It may also result in oversupply of domestic capacity and affect jobs.

Nelson said PMFTC will definitely reduce the number of its workers that currently number around 3,000.

He also believes that the sin tax bill, once enacted, will result in a rise in cigarette smuggling and counterfeit products.

“We already have smuggling in cigarettes in Mindanao. We already have brands coming in that sell for retail at P5. There’s counterfeiting even on my own brands,” he said.

“If you assume that taxes will go 100% and 700%, that (smuggling, counterfeiting) will increase significantly. The problem will grow massively,” he warned.

Nelson said the battle over the “sin tax” measure will now move to the Senate.

“I think we made a lot of good representation (in the lower House). Unfortunately, the whole process was cut short and we proposed some amendments that were not accepted,” he said. “But obviously, (we) hope that the debate will continue and obviously engage in the Senate.”

Praise for ‘sin tax’ hikes

Action For Economic Reforms (AER), a non-government watchdog that pushed for reforms in sin taxes, earlier praised congressmen for approving House Bill 5727.

It said the bill, as amended, “corrects all the mistakes in the law.”

“Representative Isidro Ungab, the chair of the ways and means committee, has done his homework. Not only did he brilliantly engineer the landslide vote for the Abaya bill at the committee level. With his avuncular mien, he has been very persuasive in defending the bill and parrying the arguments of the vested interests,” AER said.

The group said opponents of the measure cannot dispute the health argument, that the sharp increase in taxes will significantly lower consumption of tobacco and liquor, thus reducing problems associated with smoking and excessive drinking.

AER said the high tax rate for low-priced cigarette brands will deter young and poor smokers from either starting to smoke or force them to quit smoking.

According to AER’s Jo-Ann Latuja, retail price for PTFMC products will increase by 76% in the first year if the “sin tax” bill becomes law.

“Studies have shown that a 10% increase in cigarette prices in the Philippines will decrease consumption by 5%. With a 76% price increase, consumption will decrease by 44%,” Latuja said.

The group also does not believe that higher taxes on tobacco and liquor products will result in a sharp spike in smuggling and counterfeiting.

Quoting Customs Commissioner Ruffy Biazon, AER said the price of the country’s most popular tobacco brand — Fortune International Filter Kings — would rise to P35.26 per pack by 2014.

The price will still be lower than the 2009 prices of top-selling cigarettes in Cambodia (P52.36), Indonesia (P64.68), Thailand (P103.84), Malaysia (P146.08) and Singapore (P365.2), according to the group.

Again quoting Biazon, AER said cigarette smuggling will only flow out of — rather than into — the Philippines, if House Bill 5727 becomes law.

Tax revenues for health programs, tobacco farmers

Budget Secretary Florencio Abad also welcomed the bill’s approval by the lower House.

“Through this groundbreaking move, we are much closer to reforming the current tax regime for tobacco and alcohol products, which has been in place for more than 15 years and has proven ineffective and outdated,” he said in a press statement.

He said an updated “sin tax” system will boost tax efficiencies in the country, as well as increase government revenues by around P33 billion in the first year of its implementation.

He said most of the revenues to be collected from higher taxes on tobacco and liquor will go to health services.

“Once approved, 15 percent of sin tax revenues will also be used to support tobacco farmers, who may be adversely affected by the measure,” Abad said.

“Tobacco- and non-tobacco growing provinces will likewise have a share in the revenues generated by an updated excise tax regime. In its original form, HB 5727 was expected to generate at least P60.7 billion, which will be channeled to 81 beneficiary provinces. This is a far cry from the 16 provinces now being supported by the present excise tax scheme,” he added.

“More importantly, however, restructuring the sin tax system will go a long way toward improving the health and well-being of Filipinos. At present, tobacco and alcohol products enjoy very low retail prices in the country, and an updated sin tax scheme will help discourage Filipinos—particularly the youth—from engaging in harmful health practices,” Abad said.