Clear The Air News Tobacco Blog Rotating Header Image

Tobacco Advertising

Cigarette makers using devious ways to advertise to children, bypassing anti-tobacco law

Cigarette makers have resorted to devious ways to advertise, bypassing a law that bans promotion of tobacco products.

http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2016/12/24/cigarette-makers-using-devious-ways-to-advertise-to-children-bypassing_c1477557

Advocates say the firms are now enticing children as young as seven years old to smoke, thus frustrating the full implementation of the Tobacco Control Act.

International Institute for Legislative Affairs chief executive Emma Wanyonyi said the industry is openly advertising cigarettes through conspicuous shop displays at the eye-level of young children.

“The industry is not only advertising their products, but also displaying products to children due to lack of enforcement,” she said.

Wanyonyi said even though one local company has started printing the graphic warnings as demanded by the Tobacco Control Regulations, 2014, the industry is already in court challenging those regulations.

The regulations seek to operationalise the 2007 Tobacco Control Act.

The sale of single stick cigarettes is also widespread, close to schools, although it is illegal, she said.

Wanyonyi challenged the Agriculture ministry to come to the rescue of farmers, who are still dependent on tobacco for them to have alternative crops.

“Tobacco growing depletes soil but researches that have been done show that there are alternative crops that can be grown,” she said.

Tobacco is the biggest known preventable cause of cancer and other non-communicable diseases.

Kenya Tobacco Control Alliance member Achieng Otieno said tobacco industries are so powerful as they have in the recent past compromised a section of MPS.

“The fact that the industry is well resourced has been a challenge in the implementation of the new law,” he said, adding that it has taken the country nine years to come up with new regulations.

Ochieng said even though they have written to EACC concerning bribery allegations by industry to MPS with the view of influencing some of the policies, EACC is yet to respond to them, one year later.

The World Health Organisation says last year, Kenyans smoked eight million cigarette sticks, compared to 6.5 million in 2013.

Tobacco industry in the country is vehemently opposed to new regulations regulating the manufacture, sale and advertising of tobacco products.

The regulations demand that pictures of dead babies, throat cancer and rotten teeth should appear on cigarette packets next month.

They include pictures of punctured throats and cancerous lung.

The regulations require both pictorial and text health warnings printed on the packets.

Also known as plain packaging, the move aims at dissuading current and potential smokers by giving them information on the harmful effects of nicotine and tar.

Dutch plan new law to ban shops displaying cigarettes and tobacco

Junior health minister Martin van Rijn is working on draft legislation which would force shopkeepers and petrol stations to keep cigarettes out of sight of consumers, broadcaster NOS said on Friday. The tobacco industry had promised to come up with measures but is taking too long to do so, Van Rijn said in a briefing to parliament.

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2016/12/dutch-plan-new-law-to-ban-shops-displaying-cigarettes-and-tobacco/

The tobacconists’ association NSO has pledged to stop advertising tobacco products outside shops by 2020 but did not think a total ban on displays inside was an option.

Petrol station owners too had said they would bring in a partial ban on the display of packets of cigarettes within two years. ‘Smoking is extremely bad for you and we have to do all we can to stop youngsters taking up the habit,’ Van Rijn said.

Estonian govt planning to ban display of tobacco products in stores

The Estonian government is planning on Thursday to approve a draft legislation of Health and Labor Minister Jevgeni Ossinovski which would substantially increase sales restrictions of tobacco products, including restricting the display of tobacco products and their brands at points of sale, reports LETA/BNS.

http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/markets_and_companies/?doc=126223

The changes to the Tobacco Act would expand the regulation sphere of the law to prevent and reduce the spread of addiction and health damage as a result of tobacco and tobacco products, it is written on Thursday’s agenda of the government.

Among the biggest changes are banning the display of tobacco products and their brands at points of sale. The exceptions are specialized retail stores, ships sailing on international routes as well as stores located in the closed territories of the airport and port.

The bill also seeks to reduce the accessibility and consumption of e-cigarettes. For instance, in the future the use of e-cigarettes would be banned, in addition to children’s institutions, also in all places where smoking is banned, like restaurants and stores. In addition, it would not be possible to buy tobacco products or e-cigarettes online or from a catalogue.

Sneaky tobacco companies use mystery shoppers to exploit ciggie loophole

TOBACCO companies are offering gift cards, flights and hotel stays to retailers to try and encourage them to push their brand onto customers.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/companies/sneaky-tobacco-companies-use-mystery-shoppers-to-exploit-ciggie-loophole/news-story/34d79da234e20b409cfa210739fb4e6d

TOBACCO companies are offering gift cards, flights and hotel stays to retailers to try and encourage them to push their brand onto customers.

With the battle for Australia’s $2.6 billion tobacco industry fiercer than ever, manufacturers are fighting to lure the nation’s dwindling number of smokers.

And while advertising bans and plain packaging laws have hit their profits, tobacco companies have found a sneaky legal loophole around them.

Marketing reps are sent to hotels, supermarkets, petrol stations, tobacconists and newsagents to train sales assistants in how to promote their brands to customers.

If they do as they are instructed, staff can win points and prizes such as gift cards, flights, hotel stays and vouchers for spa and beauty packages.

That’s where mystery shoppers come in: they keep tabs on staff, awarding points to those who recommend one cigarette brand over another.

It’s called “trade marketing”, and is one of the only legal ways cigarette makers can promote their wares under the highly restrictive regime that governs the sale and use of tobacco.

Health advocates say the scheme threatens to undermine the government’s plan to slash the rate of smoking to 10 per cent of the population by 2018.

But the loophole may soon be closed, with NSW Health Minister Jillian Skinner vowing to clamp down on the practice after being contacted by news.com.au.

‘WHAT WOULD YOU RECOMMEND?’

Mystery shoppers hired by Imperial Tobacco are sent to retailers with a very specific script.

“I normally smoke Winfield 30s but I am looking for an alternative, what would you recommend instead of Winfield 30s?” the shoppers are instructed to ask, in a job summary seen by news.com.au.

When asked how much they want to spend, the mystery shopper says “maybe something a little cheaper”.

If asked about their preferred cigarette’s strength, the shopper replies: “I usually smoke the blue ones.”

Then it’s over to the staff member who says the magic words and steers the “customer” towards John Player Special, a brand imported by Imperial. If the staff member does not mention any other brand, they score points towards the company’s incentive program.

At this point, the mystery shopper identifies him or herself and informs the staff member that the results will be tallied at head office and prizes awarded to those with the top scores.

mystery

The script given to mystery shoppers.

‘PUSHING THE ENVELOPE’

Scott Walsberger, the head of tobacco control and prevention at Cancer Council NSW, said mystery shopping was central to tobacco companies’ marketing strategies.

“Trade marketing as they call it is a significant part of their work,” Mr Walsberger said, adding that building relationships with retailers was one of the only legal methods to promote cigarettes after successive law reforms.

He said tobacco companies were desperate to make their products attractive to consumers after being banned from advertising in print and on television, and having the distinctive imagery and colour in their packaging replaced with drab, dark brown.

“Every time we’ve brought in legislation, you see the tobacco industry push the envelope, continually trying to make their product attractive and market them as much as possible,” he said.

“They’re always focused on selling more cigarettes, more people getting addicted and they go to all lengths to do that — so it’s not surprising that, as we tighten up regulations of how they market their products in some ways, that they’ve sought out the channels where they’re not regulated and exploit them to continue to promote their product.”

He called for new laws to better regulate how tobacco products are sold and marketed and made available through retail outlets, and rejected the argument that trade marketing only targeted customers who were already smokers.

“They say they’re not marketing to new customers, just getting people to switch brands or building brand loyalty; we know that’s not true,” Mr Walsberger said.

“Two out of every three smokers will die from their smoking habit. If that’s your consumer base, your target audience and you’re losing two out of every three of those, you need to be recruiting new smokers. So that has to be a key part of their marketing strategy.”

MINISTER PROMISES REFORM

Health Minister Jillian Skinner vowed to crack down on the mystery shopping scheme after being contacted by news.com.au.

“The NSW Government will seek to amend the Public Health (Tobacco) Act 2008 with the intention of tightening the law to prohibit this practice,” Ms Skinner said. “I am proud of this government’s record in reducing smoking in this state.”

A spokesman for Imperial Tobacco Australia said the company sold a legal product and defended its trade marketing practices.

“We work with a range of retail partners to have adult consumers of tobacco products choose our brands — including Peter Stuyvesant and JPS — over those of our competitors,” the spokesman said.

“The program in question sees shoppers specifically identifying themselves as adult consumers of tobacco products who are seeking a brand recommendation from a retailer.

“This clearly neither ‘circumvents legislation’ nor has any bearing on the choice of an adult to consume tobacco. It simply addresses which brand that adult consumer might choose.”

He said “anti-tobacco zealots” should look at the billion-dollar illicit tobacco trade and “focus their attention on serious problems rather than attempting to undermine legitimate and legal competition for no apparent purpose”.

Estonian govt planning to ban display of tobacco products in stores

The Estonian government is planning on Thursday to approve a draft legislation of Health and Labor Minister Jevgeni Ossinovski which would substantially increase sales restrictions of tobacco products, including restricting the display of tobacco products and their brands at points of sale, reports LETA/BNS.

http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/markets_and_companies/?doc=126223

The changes to the Tobacco Act would expand the regulation sphere of the law to prevent and reduce the spread of addiction and health damage as a result of tobacco and tobacco products, it is written on Thursday’s agenda of the government.

Among the biggest changes are banning the display of tobacco products and their brands at points of sale. The exceptions are specialized retail stores, ships sailing on international routes as well as stores located in the closed territories of the airport and port.

The bill also seeks to reduce the accessibility and consumption of e-cigarettes. For instance, in the future the use of e-cigarettes would be banned, in addition to children’s institutions, also in all places where smoking is banned, like restaurants and stores. In addition, it would not be possible to buy tobacco products or e-cigarettes online or from a catalogue.

Seven years of progress in tobacco control

“Findings In total, 88 countries adopted at least one highest level MPOWER policy between 2007 and 2014, resulting in almost 22 million fewer projected SADs. The largest number of future smoking attributable deaths (SADs) averted was due to increased cigarette taxes (7.0 million), followed by comprehensive smoke-free laws (5.4 million), large graphic health warnings (4.1 million), comprehensive marketing bans (3.8 million) and comprehensive cessation interventions (1.5 million).”

http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2016/12/09/tobaccocontrol-2016-053381

Abstract

Objective

Since WHO released the package of six MPOWER measures to assist nations with implementing the WHO Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC), 88 countries adopted at least one highest level MPOWER measure. We estimated the subsequent reduction in smoking-related deaths from all new highest level measures adopted between 2007 and 2014.

Methods

Policy effect sizes based on previously validated SimSmoke models were applied to the number of smokers in each nation to determine the reduction in the number of smokers from policy adoption. On the basis of research that half of all smokers die from smoking, we derived the smoking-attributable deaths (SADs) averted of those smokers alive today.

Findings

In total, 88 countries adopted at least one highest level MPOWER policy between 2007 and 2014, resulting in almost 22 million fewer projected SADs. The largest number of future SADs averted was due to increased cigarette taxes (7.0 million), followed by comprehensive smoke-free laws (5.4 million), large graphic health warnings (4.1 million), comprehensive marketing bans (3.8 million) and comprehensive cessation interventions (1.5 million).

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate the immense public health impact of tobacco control policies adopted globally since the WHO-FCTC and highlight the importance of more countries adopting highest level MPOWER measures to reduce the global burden of tobacco use. Substantial additional progress could be made, especially if heavily populated nations with high smoking prevalence were to reach highest level MPOWER measures.

Tobacco corporations target Africa’s children

http://www.heraldlive.co.za/business/2016/12/08/tobacco-corporations-target-africas-children/

Children in Africa have become a target for tobacco companies‚ research by the African Tobacco Control Alliance (ATCA) has found.

The survey looked at the way in which tobacco companies in five African countries– Burkina Faso‚ Cameroon‚ Benin and Nigeria – get consumers to keep using their product.

It found tobacco use caused about six million deaths yearly‚ with 80% of them occurring in low- and middle-income countries.

Findings show that in Africa‚ smoking prevalence is about 21% among adult men and 3% among women.

About 21% of young boys and 13% of young girls use tobacco products.

“The aggressive sale and marketing strategies of the tobacco industry targeting young people will be among the key contributing factors to the growing epidemic of tobacco use in Africa‚” the report said.

Four strategies were identified as being used to lure children to smoke‚ a concern that was highlighted at the launch of the report in Johannesburg recently.

Advertising and promotion, the sale of single cigarettes, child-friendly flavoured cigarettes and noncompliance with existing tobacco control laws were the main causes for an increase in young children’s interest in smoking.

Sales of single cigarettes were found to be widespread near schools.

Swiss parliament rejects tobacco advertising ban

According to a study published by the Swiss federal office of public health last December1, two thirds of the Swiss public were in favour of banning tobacco advertising, everywhere except at the point of sale. 58% were even in favour of a blanket ban, while one in six wanted to see cigarette price increases. Switzerland’s parliament does not appear to share this view.

http://lenews.ch/2016/12/08/swiss-parliament-rejects-tobacco-advertising-ban/

A plan put forward by Federal Councillor Alain Berset to restrict tobacco advertising was rejected by parliament today by 101 votes to 75. Those against the plan think it went too far and said there was nothing that proved that banning advertising would reduce tobacco consumption. In addition, they thought a federal ban limited the power of cantons to introduce stricter rules.

A 2013 World Health Organisation report2 said “complete bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship decrease tobacco use”. The WHO report also said that the best estimate is that the tobacco industry spends tens of billions of US dollars worldwide each year on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. In the United States alone, the tobacco industry spends more than US$ 10 billion annually.

Berset’s proposed rules would have banned advertising in public spaces, in cinemas, in the press and on the internet. Distribution of free samples and some promotional price reductions would have also been banned. According to a WHO report these practices are banned in Spain, France, Sweden, Holland, Portugal, the UK and a number of other European countries, but not Switzerland.

Corine Kibora, spokesperson for Addiction Suisse described parliament’s decision as “disappointing” and “proof that the arguments of lobbyists and the economy triumphed over the public’s health”, while adding that as the trend towards favouring individual choice over collective responsibility takes over we seem to have forgotten the central point: business and advertisers are driven to make sales.

According to Swiss federal office of public health, Swiss smokers dropped from 33% of the population in 2001 to 25% in 2015. However, since 2011, the number of smokers has stayed stubbornly high. In addition, it calculates the annual cost of tobacco at tens of billions of francs per year of which CHF 1.7 billion goes on medical treatments and CHF 3.9 billion on compensation for work absenteeism and invalidity. On the other hand, tobacco tax only brings in CHF 2 billion annually.

National Cancer Institute – The Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control

Download (PDF, 15.8MB)

Curbing tobacco pays dividends

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2016/11/19/curbing-tobacco-pays-dividends.html

Hardly anyone starts smoking after age 21, for obvious reasons: By adulthood, people can better grasp the deadly risks and expense of tobacco addiction.

That explains why tobacco companies target marketing to young adults, ages 18 to 21. “They know it is a critical time period for solidifying tobacco addiction,” according to the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids.

This addiction is life-changing and life-ending: Smoking eventually kills a third of those who become smokers before age 18. It is the leading cause of preventable deaths in the U.S., killing more people than alcohol, AIDS, car crashes, illegal drugs, murders and suicides — combined.

This argues for legislation under consideration by Columbus City Council to ban tobacco sales, including e-cigarettes, to those younger than 21. (A public hearing will be held at 5 p.m. on Tuesday at Columbus City Hall, 90 W. Broad Street.)

While, generally, government should not be in the position of dictating personal choices to adults, who now might purchase tobacco products at 18, it has overriding reasons to intervene:

Big Tobacco spends more than $1 million a day — an estimated $425.7 million a year — marketing its product in Ohio. A government ban on sales to those most susceptible to the industry’s subliminal and overt advertising efforts evens the playing field. And it meets government’s obligation to protect citizens’ health, including efforts to reduce Ohio’s high infant-mortality rate.

Federal studies also show 95 percent of smokers begin before age 21. Delaying addiction amounts to preventing it.

Taxpayers bear an enormous expense from tobacco use. Smoking-related Medicaid costs in the state total $1.72 billion a year, Tobacco Free Kids reports. It estimates each Ohio household pays $1,047 in state and federal taxes for smoking-related government expenditures.

And since many teens in middle and high school get their smokes from high-school pals or siblings who can buy at age 18, restricting the supply line could help snuff out smoking before young people can become addicted.

“If we can prevent the addiction from the beginning, that’s the right start,” said Dr. Teresa Long, health commissioner for Columbus.

Her city would join a growing number of cities and states, including California and Hawaii, that have raised the legal age for tobacco sales to 21. In Ohio, Cleveland, Upper Arlington and Grandview Heights all have similar bans.

The Columbus proposal would not criminalize the smoker, but police could charge clerks and levy fines for underage sales. Columbus Public Health says its proposed ban would differ from many other existing ones, in that it includes compliance checks and education for merchants and the public. To do so, it will hire a dedicated sanitarian and a part-time administrator. This shows the city is serious about protecting young people.

Raising the legal smoking age works: After Needham, Massachusetts, banned cigarette sales in 2005 to those under 21, tobacco use dropped by nearly half among those younger than 18.

Ohio already bans alcohol use until age 21, a recognition that youths need to develop judgment before obtaining a product that, absent abuse and far unlike tobacco, might have heart-healthy benefits.

Retailers, who would be required to purchase a $150 annual sales license, understandably question whether cities should be able to regulate tobacco sales; the Ohio Council of Retail Merchants thinks the state should decide. We agree: The legislature should follow the bold lead of its largest cities and raise the age for tobacco purchases statewide to age 21.